Prognostic relevance of global work index and global constructive work in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Myocardial work (MW) derived from pressure-strain loops is a novel non-invasive tool to assess left ventricular (LV) function, incorporating global longitudinal strain (GLS) by speckle tracking echocardiography and non-invasively assessed blood pressure. Studies on the role of MW in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) are still limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the potential value of MW for predicting adverse outcomes in patients with DCM. 116 consecutive patients with DCM who underwent heart catheterization were retrospectively recruited from June 2009 to July 2014. 34 patients (30%) met the composite endpoints for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) of cardiac transplantation, need for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy, heart failure hospitalization and all-cause mortality. Patients with DCM were followed up for a mean of 5.1 years (IQR: 2.2-9.1 years). Global work index (GWI) and global constructive work (GCW) were not only independent predictors but also provided incremental predictive values (Integrated discrimination improvement [IDI] > 0) of MACE in multivariate Cox models. Furthermore, Patients with GWI < 788 mm Hg% (HR 5.46, 95%CI 1.66-17.92, p = 0.005) and GCW < 1,238 mm Hg% (HR 4.46, 95%CI 1.53-12.98, p = 0.006) had higher risks of MACE. GWI and GCW assessed by strain imaging echocardiography may have an additional value beyond LV-EF and GLS for predicting adverse outcomes in DCM.

Clinical Comparison of a Novel Balloon-Expandable Versus a Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valve for the Treatment of Patients with Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis: The EVAL Registry.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an effective treatment option for patients with severe, symptomatic AS, regardless of the transcatheter heart valve (THV) implanted. Prior studies demonstrated a higher device success with lower paravalvular leak (PVL) using the balloon-expandable (BE) Sapien/XT THV vs. a self-expanding (SE) THV. However, few data are available on the performance of a novel BE THV. PURPOSE: to compare early clinical performance and safety of the newly available BE Myval THV (Myval, Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., India) vs. the commonly used SE (Evolut R, Medtronic) THV. METHODS:  A single-center, retrospective cohort analysis was performed with 166 consecutive patients undergoing TAVR from March 2019 to March 2021 for severe symptomatic AS treated with either the novel BE Myval or the SE Evolut R (ER) bioprosthesis. The primary endpoint was device success at day 30 according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3). Secondary endpoints included 30-day all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, more than mild PVL, permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) rates and a composite of all-cause mortality and disabling stroke at 6 months. RESULTS:  Among the 166 included patients, 108 patients received the SE ER THV and 58 patients were treated with the BE Myval THV. At baseline, the two groups showed comparable demographic characteristics. The primary composite endpoint of early device success occurred in 55 patients (94.8%) in the BE Myval group and in 90 patients (83.3%) in the SE ER group (OR 3.667, 95% CI 1.094-12.14; p = 0.048). At day 30, the BE Myval THV group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of more than mild PVL (BE Myval 3.45% vs. SE ER 14.8%, OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.05-0.8; p = 0.0338), along with a lower rate of PPI (BE Myval 11% vs. SE ER 24.2%, OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.15-0.99; p = 0.0535). At the 6-month follow-up, the incidence of all-cause mortality and disabling stroke did not significantly differ between the two groups, while the incidence of PPI (BE Myval 11% vs. SE ER 27.5%, OR 0.32, CI 95% 0.1273-0.8; p = 0.02) and ≥moderate PVL (BE Myval 6.9% vs. SE ER 19.8%, OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.1-0.94; p = 0.0396) was significantly lower in the BE Myval group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe symptomatic AS undergoing TAVR, the novel Myval BE THV provided a comparable performance to the well-known ER SE THV, and it was associated with a lower rate of PPI and ≥moderate PVL within 30 days and 6 months after the procedure. Randomized, head-to-head comparison trials are needed to confirm our results.