Having Social Media among Integrated Plastic Surgery Applicants: Is It Needed to Match?

Background: Little information exists on the perceptions of integrated plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) residency applicants on the need for having social media (SoMe) during the application process. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted during the 2022 match cycle to assess integrated PRS residency applicants' perceptions on the role of SoMe during the match. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on variables of interest. Qualitative analysis was conducted on free-form responses. Results: Seventy-nine surveys were completed (response rate: 24%). The majority of respondents were educated in the United States (92%). Instagram was the most commonly used SoMe platform (92%). Of those surveyed, 18% thought that SoMe was beneficial to the application process. Twenty-nine percent of respondents agreed that a SoMe presence increases one's chances of matching into PRS residency (41% disagreed and 30% responded neutrally). Forty-four percent endorsed stress about maintaining a SoMe presence in PRS. Having mentors who recommended maintaining a SoMe presence was associated with the belief that SoMe increases one's chances of matching [odds ratio (OR) 8.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-40.4, P = 0.011] and stress about maintaining a SoMe presence (OR 6.3, 95% CI 1.2-33.3, P = 0.030). Applicants who did research years had lower odds of experiencing stress (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.70, P = 0.015). Conclusions: The growing role of SoMe in the residency selection process may be exacerbating applicants' stress and anxiety. PRS programs may consider establishing clear policies for how SoMe will be used in evaluating candidates.

Workplace Bias Affecting Applicants to Independent Plastic Surgery Residencies.

Background: This study explores factors that encourage residents to apply to independent plastic surgery residencies to gain insight into whether they faced bias as a result of this decision. Methods: Resident applicants who applied to two academic independent plastic surgery residencies in 2021 and 2022 were emailed a survey consisting of 25 questions. Responses were collected anonymously and analyzed. Descriptive statistics were performed, and subgroup analyses were conducted with Fisher exact and Pearson χ2 testing. Results: Thirty-nine complete responses were included for analysis (response rate 22.7%). Participants were asked what encouraged them to go into plastic surgery during residency. The most common reasons were scrubbing in on plastic surgery cases and interactions with plastic surgery faculty/residents, with each reason cited by 30 respondents (76.8%). Further, 20.5% of residents agreed or strongly agreed that they felt unsupported by their program director in their decision to apply into plastic surgery. Likewise, 64.1% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed to having experienced demeaning comments or jokes by faculty about their choice of plastic surgery. Consequently, 17.9% agreed or strongly agreed that they developed stress or anxiety due to how co-residents and/or faculty treated them regarding their decision to pursue plastic surgery. Conclusions: General surgery residents planning to apply to independent plastic surgery residency may experience workplace biases related to their career decision. An important opportunity exists to support independent applicants and to provide mentorship.

The Upcoming Pass/Fail USMLE Step 1 Score Reporting: An Impact Assessment From Medical School Deans.

Background: The US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 change to pass/fail has been met with mixed reviews, and the impact on medical student education and residency match is unknown. We surveyed medical school student affairs deans regarding their thoughts on the upcoming transition of Step 1 to pass/fail. Methods: A questionnaire was emailed to medical school deans. Deans were asked to rank the importance of the following after the Step 1 reporting change: Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (Step 2 CK), clerkship grades, letters of recommendation, personal statement, medical school reputation, class rank, Medical Student Performance Evaluation, and research. They were asked how the score change will affect curriculum, learning, diversity, and student mental health. Deans were asked to select 5 specialties they thought would be most affected. Results: Regarding perceived importance of residency applications following the scoring change, the most frequent number 1 choice was Step 2 CK. The majority of deans (93.5%, n = 43) felt that the change to pass/fail would benefit medical student education/learning environment; however, most (68.2%, n = 30) did not believe their school curriculum would change. Students applying to dermatology, neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, ENT, and plastic surgery were felt to be most affected by the scoring change; 58.7% (n = 27) felt it would not adequately address future diversity. Conclusion: The majority of deans feel the USMLE Step 1 change to pass/fail would benefit medical student education. Deans feel that students applying to traditionally more competitive specialties (ie, programs with fewer overall residency positions available) will be most affected.

