Impact of early death recording on international comparison of acute myocardial infarction mortality - administrative hospital data study using the example of Germany and the United States.

BACKGROUND: In-hospital mortality from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is widely used in international comparisons as an indicator of health system performance. Because of the high risk of early death after AMI, international comparisons may be biased by differences in the recording of early death cases in hospital inpatient data. This study examined whether differences in the recording of early deaths affect international comparisons of AMI in-hospital mortality by using the example of Germany and the United States, and explored approaches to address this issue. METHODS: The German Diagnosis-Related Groups Statistics (DRG Statistics), the U.S. National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and the U.S. Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) were analysed from 2014 to 2019. Cases with treatment for AMI were identified in German and U.S. inpatient data. AMI deaths occurring in the emergency department (ED) without inpatient admission were extracted from NEDS data. 30-day in-hospital mortality figures were calculated according to the OECD indicator definition (unlinked data) and modified by including ED deaths, or excluding all same-day cases. RESULTS: German age-and-sex standardized 30-day in-hospital mortality was substantially higher compared to the U.S. (in 2019, 7.3% vs. 4.6%). The ratio of German vs. U.S. mortality was 1.6. After inclusion of ED deaths in U.S. data this ratio declined to 1.4. Exclusion of same-day cases in German and U.S. data led to a similar ratio. CONCLUSIONS: While short-duration treatments due to early death are generally recorded in German inpatient data, in U.S. inpatient data those cases are partially missing. Excluding cases with short-duration treatment from the calculation of mortality indicators could be a feasible approach to account for differences in the recording of early deaths, that might be existent in other countries as well.

Oral anticoagulation in heart failure complicated by atrial fibrillation: A nationwide routine data study.

BACKGROUND: This nationwide routine data analysis evaluates if oral anticoagulant (OAC) use in patients with heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) leads to a lower mortality and reduced readmission rate. Superiority of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs), compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA), was analyzed for these endpoints. METHODS: Anonymous data of patients with a health insurance at the Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse and a claims record for hospitalization with the main diagnosis of HF and secondary diagnosis of AF (2017-2019) were included. A hospital stay in the previous year was an exclusion criterion. Mortality and readmission for all-cause and stroke/intracranial bleeding (ICB) were analyzed 91-365 days after the index hospitalization. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Cox regression models were used to evaluate the impact of medication on outcome. RESULTS: 180,316 cases were included [81 years (IQR 76-86), 55.6% female, CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2 (96.81%)]. In 80.6%, OACs were prescribed (VKA: 21.7%; direct factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI): 60.0%; direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI): 3.4%; with multiple prescriptions per patient included). Mortality rate was 19.1%, readmission rate was 29.9% and stroke/ICB occurred in 1.9%. Risk of death was lower with any OAC (HR 0.77, 95% CI [0.75-0.79]) but without significant differences in OAC type (VKA: HR 0.73, [0.71-0.76]; FXaI: HR 0.77, [0.75-0.78]; DTI: HR 0.71, [0.66-0.77]). The total readmission rate (HR 0.97, [0.94 to 0.99]) and readmission for stroke/ICB (HR 0.71, [0.65-0.77]) was lower with OAC. CONCLUSIONS: Nationwide data confirm a reduction in mortality and readmission rate in HF-AF patients taking OACs, without NOAC superiority.

In-hospital mortality and failure to rescue following hepatobiliary surgery in Germany - a nationwide analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recent observational studies on volume-outcome associations in hepatobiliary surgery were not designed to account for the varying extent of hepatobiliary resections and the consequential risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality for minor and major hepatobiliary resections at the national level in Germany and to examine the effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue. METHODS: All inpatient cases of hepatobiliary surgery (n = 31,114) in Germany from 2009 to 2015 were studied using national hospital discharge data. After ranking hospitals according to increasing hospital volumes, five volume categories were established based on all hepatobiliary resections. The association between hospital volume and in-hospital mortality following minor and major hepatobiliary resections was evaluated by multivariable regression methods. RESULTS: Minor hepatobiliary resections were associated with an overall mortality rate of 3.9% and showed no significant volume-outcome associations. In contrast, overall mortality rate of major hepatobiliary resections was 10.3%. In this cohort, risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality following major resections varied widely across hospital volume categories, from 11.4% (95% CI 10.4-12.5) in very low volume hospitals to 7.4% (95% CI 6.6-8.2) in very high volume hospitals (risk-adjusted OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41-0.54). Moreover, rates of failure to rescue decreased from 29.38% (95% CI 26.7-32.2) in very low volume hospitals to 21.38% (95% CI 19.2-23.8) in very high volume hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: In Germany, patients who are undergoing major hepatobiliary resections have improved outcomes, if they are admitted to higher volume hospitals. However, such associations are not evident following minor hepatobiliary resections. Following major hepatobiliary resections, 70-80% of the excess mortality in very low volume hospitals was estimated to be attributable to failure to rescue.

[Definition of Variables in Hospital Discharge Data: Pitfalls and Proposed Solutions]. / Variablendefinition in fallbezogenen Krankenhausabrechnungsdaten ­ Fallstricke und Lösungsmöglichkeiten.

In Germany, the Diagnosis-Related Group Statistics (DRG Statistics) supply full coverage of inpatient episodes in acute care hospitals. The Research Data Centres of the Federal Statistical Office and the Statistical Offices of the Federal States provide the microdata of the DRG Statistics, namely hospital discharge files of each inpatient case, for scientific research. Hospital discharge data are generated for administrative purposes. As well as other data sources, they have specific features and characteristics, which should be considered in planning and designing research studies. A key challenge is the appropriate and sophisticated operationalization of units of analysis, targets variables, and other study variables. The methodological approach should consider, among other factors, differing coding behaviour between hospitals in order to minimize the risk of bias. This contribution shows by practical examples what should be incorporated in variable definition to ensure that the risk of bias by coding behaviour or other factors is minimized to the greatest possible degree. First of all, the features and characteristics of the German hospital discharge data are outlined. Based on the authors' experiences, basic steps and challenges in observational health services research studies are described. Examples are illustrated by our own calculations, derived from previous studies based on the microdata of the DRG Statistics. The reliability and validity of analyses based on hospital discharge data are crucially dependent on the appropriateness of variable definition. To minimize the risk of bias and misinterpretation, extensive preliminary considerations are required which involve clinical aspects, as well as the context of data collection and technical classification opportunities. Hopefully, there will be greater acceptance of research based on hospital discharge data, so that these valuable data will be used more frequently for research purposes in the future.

[Health Care Provision and Volume-Outcome Relationship for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Long-Term Analysis of German Nationwide Hospital Discharge Data 2005-2015]. / Versorgungsstrukturen und Mengen-Ergebnis-Beziehung beim akuten Herzinfarkt ­ Verlaufsbetrachtung der deutschlandweiten Krankenhausabrechnungsdaten von 2005 bis 2015.

BACKGROUND: Studies on acute myocardial infarction have reported that higher hospital volume is associated with better outcomes. In this context, changes of acute hospital care for myocardial infarction and of the volume-outcome relationship were analysed. The aim of this study was to assess developments of hospital care in order to derive approaches for improving care for acute myocardial infarction in German hospitals. METHODS: Inpatient cases of acute myocardial infarction in the first admitting hospital were identified from the complete national hospital discharge data (DRG statistics) 2005-2015. These cases were assigned to quintiles according to the annual myocardial infarction case volume of the treating hospital. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2015, there was an increase in the proportion of patients with myocardial infarction treated with a coronary intervention. In-hospital mortality in first treating hospitals declined from 12.1 to 8.7%. In all the years of observation, mortality was lower in higher volume hospitals quintiles than in the very-low volume quintile. In 2015, the risk of in-hospital death in hospitals with medium, high, or very high volume was 20% lower (adjusted OR 0.8 [95% KI 0.7-0.9] respectively), compared to very-low volume hospitals. More than 40% of very-low volume hospitals were located in urban areas. CONCLUSION: Hospital care for acute myocardial infarction in Germany can be improved further, if patients with heart attack symptoms were primarily allocated to hospitals with high volumes. For reasons of medical quality and economic efficiency, such a targeted referral is essential particularly in urban regions.

