Asciminib in Patients With CML-CP Previously Treated With ≥ 2 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: 96-Week Results From the Japanese Subgroup Analysis of the ASCEMBL Study.

Asciminib is a first-in-class BCR::ABL1 inhibitor that Specifically Targets the ABL1 Myristoyl Pocket (STAMP). It is approved worldwide and in Japan for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) with resistance or intolerance to previous tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. In the Phase 3 ASCEMBL study, patients with CML-CP who received ≥ 2 prior ATP-competitive TKIs were randomized (2:1) to asciminib 40 mg twice-daily or bosutinib 500 mg once-daily. Here, we report the 96-week results of the subgroup analysis of Japanese patients (asciminib, n = 13; bosutinib, n = 3) in the ASCEMBL study. The MMR rate at Week 96 was 46.2% in asciminib-treated patients, increasing from Weeks 24 and 48. Patients who achieved MMR at Week 24 remained in MMR up to the Week 96 cutoff. While a high proportion of patients treated with asciminib remained on treatment at cutoff, none randomized to bosutinib were on treatment at Week 96. Despite the longer duration of exposure to asciminib, its safety and tolerability continued to be favorable with no new or worsening safety findings. Overall, the efficacy and safety outcomes in the Japanese subgroup were comparable with the ASCEMBL global study population, which supports the use of asciminib in Japanese patients with previously treated CML-CP.

Ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory acute graft-vs-host disease: Japanese subgroup analysis of the randomized REACH2 trial.

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) is a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Japan and other countries. Nearly one-third of patients do not respond to standard systemic steroid therapy and no standard second-line treatment has been established in Japan. We report efficacy and safety findings of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy (BAT) from a subgroup analysis of the international, phase 3 REACH2 study in Japanese patients with steroid-refractory aGvHD. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) at day 28. Overall, 9 patients received ruxolitinib and 21 received BAT. The ORR at day 28 (88.9% vs 52.4%) and durable ORR at day 56 (66.7% vs 28.6%) were higher with ruxolitinib versus BAT. The estimated cumulative incidence of loss of response at 6 months was 12.5% with ruxolitinib and 18.2% with BAT. The median failure-free survival was longer with ruxolitinib versus BAT (2.73 vs 1.25 months). The most common adverse events up to day 28 in the ruxolitinib and BAT groups were anemia (55.6% vs 19.0%) and thrombocytopenia (44.4% vs 4.8%, respectively). Ruxolitinib showed better efficacy outcomes and a consistent safety profile compared with BAT in the Japanese subgroup, and the findings were consistent with overall study results.

Factors Associated with Inclusion of Japan in Phase I Multiregional Clinical Trials in Oncology.

BACKGROUND: Early inclusion of Japan in the global development program could be a key factor in reducing the drug lag, making participation in phase I multiregional clinical trials (Ph. I MRCTs) an important consideration for oncology drug development in Japan. We aimed to investigate the factors associated with the inclusion of Japan in Ph. I MRCTs in oncology. METHODS: We compared the trial design, target population, type of primary tested drug, trial conduct profile, and sponsor profile for Ph. I MRCTs with or without Japan conducted by the top 20 companies in more than two countries and started between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-seven Ph. I MRCTs included Japan, and 697 did not. Detailed features of the Ph. I MRCTs in oncology were summarized, and several factors (trial design, target population, trial conduct profile, and sponsor profile) associated with inclusion of Japan in the Ph. I MRCTs were identified. CONCLUSIONS: It is important for Japanese subsidiaries within global pharmaceutical companies to closely communicate with the headquarters based on medical practice and unmet needs in Japan to join global development from an early stage. In addition, further efforts to attract emerging biopharmaceutical companies to Japan from the regulatory and/or political perspectives would be needed, thereby preventing drug lag in Japan.

[Pharmacological and clinical profile of asciminib hydrochloride, a novel first-in-class tyrosine kinase inhibitor specifically targeting ABL myristoyl pocket].

