RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Six thoracic pathologists reviewed 259 lung neuroendocrine tumours (LNETs) from the lungNENomics project, with 171 of them having associated survival data. This cohort presents a unique opportunity to assess the strengths and limitations of current World Health Organization (WHO) classification criteria and to evaluate the utility of emerging markers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were diagnosed based on the 2021 WHO criteria, with atypical carcinoids (ACs) defined by the presence of focal necrosis and/or 2-10 mitoses per 2 mm2. We investigated two markers of tumour proliferation: the Ki-67 index and phospho-histone H3 (PHH3) protein expression, quantified by pathologists and automatically via deep learning. Additionally, an unsupervised deep learning algorithm was trained to uncover previously unnoticed morphological features with diagnostic value. RESULTS: The accuracy in distinguishing typical from ACs is hampered by interobserver variability in mitotic counting and the limitations of morphological criteria in identifying aggressive cases. Our study reveals that different Ki-67 cut-offs can categorise LNETs similarly to current WHO criteria. Counting mitoses in PHH3+ areas does not improve diagnosis, while providing a similar prognostic value to the current criteria. With the advantage of being time efficient, automated assessment of these markers leads to similar conclusions. Lastly, state-of-the-art deep learning modelling does not uncover undisclosed morphological features with diagnostic value. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the mitotic criteria can be complemented by manual or automated assessment of Ki-67 or PHH3 protein expression, but these markers do not significantly improve the prognostic value of the current classification, as the AC group remains highly unspecific for aggressive cases. Therefore, we may have exhausted the potential of morphological features in classifying and prognosticating LNETs. Our study suggests that it might be time to shift the research focus towards investigating molecular markers that could contribute to a more clinically relevant morpho-molecular classification.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Tumores Neuroendócrinos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/classificação , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/patologia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/classificação , Feminino , Antígeno Ki-67/metabolismo , Masculino , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Organização Mundial da Saúde , Histonas/metabolismo , Idoso , Prognóstico , Aprendizado ProfundoRESUMO
The worldwide incidence of pulmonary carcinoids is increasing, but little is known about their molecular characteristics. Through machine learning and multi-omics factor analysis, we compare and contrast the genomic profiles of 116 pulmonary carcinoids (including 35 atypical), 75 large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC), and 66 small-cell lung cancers. Here we report that the integrative analyses on 257 lung neuroendocrine neoplasms stratify atypical carcinoids into two prognostic groups with a 10-year overall survival of 88% and 27%, respectively. We identify therapeutically relevant molecular groups of pulmonary carcinoids, suggesting DLL3 and the immune system as candidate therapeutic targets; we confirm the value of OTP expression levels for the prognosis and diagnosis of these diseases, and we unveil the group of supra-carcinoids. This group comprises samples with carcinoid-like morphology yet the molecular and clinical features of the deadly LCNEC, further supporting the previously proposed molecular link between the low- and high-grade lung neuroendocrine neoplasms.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Tumor Carcinoide/genética , Carcinoma de Células Grandes/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Tumor Carcinoide/mortalidade , Tumor Carcinoide/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Grandes/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Grandes/patologia , Hibridização Genômica Comparativa , Conjuntos de Dados como Assunto , Feminino , Genômica , Proteínas de Homeodomínio/genética , Humanos , Peptídeos e Proteínas de Sinalização Intracelular/genética , Pulmão/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Aprendizado de Máquina , Masculino , Proteínas de Membrana/genética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas do Tecido Nervoso/genética , Prognóstico , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/patologia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Provider report cards: Are they worth the paper they're printed on? Health plans and medical groups in California have begun releasing outcomes and service "report cards" in order to gain a competitive advantage in a crowded marketplace. Some observers charge that vagaries in reporting methodology are more likely to lead to confusion than enlightenment among patients and payers. However, a new initiative will develop standardized data analysis and reporting methods.