Contexte : Le changement de l'épreuve 1 de l'USMLE pour un résultat de type réussite/échec a été accueilli par des opinions variées et son impact sur la formation des étudiants en médecine et l'adéquation des résidences est inconnu. Nous avons mené une enquête auprès des doyens des affaires étudiantes des facultés de médecine pour connaître leur opinion sur la transition prochaine de l'épreuve 1 à un score réussite/échec. Méthodes : Un questionnaire a été envoyé par courriel aux doyens des facultés de médecine. Il leur a été demandé de classer l'importance des éléments suivants après la modification de déclaration des résultats de l'Épreuve 1: Épreuve 2 CK, notes d'externat, lettres de recommandation, déclaration personnelle, réputation de l'école de médecine, classement, évaluation des performances des étudiants en médecins (MSPE) et recherche. Il leur a été demandé comment le changement de notation allait affecter les programmes, l'apprentissage, la diversité et la santé mentale des étudiants. Les doyens devaient sélectionner les 5 spécialités qui, à leur avis, allaient être les plus touchées. Résultats : Pour ce qui concerne l'importance perçue des demandes de résidence après le changement de notation, le choix numéro 1 le plus fréquent a été l'épreuve 2 CK. La majorité des doyens (93,5%, n = 43) a eu le sentiment que le changement en Réussite/Échec serait bénéfique pour la formation des étudiants en médecine et leur environnement pédagogique; toutefois, la plupart d'entre eux (68,2%, n = 30) ne croyaient pas que les programmes d'études changeraient. Les étudiants faisant des demandes en dermatologie, neurochirurgie, chirurgie orthopédique, ORL, et chirurgie plastique étaient perçus comme les plus touchés par le changement de notation. Par ailleurs 58,7% des répondants (n = 27) ont estimé que cela n'aborderait pas de manière adéquate la diversité future. Conclusion : La majorité des doyens a le sentiment que le passage à une notation Réussite/Échec de l'Épreuve 1 de l'USMLE serait bénéfique à la formation des étudiants en médecine. Les doyens estiment que les étudiants faisant des demandes pour des spécialités où règne traditionnellement une plus grande concurrence (c.-à-d. les programmes avec un moins grand nombre global de postes de résidents) seront les plus touchés.

Trends of Autologous Free-Flap Breast Reconstruction and Safety during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Autologous free-flap breast reconstruction (ABR) is a valuable surgical option for patients following mastectomy. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a myriad of factors that have affected access to care, hospital logistics, and postoperative outcomes. This study aims to identify differences in patient selection, hospital course and severity, and postoperative outcomes for patients who underwent ABR during and prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Patients undergoing ABR from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2019 to 2020 database were analyzed to compare sociodemographics, hospital course, and outcomes over the first postoperative month. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors predictive of complications based on the operative year. RESULTS: In total, 3,770 breast free flaps were stratified into two groups based on the timing of reconstruction (prepandemic and pandemic groups). Patients with a diagnosis of disseminated cancer were significantly less likely to undergo ABR during the COVID-19 pandemic. On univariate analysis, there were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the two groups. When controlling for potentially confounding sociodemographic and clinical risk factors, the COVID-19 group was significantly more likely to undergo reoperation compared with the prepandemic group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: When comparing outcomes for patients who underwent ABR prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic, we found a significant increase in the odds of reoperation for those who had ABR during the pandemic. Debridement procedures and exploration for postoperative hemorrhage, thrombosis, or infection increased in the prepandemic group compared to the COVID-19 group. Notably, operative times decreased.

Perspectives on the Plastic Surgery Common Application (PSCA): A Survey of 2021-2022 Integrated Plastic Surgery Applicants.

