"Coke's not a food": A critical discourse analysis of sugar-sweetened beverage tax acceptability by white residents from an upper-middle class neighborhood in Winnipeg Manitoba.

Increasing concerns about the health impacts of sugar consumption has led to the proposition of a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax in Canada. However, competing concerns related to stigma and equity remain and have not been explored in a Canadian context. As part of a broader study examining the perspectives of various populations on SSB tax acceptability, we examined how residents of an upper-middle class neighborhood conceptualize SSB tax acceptability, and we explored the discourses that inform their discussion. We conducted and analyzed qualitative, semi-structured interviews with residents of an upper-middle class neighborhood in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Recruitment criteria were residence, adults, and English speaking. Critical discourse analysis methodology was used, and healthism (health moralism) and tax psychology informed the analysis. Eighteen participants volunteered: 15 females and 3 males; all self-identified as white, and all spoke about (grand)parenting. Healthist discourse was utilized in supportive discussion of SSB taxation. With the mobilization of healthism, ideal citizens and parents were described as "health conscious" and those who might be likely to reduce SSB intake because of taxation. Healthism also contributed to their identification of beverages targeted by a tax, versus those they deemed as having redeeming nutritional qualities. Limits to SSB tax support were expressed as fairness concerns, with a focus on the procedural justice of the tax. Participants supported SSB taxation and the discourses they employed suggested support for the tax was perceived as contributing to their construction of the kind of ideal, health-valuing citizens they hoped to embody. However, participants were also concerned about the fairness of implementation, although this did not outweigh the prioritization of good health.

Perceptions of Beverages With Non-nutritive Sweeteners Among Indigenous Adults Living in Manitoba and Implications for Type 2 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to explore the perspectives of Indigenous adults on consuming beverages with non-nutritive sweeteners. METHODS: In this work, we used a community-based, participatory design in partnership with National Indigenous Diabetes Association, Four Arrows Regional Health Authority, and Fearless R2W. We conducted 74 qualitative interviews with Indigenous adults living in Manitoba, including Island Lake First Nations (n=39), Flin Flon (n=15), and the North End neighbourhood of Winnipeg (n=20). Data were indexed in NVivo, and transcripts were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Participants exclusively discussed beverages with non-nutritive sweeteners (BNNSs) as an alternative to regular pop or sugary drinks, which were widely available, accessible, and consumed. Why or how BNNSs were viewed as an alternative comprised 3 subthemes: an alternative for health reasons; divergent taste preferences; and an alternative with mysterious but negative health effects. Participants who reported regular consumption of BNNSs largely described consuming them to manage type 2 diabetes. Fewer participants discussed BNNS as a means of weight management or as a preventive health behaviour. Participants who did not report regular BNNS consumption described not liking the taste of BNNSs. Finally, many participants described negative health impacts of consuming BNNSs, and specifically aspartame, although few articulated what those negative impacts were. CONCLUSIONS: Divergent perspectives among Indigenous adults regarding the health implications of consuming BNNSs may reflect ongoing scholarly debates. These findings have implications for the prevention and dietary management of type 2 diabetes in Indigenous communities.

Predictors of Tri-council Funding Among Nutrition Researchers in Canada.

Purpose: Barriers in research for women and dietitians have been documented. We sought to describe tri-council funding awarded within the nutrition discipline according to institution type, academic rank, gender, dietitian status, and primary research methods used.Methods: Using an online search methodology, faculty members with research appointments were identified from nutrition departments offering accredited dietetic programs and/or at Canada's collective of research-intensive universities known as U15. All data regarding faculty members, their institutions, and funding were collected through publicly available websites and Scopus. Tri-council funding associated with the nominated principal investigator, from a 5-year period, 2013-2014 to 2017-2018, was extracted. Binary logistic regression was used to test for predictors of receiving any tri-council operating funds within the 5-year period.Results: Faculty members (n = 237) from 21 institutions were identified for inclusion. Those from U15 institutions, at the full professor rank, nondietitians, men, and those who engaged in primarily quantitative research methods (vs. qualitative or mixed-methods) were significantly more likely to hold any tri-council funding during the eligible period. Dietitians (n = 76) were significantly less likely to hold tri-council funding, independent of institution, rank, gender, and primary research methods utilized.Conclusions: The apparent under-funding of academic dietitians from federal tri-council sources requires exploration.

Policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in the Manitoba grocery sector: a qualitative analysis of media, organizational communications, and key informant interviews.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted all aspects of the food system, including the retail grocery sector. We sought to (objective 1) document and (objective 2) analyze the policies implemented in the grocery sector during the first wave of the pandemic in Manitoba, Canada. METHODS: Our qualitative policy analysis draws from organizational communications (websites and social media) (n = 79), news media articles (n = 95), and key informant interviews with individuals (n = 8) working within the grocery sector in urban and rural, Manitoba. Media and communications were extracted between March 9-May 8, 2020 and interviews were conducted in July-August, 2020. RESULTS: Newly implemented policies due to the pandemic fell under four inter-related themes: Employee health and wellbeing, Safety measures, Operational measures, and Community support. Employee health and wellbeing included sub-themes of financial and social support, health recommendations and protocols, and new employee guidelines. Safety measures encompassed numerous policies pertaining to sanitation, personal protection, transmission prevention, physical distancing, and limiting access. Overall, new policies were discussed as effective in making grocery shopping as safe as possible given the situation. Compliance and enforcement, employee teamwork, and support for employees were key themes related to perceptions of policy success in a challenging and inequitable context. Nevertheless, government support and communication was needed as well to ensure safety within the grocery sector. CONCLUSIONS: The grocery sector reacted to the pandemic with the swift implementation of policies to address food supply issues, prevent transmission of the virus, support their employees as essential workers, and better serve high-risk populations.

Nocturnal Hypoglycemia Associated with Bedtime Administration of Premixed Insulin Preparations in Hospitalized Patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus for whom premixed insulin preparations (PMIPs) are ordered in the hospital setting may be at risk of hypoglycemia if the PMIP is incorrectly administered at bedtime (instead of suppertime). OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine, retrospectively, the incidence of bedtime administration of PMIPs at a tertiary teaching hospital. The secondary objective was to investigate whether bedtime administration of PMIPs led to an increase in nocturnal hypoglycemia. METHODS: Inpatient PMIP orders for the period April 1, 2013, to March 31, 2017, were extracted from the pharmacy information system of the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia. Two hundred randomly selected inpatient admissions were audited, and instances of PMIP administration after 2000 (8 pm) were recorded. Data from an additional random sample of inpatient admissions, from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017, were reviewed to determine whether bedtime administration of PMIPs was associated with increased incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia, relative to suppertime administration. RESULTS: In the randomly selected sample of 200 inpatient admissions, a PMIP was administered at bedtime at least once during 47 admissions (24%). In the additional sample of 123 inpatient admissions during which a PMIP had been administered, the mean nocturnal hypoglycemia rate was 4.15% for suppertime administration and 14.85% for bedtime administration (p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: For a substantial proportion of patients, PMIPs were inappropriately ordered and administered at bedtime in this hospital setting and may have been associated with nocturnal hypoglycemic events. Recommendations to reduce this practice include ongoing education and a review of preprinted order sets.

CONTEXTE: Les patients atteints de diabète sucré pour lesquels des préparations d'insuline prémélangées (PIPM) sont commandées en milieu hospitalier peuvent présenter un risque d'hypoglycémie si elles sont administrées à tort au coucher (au lieu de l'heure du souper). OBJECTIFS: L'objectif principal visait à déterminer, rétrospectivement, l'incidence de l'administration des PIPM au coucher dans un hôpital d'enseignement tertiaire. L'objectif secondaire visait quant à lui à déterminer si l'administration au coucher entraînait (ou non) une augmentation de l'hypoglycémie nocturne. MÉTHODES: Les données relatives aux commandes de PIPM pour les patients hospitalisés pendant la période du 1er avril 2013 au 31 mars 2017 ont été extraites du système d'information pharmaceutique du QEII Health Sciences Centre à Halifax (N.-É.). Deux cents admissions de patients hospitalisés sélectionnées au hasard ont été vérifiées et les cas d'administration des PIPM après 2000 (20 h) ont été enregistrés. Les données d'un échantillon aléatoire supplémentaire d'admissions de patients hospitalisés du 1er janvier 2016 au 31 décembre 2017 ont été examinées afin de déterminer si l'administration au coucher des PIPM était associée à une plus grande incidence d'hypoglycémie nocturne, par rapport à l'administration au souper. RÉSULTATS: Dans l'échantillon sélectionné au hasard de 200 admissions de patients hospitalisés, une PIPM a été administrée au coucher au moins une fois au cours de 47 admissions (24 %). Dans l'échantillon supplémentaire de 123 admissions de patients hospitalisés au cours desquelles une PIPM avait été administrée, le taux moyen d'hypoglycémie nocturne était de 4,15 % pour l'administration au souper et se montait à 14,85 % pour l'administration au coucher (p = 0,13). CONCLUSIONS: Pour une proportion considérable de patients, la PIPM a été prescrite de manière inappropriée et administrée au coucher dans ce milieu hospitalier et peut avoir été associée à des événements hypoglycémiques nocturnes. Les recommandations visant à réduire cette pratique comprennent une formation continue et un examen des ensembles de commandes préimprimés.

