Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Occup Environ Med ; 63(4): e184-e186, 2021 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33769403

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an empirical olfactory test to identify COVID-19 cases during a workplace entrance screening. METHOD: An active screening for olfactory dysfunction using water and vinegar was conducted in April to June 2020 among 4120 meat packing workers in Latin America. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the active olfactory screening examination were 41.2% and 85.3%, respectively, using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests as a gold standard. 10.6% of employees who tested positive for COVID-19 had an olfactory dysfunction as their only symptom. These individuals would not have been identified with standard workplace screening measures including temperature screening. CONCLUSION: Active screening for olfactory dysfunction may serve as a valuable tool to both identify potential COVID-19 infections and exclude those who do not have infection and should be a part of parallel algorithm combined with standard workplace entrance screening procedures.


Assuntos
Anosmia/diagnóstico , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Local de Trabalho , Ácido Acético , Anosmia/fisiopatologia , COVID-19/fisiopatologia , Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Indústria de Embalagem de Carne , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Água
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA