Patient reported outcome and quality of life measured by a simple questionnaire in patients with symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia treated by holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).

Introduction: Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) is established as an effective transurethral treatment option for LUTS due to BPH with improved postoperative outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the medium-term results by patient reported outcome measurement and to detect potential risk factors for postoperative complications or impaired outcome. Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study including all patients undergoing HoLEP in the study center between April 2019 and December 2021. Therefore, perioperative parameters and postoperative outcome was documented and all patients were asked for their outcome (PROM), complications, IPSS, QoL and changes in sexual and continence function by a questionnaire at a single time point. Results: In the study period, a total of 541 patients with a mean age of 72.5 ± 8.4 years were treated by HoLEP in the study center. 71.7% of the questionnaires were returned after a mean observation period of 14.9 ± 6.3 month. 91% of the patients reported to the single-timepoint questionnaire reporting a good satisfaction with the procedure and a low postoperative complication rate. The international prostate symptom score could be reduced significantly to 6.2 ± 5.7 (preoperative 19.0 ± 7.2; p < 0.001). Patients with an ASA score ≥ 3, prostate volume > 80 ml, medication with platelet inhibitors or DOAK or preoperative need of an indwelling catheter didn't show an increased complication rate. Conclusion: The overall satisfaction with the procedure and its results are high. We could not identify any independent risk factors for postoperative complications after HoLEP. The used questionnaire is a simple tool for postoperative patient reported outcome measurement with a good correlation to clinical parameters.

[Impact of the experience of urological senior physicians in Germany on professional and personal aspects]. / Welchen Einfluss hat die Dauer der Oberarzttätigkeit auf die Berufsausübung und Zufriedenheit urologischer OberärztInnen in Deutschland?

BACKGROUND: Urological senior physicians in Germany are a heterogeneous group with various clinical priorities and career objectives. To date, there are no reliable data concerning the impact of the time span for which senior physicians have been holding their position on professional, personal and position-linked aspects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The objective of this study was a comparative analysis of perspectives, private and professional settings, specific job-related activities and individual professional goals of urological senior physicians in Germany based on their experience in this position assessed as number of years (dichotomised at 8 years as senior physician). As part of a cross-sectional study, a 55-item web-based questionnaire was designed, which was sent via a link to members of a mailing list of the German Society of Urology. The survey was available for urological senior physicians between February and April 2019. Group differences were evaluated using multivariate regression models. RESULTS: 107 of 192 evaluable questionnaires were completed by senior physicians holding this position for less than 8 years (< 8y senior physicians), 85 were completed by senior physicians holding this position for at least 8 years (≥ 8y senior physicians). < 8y senior physicians worked significantly more often at university hospitals (42.1 % vs. 18.8 %, p = 0.002). Overall, 82.4 % of ≥ 8y senior physicians assessed themselves autonomously safe in performing open surgery, compared to 39.3 % among < 8y senior physicians (p < 0.001). No significant differences concerning the self-assessment were found for endourological procedures (94.1 % vs. 87.9 %) and for the overall lower-rated self-assessment concerning laparoscopy (29.4 % vs. 20.6 %) and robotic surgery (14.1 % vs. 10.3 %). Despite the high management responsibility associated with their position, only about one third of participants (34.8 %) had received specific postgraduate education preparing them for managing and executive tasks. CONCLUSION: This study shows significant differences among senior physicians regarding surgical skills depending on the time span they hold their position. Moreover, there is considerable dissatisfaction regarding the development of leadership skills and the preparation for managing tasks. In order to ensure availability of senior staff members for the field of urology in the future, it is important to consider their professional needs and to overcome existing shortcomings by education programs within well-orchestrated human resources development strategies.

Thromboembolic Events in Patients with Testicular Germ Cell Tumours Are Predominantly Triggered by Advanced Disease and by Central Venous Access Systems.

BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic events (TEEs) may significantly complicate the clinical management of patients with testicular germ cell tumours (GCTs). We analysed a cohort of GCT patients for the occurrence of TEEs and looked to possible pathogenetic factors. PATIENTS, METHODS: TEEs occurring within 6 months after diagnosis were retrospectively analysed in 317 consecutive patients with testicular GCT (median age 37 years, 198 seminoma, 119 nonseminoma). The following factors were analysed for association with TEE: histology, age, clinical stage (CS), chemotherapy, use of a central venous access device (CVA). Data analysis involved descriptive statistical methods with multivariable analysis to identify independent risk factors. RESULTS: Twenty-three TEEs (7.3%) were observed, 18 deep vein thromboses, 4 pulmonary embolisms, and 1 myocardial infarction. Univariable risk calculation yielded the following odds ratios (ORs) : >CS1 OR = 43.7 (95% confidence intervals [CIs] 9.9-191.6); chemotherapy OR = 7.8 (95% CI 2.3-26.6); CVA OR = 30.5 (95% CI 11.0-84.3). Multivariable analysis identified only CS > 1 (OR = 16.9; 95% CI 3.5-82.4) and CVA (OR = 9.0; 95% CI 2.9-27.5) as independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CSs >CS1 are at significantly increased risk of TEEs even without chemotherapy. Particular high risk is associated with the use of CVA devices for chemotherapy. Caregivers of GCT patients must be aware of the particular risk of TEEs.

Gender-Specific Variations in Professional and Personal Aspects among Senior Urology Physicians at German Centers: Results of a Web-Based Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Senior urology physicians represent a heterogeneous group covering various clinical priorities and career objectives. No reliable data on gender-specific variations among senior urology physicians are available concerning professional and personal aspects. METHODS: The objective of this study was to analyze professional perspectives, professional and personal settings, and individual career goals. A Web-based survey containing 55 items was designed which was available for senior physicians at German urologic centers between February and April 2019. Gender-specific differences were evaluated using bootstrap-adjusted multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-two surveys were evaluable including 29 female senior physicians (15.1%). Ninety-five percent would choose urology again as their field of specialization - with no significant gender-specific difference. 81.2% of participants rate the position of senior physician as a desirable career goal (comparing sexes: p = 0.220). Based on multivariate models, male participants self-assessed themselves significantly more frequently autonomously safe performing laparoscopic, open, and endourologic surgery. Male senior physicians declared 7 times more often to run for the position of head of department/full professor. CONCLUSION: This first study on professional and personal aspects among senior urology physicians demonstrates gender-specific variations concerning self-assessment of surgical expertise and future career goals. The creation of well-orchestrated human resources development strategies especially adapted to the needs of female urologists seems advisable.