Should we vaccinate during an active rheumatic disease?

Timing of vaccination and its relationship with concomitant immunosuppressive therapy has been a matter of debate in the field of AutoImmune Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases (AIIRD). Vaccination is crucial in the prevention of infections, which, in the setting of AIIRD, are known risk factors for disease flare and expose patients to increase risk of complications and mortality. As evidenced from real-life studies, vaccines do not significantly affect disease activity. Conversely, disease activity (especially in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus) may predict for vaccine response: high disease activity correlates with decreased seroconversion. For this reason, according to the EULAR 2019 recommendation, vaccination should preferably be administered during quiescent AIIRD. Beside disease activity, background immunosuppressive therapy should be considered when performing vaccination, as different Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) decrease vaccine immunogenicity. AIIRD patients should be vaccinated, independently from the vaccine type, before starting immunosuppression. If the patient is on active immunosuppressive therapy, the best window of opportunity to boost vaccine response is during AIIRD quiescence, as low disease activity increases seroconversion and allows safe immunosuppressant spacing. In conclusion, the majority of AIIRD patients should receive vaccination, preferably during quiescent disease and taking into consideration immunosuppressant spacing.

Tapering and discontinuation of glucocorticoids in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tofacitinib.

Although the rapid onset of effect of glucocorticoids (GCs) allows rapid control of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) symptoms, their chronic use may be associated with several adverse events. The 2022 update of EUALR recommendations for the management of patients with RA suggests to reduce and discontinue oral GCs as quickly as possible. Considering GCs as a "bridging therapy" to promptly reduce symptoms and control inflammation, fast-acting drugs such as tofacitinib could allow faster and safer tapering of GCs. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the steroid-sparing effect of adding tofacitinib in patients with RA inadequately responsive to methotrexate taking concomitant GCs. In this open-label pilot study, we enrolled patients with moderate to severe RA on a stable dose of prednisone (5-12.5 mg/day) who started treatment with tofacitinib. After 1 month, in patients who achieved at least a moderate EULAR response (decrease of > 1.2 in DAS28_CRP), GCs was tapered according to a predetermined schedule until complete discontinuation at week 12. Disease activity was assessed after 4, 12, 24 and 48 weeks of treatment. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients discontinuing GCs after 12 weeks of tofacitinib treatment. We enrolled 30 patients (26 F: 4 M, mean age 60 ± 13 years, mean disease duration 13.2 ± 7.8 years). The primary endpoint was achieved: 9 patients (30%) discontinued GCs at week-12. At week-24, other 12 patients (46%) withdrew GCs. The median prednisone dose decreased from 5 mg/day (interquartile range 5-10 mg) to 2.5 (0-5) mg/day at week 12 and 48 (p < 0.00001 vs baseline). At week 48, 12 out of 30 patients (40%) had discontinued prednisone. The percentage of patients achieving remission or low disease activity increased throughout the follow-up without any difference between patients who discontinued or not the GC. In this cohort of long-standing RA patients treated with tofacitinib, the discontinuation of glucocorticoids was achievable in up to 30% of patients. These results should encourage rheumatologists to consider GCs tapering and discontinuation of GCs, as suggested by the 2022 EULAR recommendations, an achievable goal.

Effectiveness of non-medical switch from adalimumab bio-originator to SB5 biosimilar and from ABP501 adalimumab biosimilar to SB5 biosimilar in patients with chronic inflammatory arthropathies: a monocentric observational study.

