Sustained HIV remission after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with wild-type CCR5 donor cells.

HIV cure has been reported for five individuals who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with cells from CCR5Δ32 homozygous donors. By contrast, viral rebound has occurred in other people living with HIV who interrupted antiretroviral treatment after undergoing allo-HSCT, with cells mostly from wild-type CCR5 donors. Here we report the case of a male individual who has achieved durable HIV remission following allo-HSCT with cells from an unrelated HLA-matched (9 of 10 matching for HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1 alleles) wild-type CCR5 donor to treat an extramedullary myeloid tumor. To date, plasma viral load has remained undetectable for 32 months after the interruption of antiretroviral treatment. Treatment with ruxolitinib has been maintained during this period to treat chronic graft-versus-host disease. Low levels of proviral DNA were detected sporadically after allo-HSCT, including defective but not intact HIV DNA. No virus could be amplified in cultures of CD4+ T cells obtained after antiretroviral treatment interruption, while CD4+ T cells remained susceptible to HIV-1 infection in vitro. Declines in HIV antibodies and undetectable HIV-specific T cell responses further corroborate the absence of viral rebound after antiretroviral treatment interruption. These results suggest that HIV remission could be achieved in the context of allo-HSCT with wild-type CCR5.

[Preventing relapse of acute leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes in post-allograft transplantation: Prophylactic and preemptive strategies (SFGM-TC)]. / Prévention de la rechute des leucémies aiguës et syndromes myélodysplasiques en post-allogreffe : stratégies prophylactique et préemptive (SFGM-TC).

Disease relapse remains the first cause of mortality of hematological malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for acute myeloid and lymphoid leukemia (AML and ALL) and for myelodysplastic syndroms (MDS). More and more patients are eligible for allo-HCT over the years and for many of them, only reduced intensity conditioning is possible, which is associated with a higher risk of relapse. Knowledge and biotechnology allow us to better identify diseases at very high risk of relapse and to measure residual disease before allo-HCT. Planning post-transplant maintenance treatment as part of a prophylaxis strategy is now feasible. Monitoring biomarkers of residual disease and post-transplant chimerism after allo-HCT allows a preemptive strategy. Within the frame of the 14th annual workshops of the Francophone Society for Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cell Therapy, the working group reviewed the literature and discussed novel strategies and therapies used to prevent relapse post-allo-HCT. Innovative drugs have been developed recently. Their toxicity profile allows their use post-allo-HCT, albeit with precaution. We reviewed the use of FLT3 inhibitors for AML, BCR::ABL inhibitors for Philadelphia chromosome for ALL, hypomethylating agents and Bcl-2 inhibitors for AML and MDS. The indications of immunomodulation and infusion of donor lymphocytes have been reviewed. Finally, we outlined methods of follow-up and support for patients receiving these prophylactic treatments.

Pre-engraftment bacteremia after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation without primary fluoroquinolone antibacterial prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Bacteremia is a common complication in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients (alloHCTr), especially during the pre-engraftment period. International guidelines recommend antibacterial prophylaxis (ABP), despite potential selection for multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). Limited contemporary data exist on the epidemiology of pre-engraftment bacteremia in alloHCTr, who do not receive ABP. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational single-center cohort study including all consecutive adult alloHCTr (2015-2021), investigating the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of bacteremia during the engraftment period. Primary fluoroquinolone (FQ) ABP is not routinely administered in our center. RESULTS: Among 421 patients identified, 124 bacteremia episodes were observed in 121/421 (29%) alloHCTr. The median time to the 1st bacteremia episode was 9 days (IQR 6-11). Most (105/124, 85%) episodes were monomicrobial, while >1 pathogens were identified in 19/124 (15%) episodes. Overall, 152 pathogens were isolated, with a predominance of Gram-positive (118/152, 78%), including coagulase-negative staphylococci (n:47), streptococci (n:46), and enterococci (n:15), followed by Gram-negative bacteria (GNB, 30/152, 20%), and anaerobes (4/152, 3%). There were 2/152 (1%) MDRO (extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing) GNB. Multivariable analyses identified age >40-year-old (OR 2.4, P = 0.02), male gender (OR 1.8, P = 0.02), and a haploidentical/mismatched unrelated donor (OR 2.5, P < 0.001) as independent risk factors for bacteremia. All cause 30-day mortality among alloHCTr with bacteremia was 0.8% (1/121): one patient died due to an HCT-related complication. CONCLUSION: Despite lack of primary FQ ABP, low rates of bacteremia were observed during the pre-engraftment period, with low MDRO prevalence and mortality. Our findings may allow to revisit the need for primary universal FQ ABP in high-risk neutropenic hematology patients.

