Liver Transplant Costs and Activity After United Network for Organ Sharing Allocation Policy Changes.

Importance: A new liver allocation policy was implemented by United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) in February 2020 with the stated intent of improving access to liver transplant (LT). There are growing concerns nationally regarding the implications this new system may have on LT costs, as well as access to a chance for LT, which have not been captured at a multicenter level. Objective: To characterize LT volume and cost changes across the US and within specific center groups and demographics after the policy implementation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study collected and reviewed LT volume from multiple centers across the US and cost data with attention to 8 specific center demographics. Two separate 12-month eras were compared, before and after the new UNOS allocation policy: March 4, 2019, to March 4, 2020, and March 5, 2020, to March 5, 2021. Data analysis was performed from May to December 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Center volume, changes in cost. Results: A total of 22 of 68 centers responded comparing 1948 LTs before the policy change and 1837 LTs postpolicy, resulting in a 6% volume decrease. Transplants using local donations after brain death decreased 54% (P < .001) while imported donations after brain death increased 133% (P = .003). Imported fly-outs and dry runs increased 163% (median, 19; range, 1-75, vs 50, range, 2-91; P = .009) and 33% (median, 3; range, 0-16, vs 7, range, 0-24; P = .02). Overall hospital costs increased 10.9% to a total of $46 360 176 (P = .94) for participating centers. There was a 77% fly-out cost increase postpolicy ($10 600 234; P = .03). On subanalysis, centers with decreased LT volume postpolicy observed higher overall hospital costs ($41 720 365; P = .048), and specifically, a 122% cost increase for liver imports ($6 508 480; P = .002). Transplant centers from low-income states showed a significant increase in hospital (12%) and import (94%) costs. Centers serving populations with larger proportions of racial and ethnic minority candidates and specifically Black candidates significantly increased costs by more than 90% for imported livers, fly-outs, and dry runs despite lower LT volume. Similarly, costs increased significantly (>100%) for fly-outs and dry runs in centers from worse-performing health systems. Conclusions and Relevance: Based on this large multicenter effort and contrary to current assumptions, the new liver distribution system appears to place a disproportionate burden on populations of the current LT community who already experience disparities in health care. The continuous allocation policies being promoted by UNOS could make the situation even worse.

Prospective observational study to validate a next-generation sequencing blood RNA signature to predict early kidney transplant rejection.

The objective of this study was to validate the performance of Tutivia, a peripheral blood gene expression signature, in predicting early acute rejection (AR) post-kidney transplant. Recipients of living or deceased donor kidney transplants were enrolled in a nonrandomized, prospective, global, and observational study (NCT04727788). The main outcome was validation of the area under the curve (AUC) of Tutivia vs serum creatinine at biopsy alone, or Tutivia + serum creatinine at biopsy. Of the 151 kidney transplant recipients, the mean cohort age was 53 years old, and 64% were male. There were 71% (107/151) surveillance/protocol biopsies and 29% (44/151) for-cause biopsies, with a 31% (47/151) overall rejection rate. Tutivia (AUC 0.69 [95% CI: 0.59-0.77]) and AUC of Tutivia + creatinine at biopsy (0.68 [95% CI: 0.59-0.77]) were greater than the AUC of creatinine at biopsy alone (0.51.4 [95% CI: 0.43-0.60]). Applying a model cut-off of 50 (scale 0-100) generated a high- and low-risk category for AR with a negative predictive value of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.71-0.86), a positive predictive value of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.45-0.74), and an odds ratio of 5.74 (95% CI: 2.63-12.54). Tutivia represents a validated noninvasive approach for clinicians to accurately predict early AR, beyond the current standard of care.

Immune landscape of the kidney allograft in response to rejection.

Preventing kidney graft dysfunction and rejection is a critical step in addressing the nationwide organ shortage and improving patient outcomes. While kidney transplants (KT) are performed more frequently, the overall number of patients on the waitlist consistently exceeds organ availability. Despite improved short-term outcomes in KT, comparable progress in long-term allograft survival has not been achieved. Major cause of graft loss at 5 years post-KT is chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) characterized by interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA). Accordingly, proactive prevention of CAD requires a comprehensive understanding of the immune mechanisms associated with either further dysfunction or impaired repair. Allograft rejection is primed by innate immune cells and carried out by adaptive immune cells. The rejection process is primarily facilitated by antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). It is essential to better elucidate the actions of individual immune cell subclasses (e.g. B memory, Tregs, Macrophage type 1 and 2) throughout the rejection process, rather than limiting our understanding to broad classes of immune cells. Embracing multi-omic approaches may be the solution in acknowledging these intricacies and decoding these enigmatic pathways. A transition alongside advancing technology will better allow organ biology to find its place in this era of precision and personalized medicine.

Impact of Renal Replacement Therapy on Rejection among Liver Transplant Recipients.

Introduction: Renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients is associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality, with an even higher risk among patients requiring renal replacement therapy. There is limited data evaluating rejection outcomes in patients requiring renal replacement therapy after liver transplant. Program evaluation aims: To evaluate the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, recipient and graft survival, infection, renal dysfunction, and immunosuppression practices. Design: This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study. To be eligible, patients were deceased donor liver transplant recipients ≥18 year of age transplanted between January 2017 and August 2019 who received steroid-only induction and tacrolimus as part of their initial immunosuppression regimen. Results: Recipients that required renal replacement therapy (N = 86) were compared to those who received no renal replacement therapy (N = 158). Biopsy-proven acute rejection at 1-year posttransplant was significantly higher among those requiring renal replacement therapy (36% vs 13%, P < .001). Patient survival at 12 months was 77% for those requiring renal replacement therapy and 94% for those not requiring renal replacement therapy (P < .001). Infection (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.6-8.8; P < .001), but not rejection (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.7; P = .5) was an independent predictor of mortality. The use of renal replacement therapy after liver transplant necessitated careful titration of immunosuppression to balance the detrimental risks of infection versus rejection in this high-risk population.

European Society for Organ Transplantation Consensus Statement on Biomarkers in Liver Transplantation.

Currently, one-year survival following liver transplantation (LT) exceeds 90% in large international registries, and LT is considered definitive treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease and liver cancer. Recurrence of disease, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), significantly hampers post-LT outcomes. An optimal approach to immunosuppression (IS), including safe weaning, may benefit patients by mitigating the effect on recurrent diseases, as well as reducing adverse events associated with over-/under-IS, including chronic kidney disease (CKD). Prediction of these outcome measures-disease recurrence, CKD, and immune status-has long been based on relatively inaccurate clinical models. To address the utility of new biomarkers in predicting these outcomes in the post-LT setting, the European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) and International Liver Transplant Society (ILTS) convened a working group of experts to review literature pertaining to primary disease recurrence, development of CKD, and safe weaning of IS. Summaries of evidence were presented to the group of panelists and juries to develop guidelines, which were discussed and voted in-person at the Consensus Conference in Prague November 2022. The consensus findings and recommendations of the Liver Working Group on new biomarkers in LT, clinical applicability, and future needs are presented in this article.

Management of Established Small-for-size Syndrome in Post Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Medical, Radiological, and Surgical Interventions: Guidelines From the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference.

Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) following living donor liver transplantation is a complication that can lead to devastating outcomes such as prolonged poor graft function and possibly graft loss. Because of the concern about the syndrome, some transplants of mismatched grafts may not be performed. Portal hyperperfusion of a small graft and hyperdynamic splanchnic circulation are recognized as main pathogenic factors for the syndrome. Management of established SFSS is guided by the severity of the presentation with the initial focus on pharmacological therapy to modulate portal flow and provide supportive care to the patient with the goal of facilitating graft regeneration and recovery. When medical management fails or condition progresses with impending dysfunction or even liver failure, interventional radiology (IR) and/or surgical interventions to reduce portal overperfusion should be considered. Although most patients have good outcomes with medical, IR, and/or surgical management that allow graft regeneration, the risk of graft loss increases dramatically in the setting of bilirubin >10 mg/dL and INR>1.6 on postoperative day 7 or isolated bilirubin >20 mg/dL on postoperative day 14. Retransplantation should be considered based on the overall clinical situation and the above postoperative laboratory parameters. The following recommendations focus on medical and IR/surgical management of SFSS as well as considerations and timing of retransplantation when other therapies fail.

Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals peripheral blood mononuclear immune cell landscape associated with operational tolerance in a kidney transplant recipient.

Operational tolerance (OT) after kidney transplantation is defined as stable graft acceptance without the need for immunosuppression therapy. However, it is not clear which cellular and molecular pathways are driving tolerance in these patients. In this first-of-its-kind pilot study, we assessed the immune landscape associated with OT using single-cell analyses. Peripheral mononuclear cells from a kidney transplant recipient with OT (Tol), 2 healthy individuals (HC), and a kidney transplant recipient with normal kidney function on standard-of-care immunosuppression (SOC) were evaluated. The immune landscape of the Tol was drastically different from that of SOC and emerged closer to the profile of HC. TCL1A+ naive B cells and LSGAL1+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) were in higher proportions in Tol. We were unable to identify the Treg subcluster in SOC. The ligand-receptor analysis in HC and Tol identified interactions between B cells, and Tregs that enhance the proliferation and suppressive function of Tregs. SOC reported the highest proportion of activated B cells with more cells in the G2M phase. Our single-cell RNA sequencing study identified the mediators of tolerance; however, it emphasizes the requirement of similar investigations on a larger cohort to reaffirm the role of immune cells in tolerance.

Single nuclei transcriptomics delineates complex immune and kidney cell interactions contributing to kidney allograft fibrosis.

Chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD), characterized histologically by interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, is the major cause of kidney allograft loss. Here, using single nuclei RNA sequencing and transcriptome analysis, we identified the origin, functional heterogeneity, and regulation of fibrosis-forming cells in kidney allografts with CAD. A robust technique was used to isolate individual nuclei from kidney allograft biopsies and successfully profiled 23,980 nuclei from five kidney transplant recipients with CAD and 17,913 nuclei from three patients with normal allograft function. Our analysis revealed two distinct states of fibrosis in CAD; low and high extracellular matrix (ECM) with distinct kidney cell subclusters, immune cell types, and transcriptional profiles. Imaging mass cytometry analysis confirmed increased ECM deposition at the protein level. Proximal tubular cells transitioned to an injured mixed tubular (MT1) phenotype comprised of activated fibroblasts and myofibroblast markers, generated provisional ECM which recruited inflammatory cells, and served as the main driver of fibrosis. MT1 cells in the high ECM state achieved replicative repair evidenced by dedifferentiation and nephrogenic transcriptional signatures. MT1 in the low ECM state showed decreased apoptosis, decreased cycling tubular cells, and severe metabolic dysfunction, limiting the potential for repair. Activated B, T and plasma cells were increased in the high ECM state, while macrophage subtypes were increased in the low ECM state. Intercellular communication between kidney parenchymal cells and donor-derived macrophages, detected several years post-transplantation, played a key role in injury propagation. Thus, our study identified novel molecular targets for interventions aimed to ameliorate or prevent allograft fibrogenesis in kidney transplant recipients.

Contribution of Proteomics in Transplantation: Identification of Injury and Rejection Markers.