OBJECTIVES: The use of biosimilars is constantly growing, prompting healthcare payers to encourage the switch to these drugs which are less expensive than the reference bio-originator. While switching from a bio-originator to a biosimilar is supported by increasing evidence, data on the switch between different biosimilars of the same reference product are scant. Our study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the non-medical switch both between adalimumab (ADA) bio-originator and SB5 biosimilar and between two different ADA biosimilars in patients with inflammatory chronic arthritis. METHODS: We observed adult patients with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) treated with ADA bio-originator or ABP501 ADA biosimilar (Amgevita) who switched to SB5 ADA biosimilar (Imraldi) for administrative/economic reasons. Patients were followed up for 4 months. RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients [33 RA, 40 PsA, 37 axSpA; F:M= 49:61; median age 56 years (25th-75th percentile 48-66)] switched from ADA bio-originator to SB5. After 4 months (T4), we observed a significant reduction of patients in remission/low disease activity (baseline 92.7% vs. T4 80.9%; p=0.009), with a risk of moderate-high disease activity significantly higher after the switch [RR 2.6 (95% IC 1.2 to 5.7), p=0.01]. However, no differences were found in DAS28-CRP, DAPSA, ASDAS-CRP, and BASDAI, while patients with RA and PsA experienced a worsening in the patient global assessment-VAS (p=0.04 and p=0.02, respectively), and in patients with PsA a worsening in HAQ was also observed (p=0.03). Forty patients switched from ABP501 biosimilar to SB5 [12 with RA, 25 with PsA, and 3 with axSpA; F:M=24:16; median age 56 years (25th-75th percentile 44-66)]. After 4 months, no differences in DAS28-CRP and DAPSA nor in the percentage of patients in remission/low disease activity were found compared to baseline. Likewise, no differences were found in patient-reported outcomes (PROs). CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide a reassuring profile of effectiveness when switching from ADA originator to one of its biosimilars and between two different biosimilars. However, the worse outcome in PROs in patients initially treated with the bio-originator addresses the attention to a possible nocebo response, which should encourage comprehensive communication with patients.

Relationship Between Gender Differences and Clinical Outcome in Patients With the Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), characterized by artherial and/or venous thrombosis, pregnancy morbidity and "antiphospholipid" antibodies (aPLs), is more common in women than in men, with a female to male ratio of about 3.5:1. Only few studies have investigated the clinical differences between male and female patients with APS. Therefore, this study was aimed to analyze the differences of clinical manifestations and laboratory tests, at diagnosis, between female and male APS patients and the clinical outcome. We enrolled 191 consecutive APS patients (125 with primary APS, PAPS, and 66 with secondary APS, SAPS) with a female predominant ratio of approximately 3:1 (142 vs 49). The prevalence of PAPS was higher in males than females (p<0.001). The analysis of aPL profile revealed that high IgM anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and high-medium IgG aCL titers were more frequent in males. In thrombotic APS peripheral arterial thrombosis was more common in male than female patients (p=0.049), as well as myocardial infarction (p=0.031). Multivariate analysis to correct for cardiovascular risk factors, high titer of aPLs and triple positivity for aPLs, revealed that the odds ratio for myocardial infarction in male was 3.77. Thus, APS may be considered as a disease in which serological (IgM titer) and clinical profiles are influenced by gender.

Lack of cross-reactivity between rheumatoid factor IgM and anti-S1 receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 IgM: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: Since the onset of the COVID-19 outbreak, concern has been raised about reliability of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests in people with serum positivity for rheumatoid factor (RF), due to its ability to interfere during tests carried out with immunoassay techniques, leading to false positive results. The aim of this study was to analyse, on sera from RF seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, the interference between RF IgM and anti-S1 RBD IgM. METHODS: The study was conducted on consecutive patients affected by RF seropositive RA and, as control group, COVID-19 patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia hospitalised at Sapienza University of Rome from April 2020 and April 2021. Serum samples from COVID-19 patients during their hospitalisation were collected, while RA subjects' samples were harvested prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. All samples were tested for RF IgM using nephelometry and ELIA, and for anti-S1 RBD IgM by ELISA. RESULTS: Forty RF seropositive RA and 42 COVID-19 patients were enrolled. In all RA patients, both nephelometric assay and ELIA showed RF IgM positivity, while only one patient of the control group tested positive for RF IgM by nephelometric assay and ELIA. IgM directed to S1 RBD were not detected in sera of RA patients, while all COVID-19 patients presented anti-S1 RBD IgM (median anti-S1 RBD IgM COVID-19 vs. RA: 368.5 IU/mL, IQR 654 IU/mL vs. 18.45 IU/mL, IQR 20 IU/mL; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the lack of cross-reactivity between RF and anti-S1 RBD IgM, offering to clinicians a valuable tool for a better management of RA patients undergoing SARSCoV-2 serological tests.