NK- and T-cell repertoire is established early after allogeneic HSCT and is imprinted by CMV reactivation.

ABSTRACT: Besides genetic influences, nongenetic factors such as graft-versus-host disease and viral infections have been shown to be important shapers of the immune reconstitution and diversification processes after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, differential susceptibility to immune modulation by nongenetic factors is not fully understood. We determined to follow the reconstitution of the T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire through immune sequencing of natural killer (NK) cells using a 35-marker spectral flow cytometry panel and in relation to clinical events. A longitudinal investigation was performed on samples derived from 54 HSCT recipients during the first year after HSCT. We confirmed a significant contraction in TCR repertoire diversity, with remarkable stability over time. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation had the ability to significantly change TCR repertoire clonality and composition, with a long-lasting imprint. Our data further revealed skewing of NK-cell reconstitution in CMV reactivated recipients, with an increased frequency of KIR2DL2L3S2+ adaptive, cytolytic, and functional CD107a+ NK cells, concomitant with a reduced pool of NKG2A+ NK cells. We provided support that CMV might act as an important driver of peripheral homeostatic proliferation of circulating specific T and NK cells, which can be viewed as a compensatory mechanism to establish a new peripheral repertoire.

Remission of relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma induced by brentuximab vedotin and pembrolizumab combination after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a case report.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a potentially curative treatment option for patients with highly chemorefractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). The CD30-targeting antibody-drug conjugate Brentuximab-Vedotin (BV) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) blocking agents have demonstrated clinical activity with durable responses in relapsed/refractory (r/r) HL. However, patients with a history of allo-HSCT were frequently excluded from clinical trials due to concerns about the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We report the clinical history of a patient with refractory classical HL who underwent two allo-HSCTs (first from matched unrelated and second from haploidentical donor) after relapsing on BV and nivolumab and for whom durable remission was finally obtained using BV-pembrolizumab combination for relapse after haploidentical HSCT. Such treatment was associated with the onset of GVHD after only two cycles which led to treatment discontinuation. However, the side effects were rapidly controlled, and after 2 years of follow-up, the patient is still in remission. Our data support the feasibility and efficacy of combining PD-1 blockade with BV to enhance the graft-versus-lymphoma effect after allo-HSCT.

[Vaccination of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: Guidelines from the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)]. / Mise à jour du calendrier vaccinal après allogreffe de cellules souches hématopoïétiques : recommandations de la Société francophone de greffe de moelle et de thérapie cellulaire (SFGM-TC).

During immune reconstitution following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), (re)vaccination of allo-HSCT recipients is recommended. Herein, we propose an update of practical recommendations regarding vaccination of allo-HSCT recipients. These recommendations, based on data from the literature, national and international guidelines and the consensus of the participants when no formally proven data are available, were elaborated during the workshop of practice harmonization organized by the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC) in Lille in September 2022.