Correction to: Amputation rates of the lower limb by amputation level - observational study using German national hospital discharge data from 2005 to 2015.

In the original publication of this article [1], some numbers in the below sentence errors in the Results section of the Abstract.

Amputation rates of the lower limb by amputation level - observational study using German national hospital discharge data from 2005 to 2015.

BACKGROUND: In international comparisons, rates of amputations of the lower limb are relatively high in Germany. This study aims to analyze trends in lower limb amputations over time, as well as outcomes of care concerning in-hospital mortality and reamputation rates during the same hospital stay which might indicate the quality of surgical and perioperative health care processes. METHODS: This work is an observational population-based study using complete national hospital discharge data (Diagnosis-Related Group Statistics (DRG Statistics)) from 2005 to 2015. All inpatient cases with lower limb amputation were identified and stratified by eight amputation levels. Time trends of case numbers and in-hospital mortality were studied age-sex standardized. For inpatient cases with reamputation during the same hospital stay, first and last amputation levels were cross tabulated. RESULTS: A total of 55,595 amputations of the lower limb in 2015 (52,096 in 2005) were identified. After age-sex standardization to the demographic structure of 2005, a relative decrease of - 11.1% was revealed (men - 2.6%, women - 25.0%). The stratified analysis by amputation levels showed that the decreases were induced by higher amputation levels, whereas the amputation levels of toe/foot ray after standardization still showed a relative increase of + 12.8%. In-hospital mortality of all cases with lower limb amputation fell from 11.2% in 2005 to 7.7% in 2015 (SMR 0.89 [95% CI 0.86; 0.92]). The percentage of reamputations during the same hospital stay declined from 13.2 to 10.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The number of lower limb amputations declined in Germany, however distinctly stronger in women than in men. The observed decreases of in-hospital mortality as well as of reamputation rates point to improvements in perioperative health care. Despite these indications of improvements, the distinct increase in case numbers at the level of toe/foot ray calls for additional targeted prevention efforts, especially for patients with diabetes.

Complex gastric surgery in Germany-is centralization beneficial? Observational study using national hospital discharge data.

PURPOSE: This observational study explored the association between hospital volume and short-term outcome following gastric resections for non-bariatric indication, aiming to contribute to the discussion on centralization of complex visceral surgery in Germany. METHODS: Based on complete national hospital discharge data from 2010 to 2015, the association between hospital volume and in-hospital mortality was evaluated according to volume quintiles and volume deciles. Case-mix differences regarding surgical indication, age, sex, and comorbidities were considered for risk adjustment. In addition, rates of major complications and failure to rescue were analyzed across hospital volume categories. RESULTS: Inpatient episodes (72,528) with gastric resection were analyzed. Risk-adjusted mortality in patients treated in very low volume hospitals (median volume of 5 surgeries per year) was higher (12.0% [95% CI 11.4 to 12.5]) compared to those treated in very high volume hospitals (50 surgeries per year; 10.6% [10.0 to 11.1]). Failure to rescue patients with complications was 28.1% [27.0 to 29.3] in very low volume hospitals and 22.7% [21.6 to 23.8] in very high volume hospitals. Differences were similar within the subgroup of patients operated for gastric cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment in very high volume hospitals is associated with a lower in-hospital mortality compared to treatment in very low volume hospitals. This effect seems to be determined by the ability to rescue patients who experience complications. As the observed benefit is only related to very high volumes, the results do not clearly indicate that centralization may improve short-term results substantially, unless a very high degree of centralization would be achieved. Possibly, further research focusing on other outcome measures, such as clinical processes or long-term results, might lead to divergent conclusions.

