Arterial and venous Thrombelastograph variables differ during cardiac surgery.

UNLABELLED: The Thrombelastograph (TEG; Haemoscope Corp., Skokie, IL) coagulation analyzer is an effective point-of-care monitor for routine clinical practice and clinical research. Prior investigators have used either arterial or venous samples of blood for TEG measurements. We conducted this prospective cohort study to determine potential differences in TEG variables between arterial and venous blood samples. Arterial and venous samples were drawn from 40 cardiac surgical patients, yielding 134 pairs for comparison. Twenty-nine comparisons (control) were between arterial and arterial samples and were not significantly different. For the arterial and venous comparisons (n = 105), mean (+/-sd) arterial and venous values were the following: reaction time, 10 +/- 2 mm vs 13 +/- 4 mm, P = 0.004; maximum amplitude, 59 +/- 9 mm vs 49 +/- 12 mm, P < 0.001; alpha angle, 61 +/- 10 degrees vs 51 +/- 14 degrees, P < 0.001; K, 5 +/- 2 mm vs 8 +/- 4 mm, P = 0.007; and lysis, 2.5 +/- 1.7 vs 2.5 +/- 2.0 (not significant), arterial versus venous, respectively. Arterial blood samples demonstrated TEG values reflecting stronger (larger maximum amplitude) and faster (shorter reaction time and K value, wider alpha angle) clot formation. The results suggest that users of TEG coagulation analyzers should be consistent with the site of blood sampling given the potential differences obtained. IMPLICATIONS: Thrombelastograph (TEG) values obtained from venous blood samples differ from values obtained from arterial blood samples. When the TEG coagulation analyzer is used for clinical purposes, it is important to be consistent in the blood collection site.

Cardiac surgical patients exposed to heparin-bonded circuits develop less postoperative cerebral dysfunction than patients exposed to non-heparin-bonded circuits.

A prospective randomized trial was used to study the incidence of cerebral dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with heparin-bonded vs non-heparin-bonded circuits. Although the etiology of postoperative cerebral dysfunction is controversial, activation of the systemic inflammatory response may play a role. After institutional approval and informed written consent, 39 elective coronary artery bypass (CABG) patients were studied. A battery of neuropsychometric tests (NPMTs) was performed preoperatively, and 5 days and 6 weeks postoperatively. Significant change in NPMT performance was defined as a 25% or greater decrease in postoperative performance, compared to baseline. The number of abnormal tests per patient was calculated. Analysis using the Mann-Whitney rank test was performed for the first follow-up. Patients randomized to heparin-bonded circuits had fewer abnormal NPMTs (>1 abnormal test) on postoperative day 5 (58 vs 70%, n=19 and 20) than patients randomized to non-heparin-bonded circuits. Patients exposed to heparin-bonded circuits had fewer abnormal tests (>1 abnormal test) at 6 weeks (36 vs 63%, n=14 and 16). Results suggested that the attenuation of systemic inflammation by heparin-bonded CPB circuits may lower the incidence of cerebral injury in cardiac surgical patients.

Anticoagulation for cardiac surgery in patients receiving preoperative heparin: use of the high-dose thrombin time.

UNLABELLED: Patients receiving heparin infusions have an attenuated activated clotting time (ACT) response to heparin given for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We compared patients receiving preoperative heparin (Group H) to those not receiving heparin (REF group) with respect to ACT, high-dose thrombin time (HiTT), and markers of thrombin generation during CPB. Sixty-five consecutive patients (33 Group H, 32 REF group) undergoing elective CPB were evaluated. ACT and HiTT were measured at multiple time points. Plasma levels of thrombin-antithrombin III complex and fibrin monomer were determined at baseline, during CPB, and after protamine administration. Transfusion requirements and postoperative blood loss were measured and compared. ACT values after heparinization increased less in Group H and were significantly lower than those in the REF group (P < 0.01). HiTT values did not differ significantly between the two groups. Blood loss and transfusion requirements were not significantly different between the two groups. Plasma levels of thrombin-antithrombin III complexes and fibrin monomer also did not differ between groups at any time, despite a lower ACT in Group H after heparinization and during CPB. Our data suggest that thrombin formation and activity are not enhanced in patients receiving heparin therapy, despite a diminished ACT response to heparin. The utility of ACT and the threshold values indicative of adequate anticoagulation for CPB are relatively undefined in patients receiving preoperative heparin. HiTT should be investigated as a safe and accurate monitor of anticoagulation for CPB in patients receiving preoperative heparin therapy. IMPLICATIONS: The diminished activated clotting time response to heparin, in patients receiving preoperative heparin therapy, poses difficulties when attempting to provide adequate anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass. Current data suggest that heparin resistance is not observed when high-dose thrombin time is used to monitor anticoagulation and that a lower activated clotting time value in these patients may be safe.