Solid organ transplantation saves thousands of lives suffering from end-stage diseases. Although early transplants experienced acute organ injury, medical breakthroughs, such as tissue typing, and use of immunosuppressive agents have considerably improved graft survival. However, the overall incidence of allograft injury and chronic rejection remains high. Often the clinical manifestations of organ injury or rejection are nonspecific and late. Current requirement for successful organ transplantation is the identification of reliable, accurate, disease-specific, noninvasive methods for the early diagnosis of graft injury or rejection. Development of noninvasive techniques is important to allow routine follow-ups without the discomfort and risks associated with a graft biopsy. Multiple biofluids have been successfully tested for the presence of potential proteomic biomarkers; these include serum, plasma, urine, and whole blood. Kidney transplant research has provided significant evidence to the potential of proteomics-based biomarkers for acute and chronic kidney rejection, delayed graft function, early detection of declining allograft health. Multiple proteins have been implicated as biomarkers; however, recent observations implicate the use of similar canonical pathways and biofunctions associated with graft injury/rejection with altered proteins as potential biomarkers. Unfortunately, the current biomarker studies lack high sensitivity and specificity, adding to the complexity of their utility in the clinical space. In this review, we first describe the high-throughput proteomics technologies and then discuss the outcomes of proteomics profiling studies in the transplantation of several organs. Existing literature provides hope that novel biomarkers will emerge from ongoing efforts and guide physicians in delivering specific therapies to prolong graft survival.

Comparison of Biliary Complications Rates After Brain Death, Donation After Circulatory Death, and Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Cohort Study.

Donation-after-circulatory-death (DCD), donation-after-brain-death (DBD), and living-donation (LD) are the three possible options for liver transplantation (LT), each with unique benefits and complication rates. We aimed to compare DCD-, DBD-, and LD-LT-specific graft survival and biliary complications (BC). We collected data on 138 DCD-, 3,027 DBD- and 318 LD-LTs adult recipients from a single center and analyzed patient/graft survival. BC (leak and anastomotic/non-anastomotic stricture (AS/NAS)) were analyzed in a subset of 414 patients. One-/five-year graft survival were 88.6%/70.0% for DCD-LT, 92.6%/79.9% for DBD-LT, and, 91.7%/82.9% for LD-LT. DCD-LTs had a 1.7-/1.3-fold adjusted risk of losing their graft compared to DBD-LT and LD-LT, respectively (p < 0.010/0.403). Bile leaks were present in 10.1% (DCD-LTs), 7.2% (DBD-LTs), and 36.2% (LD-LTs) (ORs, DBD/LD vs. DCD: 0.7/4.2, p = 0.402/<0.001). AS developed in 28.3% DCD-LTs, 18.1% DBD-LTs, and 43.5% LD-LTs (ORs, DBD/LD vs. DCD: 0.5/1.8, p = 0.018/0.006). NAS was present in 15.2% DCD-LTs, 1.4% DBDs-LT, and 4.3% LD-LTs (ORs, DBD/LD vs. DCD: 0.1/0.3, p = 0.001/0.005). LTs w/o BC had better liver graft survival compared to any other groups with BC. DCD-LT and LD-LT had excellent graft survival despite significantly higher BC rates compared to DBD-LT. DCD-LT represents a valid alternative whose importance should increase further with machine/perfusion systems.

Impact of Steroid Only Induction on Rejection in Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation.

Introduction: The occurrence of simultaneous liver kidney transplantation has greatly increased; however, the ideal induction and maintenance immunosuppression remains unknown. Question: This evaluation aimed to determine if corticosteroid only induction in simultaneous liver kidney transplant recipients provided adequate prophylaxis against rejection when compared to basiliximab. Design: This was a single center, retrospective, cohort study of adult simultaneous liver kidney transplant recipients from June 2010 to June 2019 receiving corticosteroid only (N = 41) or basiliximab (N = 42) induction. Results: Liver or kidney biopsy proven acute rejection at 3 months was comparable between the corticosteroid only and basiliximab groups (10% vs 7%, P = .67), which persisted through 12 months posttransplant (15% vs 21%, P = .42). The occurrence of any infection at 3 months was increased in the corticosteroid only group relative to the basiliximab group (41% vs 21%, P = .049). Graft and patient survival at 12 months were similar between groups. Maintenance immunosuppression was overall minimized with a tacrolimus goal of 6-8 ng/mL, mycophenolate mofetil dose reduction to 1000 mg/day by 3 months, and early steroid withdrawal in both groups. Conclusion: Our findings suggested that corticosteroid only induction was an effective strategy for preventing rejection in simultaneous liver kidney transplant recipients, even in combination with reduced maintenance immunosuppression.