The Plastic Surgery Common Application (PSCA) was introduced as a free and specialty-specific application for plastic surgery applicants in the 2020-2021 cycle. Now in its second year, the PSCA is being piloted by all integrated residency programs with future plans to replace Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) in the 2022-2023 cycle. This study aimed to explore applicant perspectives related to the PSCA and ERAS applications. Methods: An anonymous survey was distributed to integrated plastic surgery residency applicants from the 2021-2022 application cycle. Participants were asked to provide basic demographic information, their perspectives of the PSCA, and overall application preference. Results: One hundred forty (43.1%) applicants completed the survey. Nearly, 63% of applicants responded "slightly well" or "not well at all" regarding their ability to highlight at least one aspect of their application. Forty-one percent of applicants believed ERAS best highlighted the strengths of their application compared with 27% who believed their strengths were better highlighted by the PSCA. Seventy-nine percent reported the cost savings associated with the PSCA were "very" or "extremely important." Overall, 63% of respondents reported a preference to apply with the PSCA alone. Conclusions: This is the first study to provide insight on applicants' perspectives of the PSCA. Although the majority preferred applying with the PSCA, there may be challenges with transitioning to this application solely. Future iterations of the PSCA may aim to ameliorate functionality concerns, optimize application content, and incorporate plastic surgery-specific information that may be important to selection committees.

Outpatient Prosthetic-Based Reconstruction during COVID-19 Pandemic Possible in Selected Patients without Increased Complications.

BACKGROUND: Following the reopening of elective surgery, the authors' division transitioned from inpatient admission to same-day discharge for immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction in an effort to decrease the hospital's clinical burden and minimize potential coronavirus disease of 2019 exposure. This study aims to compare complication rates following this acute transition for patients who had inpatient and outpatient mastectomy with immediate alloplastic reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent mastectomy with immediate prosthetic reconstruction. The outcome of interest was 30-day morbidity. Descriptive statistics were compared for patients with outpatient and inpatient operations. Odds ratios were calculated to determine whether any preoperative factors increased odds of 30-day complications. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients were included in this study. Twenty-six patients had outpatient surgery and 89 stayed inpatient postoperatively. Same-day discharge did not significantly impact the odds of having one or more 30-day complications (OR, 0.275; 95% CI, 0.047 to 1.618; P = 0.153). Patients with complications had significantly longer median operating times [5.0 hours (interquartile range, 4.0 to 6.0 hours) versus 4.0 hours (interquartile range, 3.0 to 5.0 hours; P = 0.05), and there was a statistically significant association between length of surgery and odds of complication (OR, 1.596; 95% CI, 1.039 to 2.451; P = 0.033). Age was independently associated with increased risk of 30-day complication (OR, 1.062; 95% CI, 1.010 to 1.117; P = 0.020). CONCLUSION: The authors' findings support a continuation of same-day discharge strategy, which could decrease costs for patients and hospitals without increasing complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Public Confidence for Undergoing Elective Plastic Surgery Procedures during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: The COVID-19 vaccine rollout has since been followed by a gradual resumption of elective surgery. Many individuals remain cautious about visiting a hospital or clinic to undergo surgery. As plastic surgeons are starting to resume elective surgery at this time, it is important to understand the perspectives of potential patients and the concerns they may have. Methods: A survey was distributed to participants in the United States through Amazon's Mechanical Turk (mTurk) during March of 2021. Participants were surveyed regarding their views on the severity of COVID-19, vaccination status, and how much COVID-19 has affected their interest in undergoing surgery. Results: Thirty-nine percent of respondents were either no longer willing or less willing to undergo elective plastic surgery. Seventy-three percent of respondents felt comfortable going to an office for a consultation. With regards to feeling comfortable visiting a hospital, 43.4% reported they would feel safe, 36% felt they would feel safe only if they could be discharged on the same day, and 30.6% reported not feeling safe. Fifty-two percent of respondents reported feeling comfortable undergoing surgery now or within the next year. Respondents who do not think COVID-19 is still a major health issue were more likely to still want plastic surgery. Conclusion: The results of this study highlight that the majority of patients, regardless of vaccination status, currently feel comfortable undergoing elective plastic surgery, particularly in an office setting. Plastic surgeons may expect to see a return in demand for elective procedures in the coming months.

Neurotization in Innervated Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Significant improvements in sensory recovery after innervated breast reconstruction have been reported. However, surgical approaches and sensory testing methods have been widely variable. This systematic review aimed to synthesize neurotization techniques and outcomes in breast reconstruction surgery. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was conducted to identify all studies reporting outcomes of neurotization in innervated breast reconstruction. Data extracted from each study included neurotization techniques, operative times, sensory methods and outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1,350 articles were identified, and 23 articles were included for analysis. Nerve coaptation was performed in 536 breasts and 419 patients, with techniques consisting of direct coaptation (65.1% of flaps), coaptation with nerve conduit (26.3%), and coaptation with nerve allograft (8.6%). The neural component of operating time ranged from 8 to 38 min, and the pooled neurotization success rate among nine studies that reported this outcome was 90.6% (95% CI: 83.6%-96.0%). Overall, innervated breasts achieved earlier and superior sensory recovery that was more uniformly distributed throughout the flap compared to non-innervated breasts. Despite high heterogeneity between studies, all included studies supported neurotized breast reconstruction to improve the rate, quality, and magnitude of sensory recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Neurotization during breast reconstruction may be worth the investment of additional operating time to increase the prospect of high-quality sensory recovery. Further investigation with standardized sensory testing methods and patient-reported outcome tools is needed to definitively support neurotization as a standard of care in breast reconstruction surgery.

A national analysis of outpatient mastectomy and breast reconstruction trends from 2013 through 2019.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, patients with breast reconstruction (BR) were hospitalized at least one day postoperatively. However, new trends suggest that outpatient surgery is a viable and safe alternative. This study aims to assess trends among patients with breast cancer who underwent outpatient mastectomy alone, with immediate BR (IBR) or delayed BR (DBR). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the 2013-2019 ACS NSQIP® database was conducted. All women who underwent outpatient mastectomy were included in this study. The cohort was divided as follows: (1) mastectomy without BR, (2) IBR, and (3) DBR. A Cochran-Armitage test and adjusted multivariable logistic regression models were performed to evaluate linear trends over time within groups, and overall and pairwise comparisons between groups across the years, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 84,954 women were included in this study. Overall, 54.9%, 16.2%, and 28.9% underwent mastectomy without BR, IBR, and DBR, respectively. From the BR groups, the majority had implant placement. A significant difference in incidence trends between the three groups was evidenced over time (p<0.001). The greatest increase was evidenced in the IBR group and the lowest in the mastectomy without BR group. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients, a significant difference in linear trends was evidenced over time within and between the three groups. Our results suggest that outpatient IBR procedures are increasing in a greater proportion compared to other surgical approaches. Further studies are required to better characterize this population and comprehend the decision-making process toward a surgical procedure within each of the three groups.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Impact of Tranexamic Acid Administration in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests tranexamic acid (TXA) may improve outcomes in aesthetic surgery patients. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to investigate the impact of TXA use in aesthetic plastic surgery on bleeding and aesthetic outcomes. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies evaluating TXA use in aesthetic plastic surgery. The primary outcome of interest was perioperative bleeding, reported as total blood loss (TBL), ecchymosis, and hematoma formation. Meta-analyses analyzing TBL and postoperative hematoma were performed. RESULTS: Of 287 identified articles, 14 studies evaluating TXA use in rhinoplasty (6), rhytidectomy (3), liposuction (3), reduction mammaplasty (1), and blepharoplasty (1) were included for analysis. Of 820 total patients, 446 (54.4%) received TXA. Meta-analysis demonstrated TXA is associated with 26.3 mL average blood loss reduction (95% CI, -40.0 to -12.7 mL; P < 0.001) and suggested a trend toward decreased odds of postoperative hematoma with TXA use (odds ratio, 0.280; 95% CI, 0.076-1.029; P = 0.055). Heterogeneity among reporting of other outcomes precluded meta-analysis; however, 5 of 7 studies found significantly decreased postoperative ecchymosis levels within 7 days of surgery, 3 studies found statistically significant reductions in postoperative drain output, and 1 study reported significantly improved surgical site quality for patients who received TXA (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TXA is associated with decreased blood loss and a trend toward decreased hematoma formation in aesthetic plastic surgery. Its use has the potential to increase patient satisfaction with postoperative recovery and decrease costs associated with complications, including hematoma evacuation.

