RESUMO
Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are commonly used to treat patients with chronic inflammatory diseases, and function by inhibiting the pro-inflammatory cytokine tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). Although beneficial in reducing disease activity, they are associated with an increased risk of serious infections. Data on the risk of serious infections associated with TNFi use during the reproductive years, particularly in pregnancy, are limited. For pregnant women, there is an additional risk of immunosuppression in the offspring as TNFi can be actively transported across the placenta, which increases in the second and third trimesters. Several studies have explored the risk of serious infections with TNFi exposure in non-pregnant and pregnant patients and offspring exposed in utero, indicating an increased risk in non-pregnant patients and a potentially increased risk in pregnant patients. The studies on TNFi-exposed offspring showed conflicting results between in utero TNFi exposure and serious infections during the offspring's first year. Further research is needed to understand differential risks based on TNFi subtypes. Guidelines conditionally recommend the rotavirus vaccine before 6 months of age for offspring exposed to TNFi in utero, but more data are needed to support these recommendations because of limited evidence. This narrative review provides an overview of the risk in non-pregnant patients and summarizes evidence on how pregnancy can increase vulnerability to certain infections and how TNFi may influence this susceptibility. This review focuses on the evidence regarding the risk of serious infections in pregnant patients exposed to TNFi and the risk of infections in their offspring.
Assuntos
Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral , Humanos , Gravidez , Feminino , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/efeitos adversos , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/uso terapêutico , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/epidemiologia , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores , Infecções/epidemiologia , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. During pregnancy, VTE is treated with low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH). Studies assessing the optimal duration and peripartum management of therapeutic anticoagulation are lacking. This survey aimed to assess clinician practices for the management of anticoagulation in pregnant women with acute VTE. METHODS: An electronic survey consisting of clinical scenarios addressing anticoagulation management for VTE in pregnancy was created. The target sample was clinicians likely to be involved in the management of pregnant women with acute VTE. The survey completion rate and proportion of individuals selecting a response were determined. RESULTS: 96 respondents completed the survey including general internists (56.3%), hematologists (21.9%), and obstetricians (6.3%). In the management of a VTE in first or second trimester, most respondents preferred therapeutic LMWH until 6 weeks postpartum. In the first and second trimester, 48.0% and 37.5% of respondents, respectively, opted to reduce the dose of anticoagulation after 3 or 6 months. 29.2% of physicians opted for bridging with intravenous heparin around delivery when treating a VTE in the third trimester. 73.0% perceived an increased risk of clinically relevant non-major bleeding associated with the use of therapeutic anticoagulation in the peripartum and postpartum periods. CONCLUSIONS: The survey highlights a wide variability of practice in the management of therapeutic anticoagulation in pregnancy. Larger scale studies with relevant clinical outcomes including thrombosis and bleeding risks are needed to inform clinical practice.
Assuntos
Tromboembolia Venosa , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Gravidez , Gestantes , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologiaRESUMO
In this review, we summarize evidence regarding the use of routine and investigational pharmacologic interventions for pregnant and lactating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Antenatal corticosteroids may be used routinely for fetal lung maturation between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation, but decisions in those with critical illness and those < 24 or > 34 weeks' gestation should be made on a case-by-case basis. Magnesium sulfate may be used for seizure prophylaxis and fetal neuroprotection, albeit cautiously in those with hypoxia and renal compromise. There are no contraindications to using low-dose aspirin to prevent placenta-mediated pregnancy complications when indicated. An algorithm for thromboprophylaxis in pregnant patients with COVID-19 is presented, which considers disease severity, timing of delivery in relation to disease onset, inpatient vs outpatient status, underlying comorbidities and contraindications to the use of anticoagulation. Nitrous oxide may be administered for labor analgesia while using appropriate personal protective equipment. Intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia should be used with caution in patients with respiratory depression. Liberal use of neuraxial labor analgesia may reduce the need for emergency general anesthesia which results in aerosolization. Short courses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can be administered for postpartum analgesia, but opioids should be used with caution due to the risk of respiratory depression. For mechanically ventilated pregnant patients, neuromuscular blockade should be used for the shortest duration possible and reversal agents should be available on hand if delivery is imminent. To date, dexamethasone is the only proven and recommended experimental treatment for pregnant patients with COVID-19 who are mechanically ventilated or who require supplemental oxygen. Although hydroxycholoroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir and remdesivir may be used during pregnancy and lactation within the context of clinical trials, data from non-pregnant populations have not shown benefit. The role of monoclonal antibodies (tocilizumab), immunomodulators (tacrolimus), interferon, inhaled nitric oxide and convalescent plasma in pregnancy and lactation needs further evaluation. © 2020 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/virologia , Cuidado Pré-Natal/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/virologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Imunização Passiva/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Soroterapia para COVID-19RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To develop and internally validate risk prediction models identifying women at risk for cardiovascular severe maternal morbidity (CSMM). DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: An obstetric teaching hospital between 2007 and 2017. POPULATION: A total of 89 681 delivery hospitalisations. METHODS: We created and evaluated two models, one predicting CSMM at delivery (delivery model) and the other predicting CSMM postpartum following discharge from delivery hospitalisation (postpartum CSMM). We assessed model discrimination and calibration and used bootstrapping for internal validation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cardiovascular severe maternal morbidity comprised the following confirmed conditions: pulmonary oedema/acute heart failure, myocardial infarction, aneurysm, cardiac arrest/ventricular fibrillation, heart failure/arrest during surgery or procedure, cerebrovascular disorders, cardiogenic shock, conversion of cardiac rhythm and difficult-to-control severe hypertension. RESULTS: The delivery model contained 11 variables and 3 interaction terms. The strongest predictors were gestational hypertension, chronic hypertension, multiple gestation, cardiac lesions or valvular heart disease, maternal age ≥40 years and history of poor pregnancy outcome. The postpartum model comprised eight variables. The strongest predictors were severe pre-eclampsia, non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity, chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, non-severe pre-eclampsia and maternal age ≥40 years at delivery. The delivery and postpartum models had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87 (95% CI 0.85-0.89) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.80-0.90), respectively. Both models were adequately calibrated and performed well on internal validation. CONCLUSIONS: These tools may help providers to identify women at highest risk of CSMM and enable future prevention measures. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Risk assessment tools for cardiovascular severe maternal morbidity were developed and internally validated.