Hospital Volume, In-Hospital Mortality, and Failure to Rescue in Esophageal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: In Germany, complex esophageal surgery is often performed in hospitals with low case numbers. For these procedures, an association exists between hospital case numbers and treatment outcomes, possibly because of differences in complication management. This aspect of the association between volume and outcome in esophageal surgery has not yet been studied in Germany. METHODS: On the basis of nationwide hospital discharge data (DRG statistics) from the years 2010 to 2015, the association between volume and outcome was analyzed in relation to in-hospital mortality, the frequency of complications, and the mortality of patients who had complications. RESULTS: 22 700 cases of complex esophageal surgery were identified. The probability of dying after esophageal surgery was much lower in hospitals with very high case numbers (median, 62 per year) than in those with very low case numbers (median, two per year), with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.50 (95% confidence interval, [0.42; 0.60]). At least one complication was documented for more than half of all patients; no association was found between the frequency of complications and the hospital case volume. The in-hospital mortality among patients who had complications was 12.3% [11.1; 13.7] in hospitals with very high case numbers and 20.0% [18.5; 21.6] in hospitals with very low case numbers. Of the 4032 procedures performed in 2015, 83% were for cancer of the esophagus. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that the quality of care for patients undergoing esophageal surgery in Germany could be improved if more patients were treated in hospitals with high case numbers. The observed association between case numbers and outcomes is tightly linked to failure to rescue.

Effect of Hospital Volume on In-hospital Morbidity and Mortality Following Pancreatic Surgery in Germany.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue following major pancreatic resections using hospital discharge data of every inpatient case in Germany. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Several studies have found strong volume-outcome relationships in pancreatic surgery, with high mortality in low-volume facilities. However, their datasets were only based on portions of national populations. In addition, these studies did not assess the effect of hospital volume according to other crucial variables such as medical indications, postoperative complications, and failure to rescue. METHODS: We studied all inpatient cases of major pancreatic surgery (n = 60,858) in Germany from 2009 to 2014, using national hospital discharge data. We evaluated the association between hospital volume and in-hospital mortality following major pancreatic resections by using multivariate regression methods. In addition, we analyzed rates of major complications and failure to rescue across hospital volume quintiles. RESULTS: Risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality varied widely across hospital volume quintiles, from 6.5% (95% CI 6.0-7.0) in very high volume hospitals to 11.5% (95% CI 10.9-12.1) in very low volume hospitals (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.41-0.54). Rates of postoperative interventions necessary for complications and failure to rescue were lower in higher volume hospitals [eg, mortality following septic complications in very high volume hospitals: 24.2% (95% CI 22.4-26.1) vs. very low volume hospitals: 36.8% (34.9-38.7)]. Moreover, we estimated that centralization of surgical care to the minimum volume and mortality risk of the medium volume quintile could prevent at least 94 deaths per year. CONCLUSIONS: In Germany, patients who are undergoing major pancreatic resections have improved outcomes if they are admitted to higher volume hospitals. As current health policies failed to centralize pancreatic surgery procedures in Germany, new strategies to initiate a sufficient centralization process in the field of pancreatic surgery are needed.

[Volume Growth of Inpatient Treatments for Spinal Disease - Analysis of German Nationwide Hospital Discharge Data from 2005 to 2014]. / Mengenentwicklung stationärer Behandlungen bei Erkrankungen der Wirbelsäule ­ Analyse der deutschlandweiten Krankenhausabrechnungsdaten von 2005 bis 2014.

BACKGROUND: Marked volume growth of inpatient treatments for spinal disease has been observed since diagnosis related groups (DRG) were introduced as payment for inpatient services in Germany. This study aims to analyse this increase by population and stratified by types of treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using German nationwide hospital discharge data (DRG statistics), inpatient treatments for spinal disease with or without surgery were identified. Trends in case numbers were analysed from 2005 to 2014 with consideration of demographic changes, in order to explore which age groups and which types of treatment are affected by volume growth. RESULTS: In 2014 (2005), 289 000 (177 000) inpatient treatments with surgery and 463 000 (287 000) treatments without surgery were identified. After adjusting for demographic factors, treatments with and without surgery exhibited a relative volume growth of + 50%. This increase affected higher age groups and women, in particular. Depending on the type of treatment, very different degrees of volume growth were observed. For example, disc surgeries adjusted for demographic change increased by about + 5%, whereas spinal fusion and vertebral replacement surgeries, kypho-/vertebroplasties and decompression of the spine more than doubled. Within the non-surgically treated cases, local pain therapies of the spine increased after adjustment for demographic changes by about + 142%. The conservatively treated cases showed a demographically adjusted increase of + 22%. CONCLUSION: Apart from demographic changes, this analysis cannot resolve the underlying causes of volume growth in treatments for spinal disease. However, the stratified analysis of various subgroups may help to classify these developments in a more differentiated manner. The results may support a more targeted debate about potential over- or misallocation of inpatient services in this area.