Trends and characteristics of neurotization during breast reconstruction: perioperative outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP).

This study aimed to investigate the impact of performing neurotization during breast reconstruction on total operating time and post-operative morbidity. The 2015 through 2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) databases were utilized to identify patients who underwent breast reconstruction with and without neurotization. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, operative characteristics and outcomes were examined for each group. Thirty-day complication and readmission rates were compared using univariable and multivariable logistic regressions. Of 73,507 patients identified who underwent breast reconstruction, 240 had reconstruction with neurotization. Autologous reconstruction was more prevalent for patients with neurotization (90.8% vs. 18.5%, p<.001). Average operating time was longer when neurotization was performed during both autologous (527.1 ± 152.4 vs. 414.8 ± 186.3, p<.001) and alloplastic-only reconstruction (310.9 ± 115.9 vs. 173.0 ± 94.3, p<.001). The likelihood total operating time exceeded 521 min (two standard deviations above average) increased when neurotization was performed (OR 2.464, CI 1.864-3.255, p<.001). Thirty-day complications occurred in 13.8% of patients with neurotization and 6.8% without (p<.001). Similarly, 30-day readmission rates were higher for patients with neurotization (7.5% vs. 4.2%, p<.001). However, when adjusted for comorbidities and operative characteristics, neurotization did not significantly impact 30-day complication rates (OR 0.802, CI 0.548-1.174, p=.256) or 30-day readmission rates (OR 1.352, CI 0.822-2.223, p=.077). Although neurotization during breast reconstruction increases operating time, comorbidities and procedural characteristics play a greater role in post-operative outcomes than neurotization alone.

Evaluation of Social Media Utilization by Academic Plastic Surgery Programs during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: In response to the cancellation of away rotations and the shift to virtual interviews due to the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, residency programs have pursued other methods of sharing program details, most notably with the use of social media. This study aimed to evaluate the extent of social media utilization in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic by plastic surgery residency programs. METHODS: Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook accounts of plastic surgery programs, program directors, and chiefs were identified. Number of followers, total posts, and posts since March 1, 2020, were extracted. Account content was categorized as informational, social, operative, research, self-promotional, guest lecture, education, or other. Spearman's coefficient was used to determine correlations among account data. Differences among regions and program pathways were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: Since March 1, 2020, 17 Instagram, five Twitter, and three Facebook accounts have been created. Instagram was most widely used and followed (1720 posts, 1235.7 ± 735.9 followers) compared with Twitter (722 tweets, 325.6 ± 451.0 followers) and Facebook (430 posts, 338.3 ± 363.3 followers). Although the majority of content was informational (45.1 percent), Instagram contained more social content (21 percent), Twitter contained more research (21 percent), and Facebook contained more self-promotional content (25 percent). Integrated-only programs on average posted more on Instagram (21.5 ± 15.1 posts) than did independent-only programs (9.4 ± 8.5 posts), and post volume moderately correlated with number of followers. There were no statistically significant differences among regional means. CONCLUSION: Plastic surgery residency programs have incorporated social media into their recruitment strategies and will likely continue to increase and diversify their posts to effectively engage with future applicants.

Special Considerations for Chin Augmentation in the Professional Violinist.

