RESUMO
CLINICAL SCENARIO: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a widespread knee disorder encountered in clinical practice. Clinicians have often focused on strengthening hip and knee musculature to improve pain and disability, which are the ultimate clinical goals of PFP treatment. However, PFP literature has shown improvement in pain and disability without concurrent changes in lower-extremity strength after rehabilitation. Although some researchers have achieved a significant increase in strength after rehabilitation in PFP cohorts, there was no association with improved pain and disability. The inconsistent improvements in strength and the lack of association with clinical outcomes call for a critical appraisal of the available evidence to better understand the association between changes in hip and knee strength and improved clinical outcomes in individuals with PFP. CLINICAL QUESTION: Are changes in hip and knee strength associated with improved pain and disability after rehabilitation in individuals with PFP? SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS: Four studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the appraisal. Following rehabilitation, one study achieved strength improvements in knee extension. One study achieved strength improvements in knee extension, but not in hip external rotation and hip abduction. Two studies did not achieve strength improvements in hip external rotation, hip abduction, hip extension, or knee extension. All included studies achieved improvements in pain or disability after rehabilitation. None of the studies found a significant association between changes in hip and knee strength (either improved or not) and improved pain and disability. CLINICAL BOTTOM LINE: There is consistent evidence that changes in hip and knee strength are not associated with improved clinical outcomes after rehabilitation in adults with PFP. STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION: Collectively, the body of evidence included is to answer the clinical question aligns with the strength of recommendation of B based on the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy.
Assuntos
Síndrome da Dor Patelofemoral , Adulto , Humanos , Síndrome da Dor Patelofemoral/terapia , Joelho , Articulação do Joelho , Dor , Manejo da Dor , Força Muscular , Fenômenos BiomecânicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Individuals with patellofemoral pain have a heterogeneous presentation of symptoms during functional tasks; however, biomechanical data often negates self-reported disability. The single leg squat is common in patellofemoral pain literature but may not be a pain provoking task for all individuals. Therefore, our study examined the influence of self-perceived squatting disability in individuals with patellofemoral pain on lower extremity squatting kinematics. METHODS: We analyzed two-dimensional hip frontal plane projection angle, knee frontal plane projection angle, lateral trunk movement, and pelvic drop in 100 participants, 82 with patellofemoral pain and 18 pain-free controls. Participants with patellofemoral pain were dichotomized based on the level of disability reported during squatting on the anterior knee pain scale. An analysis of variance with post hoc testing was used to compare differences in lower extremity and trunk kinematics between groups, p < 0.05. FINDINGS: Participants who reported only being able to squat with partial weight bearing had greater hip frontal plane projection angles than those who reported squatting painful each time (p = 0.017). The partial weight bearing group had greater knee frontal plane projection angles compared those who reported pain with repeated squatting and the pain-free group, (p < 0.034). We found no significant differences in lateral trunk motion or pelvic drop between groups. INTERPRETATION: Individuals with patellofemoral pain who self-reported worse squatting disability had greater hip and knee frontal plane motion compared to individuals with less disability and pain-free controls. Clinicians and researchers should consider specific pain provoking tasks when evaluating and treating patients with patellofemoral pain.