Hospital volume and mortality for 25 types of inpatient treatment in German hospitals: observational study using complete national data from 2009 to 2014.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the existence and strength of a relationship between hospital volume and mortality, to estimate minimum volume thresholds and to assess the potential benefit of centralisation of services. DESIGN: Observational population-based study using complete German hospital discharge data (Diagnosis-Related Group Statistics (DRG Statistics)). SETTING: All acute care hospitals in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: All adult patients hospitalised for 1 out of 25 common or medically important types of inpatient treatment from 2009 to 2014. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Risk-adjusted inhospital mortality. RESULTS: Lower inhospital mortality in association with higher hospital volume was observed in 20 out of the 25 studied types of treatment when volume was categorised in quintiles and persisted in 17 types of treatment when volume was analysed as a continuous variable. Such a relationship was found in some of the studied emergency conditions and low-risk procedures. It was more consistently present regarding complex surgical procedures. For example, about 22 000 patients receiving open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm were analysed. In very high-volume hospitals, risk-adjusted mortality was 4.7% (95% CI 4.1 to 5.4) compared with 7.8% (7.1 to 8.7) in very low volume hospitals. Theminimum volume above which risk of death would fall below the average mortality was estimated as 18 cases per year. If all hospitals providing this service would perform at least 18 cases per year, one death among 104 (76 to 166) patients could potentially be prevented. CONCLUSIONS: Based on complete national hospital discharge data, the results confirmed volume-outcome relationships for many complex surgical procedures, as well as for some emergency conditions and low-risk procedures. Following these findings, the study identified areas where centralisation would provide a benefit for patients undergoing the specific type of treatment in German hospitals and quantified the possible impact of centralisation efforts.

Drug-eluting stents in clinical routine: a 1-year follow-up analysis based on German health insurance administrative data from 2008 to 2014.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the use of drug-eluting stents (DESs) in the largest population of statutory health insurance members in Germany, including newly developed bio-resorbable vascular scaffolds (BVSs), and to evaluate 1-year complication rates of DES as compared with bare metal stents (BMSs) in this cohort. DESIGN: Routine data analysis of statutory health insurance claims data from the years 2008 to 2014. SETTING: The German healthcare insurance Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse covers approximately 30% of the German population and is the largest nationwide provider of statutory healthcare insurance in Germany. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: We included all patients with a claims record for a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with either DES or BMS and additionally, from 2013, BVS. Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiovascular event (MACCE, defined as mortality, AMI, stroke and transient ischaemic attack), bypass surgery, PCI and coronary angiography) at 1 year after the intervention. RESULTS: A total of 243 581 PCI cases were included (DES excluding BVS: 143 765; BVS: 1440; BMS: 98 376). The 1-year MACCE rate was 7.42% in the DES subgroup excluding BVS and 11.29% in the BMS subgroup. The adjusted OR for MACCE was 0.72 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.75) in patients with DES excluding BVS as compared with patients with BMS. In the BVS group, the proportion of 1-year MACCE was 5.0%. CONCLUSION: The analyses demonstrate a lower MACCE rate for PCI with DES. BVSs are used in clinical routine in selected cases and seem to provide a high degree of safety, but data are still sparse.

[Continuity of hospital identifiers in hospital discharge data - Analysis of the nationwide German DRG Statistics from 2005 to 2013]. / Kontinuität der Institutionskennzeichen in Krankenhausabrechnungsdaten ­ Analyse der bundesweiten DRG-Statistik von 2005 bis 2013.

BACKGROUND: In Germany, nationwide hospital discharge data (DRG statistics provided by the research data centers of the Federal Statistical Office and the Statistical Offices of the 'Länder') are increasingly used as data source for health services research. Within this data hospitals can be separated via their hospital identifier ([Institutionskennzeichen] IK). However, this hospital identifier primarily designates the invoicing unit and is not necessarily equivalent to one hospital location. Aiming to investigate direction and extent of possible bias in hospital-level analyses this study examines the continuity of the hospital identifier within a cross-sectional and longitudinal approach and compares the results to official hospital census statistics. METHODS: Within the DRG statistics from 2005 to 2013 the annual number of hospitals as classified by hospital identifiers was counted for each year of observation. The annual number of hospitals derived from DRG statistics was compared to the number of hospitals in the official census statistics 'Grunddaten der Krankenhäuser'. Subsequently, the temporal continuity of hospital identifiers in the DRG statistics was analyzed within cohorts of hospitals. RESULTS: Until 2013, the annual number of hospital identifiers in the DRG statistics fell by 175 (from 1,725 to 1,550). This decline affected only providers with small or medium case volume. The number of hospitals identified in the DRG statistics was lower than the number given in the census statistics (e.g., in 2013 1,550 IK vs. 1,668 hospitals in the census statistics). The longitudinal analyses revealed that the majority of hospital identifiers persisted in the years of observation, while one fifth of hospital identifiers changed. CONCLUSION: In cross-sectional studies of German hospital discharge data the separation of hospitals via the hospital identifier might lead to underestimating the number of hospitals and consequential overestimation of caseload per hospital. Discontinuities of hospital identifiers over time might impair the follow-up of hospital cohorts. These limitations must be taken into account in analyses of German hospital discharge data focusing on the hospital level.

[Impact of quality measurement, transparency and peer review on in-hospital mortality - retrospective before-after study with 63 hospitals]. / Der Einfluss von Qualitätsmessung, Transparenz und Peer Reviews auf die Krankenhaussterblichkeit ­ Retrospektive Vorher-Nachher-Studie mit 63 Kliniken.

BACKGROUND: In 2008 the 'Initiative Qualitätsmedizin' (initiative for quality in medical care, IQM) was established as a voluntary non-profit association of hospital providers of all kinds of ownership. Currently, about 350 hospitals from Germany and Switzerland participate in IQM. Member hospitals are committed to a quality strategy based on measuring outcome indicators using administrative data, peer review procedures to improve medical quality, and transparency by public reporting. This study aims to investigate whether voluntary implementation of this approach is associated with improvements in medical outcome. METHODS: Within a retrospective before-after study 63 hospitals, which started to participate in IQM between 2009 and 2011, were monitored. In-hospital mortality in these hospitals was studied for 14 selected inpatient services in comparison to the German national average. The analyses examine whether in-hospital mortality declined after participation of the studied hospitals in IQM, independently of secular trends or deviations in case mix when compared to the national average, and whether such findings were associated with initial hospital performance or peer review procedures. RESULTS: Declining in-hospital mortality was observed in hospitals with initially subpar performance. These declines were statistically significant for treatment of myocardial infarction, heart failure, pneumonia, and septicemia. Similar, but statistically non-significant trends were observed for nine further treatments. Following peer-review procedures significant declines in in-hospital mortality were observed for treatments of myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia. Mortality declines after peer reviews regarding stroke, hip fracture and colorectal resection were not significant, and after peer reviews regarding mechanically ventilated patients no changes were observed. CONCLUSION: The results point to a positive impact of the quality approach applied by IQM on clinical outcomes. A more targeted selection of hospitals to be peer-reviewed might further enhance the impact of this approach.

