Effect of age in women undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether elderly women (≥65 years) have an increased risk of complications and lower success when undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) compared with younger women (<65 years). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all LSC procedures performed from August 2014 to February 2021 by a single urogynecologic surgeon in an academic affiliated hospital system. Charts were identified through procedure codes. Patient demographics, clinical, surgical, and postoperative data were collected. The primary outcome of this study was to compare complications associated with LSC, including intraoperative and postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes included subjective, objective, and composite success. RESULTS: In total, 312 participants met the criteria. The mean age of the group who were younger than 65 years was 55.7 years (±6.5) and of the group aged 65 years or older was 69.3 years (±3.5). Racial demographics revealed no differences between the two groups. Patients aged 65 years or older had a statistically significant lower body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters), a higher rate of hypertension, smaller genital hiatus, and a larger anterior vaginal wall prolapse compared with the younger cohort. They also less often underwent a posterior repair. No statistically significant differences were found with regards to intraoperative and postoperative complications, including 30-day re-admission, between the two age groups. Both groups had high anatomic success rates, with no significant difference (<65 = 96.3%; ≥65 = 98.4%; P = 0.326). Those aged younger than 65 years compared with those aged 65 years or older had lower subjective success that was not significantly different (<65 = 62.8%; ≥65 = 71.0; P = 0.134). Composite success was noted to reach the threshold of a statistically significant difference in the group aged younger than 65 years compared with those aged 65 years or older (60.1% vs 71.0%; P = 0.0499). CONCLUSION: In this study, elderly patients did not have increased intraoperative and postoperative complications after undergoing LSC. Similar rates of anatomic and subjective success were also found with younger patients having a lower composite success. Proper candidates for LSC should not be excluded based upon age.

Suprapubic-assisted transurethral excision of eroded transvaginal cerclage suture.

AIM OF THE VIDEO/INTRODUCTION: The aim was to demonstrate our minimally invasive technique for excision of eroded transvaginal cervical cerclage suture through the bladder mucosa using a suprapubic-assisted transurethral approach. Transvaginal cervical cerclage is a common treatment for cervical insufficiency in pregnancy. Complications such as erosion are rare, as the duration of treatment is typically several months, with cerclage placement in the second trimester and complete removal prior to the onset of labor. Retained suture can lead to erosion through the vaginal epithelium and into other organs, as seen in our case. Our technique offers a minimally invasive approach to the excision of eroded transvaginal cervical cerclage suture through the bladder mucosa. METHODS: A narrated, stepwise video demonstration for removal of eroded cervical cerclage through bladder epithelium with suprapubic-assisted transurethral technique in a single patient was carried out. Key strategies for a successful outcome include: use of a Carter-Thomason device for suprapubic assistance in lieu of suprapubic trocar or suprapubic incision, use of rigid biopsy forceps for improved traction on the eroded suture, performing a methylene blue test for evaluation of vesicovaginal fistula after excision procedure. RESULTS: At her 2-week postoperative evaluation, the patient reported resolution of all symptoms. The Carter-Thomason incision was well healed, and postoperative urinalysis was negative for hematuria. CONCLUSIONS: A suprapubic-assisted transurethral approach can be used as a minimally invasive technique for excision of eroded transvaginal cervical cerclage suture through the bladder mucosa.

Clinical presentation and treatment of Macroplastique® urethral exposures: a retrospective case series.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Manufacturers of Macroplastique® for urethral bulking have not previously reported exposures as potential complications. This study was aimed at identifying presenting symptoms, management, and outcomes in patients experiencing urethral or bladder exposures. METHODS: A retrospective case series from 2010 to 2019 was performed in an academic affiliated hospital system. Participants were 18-89 years old and received Macroplastique® urethral bulking for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Charts were identified through diagnosis and procedure codes relating to injections of urethral bulking agents and foreign bodies in the bladder or urethra. Factors evaluated were patient history and presenting symptoms, diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and outcomes using frequency tables for categorical values and statistical distribution with median and interquartile ranges (IQR) for continuous variables. RESULTS: After review of 1,269 charts, 580 cases met the inclusion criteria and 14 Macroplastique® urethral exposures were identified. The median age at first presentation was 73.5 years (IQR57.5-79.7 years) with 48 months (IQR 22-78 months) as the median time to first presentation after last Macroplastique® injection. The median number of injection sessions was 2 (IQR 1-2.75 sessions) with a medium volume of 4.5 ml (IQR 2.75-9.0 ml). Presenting symptoms included urge incontinence (64.3%), stress urinary incontinence (57.1%), recurrent urinary tract infection (42.9%), urinary urgency (28.9%), urinary frequency (28.9%), urinary retention (14.3%), and interrupted flow (7.1%). Macroplastique® urethral exposures were extracted in 10 patients using blunt, sharp, or electrocautery excision. No complications after excision were identified and improvement in urinary symptoms was observed. CONCLUSION: Urethral bulking with Macroplastique® can lead to symptomatic urethral exposures.

Perioperative management for gynecologic minimally invasive surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article will review current guidelines regarding surgical protocols for elective and nonelective surgeries during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic. RECENT FINDINGS: Perioperative management for surgical patients should be modified to promote the safety and wellbeing of patients and caregivers amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 testing should be performed preoperatively with subsequent preprocedure quarantine. Nonemergent or nonlife-threatening surgery should be postponed for COVID-19 positive patients. The consensus of surgical societies is to use a laparoscopic surgical approach for COVID-19 positive patients when appropriate and to avoid port venting at the end of procedures. For COVID-19 positive patients requiring an emergent procedure, the use of personal protective equipment is strongly recommended. SUMMARY: After over a year of the COVID-19 pandemic, effective protocols and precautions have been established to decrease the morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing surgery and to promote the safety of healthcare personnel. Continued investigations are necessary as cases of new, possibly more virulent, strains of the virus arise.

Laparoscopic excision and re-attachment of sacrocolpopexy mesh.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Two cases are described and surgical techniques for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy are demonstrated at an academic affiliated hospital in patients with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: A laparoscopic approach was taken for surgical intervention, with excision of prior detached vaginal mesh and re-attachment of new sacrocolpopexy mesh. RESULTS: Two patients presented with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after failed surgical treatment. The first case is a 68-year-old vaginal multipara with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse status post laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, sacrocolpopexy, and mid-urethral sling performed at an outside institution. Preoperative physical examination revealed stage 3 prolapse. Mesh was loosely attached to the cervix. After surgical correction, postoperative physical examination revealed stage 1 prolapse at the 6-week postoperative visit. The second case is a 62-year old vaginal multipara with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse status post-total laparoscopic hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy at an outside institution. Preoperative physical examination revealed stage 2 prolapse. The mesh was loosely attached to the vagina. After surgical correction, postoperative physical examination revealed stage 0 prolapse at the 6-week postoperative visit. Both patients reported improvement in symptoms and overall quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after failed initial sacrocolpopexy procedure can be safely accomplished laparoscopically through identification of points of mesh detachment, anatomical landmarks, removal of the prior vaginal portion of the mesh, and attachment of a new surgical mesh to either the sacrum or the sacral portion of the mesh.