Hydroxychloroquine cardiotoxicity: a case-control study comparing patients with COVID-19 and patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: Antimalarials have been associated with QT prolongation in COVID-19 patients but are generally safe in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).We compared the prevalence of QTc prolongation between COVID-19 and SLE patients treated with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). METHODS: We included patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by nasopharyngeal swab and patients taking HCQ for SLE. A prolonged QTc was defined as an increase in QTc intervals >60 ms (compared with baseline) or as a QTc of ≥500 ms. We performed the univariate and multivariate logistic regression to investigate the risk factors for QTc prolongation in COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: We enrolled 58 COVID-19 patients (median age 70.5 years, IQR 25), grouped into group A (patients with HCQ) group B (patients with HCQ + azithromycin) and group C (not received either drug). Fifty (26%) COVID-19 patients presented a QTc prolongation (12 QTc≥500 ms, 3 patients ΔQTc>60 ms). We did not find any differences in QTc prolongation among the three treatment groups. Baseline QTc (OR 111.5) and D-dimer (OR 78.3) were independently associated to QTc prolongation. Compared to the 50 SLE patients (median age 38.5 years, IQR 22), chronically treated with HCQ, COVID-19 patients showed significantly longer QTc (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study demonstrating that, unlike COVID-19 patients, patients with SLE are not susceptible to HCQ-induced long QT syndrome and arrhythmia. The combined arrhythmogenic effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection and HCQ could account for the excess of QTc prolongation and fatal arrhythmias described in patients with COVID-19.

Carbamylation of ß2-glycoprotein I generates new autoantigens for antiphospholipid syndrome: a new tool for diagnosis of 'seronegative' patients.

OBJECTIVES: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a prothrombotic condition defined by recurrent thrombosis, pregnancy complications and circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), including anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (ß2-GPI). In clinical practice it is possible to find patients with APS persistently negative for the aPL tests according to Sydney criteria ('seronegative APS', SN-APS). Recently, several autoimmune responses have been described as a consequence of post-translational modifications of their target autoantigens. This study was undertaken to test carbamylated-ß2-GPI (Carb-ß2-GPI) as a new autoantigen of APS. METHODS: ß2-GPI was carbamylated by potassium cyanate and used to investigate its effect on monocyte-derived dendritic cell (moDC) phenotype and function. Sera from 114 SN-APS patients, 60 APS, 20 patients with RA, 20 non-APS thrombosis and 50 healthy donors were analysed for anti-Carb-ß2-GPI by ELISA. RESULTS: Carb-ß2-GPI is able to activate moDCs, inducing upregulation of CD80, CD86 and CD40, activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and nuclear factor-κB, and IL-12p70 release. Serological results showed that both 37/114 SN-APS (32.46%) and 23/60 APS (38.33%) patients resulted positive for anti-Carb-ß2-GPI. Interestingly, SN-APS patients who tested positive for anti-Carb-ß2-GPI showed a higher prevalence of thrombocytopenia (P = 0.04, likelihood positive ratio of 3.9). CONCLUSION: Data obtained from both functional tests on moDCs and immunological approaches prompted identification of Carb-ß2-GPI as a 'new' antigenic target in APS. In particular, anti-Carb-ß2-GPI revealed a potential usefulness in identification of a significant proportion of SN-APS patients. Moreover, since patients who tested positive for anti-Carb-ß2-GPI reported a high risk of thrombocytopenia, this test may be considered a suitable approach in the clinical evaluation of SN-APS.

'Non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies': bridging the gap between seropositive and seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to analyse the prevalence of non-criteria anti-phospholipid (aPL) antibodies and their role in the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis in a cohort of patients with clinical features consistent with a diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), but persistently negative for criteria aPL - anti-cardiolipin antibodies (aCL), anti-ß2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aß2-GPI) and lupus anticoagulant (LA) - named seronegative APS (SN-APS). METHODS: Sera from SN-APS patients were tested for aCL by TLC-immunostaining, anti-vimentin/cardiolipin (aVim/CL) and anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (anti-PS/PT) by ELISA. Control groups of our study were APS patients and healthy controls. RESULTS: We enrolled 114 consecutive SN-APS patients, 69 (60.5%) resulted positive for at least one non-criteria test in two occasions 12 weeks apart. Among the persistently positive patients to these tests, 97% resulted positive for aCL by TLC-immunostaining, 52.3% for aVim/CL and 17.4% for aPS/PT. SN-APS patients with double positivity (aCL by TLC-immunostaining and aVim/CL) showed a likelihood positive ratio of 8 to present mixed thrombotic and obstetrical features. Among SN-APS patients tested positive, after the therapeutic changes, three cases of recurrent thrombosis were observed [median follow-up 41 months (IQR 39.5)]. Twenty pregnancies were recorded in 17 SN-APS patients after the detection of unconventional aPL and 12 of them (60%) experienced a good outcome under conventional treatment for APS. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest monocentric study demonstrating that aCL tested by TLC-immunostaining and aVim/CL can detect aPL positivity in SN-APS. It may encourage clinicians to monitor and provide adequate targeted therapy, which improve SN-APS prognosis.

