Molecular basis for the interactions of eIF2ß with eIF5, eIF2B, and 5MP1 and their regulation by CK2.

The heterotrimeric GTPase eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2) delivers the initiator Met-tRNAi to the ribosomal translation preinitiation complex. eIF2ß has three lysine-rich repeats (K-boxes) in its N-terminal tail, which are important for binding to the GTPase-activating protein (GAP) eIF5, the guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) eIF2B, and the regulator eIF5-mimic protein (5MP). Here, we combine X-ray crystallography with NMR to understand the molecular basis and dynamics of these interactions. The crystal structure of yeast eIF5-CTD in complex with K-box 3 of eIF2ß reveals an extended binding site on eIF2ß, far beyond the K-box. We show that human eIF5, eIF2Bε, and 5MP1 can all bind to each of the three K-boxes, while reducing each other's affinities. Moreover, all these affinities are increased by CK2 phosphomimetic mutations. Our results reveal how eIF5, eIF2B, and 5MP displace each other from eIF2, and elucidate the role of CK2 in remodeling the translation apparatus.

The PCI domains are "winged" HEAT domains.

The HEAT domains are a family of helical hairpin repeat domains, composed of four or more hairpins. HEAT is derived from the names of four family members: huntingtin, eukaryotic translation elongation factor 3 (eEF3), protein phosphatase 2 regulatory A subunit (PP2A), and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR). HEAT domain-containing proteins play roles in a wide range of cellular processes, such as protein synthesis, nuclear transport and metabolism, and cell signaling. The PCI domains are a related group of helical hairpin domains, with a "winged-helix" (WH) subdomain at their C-terminus, which is responsible for multi-subunit complex formation with other PCI domains. The name is derived from the complexes, where these domains are found: the 26S Proteasome "lid" regulatory subcomplex, the COP9 signalosome (CSN), and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3). We noted that in structure similarity searches using HEAT domains, sometimes PCI domains appeared in the search results ahead of other HEAT domains, which indicated that the PCI domains could be members of the HEAT domain family, and not a related but separate group, as currently thought. Here, we report extensive structure similarity analysis of HEAT and PCI domains, both within and between the two groups of proteins. We present evidence that the PCI domains as a group have greater structural similarity with individual groups of HEAT domains than some of the HEAT domain groups have among each other. Therefore, our results indicate that the PCI domains have evolved from a HEAT domain that acquired a WH subdomain. The WH subdomain in turn mediated self-association into a multi-subunit complex, which eventually evolved into the common ancestor of the Proteasome lid/CSN/eIF3.

Regulation of the interactions between human eIF5 and eIF1A by the CK2 kinase.

Translation initiation in eukaryotes relies on a complex network of interactions that are continuously reorganized throughout the process. As more information becomes available about the structure of the ribosomal preinitiation complex (PIC) at various points in translation initiation, new questions arise about which interactions occur when, their roles, and regulation. The eukaryotic translation factor (eIF) 5 is the GTPase-activating protein (GAP) for the GTPase eIF2, which brings the initiator Met-tRNAi to the PIC. eIF5 also plays a central role in PIC assembly and remodeling through interactions with other proteins, including eIFs 1, 1A, and 3c. Phosphorylation by casein kinase 2 (CK2) significantly increases the eIF5 affinity for eIF2. The interaction between eIF5 and eIF1A was reported to be mediated by the eIF5 C-terminal domain (CTD) and the eIF1A N-terminal tail. Here, we report a new contact interface, between eIF5-CTD and the oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding fold (OB) domain of eIF1A, which contributes to the overall affinity between the two proteins. We also show that the interaction is modulated by dynamic intramolecular interactions within both eIF5 and eIF1A. CK2 phosphorylation of eIF5 increases its affinity for eIF1A, offering new insights into the mechanisms by which CK2 stimulates protein synthesis and cell proliferation.

The metaphorical swiss army knife: The multitude and diverse roles of HEAT domains in eukaryotic translation initiation.

Biomolecular associations forged by specific interaction among structural scaffolds are fundamental to the control and regulation of cell processes. One such structural architecture, characterized by HEAT repeats, is involved in a multitude of cellular processes, including intracellular transport, signaling, and protein synthesis. Here, we review the multitude and versatility of HEAT domains in the regulation of mRNA translation initiation. Structural and cellular biology approaches, as well as several biophysical studies, have revealed that a number of HEAT domain-mediated interactions with a host of protein factors and RNAs coordinate translation initiation. We describe the basic structural architecture of HEAT domains and briefly introduce examples of the cellular processes they dictate, including nuclear transport by importin and RNA degradation. We then focus on proteins in the translation initiation system featuring HEAT domains, specifically the HEAT domains of eIF4G, DAP5, eIF5, and eIF2Bϵ. Comparative analysis of their remarkably versatile interactions, including protein-protein and protein-RNA recognition, reveal the functional importance of flexible regions within these HEAT domains. Here we outline how HEAT domains orchestrate fundamental aspects of translation initiation and highlight open mechanistic questions in the area.

Dynamic interaction network involving the conserved intrinsically disordered regions in human eIF5.

Translation initiation in eukaryotes requires multiple eukaryotic translation initiation factors (eIFs) and involves continuous remodeling of the ribosomal preinitiation complex (PIC). The GTPase eIF2 brings the initiator Met-tRNAi to the PIC. Upon start codon selection and GTP hydrolysis, promoted by eIF5, eIF2-GDP is released in complex with eIF5. Here, we report that two intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) in eIF5, the DWEAR motif and the C-terminal tail (CTT) dynamically contact the folded C-terminal domain (CTD) and compete with each other. The eIF5-CTD•CTT interaction favors eIF2ß binding to eIF5-CTD, whereas the eIF5-CTD•DWEAR interaction favors eIF1A binding, which suggests how intramolecular contact rearrangement could play a role in PIC remodeling. We show that eIF5 phosphorylation by CK2, which is known to stimulate translation and cell proliferation, significantly increases the eIF5 affinity for eIF2. Our results also indicate that the eIF2ß subunit has at least two, and likely three eIF5-binding sites.

eIF2B and the Integrated Stress Response: A Structural and Mechanistic View.

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF2 is a GTPase, which brings the initiator Met-tRNAi to the ribosome as the eIF2-GTP·Met-tRNAi ternary complex (TC). TC regeneration is catalyzed by the guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) eIF2B. eIF2 phosphorylation by several stress-induced kinases converts it into a competitive inhibitor of eIF2B. Inhibition of eIF2B activity lowers cellular TC concentrations, which in turn triggers the integrated stress response (ISR). Depending on its degree of activation and duration, the ISR protects the cell from the stress or can itself induce apoptosis. ISR dysregulation is a causative factor in the pathology of multiple neurodegenerative disorders, while ISR inhibitors are neuroprotective. The realization that eIF2B is a promising therapeutic target has triggered significant interest in its structure and its mechanisms of action and regulation. Recently, four groups published the cryo-electron microscopy structures of eIF2B with its substrate eIF2 and/or its inhibitor, phosphorylated eIF2 [eIF2(α-P)]. While all three structures of the nonproductive eIF2B·eIF2(α-P) complex are similar to each other, there is a sharp disagreement between the published structures of the productive eIF2B·eIF2 complex. One group reports a structure similar to that of the nonproductive complex, whereas two others observe a vastly different eIF2B·eIF2 complex. Here, we discuss the recent reports on the structure, function, and regulation of eIF2B; the preclinical data on the use of ISR inhibitors for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders; and how the new structural and biochemical information can inform and influence the use of eIF2B as a therapeutic target.

Human eIF5 and eIF1A Compete for Binding to eIF5B.

Eukaryotic translation initiation is a multistep process requiring a number of eukaryotic translation initiation factors (eIFs). Two GTPases play key roles in the process. eIF2 brings the initiator Met-tRNAi to the preinitiation complex (PIC). Upon start codon selection and GTP hydrolysis promoted by the GTPase-activating protein (GAP) eIF5, eIF2-GDP is displaced from Met-tRNAi by eIF5B-GTP and is released in complex with eIF5. eIF5B promotes ribosomal subunit joining, with the help of eIF1A. Upon subunit joining, eIF5B hydrolyzes GTP and is released together with eIF1A. We found that human eIF5 interacts with eIF5B and may help recruit eIF5B to the PIC. An eIF5B-binding motif was identified at the C-terminus of eIF5, similar to that found in eIF1A. Indeed, eIF5 competes with eIF1A for binding and has an ∼100-fold higher affinity for eIF5B. Because eIF5 is the GAP of eIF2, the newly discovered interaction offers a possible mechanism for coordination between the two steps in translation initiation controlled by GTPases: start codon selection and ribosomal subunit joining. Our results indicate that in humans, eIF5B displacing eIF2 from Met-tRNAi upon subunit joining may be coupled to eIF1A displacing eIF5 from eIF5B, allowing the eIF5:eIF2-GDP complex to leave the ribosome.

Comparative sequence and structure analysis of eIF1A and eIF1AD.

BACKGROUND: Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A (eIF1A) is universally conserved in all organisms. It has multiple functions in translation initiation, including assembly of the ribosomal pre-initiation complexes, mRNA binding, scanning, and ribosomal subunit joining. eIF1A binds directly to the small ribosomal subunit, as well as to several other translation initiation factors. The structure of an eIF1A homolog, the eIF1A domain-containing protein (eIF1AD) was recently determined but its biological functions are unknown. Since eIF1AD has a known structure, as well as a homolog, whose structure and functions have been extensively studied, it is a very attractive target for sequence and structure analysis. RESULTS: Structure/sequence analysis of eIF1AD found significant conservation in the surfaces corresponding to the ribosome-binding surfaces of its paralog eIF1A, including a nearly invariant surface-exposed tryptophan residue, which plays an important role in the interaction of eIF1A with the ribosome. These results indicate that eIF1AD may bind to the ribosome, similar to its paralog eIF1A, and could have roles in ribosome biogenenesis or regulation of translation. We identified conserved surfaces and sequence motifs in the folded domain as well as the C-terminal tail of eIF1AD, which are likely protein-protein interaction sites. The roles of these regions for eIF1AD function remain to be determined. We have also identified a set of trypanosomatid-specific surface determinants in eIF1A that could be a promising target for development of treatments against these parasites. CONCLUSIONS: The results described here identify regions in eIF1A and eIF1AD that are likely to play major functional roles and are promising therapeutic targets. Our findings and hypotheses will promote new research and help elucidate the functions of eIF1AD.

eIF2B Mechanisms of Action and Regulation: A Thermodynamic View.