Revisiting Cytomegalovirus Serology in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients (allo-HCTRs) with positive cytomegalovirus (CMV) serology may have false-positive results due to blood product transfusion-associated passive immunity. METHODS: This single-center cohort study included allo-HCTRs with negative baseline (at malignancy diagnosis) CMV serology and indeterminate/low-positive (CMV IgG titer, ≥0.6-<50 U/mL) pretransplant CMV serology with negative pretransplant plasma CMV DNAemia. The CMV status of those patients was reclassified from R+ to R- (CMVR- reclassification group). We compared those patients to allo-HCTRs with negative (CMV IgG titer <0.6 U/mL) pretransplant CMV IgG (CMVR- group). We describe the number and type of patients whose pretransplant CMV status was reclassified from indeterminate/positive to negative. We reviewed all plasma CMV DNAemia tests performed during the first 6 months posttransplant in both groups to assess the safety of this approach. RESULTS: Among 246 (84.5%) of 291 transplanted patients identified as CMVR+ pretransplant, 60 (24.4%) were reclassified from CMV serology indeterminate (N:10)/low-positive (N:50) to R-. Only 1 of 60 patients (1.67%) in the CMVR- reclassification group versus 3 of 44 (6.8%; P = .30) in the CMVR- group developed CMV DNAemia during the follow-up period. There were no significant differences in the number of CMV DNAemia tests performed, CMV DNAemia range, and time posttransplant between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: One of 4 allo-HCT CMVR+ may be falsely flagged as R+, with significant impact on donor selection and prophylaxis administration. A 2-step approach including CMV serology testing at hematologic malignancy diagnosis in allo-HCT candidates and careful review of pretransplant CMV IgG titers may help correctly classify CMV serology status.

Routine Infectious Disease Consultation Prior to an Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant.

Background: A transplant infectious disease (TID) assessment is essential to select recipients for an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and tailor prophylactic and empirical treatment recommendations. Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center study to describe our model of care based on a routine TID consultation prior to an allogeneic HCT between 2018 and 2022 in 292 adult (≥18-year-old) consecutive patients. We describe the performance of a TID consultation, arbitrarily defined as major (HCT postponement, procedure, cytomegalovirus [CMV] recipient serology reinterpretation) and minor interventions. Results: Overall, 765 interventions were observed in 257 of 292 (88%) patients: 88 of 765 (11.5%) major and 677 of 765 (88.5%) minor interventions. Among major interventions, HCT was postponed in 8 of 292 (2.7%) patients and a procedure was requested in 18 of 292 (6.2%) patients. The CMV recipient serostatus was changed from indeterminate/low-titer positive to negative in 60 of 292 (20.5%) patients. Among 677 minor interventions, there were 68 (8.8%) additional consultations with other services requested, 260 (33.7%) additional diagnostic tests requested, 102 (13.2%) additional treatments recommended, 60 (7.8%) non-CMV serology reinterpretations performed, 115 (14.9%) deviations from routine anti-infective prophylaxis, and 72 (9.3%) deviations from routine empirical antibiotic treatment recommendations in case of neutropenic fever. Conclusions: We are proposing a structured, clearly defined, and comprehensive pretransplant checklist for an effective assessment of infectious disease risks and complications prior to an allogeneic HCT. Further studies or experiences like ours could help to define a global strategy or new models of care to be implemented in HCT centers in the future.

Hepatitis E Virus Infection Epidemiology in Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant.

Among 292 recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (2018-2022), 64 (21.9%) tested positive for anti-hepatitis E virus (HEV) immunoglobulin G. Among 208 recipients tested by plasma/serum HEV polymerase chain reaction (2012-2022), 3 (1.4%) primary HEV infections were diagnosed; in 1 patient, plasma HEV polymerase chain reaction relapsed positive for 100 days. HEV infection remains rare albeit associated with persistent viral replication.

SARS-CoV-2 m-RNA Vaccine Response in Immunocompromised Patients: A Monocentric Study Comparing Cancer, People Living with HIV, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients and Lung Transplant Recipients.

Immunocompromised patients (ICPs) have a higher risk of developing severe forms of COVID-19 and experience a higher burden of complications and mortality than the general population. However, recent studies have suggested that the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines could be highly variable among different ICPs. Using a collaborative, monocentric, prospective cohort study, we assessed anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody titers following two and three doses of mRNA vaccines in four groups of ICPs (cancer [n = 232]: hematopoietic stem cell transplant [HSCT; n = 126] patients; people living with HIV [PLWH; n = 131]; and lung transplant [LT; n = 39] recipients) treated at Geneva University Hospitals; and healthy individuals (n = 49). After primo-vaccination, the highest anti-S antibody geometric mean titer (IU/mL) was observed in healthy individuals (2417 IU/mL [95% CI: 2327-2500]), the PLWH group (2024 IU/mL [95% CI:1854-2209]) and patients with cancer (840 IU/mL [95% CI: 625-1129]), whereas patients in the HSCT and LT groups had weaker antibody responses (198 IU/mL [95% CI: 108-361] and 7.3 IU/mL [95% CI: 2.5-22]). The booster dose conferred a high antibody response after 1 month in both PLWH (2500 IU/mL) and cancer patients (2386 IU/mL [95% CI: 2182-2500]), a moderate response in HSCT patients (521 IU/mL [95% CI: 306-885]) and a poor response in LT recipients (84 IU/mL [95% CI: 18-389]). Contemporary treatment with immunosuppressive drugs used in transplantation or chemotherapy was associated with a poor response to vaccination. Our findings confirmed the heterogeneity of the humoral response after mRNA vaccines among different ICPs and the need for personalized recommendations for each of these different groups.