On March 28th, 2022, asciminib hydrochloride (Scemblix® Tablets 20 |mg/40 |mg), the world's first tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) specifically targeting the ABL myristoyl pocket (STAMP inhibitor), was approved for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) resistant or intolerant to prior therapy. Asciminib specifically binds to the myristoyl pocket, an allosteric site of BCR::ABL1, and inhibits the ABL1 family molecules. In vitro and in vivo pharmacology studies demonstrated cell growth inhibition and antitumor effects of asciminib. The international phase I study for patients with chronic or accelerated phase CML investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose for expansion (RDE) of asciminib monotherapy. However, the MTD was not reached, so and RDE was determined based on tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy data obtained by the time of the study. RDE was determined to be 40 |mg twice daily in chronic or accelerated phase CML without T315I mutation, and 200 |mg twice daily in chronic or accelerated phase CML with T315I mutation. The international phase III study for patients with chronic phase CML who were previously treated with ≥2 TKIs and resistant or intolerant to the recent treatment demonstrated the superiority of asciminib over bosutinib in achieving the primary endpoint of a major molecular response (MMR) at week 24. Regarding safety, the most common treatment-related adverse event in asciminib arm was thrombocytopenia, and others included neutropenia. Asciminib is expected to be a new treatment option for CML patients who have limited choices due to resistance or intolerance to previous therapies.

Exploratory Analysis of Drug Lag in New Oncology Drugs Between Japan and the US.

BACKGROUND: Drug lag in Japan has greatly decreased over the past decades; however, new instances of drug lag have appeared along with changes in the circumstances of oncology drug development. We aimed to investigate the factors associated with the approval lag for new oncology drugs between Japan and the United States (US) over the past decade by comparing approval dates and modalities, lead indications, approval types, and phase I strategies for earlier approval in Japan. METHOD: We descriptively evaluated the characteristics of 117 new oncology drugs approved in either Japan or the US from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2020. RESULTS: Seventy-one drugs were approved in Japan, 112 in the US, five only in Japan, and 46 only in the US. Interestingly, new oncology drugs were predominantly developed by the top 20 pharmaceutical companies in Japan; however, the opposite was true for drugs that were not yet approved in Japan. However, no clear trend was observed in the relationship between drug lag and the studied factors, except for the phase I strategy. There was a numerical but clear trend in which a higher percentage of phase I multiregional clinical trials (MRCTs) in the drug development strategy was observed for drugs with earlier approval in Japan. CONCLUSION: Participation in global drug development during the early stages, such as during phase I MRCTs, is one of the keys to successfully minimizing this new instance of drug lag in Japan.

Asciminib vs bosutinib in CML patients pretreated with ≥2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Results from the Japanese subgroup analysis of ASCEMBL study.

Asciminib, a first-in-class, allosteric inhibitor of BCR-ABL1 that acts by STAMP (Specifically Targeting the ABL Myristoyl Pocket), is a novel therapeutic option for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In the global, phase 3, open-label ASCEMBL study in patients with CML in chronic phase (CML-CP) pretreated with ≥2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (NCT03106779), asciminib (40 mg twice-daily) demonstrated significant superiority over the ATP-competitive TKI bosutinib (500 mg once daily) for the primary endpoint of major molecular response (MMR; BCR::ABL1 transcript levels on the international scale [BCR::ABL1IS ] ≤0.1%) at week 24. Here, we report results from a descriptive subgroup analysis of Japanese patients enrolled in ASCEMBL study (data cut-off: May 25, 2020). Overall, 16 Japanese patients were randomized (asciminib, n = 13; bosutinib, n = 3). At week 24, the MMR rate with asciminib was 30.8% (4/13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.09-61.43). BCR::ABL1IS ≤1% and complete cytogenic response (CCyR) at week 24 were 61.5% (8/13 patients) and 50.0% (4/8 patients), respectively. In the bosutinib group, no patient achieved MMR, CCyR, or BCR::ABL1IS ≤1%, but results were limited by the low number of patients. The safety profile of asciminib was comparable to that previously observed in the overall study population. Findings from this Japanese subgroup analysis of the ASCEMBL study support the use of asciminib for the treatment of Japanese patients with CML-CP previously treated with ≥2 TKIs. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03106779.

Nilotinib vs. imatinib in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: 10-year follow­up of the Japanese subgroup of the randomized ENESTnd trial.

