RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Many Knowledge Translation (KT) networks have been set up to support the improvement of research-based practices. However despite the deployment of KT networks, there is little empirical data on how they work. The Réseau national d’expertise en trouble du spectre de l’autisme (RNETSA) is the result of a ministerial initiative. OBJECTIVE AND METHOD: Its mission is to promote the evolution of autism practices and services in the education, early childhood, and health and social services sectors. The purpose of this article is to analyze the governance structure and KT strategy of the RNETSA in terms of its legitimacy. The study was based on a case study design combining a literature review and interviews. RESULTS: The results highlight the key components of 1) the governance structure (e.g., identification of a common need, formalization of bodies, allocation of resources) and 2) the KT strategy (e.g., knowledge dissemination, collaborations, increasing participation in activities). The discussion addresses a number of building blocks that could help strengthen the network’s legitimacy with a view to bringing it closer to its purpose. CONCLUSIONS: RNETSA has demonstrated a strong capacity to ensure its legitimacy in the autism KT ecosystem. The potential to influence public policy in the field of autism is also a key feature of RNETSA. To improve knowledge of RNETSA’s legitimacy, an evaluation of the effects of its KT activities would be necessary.
Assuntos
Transtorno Autístico , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica , Humanos , Transtorno Autístico/terapia , QuebequeRESUMO
Confronted with a wide range of digital health tools (DHT), professionals and patients need guidance to use these tools correctly and optimize health management. In the fall of 2020, a DHT library developed by Quebec-based company TherAppX was implemented in 22 institutions. The library was designed to enable healthcare professionals to use DHT in clinical care. The purpose of the current study was to assess the feasibility of implementing the library, including user experience, changes in DHT recommendation habits, and factors that helped or hindered the implementation process. A multi-methods design focusing on secondary use of quantitative data collected by TherAppX and semi-structured interviews with users was employed. While the quantitative analyses indicated infrequent use of the library, qualitative analyses highlighted several factors that hindered its implementation, including certain library and user characteristics and the unprecedented context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, the quantitative analyses confirmed interest in DHT and their usefulness during follow-ups. The results revealed a marginally significant pre-post changes in the frequency with which DHT were recommended. This study helped identify areas for improvements and indicates that further evaluation is needed. Future implementations would benefit from ensuring optimal conditions for a successful implementation.
Assuntos
Aplicativos Móveis , Pandemias , Humanos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Saúde Mental , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Atenção Primária à SaúdeRESUMO
To map the state of the existing literature to identify the optimal time frame between the arrival of refugees in a host country and psychosocial assessments. We conducted scoping review using the method of Arksey and O'Malley (2005). A systematic search of 5 databases including PubMed, Psycinfo (OVID), PsycINFO BD APA, Scopus and Web of Sciences) and grey literature identified 2698 references. Thirteen studies published between 2010 and 2021 were considered eligible. A data extraction grid was designed and tested by the research team. It is not so ease to identify the most appropriate time interval to assess the mental health of newly settled refugees. All the studies selected agree on the need to carry out an initial assessment when refugees arrive in their host country. Several authors agree on the need to carry out screening at least twice during the resettlement period. However, what is less clear is the best time to perform the second screening. This scoping review mainly helped in highlighting the lack of probing data on the mental health indicators focused on during the assessment and on the optimal timeline for the assessment of refugees. Further research is needed to determine whether developmental and psychological screening is beneficial, the right time to perform the screening, and the most appropriate collection instruments and interventions.
Assuntos
Saúde Mental , Refugiados , Humanos , Refugiados/psicologia , QuebequeRESUMO
Le Québec présente le taux de prescriptions d'antipsychotiques le plus élevé chez les personnes âgées de 65 ans et plus au Canada. La démarche « Optimiser les pratiques, les usages, les soins et les services - antipsychotiques ¼ (OPUS-AP) vise à pallier cet enjeu. Étant donné ses premiers résultats prometteurs, notre étude visait à identifier les déterminants de son succès. Elle repose sur un devis d'étude de cas regroupant une analyse documentaire et 21 entrevues auprès d'acteurs clés impliqués dans l'implantation. Les résultats mettent en lumière cinq déterminants centraux : 1) une démarche intégrée, collaborative et probante; 2) des communications et des réseaux au service de la démarche; 3) un climat d'implantation favorable aux changements; 4) un engagement et une implication des parties prenantes; et 5) une stratégie d'application des connaissances intégrée et appuyée. Des défis et recommandations pour assurer la pérennisation et la mise à l'échelle d'OPUS-AP et inspirer des démarches similaires sont identifiés.