CMV Infection After Letermovir Primary Prophylaxis Discontinuation in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients.

In this single-center study of 61 allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients receiving letermovir primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis for the first 100 days, we report 23% incidence of clinically significant CMV infection during the first 100 days after letermovir discontinuation, predominately in haploidentical HCT recipients, without any associations with CMV-DNAemia under letermovir.

Real-world experience of sorafenib maintenance after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for FLT3-ITD AML reveals high rates of toxicity-related treatment interruption.

Sorafenib significantly improves survival of FLT3-ITD mutated AML patients when used as a post-allogeneic HSCT maintenance. Importantly, clinical trials reported a low rate of toxicities requiring sorafenib discontinuation. The aim of our analysis was to evaluate the real-world experience in patients treated with post-allogeneic HSCT sorafenib maintenance therapy for FLT3-ITD AML with a particular focus on tolerability and toxicity-related treatment interruption. We conducted a single-center retrospective study on 30 FLT3-ITD AML patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT in complete remission between 2017 and 2020 and who received sorafenib maintenance. 26 patients (87%) experienced toxicities leading to dose reduction (n=9) or direct interruption (n=17). Average time on sorafenib was 125 days (range 1-765). Most common toxicities were skin, gastrointestinal, and hematologic. Among patients who had a dose reduction, 4 eventually interrupted the drug and 5 were able to continue. Among patients who interrupted sorafenib because of toxicities, 7 were re-challenged with good tolerance in 3 cases. Overall, 18 patients (60% of the entire cohort) definitively discontinued sorafenib because of toxicities. 14 patients were thereafter switched to midostaurin. Importantly, with a median follow-up of 12 months, the median overall survival was not reached suggesting a positive impact of sorafenib maintenance despite the high rates of treatment interruption. In conclusion, our real-world analysis reveals high rates of toxicity-related interruption of sorafenib maintenance after allogeneic HSCT. Interestingly, our results suggest the feasibility of re-challenging with sorafenib and/or of switching to other maintenance approaches in case of intolerance.

Salvage Treatment of Refractory HSV Oral Lesions with Pritelivir in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients.

We present two allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients (HCTr) treated with pritelivir for acyclovir-resistant/refractory (r/r) HSV infection based on the expanded access program of the pritelivir manufacturer. Outpatient treatment with pritelivir was administered, with partial response by week 1 of treatment and complete response by week 4 of treatment in both patients. No adverse events were noted. Pritelivir appears to be an effective and safe option for the management of acyclovir-r/r HSV infections in highly immunocompromised patients in an outpatient setting.

[Method and impact of allografts cryopreservation during the Covid-19 pandemic: guidelines from the SFGM-TC]. / Modalités et impact de la cryopréservation des greffons allogéniques en contexte pandémique : recommandations de la SFGM-TC.

The COVID-19 pandemic disorganized the allogeneic stem cell transplantation activities all over the world, with the necessity to cryopreserve allografts to secure the procedure for both the recipient and the donor. Cryopreservation, usually anecdotal, has been used by all the French speaking centers; data collected from 24 centers were assessed in order to determine the impact of cryopreservation on the quality of allografts. Our analysis clearly demonstrates that increasing transit time (more than 48hours) is deleterious for CD34+ recovery, legitimates the slight increase of the requested CD34+ cell dose with respect to the average recovery rate as well as the importance of the quality control on the infused product.