In the 10-year analysis of Japanese patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP in the ENESTnd trial, nilotinib yielded higher cumulative response rates. There were no new occurrences of disease progression or deaths since the 5-year analysis. Cumulative 10-year rates of MMR and MR4.5 were higher in the nilotinib arms [300 mg twice daily (BID), 86.2% and 69.0%, respectively; 400 mg BID, 78.3% and 69.6%, respectively] than the imatinib arm (400 mg once daily, 60.0% and 48.0%, respectively). Nasopharyngitis (85.7%, 77.3%, 79.2%), rash (50.0%, 68.2%, 37.5%), headache (39.3%, 45.5%, 25.0%), and back pain (39.3%, 50.0%, 29.2%) were the most frequently reported all-grade adverse events (AEs) for nilotinib 300 and 400 mg BID and imatinib, respectively. Cardiovascular AEs were more common with nilotinib than with imatinib. More patients on nilotinib had pre-diabetic and diabetic levels of HbA1c (300 mg BID, 17.9% and 10.7%, respectively; 400 mg BID, 22.7% and 18.2%, respectively) compared with imatinib (4.2% each). Overall, 10-year results from the Japanese cohort are consistent with prior results from the full ENESTnd cohort and the Japanese subgroup, and continue to support the long-term use of nilotinib in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP, but with proper monitoring and management of comorbidities.

Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Panobinostat in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Japanese Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed-and-Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: Panobinostat, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination therapy demonstrated progression-free survival (PFS) benefit over bortezomib and dexamethasone alone in the PANORAMA-1 study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Here, we present data from a phase II study (NCT02290431) of this combination in Japanese patients with relapsed or relapsed-and-refractory MM. METHODS: Patients received 3-week cycles of 20-mg oral panobinostat (weeks 1 and 2), 1.3-mg/m2 subcutaneous bortezomib (days 1, 4, 8, and 11), and 20-mg oral dexamethasone (day of and the day following bortezomib administration) for a total of 8 cycles (24 weeks; treatment phase 1). Patients with treatment benefit had an option to enter the extension phase to receive 6-week (42-day) cycles of panobinostat (weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5) plus bortezomib (days 1, 8, 22, and 29) and dexamethasone (day of and the day following bortezomib treatment) for 24 weeks. The primary objective was complete response (CR) + near CR (nCR) rate after treatment phase 1 as per the modified European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria. RESULTS: Of the 31 patients, 4 (12.9%) completed the treatment and 27 (87.1%) discontinued; 17 (54.8%) entered the extension phase. In total, 24 patients (77.4%) entered the survival follow-up phase and followed until study closure when the last patient was treated for 1 year after treatment phase 1. The CR + nCR rate was 48.4% (90% CI: 33.6-63.2). The overall response rate (CR + nCR + partial response) was 80.6%. The median PFS, duration of response, time to response, and time to progression were 15.3, 22.7, 1.4, and 15.3 months, respectively. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), with diarrhea (80.6%), decreased appetite (58.1%), and thrombocytopenia (54.8%) being the most frequent, regardless of relationship to the study treatment. Thrombocytopenia (48.4%), fatigue (25.8%), diarrhea (22.6%), neutrophil count decrease (22.6%), platelet count decrease (22.6%), and lymphocyte count decrease (22.6%) were the most frequent grade 3/4 AEs. CONCLUSION: The study met the primary objective with 48.4% CR + nCR rate. The AEs associated with the combination treatment were safely managed using the existing AE management guidelines, including dose interruption/modification and/or supportive medical intervention. This treatment regimen is an effective option with a favorable benefit/risk profile for Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory MM.

Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study of Serelaxin in Japanese Patients With Acute Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Serelaxin, a recombinant form of human relaxin-2, is in development for treating acute heart failure (AHF) and a Phase II study in Japanese AHF patients was conducted. METHODS AND RESULTS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of serelaxin at 10 and 30 µg·kg(-1)·day(-1)continuous intravenous infusion for up to 48 h, added to standard care for Japanese AHF patients. Primary endpoints were adverse events (AEs) through Day 5, serious AEs (SAEs) through Day 14, and serelaxin pharmacokinetics. Secondary endpoints included changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and cardiorenal biomarkers. A total of 46 patients received the study drug and were followed for 60 days. The observed AE profile was comparable between the groups, with no AEs of concern. Dose-dependent increase in the serum concentration of serelaxin was observed across the 2 dose rates of serelaxin. A greater reduction in SBP was observed with serelaxin 30 µg·kg(-1)·day(-1)vs. placebo (-7.7 [-16.4, 1.0] mmHg). A greater reduction in NT-proBNP was noted with serelaxin (-50.8% and -54.9% for 10 and 30 µg·kg(-1)·day(-1), respectively at Day 2). CONCLUSIONS: Serelaxin was well tolerated in this study with Japanese AHF patients, with no AEs of concern and favorable beneficial trends on efficacy. These findings support further evaluation of serelaxin 30 µg·kg(-1)·day(-1)in this patient population.

