Efficacy and safety of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists for the management of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of recently approved once-weekly glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing any GLP-1 RA licensed for once-weekly dosing (albiglutide, dulaglutide or exenatide extended release) with placebo or other antidiabetic agents. We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and grey literature for articles published up to December 2014 and extracted data in duplicate. RESULTS: In our systematic review we included 33 trials with a total of 16 003 participants. Compared with placebo the change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration was -0.66% [six studies; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.14 to -0.19; I(2) = 88%] with albiglutide, and -1.18% (seven studies; 95% CI -1.34 to -1.02; I(2) = 65%) with dulaglutide. Based on data from placebo-controlled trials, we did not detect statistically significant weight-sparing benefits for albiglutide or dulaglutide. Compared with other antidiabetic agents, once-weekly GLP-1 RAs outperformed sitagliptin, daily exenatide and insulin glargine in terms of HbA1c-lowering (mean differences -0.40%; 95% CI -0.66 to -0.14; I(2) = 85%, -0.44%; 95% CI -0.58 to -0.29; I(2) = 40% and -0.28; 95% CI -0.45 to -0.10; I(2) = 81%, respectively). The main adverse effects of treatment included gastrointestinal and injection site reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Given their dosing scheme and overall efficacy and safety profile, once-weekly GLP-1 RAs are a convenient therapeutic option for use as add-on to metformin.

Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of the novel sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor empagliflozin compared with placebo or other antidiabetic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. We searched Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library through December 2013 and grey literature. Two reviewers working independently extracted relevant data and carried out risk-of-bias assessments. We synthesized results using random-effects models and computed weighted mean differences (WMDs) and odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: We included 10 studies with 6203 participants. Compared with placebo, mean changes in haemoglobin A1c were -0.62% [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.68 to -0.57%] for empagliflozin 10 mg and -0.66% (-0.76 to -0.57%) for empagliflozin 25 mg. Empagliflozin 25 mg daily had glycaemic efficacy similar to metformin or sitagliptin (WMD -0.11%; 95% CI -0.25 to 0.03%), without increasing risk for hypoglycaemia. It was also associated with body weight loss (WMD -1.84; 95% CI -2.30 to -1.38 kg vs. placebo) and had a favourable effect on blood pressure. Incidence of hypoglycaemia with empagliflozin was similar to placebo (OR 1.10; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.39); nevertheless we noted an increased risk for genital tract infections (OR 3.31; 95% CI 1.55 to 7.09). Findings were similar for the 10-mg dosing regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin effectively lowers blood glucose and provides additional clinical benefits including body weight and blood pressure reduction. Ongoing trials will elucidate the long-term safety and effect of empagliflozin on cardiovascular outcomes.