ABSTRACT: The extensive training and unique positioning of a stringed instrument (eg, professional violinist) may subject the mandible to compressive forces that may lead to asymmetric micrognathia. Prior cephalometric studies have shown a right-sided facial dominance with an underdeveloped left mandible. Surgical correction must account for occupational demands, as the chin is uniquely load-bearing in violinists. The use of three-dimensional planning with a customized implant facilitates the correction of asymmetries and allows shared decision-making for optimal implant fit. Our case outlines important considerations for alloplastic chin augmentation in violinists.

Does the Surgical Apgar Score predict serious complications after elective major cancer surgery?

BACKGROUND: Major cancer surgery is associated with significant risks of perioperative morbidity and mortality, resulting in delayed adjuvant therapy, higher recurrence rates, and worse overall survival. Previous retrospective studies have used the Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) for perioperative risk assessment. This study prospectively evaluated the predictive value of SAS to predict serious complication (SC) after elective major cancer surgery. METHODS: Demographic, comorbidity, procedure, and intraoperative data were collected prospectively for 405 patients undergoing elective major cancer surgery between 2014-17. The SAS was calculated immediately postoperative and outcome data were collected prospectively. Rates of SC according to SAS risk category were compared using Cochran-Armitage trend test. Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were generated and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Eighty percent, 17.3%, and 2.7% of patients were low (SAS 7-10), intermediate (SAS 5-6), and high risk (SAS 0-4), respectively, for SC based on their SAS. Forty-six (11.4%) had an SC within 30 days; 3.7% returned to the operating room, 3.7% experienced a urinary tract infection, 3.2% experienced a respiratory complication, 2.7% experienced a wound complication, and 1.2% experienced a cardiac complication. Overall, 9.3%, 18.6%, and 27.3% of patients with SAS 7-10, 5-6, and 0-4 experienced an SC, respectively (P = 0.005). The overall discriminatory ability of the SAS was modest (area under the receiver operating characteristic curves 0.661; 95% confidence intervals, 0.582-0.740). CONCLUSIONS: Although there was an overall association between SAS and higher risk of subsequent postoperative SC in our cohort, the ability of the SAS to accurately predict risk of postoperative SC at the patient level was limited.

Pathologic response following treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer: Does location matter?

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in the treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma, the management of locally advanced disease remains a challenge. The standard of care for patients with stages II and III rectal cancer includes neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by total mesorectal excision and postoperative chemotherapy. Much effort has been dedicated to the identification of predictive factors associated with pathologic complete response (pCR). The aim of our study was to examine our institutional experience and determine whether any association exists between anatomic tumor location and the rate of pCR. We hypothesized that lesions more than 6 cm from the anal verge are more likely to achieve a pCR. METHODS: Using data from our prospectively maintained tumor registry, a query was completed to identify all patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent treatment at Fox Chase Cancer Center from 2002 to 2015. Demographics, pretreatment, posttreatment, and final pathologic TNM staging data were collected as well as treatment intervals in days, recurrence status, overall survival, and disease-free survival. Patients with incomplete endoscopic data, staging information, survival, or recurrence status were excluded. The primary outcome measured was the degree of pathologic response. Logistic regression was used to adjust for covariates. RESULTS: Of the 135 patients eligible in the study cohort, 39% were female and 61% were male. Regarding initial clinical stage, 43% were stage II and 57% were stage III. A total of 29% had a pCR, 43% had partial pathologic response, and 28% had no response to neoadjuvant treatment. Tumor location ranged from 0 to 13 cm from the anal verge. Longitudinal tumor length was recorded in 111 patients, facilitating the calculation of mean tumor distance from the anal verge. This ranged from 0 to 15.5 cm. Univariate and multivariable analyses were completed using pCR as a primary outcome. No statistically significant difference was noted based on tumor location, regardless of measurement approach. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic location of cancer of the rectum does not affect pCR after neoadjuvant therapy and subsequent surgical resection.