Wnt/beta-catenin and estrogen signaling converge in vivo.

Wnt and estrogen signaling represent important regulatory pathways, each controlling a wide range of biological processes. While an increasing number of observations suggest potential convergence between these pathways, no direct evidence of their functional interaction has been reported. Using human colon and breast cancer cells, we found that estrogen receptor (ER) alpha- and beta-catenin precipitated within the same immunocomplexes, reciprocally enhanced the transactivation of cognate reporter genes, and were reciprocally recruited to cognate response elements in the promoters of endogenous target genes. Using transgenic Drosophila that ectopically expressed human ERalpha alone or together with metabolically stable beta-catenin/Armadillo mutants, we demonstrated genetic interaction between these signal transducers in vivo. Thus, we present here the first direct evidence of cross-talk between Wnt and estrogen signaling pathways via functional interaction between beta-catenin and ERalpha.

Juvenile hormones antagonize ecdysone actions through co-repressor recruitment to EcR/USP heterodimers.

Insect development is controlled by the combined actions of ecdysteroid and juvenile hormones. Transcriptional control by ecdysteroid hormones is mediated via two nuclear receptor superfamily members, ecdysone receptor (EcR) and its heterodimeric partner, ultraspiracle (USP). Although the ecdysteroid hormone 20-hydroxyecdysone acts as an EcR ligand and activates transcription through EcR/USP heterodimers, the activity of juvenile hormones, such as Juvenile hormone III (JH III), and methoprenic acid (MA) via USP remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that juvenile hormones act as USP ligands and exhibit suppressive effects on ecdysone-dependent EcR transactivation. JH III- and MA-bound USP markedly repressed ecdysone-dependent EcR transactivation through shifting of the USP ligand-binding domain alpha-helix 12 without affecting EcR/USP heterodimerization or DNA binding. Moreover, transcriptional repression by USP ligands was attenuated by a histone deacetylation inhibitor. Our results suggested that juvenile hormones serve as USP ligands that antagonize EcR-mediated ecdysone actions through the recruitment of histone deacetylase complexes.

Ecdysone receptor-dependent gene regulation mediates histone poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation.

While the ecdysone dependency of puff formation in giant polytene chromosomes from fly salivary glands has been well documented, the molecular mechanisms underlying this process remain unknown. However, it does appear to involve chromatin remodeling and modification mediated by ecdysone receptor (EcR). As Drosophila poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (dPARP) has recently been reported to be involved in ecdysone-induced puff formation, we decided to test the possible role of dPARP in ligand-induced dEcR transactivation in an insect system. dPARP co-activated the ligand-induced transactivation function of EcR in the insect cell line S2, and appeared to physically interact with EcR in a ligand-dependent manner. ChIP analysis of an EcR target gene promoter revealed ligand-dependent recruitment of dPARP with poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of histones in the EcR binding site and, surprisingly, also in a distal region of the promoter. Our results indicated that EcR-mediated gene regulation may be coupled with chromatin modification through poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation.

A novel genetic system for analysis of co-activators for the N-terminal transactivation function domain of the human androgen receptor.

Androgen receptor (hAR) regulates transcription of target genes in a ligand-dependent manner and recruits a number of co-activators for the ligand-induced transactivation via the N-terminal, activation function-1 (AF-1), and C-terminal, AF-2, transactivation domains. But the co-regulator functions on each of AR domains have not yet been fully understood. We have established a Drosophila transgenic system in which hAR and its deletion mutants are ectopically expressed in fly tissues together with an AR response element (ARE)-GFP reporter gene, and have confirmed that hAR was functional in ARE transactivation without affecting the expression of endogenous genes. We found that transcriptional activity of the hAR AF-1 domain was markedly reduced in Drosophila deficiency mutants of homologs for known mammalian co-activators of the AR ligand-dependent AF-2 domain. This suggests that hAR AF-1 recruits co-activators previously known only to interact with the AF-2 domain. Therefore, Drosophila with the hAR AF-1 transgene provides a relevant genetic system in which to uncover novel functions of vertebrate steroid hormone receptors and to screen for novel AF-1 co-regulators.