RESUMO
In Quebec, nearly 3 persons still take their own lives every day, even though this number has been declining since 2000. Several institutional and community actors are involved in suicide prevention and several initiatives have contributed to the reduction of suicide rates. Despite this hard work, additional efforts are needed to intensify service offers and resource access to better reach people at risk of suicide not reached by actual services. For many years, several countries have been implementing digital technologies to reach them. In Quebec, there were delays in adoption of digital technologies for suicide prevention. In this context, the Health and Social services Ministry mandated Association québécoise de prévention du suicide (AQPS) to develop a Digital Strategy for Suicide Prevention (DSPS). From the beginning, AQPS wanted to anchor DSPS's development in a decision-making process based on scientific, contextual and experiential evidence. A process, derived from implementation science, was therefore put in place to actualize this intent. Implementation science is defined as the science of implementing programs in real-world settings. It is recognized as contributing to the successful implementation of new programs while promoting a rigorous evaluation of their impacts and outcomes. Objectives This article aims to: 1) present the process that was put in place to facilitate DSPS design, implementation, and evaluation; and 2) describe the DSPS action model and the DSPS. Method The Knowledge to Action (KTA) framework is central to the design, implementation, and evaluation of DSPS. This framework proposes a cyclical process in 7 iterative phases, each with its own methodological aspects and data collections Results The results section illustrates the concrete actions taken at each phase of the KTA process and the highlights that emerge from the analysis of the data collected. This section also presents the DSPS. Conclusion Optimal conditions to promote the implementation of DSPS, its use and its sustainability have been put in place. The current implementation and evaluation of this implementation and its impacts will allow to assess the capacity of DSPS to achieve its main objectives: to provide information about suicide, to identify suicidal individuals, to increase the visibility of resources, and to offer help to suicidal individuals who respond less to traditional resources.
Assuntos
Prevenção do Suicídio , Suicídio , Humanos , Quebeque , Ideação SuicidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Timely access in primary health care is one of the key issues facing health systems. Among many interventions developed around the world, advanced access is the most highly recommended intervention designed specifically to improve timely access in primary care settings. Based on greater accessibility linked with patients' relational continuity and informational continuity with a primary care professional or team, this organizational model aims to ensure that patients obtain access to healthcare services at a time and date convenient for them when needed regardless of urgency of demand. Its implementation requires a major organizational change based on reorganizing the practices of all the administrative staff and health professionals. In recent years, advanced access has largely been implemented in primary care organizations. However, despite its wide dissemination, we observe considerable variation in the implementation of the five guiding principles of this model across organizations, as well as among professionals working within the same organization. The main objective of this study is to assess the variation in the implementation of the five guiding principles of advanced access in teaching primary healthcare clinics across Quebec and to better understand the influence of the contextual factors on this variation and on outcomes. METHODS: This study will be based on an explanatory sequential design that includes 1) a quantitative survey conducted in 47 teaching primary healthcare clinics, and 2) a multiple case study using mixed data, contrasted cases (n = 4), representing various implementation profiles and geographical contexts. For each case, semi-structured interviews and focus group will be conducted with professionals and patients. Impact analyses will also be conducted in the four selected clinics using data retrieved from the electronic medical records. DISCUSSION: This study is important in social and political context marked by accessibility issues to primary care services. This research is highly relevant in a context of massive media coverage on timely access to primary healthcare and a large-scale implementation of advanced access across Quebec. This study will likely generate useful lessons and support evidence-based practices to refine and adapt the advanced access model to ensure successful implementation in various clinical contexts facing different challenges.