Defibrotide Shows Efficacy in the Prevention of Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Study.

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), also known as hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), is a well-known complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) associated with a mortality rate of up to 85%.  Defibrotide has shown efficacy in treatment of SOS/VOD. Moreover, evidence exists supporting the efficacy of defibrotide as SOS/VOD prophylaxis. We have previously reported our single center experience on 52 HSCT recipients receiving defibrotide as SOS/VOD prophylaxis, which has shown that the patients did not develop any SOS/VOD under this prophylaxis. The aim of the present study was to see if we can confirm the previous results, mainly on the decrease incidence of SOS/VOD, as well as improve event-free survival (EFS) on a larger study population. We extended our previous study in a single-center retrospective analysis to include 237 consecutive patients (248 transplantations) who underwent transplantation between 1999 and 2009 for hematological diseases and receiving intravenous defibrotide as prophylaxis. This cohort was compared to 241 patients (248 transplantations) treated before 1999 or after 2009 when defibrotide prophylaxis was not routinely used in our center. Median follow-up for the study group was 10 (range 2-16) years and for the control group 2.7 (range 1-18) years. None of the 237 patients in the defibrotide group developed SOS/VOD. The cumulative incidence (CI) of SOS/VOD was 0% in the defibrotide group as compared to 4.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-8%; P= .00046) in the control group. There was also a better 1-year EFS with 38% (95% CI, 32%-44%) in the defibrotide group versus 28% (95% CI, 22%-34%) (P= .00969) and decreased cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in the defibrotide group 31% (95% CI, 25%-37%) versus 42% (95% CI, 36%-48%) (P= .026). The 1-year overall survival, relapse incidence, and non-relapse mortality were not statistically different. Multivariable analysis, performed taking into account clinical factors known to influence the risk of SOS/VOD, confirmed the favorable impact of defibrotide on SOS/VOD (HR 1.38e-08 [95% CI, 3.28e-09-5.80e-08]; P< .00001). Conversely, multivariable analysis failed to confirm the impact of defibrotide on 1-year EFS or acute GvHD. This large retrospective study on SOS/VOD-prophylaxis with defibrotide suggests that this approach may be of benefit. These results need to be confirmed in a prospective randomized trial.

When and how do we stop antifungal treatment for an invasive mould infection in allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant recipients?

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist to describe end-of-treatment (EOT) parameters of antifungal therapy for invasive mould infections (IMI). METHODS: In a 10-year cohort of consecutive adult allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant recipients with proven/probable IMI, we describe treatment duration and patient profile at EOT. RESULTS: There were 61 patients with 66 proven/probable IMI identified: 47/66 (71%) invasive aspergillosis (IA), 11/66 (17%) mucormycosis, and 8/66 (12%) other-IMI. Excluding 5 (8%) patients lost to follow-up, treatment was prematurely discontinued due to death or palliative care in 29/56 (51.8%) patients. Antifungal treatment was completed in 27 (48.2%) patients, for a median duration of 280 days (IQR: 110, 809): 258 (IQR: 110, 1905) and 307.5 (99, 809) days in IA and non-IA IMI, respectively. Treatment was continued after 90 and 180 days in 43/56 (76.8%) and 30/56 (53.6%) patients, respectively. At EOT, most patients were not neutropenic (ANC: 2.12 G/L, IQR: 0.04, 5.3), with CD4+ counts at 99 cells/µl (IQR: 0, 759) and immunoglobulins at 5.6 g/L (IQR: 2.3, 10.6). Most patients (16/27, 59.3%) were not receiving steroids at EOT, while 14/27 (53.9%) were on another type of immunosuppression. Amongst 15 patients with imaging at EOT, 12 (80%) had complete/partial radiologic response. Any chart documentation or an infectious disease consultation on treatment discontinuation was observed in 12/56 (21%) and 11/56 (20%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Long treatment courses are observed in patients with IMI, due to prolonged immunosuppression. Although immune reconstitution and radiological response were frequently observed at EOT, consistent documentation of treatment discontinuation based on well-defined parameters is lacking.

