Sensitization properties of acetophenone azine, a new skin sensitizer identified in textile.

BACKGROUND: Acetophenone azine (CAS no. 729-43-1) present in sports equipment (shoes, socks and shin pads) has been suspected to induce skin allergies. Twelve case reports of allergy in children and adults from Europe and North America were published between 2016 and 2021. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to confirm that acetophenone azine is indeed a skin sensitizer based on in vitro/ in vivo testings derived from the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) built for skin sensitization by OECD in 2012. METHODS: Acetophenone azine was tested in vitro according to the human cell line activation test (h-CLAT) and the ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase Test (KeratinoSens) and in vivo using the Local Lymph Nodes Assay (LLNA). RESULTS: Both the h-CLAT and the KeratinoSens were positive whereas the LLNA performed at 5, 2.5 and 1% (wt/vol) of acetophenone azine, was negative. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, acetophenone azine was considered as a skin sensitizer. This was recently confirmed by its classification under the CLP regulation.

DNA damage and DNA adduct formation in rat tissues following oral administration of acrylamide.

Acrylamide is present as a contaminant in the human diet in heated food products. It has been found to be carcinogenic in laboratory rats and has been classified as probably carcinogenic in humans. In order to clarify the possible involvement of a primary genotoxic mechanism in acrylamide-induced carcinogenicity, both the presence of DNA damage, measured by the comet assay, and the formation of N7-(2-carbamoyl-2-hydroxyethyl)guanine (N7-GA-Gua) and N3-(2-carbamoyl-2-hydroxyethyl)adenine (N3-GA-Ade), derived from reaction of the active metabolite glycidamide (GA) with the DNA, analyzed by LC/MS/MS, were assessed in selected rat tissues. Rats were administered with single oral doses of acrylamide (18, 36 or 54 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) and the organs (blood leukocytes, brain, bone marrow, liver, testes and adrenals) were sampled at different times after treatment. Results from GA-induced DNA adduct measurements indicated a relatively even organ distribution of the adducts in brain, testes and liver. Organ-specificity in acrylamide carcinogenesis can therefore not be explained by a selective accumulation of GA-DNA adducts in the target organs, at least not after a single dose exposure. The DNA adduct profiles and half-lives were similar in the different organs; except that the N3-GA-Ade adduct was more rapidly removed from tissues than the N7-GA-Gua adduct. Increased extent of DNA migration, as measured by the in vivo rat comet assay, was found in brain and testes, and these specific results seem to be in accordance with the known organ-specificity in acrylamide carcinogenesis in rat. Only weak and transient DNA damage was recorded in the liver, bone marrow and adrenals. The DNA-damaging effect of the compound observed in the blood leukocytes could be a simple biomarker of acrylamide exposure and genotoxicity.

Matrix metalloproteinase 3 polymorphism: a predictive factor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Treatment of head and neck cancer often associates different therapeutic modalities, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. In an attempt to optimize therapeutics, the identification of molecular markers linked to response to chemotherapy remains important. Recently, the involvement of metalloproteinases in resistance to chemotherapy was suggested through their interaction with the Fas/Fas ligand pathway. Indeed metalloproteinases enhance Fas ligand shedding modulating chemotherapy efficiency. On the basis of these findings, we tested the existence of a correlation between response to chemotherapy and four metalloproteinase polymorphisms in a prospective series of 148 head and neck cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients were genotyped using automated fragment analysis and 5'-nuclease allelic discrimination assay. Response to chemotherapy was clinically assessed without knowledge of the genotype status. RESULTS: A significant relation between the metalloproteinase type 3 (MMP3) -1612insA polymorphism and response to chemotherapy was identified. Indeed, patients with the 6A/6A genotype responded more frequently (86%) to treatment as compared with patients with the 5A/6A (65%) or 5A/5A (55%) genotypes (P = 0.04). A multivariate analysis, including tumor stage, gender, TP53 mutations, and MMP3 polymorphism, showed that the 6A/6A genotype was an independent factor of response to 5-fluorouracil-cisplatin chemotherapy in head and neck cancer patients with an odds ratio of 6.7 as compared with the 5A/5A genotype. CONCLUSIONS: This work showed that genotyping the MMP3 gene enhancer polymorphism -1612insA could help predict chemosensitivity in head and neck cancer patients.