The role of musculoskeletal ultrasound in predicting the response to JAK inhibitors: results from a monocentric cohort.

OBJECTIVES: In this longitudinal study, we assessed the role of musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) in predicting the efficacy of JAK inhibitors (JAKi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: We enrolled RA patients starting baricitinib or tofacitinib. All patients were evaluated at baseline and after 4, 12, 24, 48 weeks. Disease activity was calculated by Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28CRP); US examination in 22 joints (I-V MCPs and PIPs, wrists) aimed at evaluating inflammatory features (synovial effusion and hypertrophy, power Doppler-PD), scored through a semi-quantitative scale (0-3). The total US (0-198) and PD (0-66) scores were calculated. We scanned bilateral flexor (I-V fingers of hands) and extensor compartments (1-6) tendons: tenosynovitis was scored as absent/present (0/1), resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 22. RESULTS: We studied 102 patients (M/F 15/87; median age 59.2 years, IQR 17.75; median disease duration 144 months, IQR 126), 61 treated with baricitinib and 41 with tofacitinib. At baseline, the median total US score was 18 (IQR 19) and the median PD score 2 (4). We observed a significant reduction in both total and PD US scores at all time-points (p<0.0001). At baseline, 75.4% of patients showed tenosynovitis involving at least one tendon, with a median score of 2 (IQR 3.5) significantly decreasing after 24 weeks (p=0.02). At multivariate analysis, PD and tenosynovitis score significantly correlated with changes in DAS28CRP. CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirmed the early efficacy of JAKi in RA patients by using US evaluation. Furthermore, we found that power Doppler and tenosynovitis scores could play a predictive role in response to treatment.

Independent Validation of Sepsis Index for Sepsis Screening in the Emergency Department.

(1) Background: The early detection of sepsis is still challenging, and there is an urgent need for biomarkers that could identify patients at a high risk of developing it. We recently developed an index, namely the Sepsis Index (SI), based on the combination of two CBC parameters: monocyte distribution width (MDW) and mean monocyte volume (MMV). In this study, we sought to independently validate the performance of SI as a tool for the early detection of patients at a high risk of sepsis in the Emergency Department (ED). (2) Methods: We enrolled all consecutive patients attending the ED with a request of the CBC. MDW and MMV were measured on samples collected in K3-EDTA tubes on the UniCel DxH 900 haematology analyser. SI was calculated based on the MDW and MMV. (3) Results: We enrolled a total of 703 patients stratified into four subgroups according to the Sepsis-2 criteria: control (498), infection (105), SIRS (52) and sepsis (48). The sepsis subgroup displayed the highest MDW (median 27.5, IQR 24.6-32.9) and SI (median 1.15, IQR 1.05-1.29) values. The ROC curve analysis for the prediction of sepsis showed a good and comparable diagnostic accuracy of the MDW and SI. However, the SI displayed an increased specificity, positive predictive value and positive likelihood ratio in comparison to MDW alone. (4) Conclusions: SI improves the diagnostic accuracy of MDW for sepsis screening.

Anti-vimentin/cardiolipin IgA in the anti-phospholipid syndrome: A new tool for 'seronegative' diagnosis.

Anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder defined by the simultaneous presence of vascular clinical events, pregnancy morbidity and anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL). In clinical practice, it is possible to find patients with APS who are persistently negative for the routine aPL tests (seronegative APS; SN-APS). Recently, the identification of aPL immunoglobulin (Ig)A and/or anti-ß2-glycoprotein-I (ß2-GPI) IgA was shown to represent a further test in SN-APS patients. In this study we analyzed the presence of anti-vimentin/cardiolipin (aVim/CL) IgA in a large cohort of patients with SN-APS, evaluating their possible association with clinical manifestations of the syndrome. This study includes 60 consecutive SN-APS patients, 30 patients with APS and 40 healthy donors. aVim/CL IgA were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results show that 12 of 30 APS patients (40%) and 16 of 60 SN-APS patients (26.7%) resulted positive for aVim/CL IgA. Interestingly, SN-APS patients who tested positive for aVim/CL IgA showed a higher prevalence of arterial thrombosis (p = 0.017, likelihood positive ratio = 5.7). This study demonstrates for the first time, to our knowledge, the presence of aVim/CL IgA in sera of patients with APS. In particular, they revealed a potential usefulness in identification of a significant proportion of SN-APS patients. Moreover, as patients tested positive for aVim/CL IgA reported a high likelihood ratio to have the clinical features of APS, this test may be considered a suitable approach in the clinical evaluation of SN-APS.