Invasive Mold Infections in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients in 2020: Have We Made Enough Progress?

BACKGROUND: Despite progress in diagnostic, prevention, and treatment strategies, invasive mold infections (IMIs) remain the leading cause of mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients. METHODS: We describe the incidence, risk factors, and mortality of allo-HCT recipients with proven/probable IMI in a retrospective single-center 10-year (01/01/2010-01/01/2020) cohort study. RESULTS: Among 515 allo-HCT recipients, 48 (9.3%) patients developed 51 proven/probable IMI: invasive aspergillosis (IA; 34/51, 67%), mucormycosis (9/51, 18%), and other molds (8/51, 15%). Overall, 35/51 (68.6%) breakthrough IMIs (bIMIs) were identified: 22/35 (62.8%) IA and 13/35 (37.1%) non-IA IMI. One-year IMI cumulative incidence was 7%: 4.9% and 2.1% for IA and non-IA IMI, respectively. Fourteen (29.2 %), 10 (20.8%), and 24 (50.0%) patients were diagnosed during the first 30, 31-180, and >180 days post-HCT, respectively. Risk factors for IMI included prior allo-HCT (sub hazard ratio [SHR], 4.06; P = .004) and grade ≥2 acute graft-vs-host disease (aGvHD; SHR, 3.52; P < .001). All-cause 1-year mortality was 33% (170/515): 48% (23/48) and 31.5% (147/467) for patients with and without IMI (P = .02). Mortality predictors included disease relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 7.47; P < .001), aGvHD (HR, 1.51; P = .001), CMV serology-positive recipients (HR, 1.47; P = .03), and IMI (HR, 3.94; P < .001). All-cause 12-week mortality for patients with IMI was 35.4% (17/48): 31.3% (10/32) for IA and 43.8% (7/16) for non-IA IMI (log-rank P = .47). At 1 year post-IMI diagnosis, 70.8% (34/48) of the patients were dead. CONCLUSIONS: IA mortality has remained relatively unchanged during the last 2 decades. More than two-thirds of allo-HCT recipients with IMI die by 1 year post-IMI diagnosis. Dedicated intensified research efforts are required to further improve clinical outcomes.

Frequency and causes of antifungal treatment changes in allogeneic haematopoïetic cell transplant recipients with invasive mould infections.

BACKGROUND: Antifungal treatment duration and changes for invasive mould infections (IMI) have been poorly described. METHODS: We performed a 10-year cohort study of adult (≥18-year-old) allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant recipients with proven/probable IMI to describe the duration and changes of antifungal treatment. All-cause-12-week mortality was described. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients with 66 IMI were identified. Overall treatment duration was 157 days (IQR: 14-675) and 213 (IQR: 90-675) days for patients still alive by Day 84 post-IMI diagnosis. There was at least one treatment change in 57/66 (86.4%) cases: median 2, (IQR: 0-6, range:0-8). There were 179 antifungal treatment changes due to 193 reasons: clinical efficacy (104/193, 53.9%), toxicity (55/193, 28.5%), toxicity or drug interactions resolution (15/193, 7.8%) and logistical reasons (11/193, 5.7%) and 15/193 (7.8%) changes due to unknown reasons. Clinical efficacy reasons included lack of improvement (34/104, 32.7%), targeted treatment (30/104, 28.8%), subtherapeutic drug levels (14/104, 13.5%) and other (26/104, 25%). Toxicity reasons included hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, drug interactions, neurotoxicity and other in 24 (43.6%), 12 (21.8%), 12 (21.8%), 4 (7.4%) and 3 (5.5%) cases respectively. All-cause 12-week mortality was 31% (19/61), higher in patients whose antifungal treatment (logrank 0.04) or appropriate antifungal treatment (logrank 0.01) was started >7 days post-IMI diagnosis. All-cause 1-year mortality was higher in patients with ≥2 changes of treatment during the first 6 weeks post-IMI diagnosis (logrank 0.008) with an OR: 4.00 (p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IMI require long treatment courses with multiple changes for variable reasons and potential effects on clinical outcomes, demonstrating the need more effective and safer treatment options. Early initiation of appropriate antifungal treatment is associated with improved outcomes.