Endovascular aortic repair is associated with greater hemodynamic stability compared with open aortic reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: Examination of overall hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair (EAR) compared with open aortic repair (OAR). DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University hospital setting. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-two patients undergoing OAR and 17 patients undergoing EAR were studied. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Physiologic parameters were extracted every 15 seconds from computerized anesthesia records. Median values were calculated for every 2-minute epoch, and the absolute value of the fractional change in median (|FCM|) from epoch to epoch was calculated for a maximum of 5 hours during the intraoperative period. The incidence of extremes in hemodynamic parameters was compared. Data are presented as median and interquartile ranges. The frequency of |FCM| greater than 0.06 for mean arterial pressure (MAP) was significantly greater in the OAR compared with the EAR group (0.37 [0.30, 0.46] vs 0.14 [0.11, 0.21], p < 0.0001), implying greater stability in MAP during EAR. Similarly, the mean pulmonary artery pressures (MPAPs) were significantly more stable during EAR compared with OAR (frequency of |FCM| > 0.07: EAR, 0.20 [0.16, 0.27] vs OAR, 0.32 [0.26, 0.391; p < 0.01). No intergroup differences were detected in heart rate (HR), systolic (SPAP) or diastolic pulmonary artery pressures (DPAP), or central venous pressures (CVPs). With the exception of a greater incidence of low CVP during EAR, there were no significant differences in the frequency of extremes of hemodynamic values between groups. CONCLUSION: These results show improved hemodynamic stability during EAR compared with OAR.

Thromboelastography-guided transfusion algorithm reduces transfusions in complex cardiac surgery.

UNLABELLED: Transfusion therapy after cardiac surgery is empirically guided, partly due to a lack of specific point-of-care hemostasis monitors. In a randomized, blinded, prospective trial, we studied cardiac surgical patients at moderate to high risk of transfusion. Patients were randomly assigned to either a thromboelastography (TEG)-guided transfusion algorithm (n = 53) or routine transfusion therapy (n = 52) for intervention after cardiopulmonary bypass. Coagulation tests, TEG variables, mediastinal tube drainage, and transfusions were compared at multiple time points. There were no demographic or hemostatic test result differences between groups, and all patients were given prophylactic antifibrinolytic therapy. Intraoperative transfusion rates did not differ, but there were significantly fewer postoperative and total transfusions in the TEG group. The proportion of patients receiving fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) was 4 of 53 in the TEG group compared with 16 of 52 in the control group (P < 0.002). Patients receiving platelets were 7 of 53 in the TEG group compared with 15 of 52 in the control group (P < 0.05). Patients in the TEG group also received less volume of FFP (36 +/- 142 vs 217 +/- 463 mL; P < 0.04). Mediastinal tube drainage was not statistically different 6, 12, or 24 h postoperatively. Point-of-care coagulation monitoring using TEG resulted in fewer transfusions in the postoperative period. We conclude that the reduction in transfusions may have been due to improved hemostasis in these patients who had earlier and specific identification of the hemostasis abnormality and thus received more appropriate intraoperative transfusion therapy. These data support the use of TEG in an algorithm to guide transfusion therapy in complex cardiac surgery. IMPLICATIONS: Transfusion of allogeneic blood products is common during complex cardiac surgical procedures. In a prospective, randomized trial, we compared a transfusion algorithm using point-of-care coagulation testing with routine laboratory testing, and found the algorithm to be effective in reducing transfusion requirements.