Comprehensive disease control in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated a monocentric SLE cohort in order to assess the frequency of Lupus comprehensive disease control (LupusCDC), a condition defined by the achievement of remission and the absence of damage progression. METHODS: Our longitudinal analysis included SLE patients with 5-years follow-up and at least one visit per year. Disease activity was assessed by SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and three different remission levels were evaluated (Complete Remission, CR; Clinical remission off-corticosteroids; clinical remission on-corticosteroids). Chronic damage was assessed according to SLICC Damage Index (SDI). LupusCDC was defined as remission achievement for at least one year plus absence of chronic damage progression in the previous one year. A machine learning based analysis was carried out, applying and comparing Nonlinear Support Vector Machines (SVM) models and Decision Trees (DT), whereas features ranking was performed with the ReliefF algorithm. RESULTS: We evaluated 172 patients [M/F 16/156, median age 49 years (IQR 16.7), median disease duration 180 months (IQR 156)]. SDI values (baseline mean±SD 0.7 ± 1.1) significantly increased during the follow-up period. In all time-points analyzed, LupusCDC including CR was the most frequently detected. The failure to reach this condition was significantly associated with renal involvement and with the intake of immunosuppressant drugs and glucocorticoid (GC). Ten patients (5.8%) have maintained LupusCDC during the whole 5-year follow-up: these patients had never presented renal involvement and showed lower prevalence of anti-phospholipid antibodies (p = 0.0001). Finally, the prevalence of GC intake was significantly lower (p = 0.0001). The application of machine learning models showed that the available features were able to provide significant information to build predictive models with an AUC score of 0.703 ± 0.02 for DT and 0.713 ± 0.02 for SVM. CONCLUSIONS: Our data on a monocentric cohort suggest that the LupusCDC can efficaciously merge into one outcome SLE-related disease activity and chronic damage in order to perform an all-around evaluation of SLE patients.

Effectiveness and safety of baricitinib in rheumatoid arthritis: a monocentric, longitudinal, real-life experience.

OBJECTIVES: Baricitinib is a Janus-kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor, approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). We report the first real-life experience with baricitinib in a monocentric cohort of unselected RA patients. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive RA patients starting baricitinib. At baseline and after 4, 12, 24 and 48 weeks we assessed the disease activity by composite indices (SDAI, CDAI and DAS28CRP) and ultrasonography, and we recorded any adverse events. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving SDAI remission at week 4. RESULTS: We enrolled 59 patients [(F:M = 50:9, median age 58.1 years (IQR 12.8), median disease duration 144 (IQR 150) months] treated with baricitinib in combination with a csDMARD (52.5%) or monotherapy (47.5%) for a median follow-up of 24 weeks (IQR 36). The 12-month drug retention rate was 74%. At weeks 4, 12, 24 and 48 we observed a significant reduction of DAS28, CDAI and SDAI, global health and pain (p<0.001 for all). After 4 weeks of treatment, 12% of patients achieved SDAI remission. Concomitant csDMARDs, previous biological DMARDs, gender, seropositivity and BMI did not affect the efficacy of baricitinib. Baricitinib allowed a significant reduction in prednisone dose after 12 and 24 weeks and a rapid and sustained ultrasound improvement. No serious adverse events, serious infections or cardiovascular events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the efficacy and safety profile and rapid onset of the effect of baricitinib in RA patients in a real-life setting.

COVID-19 and systemic sclerosis: analysis of lifestyle changes during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in an Italian single-center cohort.

