A single-centre, retrospective study of mid-term outcomes of aortic arch repair using a standardized resection and patch augmentation technique.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term outcomes after the repair of aortic arch using a standard patch augmentation technique. METHODS: The study included all patients who underwent repair of a hypoplastic/interrupted aortic arch (IAA) in a single institute from June 2012 to December 2019 by a standardized patch augmentation (irrespective of concomitant intra-cardiac lesions). End points evaluated were reintervention for arch obstruction and persistent/new-onset hypertension. RESULTS: The study included 149 patients [hypoplastic aortic arch, n = 92 (62%), IAA, n = 9 (6%), Norwood procedure, n = 48 (32%)]. The patch material used for augmentation of the aortic arch included pulmonary homograft (n = 120, 81%), homograft pericardium (n = 18, 12%), CardioCel® (n = 9, 6%) and glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium (n = 2, 1%). The median age and weight at surgery were 7 days [interquartile range (IQR) 5-17 days] and 3.5 kg (IQR 3-3.9 kg), respectively. The median follow-up was 3.27 years (IQR 1.28, 5.08), range (0.02, 8.76). Freedom from reintervention at 1, 3 and 5 years was 95% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 89%, 98%], 93% (95% CI = 86%, 96%) and 93% (95% CI = 86%, 96%) respectively. One patient (0.6%) had persistent hypertension 8 years after correction for interrupted arch with truncus arteriosus. CONCLUSIONS: Repair of hypoplastic/IAA by transection and excision of all ductal tissue and standardized patch augmentation provide good mid-term durability. The freedom from reintervention at 5 years is >90%. The incidence of persistent systemic hypertension following arch reconstruction is low. The technique is reproducible and applicable irrespective of underlying arch anatomy.

Heterotaxy Is Not a Risk Factor for Adverse Long-Term Outcomes After Fontan Completion.

BACKGROUND: Heterotaxy is considered a risk factor for poor outcomes after the Fontan operation. However, long-term data to support this notion are lacking. The aims of this study were to ascertain the long-term outcomes of patients with heterotaxy after hospital discharge after Fontan completion and to compare these outcomes with those of a contemporary nonheterotaxy cohort. METHODS: A binational Fontan registry (n = 1540) was analyzed to identify patients with heterotaxy and compare them with patients without heterotaxy. The primary composite end point was Fontan failure, encompassing death, heart transplantation, Fontan takedown or conversion, protein-losing enteropathy, plastic bronchitis, or New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients with heterotaxy were identified and they were compared with 1431 nonheterotaxy patients after Fontan completion. There was no difference in unadjusted 15-year freedom from Fontan failure (heterotaxy, 78% vs nonheterotaxy, 85%; P = .2). Patients in the heterotaxy group had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of post-Fontan arrhythmias (P < .001). Propensity-score matching for confounders yielded 73 patients with heterotaxy matched with 439 patients without heterotaxy, in whom 15-year freedom from Fontan failure was also not different (heterotaxy, 76% vs nonheterotaxy, 81%; P = .2). There was no difference in 15-year freedom from Fontan failure in patients with right vs left isomerism (right isomerism, 80% vs left isomerism, 76%; P = .7). CONCLUSIONS: Although heterotaxy may complicate the pre-Fontan course, once the Fontan procedure is successfully completed, heterotaxy does not appear to be an important risk factor for Fontan failure. Patients with heterotaxy are at a higher risk of post-Fontan arrhythmias compared with patients without heterotaxy.