Pharmacist Intervention to Improve Medication Adherence in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: The PRIMA-ACS Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite ample evidence of benefit, adherence to secondary prevention medication therapy after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is often suboptimal. Hospital pharmacists are uniquely positioned to improve adherence by providing medication education at discharge. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a standardized counselling intervention at hospital discharge significantly improved patients' adherence to cardiovascular medications following ACS. METHODS: This single-centre, prospective, nonrandomized comparative study enrolled patients with a primary diagnosis of ACS (January 2014 to July 2015). Patients who received standardized discharge counselling from a clinical pharmacist were compared with patients who did not receive counselling. At 30 days and 1 year after discharge, follow-up patient surveys were conducted and community pharmacy refill data were obtained. Adherence was assessed using pharmacy refill data and patient self-reporting for 5 targeted medications: acetylsalicylic acid, P2Y purinoceptor 12 (P2Y12) inhibitors, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, ß-blockers, and statins. Thirty-day and 1-year medication utilization, cardiovascular readmission rates, and all-cause mortality were also assessed. RESULTS: Of the 259 patients enrolled, 88 (34.0%) received discharge counselling. Medication data were obtained for 253 patients (97.7%) at 30 days and 242 patients (93.4%) at 1 year. At 1 year after discharge, there were no statistically significant differences between patients who did and did not receive counselling in terms of rates of nonadherence (11.9% versus 18.4%, p = 0.19), cardiovascular readmission (17.6% versus 22.3%, p = 0.42), and all-cause mortality (3.4% versus 4.2%, p > 0.99). Overall medication nonadherence was 2.8% (7/253) at 30 days and 16.1% (39/242) at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Discharge medication counselling provided by hospital pharmacists after ACS was not associated with significantly better medication adherence at 1 year. Higher-quality evidence is needed to determine the most effective and practical interventions to ensure that patients adhere to their medication regimens and achieve positive outcomes after ACS.

CONTEXTE: Malgré l'abondance de preuves démontrant ses avantages, l'adhésion à la pharmacothérapie de prévention secondaire après les syndromes coronariens aigus (SCA) est souvent « sous-optimale ¼. Les pharmaciens d'hôpitaux occupent une place unique pour améliorer l'adhésion en expliquant au patient l'usage des médicaments au moment du congé hospitalier. OBJECTIF: Déterminer si une consultation standardisée au moment du congé hospitalier améliore significativement ou non l'adhésion à la pharmacothérapie cardiovasculaire après les SCA. MÉTHODES: Des patients ayant reçu un diagnostic primaire de SCA (de janvier 2014 à juillet 2015) ont été inscrits pour participer à cette étude comparative unicentrique prospective et non randomisée. Ceux ayant bénéficié d'une consultation standardisée par un pharmacien clinicien au moment du congé ont été comparés aux patients qui n'en n'avaient pas reçu. Trente jours et un an après le congé, des enquêtes de suivi du patient ont été menées et les données de renouvellement d'ordonnance des pharmacies communautaires ont été recueillies. L'adhésion a été évaluée à l'aide des données de renouvellement d'ordonnance et celles rapportées par le patient pour cinq médicaments ciblés : l'acide acétylsalicylique, les inhibiteurs P2Y purinoceptor 12 (P2Y12), les inhibiteurs de l'enzyme de conversion de l'angiotensine ou les antagonistes des récepteurs de l'angiotensine II, les antagonistes ß et les statines. L'utilisation des médicaments à 30 jours et à un an, le taux de réadmission en raison d'un trouble cardiovasculaire et le taux de mortalité toutes causes confondues ont également fait l'objet d'une évaluation. RÉSULTATS: Sur les 259 patients inscrits, 88 (34 %) ont bénéficié d'une consultation au moment du congé. Des données concernant la médication de 253 patients ont été obtenues (97,7 %) à 30 jours et pour 242 patients (93,4 %) à un an. Un an après le congé, aucune différence statistique significative n'a été observée entre les patients ayant reçu ou non une consultation concernant la non-adhésion (11,9 % contre 18,4 %, p = 0,19), la réadmission en raison d'un trouble cardiovasculaire (17,6 % contre 22,3 %, p = 0,42), et le taux de mortalité toutes causes confondues (3,4 % contre 4,2 %, p > 0,99). La non-adhésion aux médicaments de manière générale se montait à 2,8 % (7/253) à 30 jours et à 16,1 % (39/242) à un an. CONCLUSIONS: La consultation concernant la médication donnée par les pharmaciens d'hôpitaux au moment du congé après les SCA n'était pas associée à un meilleur suivi de la médication un an plus tard. Des données probantes de meilleure qualité sont nécessaires pour déterminer les interventions les plus efficaces et pratiques pour que les patients adhèrent à leur régime médicamenteux et qu'ils obtiennent des résultats positifs après les SCA.

