Are outpatient costs for hypertension and diabetes care affordable? Evidence from Western Kenya.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes and hypertension pose a significant socio-economic burden in developing countries such as Kenya, where financial risk-protection mechanisms remain inadequate. This proves to be a great barrier towards achieving universal health care in such settings unless mechanisms are put in place to ensure greater access and affordability to non-communicable disease (NCD) management services. AIM: This article aims to examine outpatient management services costs for patients with diabetes and hypertension attending public primary healthcare facilities. SETTING: The study was conducted in Busia and Trans-Nzoia counties in Western Kenya in facilities supported by the PIC4C project, between August 2020 and December 2020. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey included 719 adult participants. Structured interviewer-administered questionnaires were used to collect information on healthcare-seeking behaviour and associated costs. The annual direct and indirect costs borne by patients were computed by disease type and level of healthcare facility visited. RESULTS: Patients with both diabetes and hypertension incurred higher annual costs (KES 13 149) compared to those with either diabetes (KES 8408) or hypertension (KES 7458). Patients attending dispensaries and other public healthcare facilities incurred less direct costs compared to those who visited private clinics. Furthermore, a higher proportionate catastrophic healthcare expenditure of 41.83% was noted among uninsured patients. CONCLUSION: Despite this study being conducted in facilities that had an ongoing NCDs care project that increased access to subsidised medication, we still reported a substantially high cost of managing diabetes and hypertension among patients attending primary healthcare facilities in Western Kenya, with a greater burden among those with comorbidities.Contribution: Evidenced by the results that there is enormous financial burden borne by patients with chronic diseases such as hypertension and diabetes; we recommend that universal healthcare coverage that offers comprehensive care for NCDs be urgently rolled out alongside strengthening of lower-level public healthcare systems.

Integrating digital solutions into national health data systems through public-private collaboration: An early experience of the SPICE platform in Kenya.

Public-private collaborative efforts to address healthcare challenges in low- and middle-income countries have been the focus of digital initiatives to improve both access and quality of health services. We report the early feasibility, experience, and learnings of migrating healthcare data generated from a proprietary, privately owned cloud-based environment into an on-premises National Health Data Center (NHDC) in compliance with Kenya's data management legislation. In 2018, Medtronic LABS entered into a partnership with the Kenya Ministry of Health and other stakeholders to improve access to quality services and data availability for non-communicable diseases (diabetes and hypertension), anchored on the SPICE digital health platform. Data migration from SPICE to the NHDC necessitated the establishment of multi-stakeholder coordination structures, alignment on system configuration requirements, provisioning of on-premises servers, data replication and monitoring. The data replication process showed consistency in format and content with no evidence of data loss. The monitoring of the server uptime and availability, however, exposed overall downtime of 15% of the total time tracked between April and December 2022 caused by Internet Protocol address configuration issues, power outages, firewall rule changes, and unscheduled system maintenance. Monthly tracked downtime however reduced from a high of 28% in April 2022 to 5% in December 2022. Our early experience shows that data migration from proprietary host environments to public "one-stop-shop" national data warehouses are feasible provided investments are made in the requisite infrastructure, software and human resource capacity to ensure long-term sustainability, maintenance, and scale to match cloud-based data hosting. Further, digital health solutions developed in collaboration with non-state actors can be integrated into national data systems, saving Governments the cost and efforts of building similar tools while leveraging private sector capacity.

'Implementability' matters: using implementation research steps to guide and support non-communicable disease national planning in low-income and middle-income countries.

The 'implementation gap' between national plans and successful implementation is a central theme in addressing non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It is a factor that has undermined Sustainable Development Goal 3.4, which aims to achieve a one-third reduction in premature mortality from four major NCDs by 2030. Responding to the potential of implementation research to support low-income and middle-income countries to effectively advance their strategies, we describe ways to make NCD plans more robust by including implementation steps. These steps are (1) choosing some (but not all) effective and cost-effective options; (2) tailoring interventions and their scale-up to national capacity; and (3) making the priorities implementable. We illustrate with examples from several countries.

Qualitative insights into reasons for missed opportunities for vaccination in Kenyan health facilities.

BACKGROUND: In 2016, Kenya conducted a study of missed opportunities for vaccination (MOV)-when eligible children have contact with the health system but are not fully vaccinated-to explore some of the reasons for persistent low vaccination coverage. This paper details the qualitative findings from that assessment. METHODS: Using the World Health Organization MOV methodology, teams conducted focus group discussions among caregivers and health workers and in-depth interviews of key informants in 10 counties in Kenya. Caregivers of children <24 months of age visiting the selected health facilities on the day of the assessment were requested to participate in focus group discussions. Health workers were purposively sampled to capture a broad range of perspectives. Key informants were selected based on their perceived insight on immunization services at the county, sub-county, or health facility level. RESULTS: Six focus group discussions with caregivers, eight focus group discussions with health workers, and 35 in-depth interviews with key informants were completed. In general, caregivers had positive attitudes toward healthcare and vaccination services, but expressed a desire for increased education surrounding vaccination. In order to standardize vaccination checks at all health facility visits, health workers and key informants emphasized the need for additional trainings for all staff members on immunization. Health workers and key informants also highlighted the negative impact of significant understaffing in health facilities, and the persistent challenge of stock-outs of vaccines and vaccination-related supplies. CONCLUSIONS: Identified factors that could contribute to MOV include a lack of knowledge surrounding vaccination among caregivers and health workers, inadequate number of health workers, and stock-outs of vaccines or vaccination-related materials. In addition, vaccination checks outside of vaccination visits lacked consistency, leading to MOV in non-vaccinating departments. Qualitative assessments could provide a starting point for understanding and developing interventions to address MOV in other countries.