Revascularisation of patients with end-stage renal disease on chronic haemodialysis: bypass surgery versus PCI-analysis of routine statutory health insurance data.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to analyse the short-term and long-term outcome of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing percutaneous intervention (PCI) as compared to coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) to evaluate the optimal coronary revascularisation strategy. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of routine statutory health insurance data between 2010 and 2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was adjusted all-cause mortality after 30 days and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were repeat revascularisation at 30 days and 1 year and bleeding events within 7 days. RESULTS: The total number of cases was n=4123 (PCI; n=3417), median age was 71 (IQR 62-77), 30.4% were women. The adjusted OR for death within 30 days was 0.59 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.81) for patients undergoing PCI versus CABG. At 1 year, the adjusted OR for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was 1.58 (1.32 to 1.89) for PCI versus CABG and 1.47 (1.23 to 1.75) for all-cause death. In the subgroup of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), adjusted all-cause mortality at 30 days did not differ significantly between both groups (OR 0.75 (0.47 to 1.20)), whereas in patients without AMI the OR for 30-day mortality was 0.44 (0.28 to 0.68) for PCI versus CABG. At 1 year, the adjusted OR for MACCE in patients with AMI was 1.40 (1.06 to 1.85) for PCI versus CABG and 1.47 (1.08 to 1.99) for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of unselected patients with ESRD undergoing revascularisation, the 1-year outcome was better for CABG in patients with and without AMI. The 30-day mortality was higher in non-AMI patients with CABG reflecting an early hazard with surgery. In cases where the patient's characteristics and risk profile make it difficult to decide on a revascularisation strategy, CABG could be the preferred option.

Nationwide In-hospital Mortality Following Pancreatic Surgery in Germany is Higher than Anticipated.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the unbiased mortality rates for pancreatic surgery procedures at the national level through a comprehensive analysis of every inpatient case in Germany. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several studies have proclaimed a general improvement of perioperative outcomes following pancreatic surgery. These results are challenged by recent analyses of large US databases that found strong volume-outcome relationships, with high mortality in low-volume facilities. METHODS: All inpatient cases with a pancreatic surgery procedure code in Germany from 2009 to 2013 were identified from nationwide administrative hospital data. We determined the absolute number of patients and the in-hospital death rate for crucial subcategories such as medical indications and types of surgical procedure. RESULTS: A total of 58,003 inpatient episodes of pancreatic surgery were identified between 2009 and 2013. Annual case numbers increased significantly, which was primarily attributed to patients aged 70 years and older. The overall in-hospital mortality rate (10.1%) did not significantly change during the study period. Major pancreatic resections were associated with mortality ranging from 7.3% (distal pancreatectomy) to 22.9% (total pancreatectomy). Postoperative interventions indicative of severe complications were documented frequently (eg, more than 6 blood transfusions in 20% of all patients and relaparotomy in 16%). Their occurrence was associated with a dramatic increase in mortality. CONCLUSION: At the national level in Germany, perioperative mortality is higher than anticipated from previous studies. The absence of a significant reduction in overall mortality challenges current health policies that aim to improve the outcomes of high-risk surgical procedures in Germany.

Improving outcomes using German Inpatient Quality Indicators in conjunction with peer review procedures.

Some hospital comparisons seem to generate confusion because different methods of outcome comparisons lead to different results in hospital rankings. This article questions the concept of overall comparisons of hospitals, which are multiproduct enterprises and may have specialties that provide good results in some areas despite having worse outcomes in others. Therefore, the authors argue for a disease specific view of outcome measurement. The concept of the German Inpatient Quality Indicators is explained. These indicators cover volume, mortality, and other information by a disease specific approach, which includes information for potential patients as well as specific feedback to the physicians responsible for the respective specialty. This article focuses on the feedback to the hospitals and explains how these indicators can be used for improvement in conjunction with a peer review process. The indicators provide information to the hospitals regarding their relative position because German reference values are available for all indicators. Thus, the indicators can serve as a trigger instrument for identifying possible quality problems. Based on these indications, peer review can be used to analyze the treatment processes and to eventually verify weaknesses and define actions for improvement. The first studies indicate that the use of this approach within hospital quality management can largely improve hospital outcomes in hospitals with subpar results compared to the German average.