Hemodynamic Assessment and In vivo Catabolism of Adenosine 5'-triphosphate in Doxorubicin or Isoproterenol-induced Cardiovascular Toxicity.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown that catabolism of adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) in systemic blood is a potential surrogate biomarker for cardiovascular toxicity. We compared the acute toxicity of high doses of doxorubicin (DOX) and isoproterenol (ISO) on hemodynamics and ATP catabolism in the systemic circulation. METHODS: sprague Dawley (SD) rats (n = 8 - 11) were each given either a single dose of 30 mg/kg ISO, or a twice-daily dose of 10 mg/kg of DOX or 4 doses of normal saline (control) by subcutaneous injection. Blood samples were collected up to 6 hours for measuring concentrations of ATP and its catabolites. Hemodynamics was recorded continuously. The difference was considered significant at p < 0.05 (ANOVA). RESULTS: Mortality was 1/8, 5/11, and 0/11 for the DOX, ISO, and control groups, respectively. Systolic blood pressure was significantly lower in the DOX and ISO treated rats than in control measured at the last recorded time (76 ± 9 for DOX vs. 42 ± 8 for ISO vs. 103 ± 5 mmHg for control, p < 0.05 for all). Blood pressure fell gradually after the final injection for both DOX and control groups, but abruptly after ISO, followed by a rebound and then gradual decline till the end of the experiment. Heart rate was significantly higher after ISO, but there were no differences between the DOX and control rats (p > 0.05). RBC concentrations of ADP and AMP, and plasma concentrations of adenosine and uric acid were significantly higher in the ISO group. In contrast, hypoxanthine concentrations were significantly higher in the DOX treated group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Acute cardiovascular toxicity induced by DOX and ISO may be measured by changes in hemodynamics and breakdown of ATP and adenosine in the systemic circulation, albeit a notable qualitative and quantitative difference was observed.

Resident and Staff Mealtime Actions and Energy Intake of Long-Term Care Residents With Cognitive Impairment: Analysis of the Making the Most of Mealtimes Study.

Long-term care (LTC) residents with cognitive impairment (CI) are at increased risk of malnutrition, often explained by mealtime actions (e.g., resident eating challenges, staff actions with eating assistance). The purpose of the current study was to examine the association between mealtime actions and energy intake of LTC residents with CI. Participants with CI (N = 353) from 32 LTC in four provinces were included. Mealtime actions were assessed using the Relational Behavioural Scale, Edinburgh Feeding Evaluation in Dementia (Ed-FED), nine additional eating challenges, and the Mealtime Relational Care Checklist. Several eating challenges (e.g., refusal to eat, turning head away) were associated with poor energy intake. Adjusting for age and sex, partial eating assistance and total Ed-FED score were associated with poor intake, whereas dysphagia risk and often receiving assistance were associated with better intake. Interventions to support eating independence and address residents' eating challenges in LTC are needed to improve their intakes. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 45(8), 32-42.].