Xenotransplantation: A New Era.

Organ allotransplantation has now reached an impassable ceiling inherent to the limited supply of human donor organs. In the United States, there are currently over 100,000 individuals on the national transplant waiting list awaiting a kidney, heart, and/or liver transplant. This is in contrast with only a fraction of them receiving a living or deceased donor allograft. Given the morbidity, mortality, costs, or absence of supportive treatments, xenotransplant has the potential to address the critical shortage in organ grafts. Last decade research efforts focused on creation of donor organs from pigs with various genes edited out using CRISPR technologies and utilizing non-human primates for trial. Three groups in the United States have recently moved forward with trials in human subjects and obtained initial successful results with pig-to-human heart and kidney xenotransplantation. This review serves as a brief discussion of the recent progress in xenotransplantation research, particularly as it concerns utilization of porcine heart, renal, and liver xenografts in clinical practice.

An optimized protocol for single nuclei isolation from clinical biopsies for RNA-seq.

Single nuclei RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) has evolved as a powerful tool to study complex human diseases. Single cell resolution enables the study of novel cell types, biological processes, cell trajectories, and cell-cell signaling pathways. snRNA-seq largely relies on the dissociation of intact nuclei from human tissues. However, the study of complex tissues using small core biopsies presents many technical challenges. Here, an optimized protocol for single nuclei isolation is presented for frozen and RNAlater preserved human kidney biopsies. The described protocol is fast, low cost, and time effective due to the elimination of cell sorting and ultra-centrifugation. Samples can be processed in 90 min or less. This method is effective for obtaining normal nuclei morphology without signs of structural damage. Using snRNA-seq, 16 distinct kidney cell clusters were recovered from normal and peri-transplant acute kidney injury allograft samples, including immune cell clusters. Quality control measurements demonstrated that these optimizations eliminated cellular debris and allowed for a high yield of high-quality nuclei and RNA for library preparation and sequencing. Cellular disassociation did not induce cellular stress responses, which recapitulated transcriptional patterns associated with standardized methods of nuclei isolation. Future applications of this protocol will allow for thorough investigations of small biobank biopsies, identifying cell-specific injury pathways and driving the discovery of novel diagnostics and therapeutic targets.

Pretransplant kidney transcriptome captures intrinsic donor organ quality and predicts 24-month outcomes.

With the development of novel prognostic tools derived from omics technologies, transplant medicine is entering the era of precision medicine. Currently, there are no established predictive biomarkers for posttransplant kidney function. A total of 270 deceased donor pretransplant kidney biopsies were collected and posttransplant function was prospectively monitored. This study first assessed the utility of pretransplant gene expression profiles in predicting 24-month outcomes in a training set (n = 174). Nearly 600 differentially expressed genes were associated with 24-month graft function. Grafts that progressed to low function at 24 months exhibited upregulated immune responses and downregulated metabolic processes at pretransplantation. Using penalized logistic regression modeling, a 55 gene model area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) for 24-month graft function was 0.994. Gene expression for a subset of candidate genes was then measured in an independent set of pretransplant biopsies (n = 96) using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The AUROC when using 13 genes with three donor characteristics (age, race, body mass index) was 0.821. Subsequently, a risk score was calculated using this combination for each patient in the validation cohort, demonstrating the translational feasibility of using gene markers as prognostic tools. These findings support the potential of pretransplant transcriptomic biomarkers as novel instruments for improving posttransplant outcome predictions and associated management.