The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 has changed the habits and lives of people worldwide. Patients affected by systemic sclerosis (SSc) experienced constant fear because of their immunocompromised status. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and to analyze the lifestyle changes in a single-center cohort of SSc patients and if these changes were more severe than in the general population. During the Italian lockdown, we supplied two surveys to our 184 SSc patients. In the first one, filled by 110 patients, we asked if SARS-CoV-2 had infected them or if they experienced signs and symptoms consistent with COVID-19. The second survey, performed by 79 SSc patients and 63 healthy subjects, included questions about the lifestyle adopted during this specific period. Among our patients, COVID-19 was diagnosed only in one case, while three other subjects reported signs and symptoms suggestive for the disease. Regarding the second survey, our patients greatly changed their lifestyle during the pandemic, adopting more restrictive isolation measures, because of their awareness of frailty. To date, we do not dispose of enough data to speculate about the risk of COVID-19 among immunocompromised patients, although in our SSc patients their frailty seems to have been their shelter. Pending more accurate epidemiological studies, it is essential to share as much data as possible to better understand the impact of COVID-19 on SSc patients' health. Key points • The lifestyle adopted by SSc patients during the first months of COVID-19 pandemic was characterized by more stringent isolation rules than general population. • The prudential behavior of patients with SSc during Italian lockdown should be considered as a possible bias when analyzing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 disease in these subjects, as well as a protective factor against infection.

Reference interval of monocyte distribution width (MDW) in healthy blood donors.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to accurately establish the reference interval (RI) of monocyte distribution width (MDW) in healthy blood donors by the direct method using different statistical approaches. METHODS: MDW was measured in 486 subjects. RI of MDW was calculated by the non-parametric method, the robust method and, the Harrell-Davis bootstrap method and using different tests to identify potential outliers (Dixon-Reed and Tukey). RESULTS: Lower and upper reference limits of the RI calculated by the non-parametric method were, 16.22 (90%CI 15.78-16.47) - 23.15 (90%CI 22.80-24.10) (without outlier removal), and 16.44 (90%CI 16.21-16.67) - 22.99 (90%CI 22.33-23.22) (after outlier removal). The RIs based on the robust method were, respectively, 16.29-22.98 (without) and 16.50-22.67 (with outlier removal). Finally, the RIs calculated by the Harrell-Davis bootstrap method, without or after outlier removal, were 16.19-23.24 and 16.43-22.93. Thus, the RIs obtained by the three calculation methods were very similar. Additionally, no RI partition was done since no significant gender or age association was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the use of a unique RI of MDW, independently of sex and age.

Monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a screening tool for sepsis in the Emergency Department.

Objectives The diagnosis of sepsis in the Emergency Department (ED) is challenging and a reliable biomarker is needed. The current study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of monocyte distribution width (MDW) for the early identification of sepsis in the ED. Methods We performed a large observational study including consecutive adult patients (≥18 years of age) presenting to the ED between September and November 2019, with an order for complete blood count (CBC) evaluation. A total of 2,215 patients were enrolled and classified based on Sepsis-2 criteria as the control group (1,855), infection group (172), Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) group (100), and sepsis group (88). Results MDW levels were higher in patients with sepsis than in all other groups (p<0.001). ROC curve analysis showed an optimal diagnostic accuracy of MDW for sepsis prediction at a cut-off point of 23.5, with an AUC of 0.964, sensitivity and specificity of 0.920 and 0.929, respectively. Conclusions Our findings encourage further investigation to validate the use of MDW as a screening tool for the early identification of patients at risk of sepsis in the ED.

Does seronegative obstetric APS exist? "pro" and "cons".

Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is the commonest treatable cause of recurrent miscarriage and pharmacological treatment of pregnant patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) should aim at preventing obstetric complications and maternal thrombotic events. Conventional treatment for patients with an established diagnosis of obstetric APS (OAPS), generally resulting in over 70-80% successful pregnancies. Since seropositive (SP)-APS and seronegative (SN)-APS patients had shown similar clinical profiles, patients with SN- OAPS, as well as SP-OAPS, should receive combined treatment in order to improve the pregnancy prognosis; indeed, current standard of care increased good pregnancy outcome in SN-APS, with similar effect to confirmed APS. The above data suggest that there are patients with the clinical manifestations of OAPS but persistently negative to conventional aPL that need to be identified to ensure adequate therapy and therefore a better prognosis. The clinical utility of non-criteria aPL in the diagnosis of SN-APS is still a matter of debate. In the last decade more and more studies have reported the presence of patients suffering from SN-APS in which non-conventional ("non-criteria") aPL might be present or antibodies may be detected using methodological approaches different from the traditional assays. To improve test standardization large prospective, multicenter, and multinational studies are needed. Therefore, when assessing a patient with clinical manifestations consistent with OAPS but aPL negative using the conventional available assays, the clinician should consider the possibility that the patient is affected with SN-APS.