Clinical Practice Issues for Liver Transplantation in COVID-19 Recovered Recipients.

The ongoing burden of COVID-19 in persons with end stage liver failure necessitates the development of sound and rational policies for organ transplantation in this population. Following our initial experience with two COVID-19 recovered recipients who died shortly after transplant, we adjusted our center policies, re-evaluated outcomes, and retrospectively analyzed the clinical course of the subsequent seven COVID-19 recovered recipients. There were two early deaths and 5 successful outcomes. Both deceased patients shared common characteristics in that they had positive SARS-CoV2 PCR tests proximal to transplant (7-17 days), had acute on chronic liver failure, and suffered thromboembolic phenomena. After a careful review of clinical and virological outcome predictors, we instituted policy changes to avoid transplantation in these circumstances. We believe that our series offers useful insights into the unique challenges that confront transplant centers in the COVID-19 era and could guide future discussions regarding this important area.

When is it safe for the liver donor to be discharged home and prevent unnecessary re-hospitalizations? - A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Few data are available on discharge criteria after living liver donation (LLD). OBJECTIVES: To identify the features for fit for discharge checklist after LLD to prevent unnecessary re-hospitalizations and to provide international expert recommendations. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central. METHODS: Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel. The critical outcomes included were complications rates and liver function (defined by elevated bilirubin and INR) (CRD42021260725). RESULTS: Total 57/1710 studies were included in qualitative analysis and 28/57 on the final analysis. No randomized controlled trials were identified. The complications rate was reported in 20/28 studies and ranged from 7.8% to 71.2%. Post hepatectomy liver function was reported in 13 studies. The Quality of Evidence (QoE) was Low and Very-Low for complications rate and liver function test, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring and prevention of donor complications should be crucial in decision making of discharge. Pain and diet control, removal of all drains and catheters, deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, and use routine imaging (CT scan or liver ultrasound) before discharge should be included as fit for discharge checklist (QoE; Low | GRADE of recommendation; Strong). Transient Impaired liver function (defined by elevated bilirubin and INR), a prognostic marker of outcome after liver resection, usually occurs after donor right hepatectomy and should be monitored. Improving trends for bilirubin and INR value should be observed by day 5 post hepatectomy and be included in the fit for discharge checklist. (QoE; Very-Low | GRADE; Strong).

Nucleic acid biomarkers to assess graft injury after liver transplantation.

Many risk factors and complications impact the success of liver transplantation, such as ischaemia-reperfusion injury, acute rejection, and primary graft dysfunction. Molecular biomarkers have the potential to accurately diagnose, predict, and monitor injury progression or organ failure. There is a critical opportunity for reliable and non-invasive biomarkers to reduce the organ shortage by enabling i) the assessment of donor organ quality, ii) the monitoring of short- and long-term graft function, and iii) the prediction of acute and chronic disease development. To date, no established molecular biomarkers have been used to guide clinical decision-making in transplantation. In this review, we outline the recent advances in cell-free nucleic acid biomarkers for monitoring graft injury in liver transplant recipients. Prior work in this area can be divided into two categories: biomarker discovery and validation studies. Circulating nucleic acids (CNAs) can be found in the extracellular environment pertaining to different biological fluids such as bile, blood, urine, and perfusate. CNAs that are packaged into extracellular vesicles may facilitate intercellular and interorgan communication. Thus, decoding their biological function, cellular origins and molecular composition is imperative for diagnosing causes of graft injury, guiding immunosuppression and improving overall patient survival. Herein, we discuss the most promising molecular biomarkers, their state of development, and the critical aspects of study design in biomarker research for early detection of post-transplant liver injury. Future advances in biomarker studies are expected to personalise post-transplant therapy, leading to improved patient care and outcomes.