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2B (eIF2B) is the guanine nucleotide exchange factor of the GTPase eIF2, which brings the initiator Met-tRNAi to the ribosome in the form of the eIF2-GTP·Met-tRNAi ternary complex (TC). The activity of eIF2B is inhibited by phosphorylation of its substrate eIF2 by several stress-induced kinases, which triggers the integrated stress response (ISR). The ISR plays a central role in maintaining homeostasis in the cell under various stress conditions, and its dysregulation is a causative factor in the pathology of a number of neurodegenerative disorders. Over the past three decades, virtually every aspect of eIF2B function has been the subject of uncertainty or controversy: from the catalytic mechanism of nucleotide exchange, to whether eIF2B only catalyzes nucleotide exchange on eIF2 or also promotes binding of Met-tRNAi to eIF2-GTP to form the TC. Here, we provide the first complete thermodynamic analysis of the process of recycling of eIF2-GDP to the TC. The available evidence leads to the conclusion that eIF2 is channeled from the ribosome (as an eIF5·eIF2-GDP complex) to eIF2B, converted by eIF2B to the TC, which is then channeled back to eIF5 and the ribosome. The system has evolved to be regulated by multiple factors, including post-translational modifications of eIF2, eIF2B, and eIF5, as well as directly by the energy balance in the cell, through the GTP:GDP ratio.

Novel mechanisms of eIF2B action and regulation by eIF2α phosphorylation.

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2) is a heterotrimeric GTPase, which plays a critical role in protein synthesis regulation. eIF2-GTP binds Met-tRNAi to form the eIF2-GTP•Met-tRNAi ternary complex (TC), which is recruited to the 40S ribosomal subunit. Following GTP hydrolysis, eIF2-GDP is recycled back to TC by its guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), eIF2B. Phosphorylation of the eIF2α subunit in response to various cellular stresses converts eIF2 into a competitive inhibitor of eIF2B, which triggers the integrated stress response (ISR). Dysregulation of eIF2B activity is associated with a number of pathologies, including neurodegenerative diseases, metabolic disorders, and cancer. However, despite decades of research, the underlying molecular mechanisms of eIF2B action and regulation remain unknown. Here we employ a combination of NMR, fluorescence spectroscopy, site-directed mutagenesis, and thermodynamics to elucidate the mechanisms of eIF2B action and its regulation by phosphorylation of the substrate eIF2. We present: (i) a novel mechanism for the inhibition of eIF2B activity, whereby eIF2α phosphorylation destabilizes an autoregulatory intramolecular interaction within eIF2α; and (ii) the first structural model for the complex of eIF2B with its substrate, eIF2-GDP, reaction intermediates, apo-eIF2 and eIF2-GTP, and product, TC, with direct implications for the eIF2B catalytic mechanism.

eIF1A/eIF5B interaction network and its functions in translation initiation complex assembly and remodeling.

Eukaryotic translation initiation is a highly regulated process involving multiple steps, from 43S pre-initiation complex (PIC) assembly, to ribosomal subunit joining. Subunit joining is controlled by the G-protein eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5B (eIF5B). Another protein, eIF1A, is involved in virtually all steps, including subunit joining. The intrinsically disordered eIF1A C-terminal tail (eIF1A-CTT) binds to eIF5B Domain-4 (eIF5B-D4). The ribosomal complex undergoes conformational rearrangements at every step of translation initiation; however, the underlying molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. Here we report three novel interactions involving eIF5B and eIF1A: (i) a second binding interface between eIF5B and eIF1A; (ii) a dynamic intramolecular interaction in eIF1A between the folded domain and eIF1A-CTT; and (iii) an intramolecular interaction between eIF5B-D3 and -D4. The intramolecular interactions within eIF1A and eIF5B interfere with one or both eIF5B/eIF1A contact interfaces, but are disrupted on the ribosome at different stages of translation initiation. Therefore, our results indicate that the interactions between eIF1A and eIF5B are being continuously rearranged during translation initiation. We present a model how the dynamic eIF1A/eIF5B interaction network can promote remodeling of the translation initiation complexes, and the roles in the process played by intrinsically disordered protein segments.

Insights into the architecture of the eIF2Bα/ß/δ regulatory subcomplex.

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2B (eIF2B), the guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the G-protein eIF2, is one of the main targets for the regulation of protein synthesis. The eIF2B activity is inhibited in response to a wide range of stress factors and diseases, including viral infections, hypoxia, nutrient starvation, and heme deficiency, collectively known as the integrated stress response. eIF2B has five subunits (α-ε). The α, ß, and δ subunits are homologous to each other and form the eIF2B regulatory subcomplex, which is believed to be a trimer consisting of monomeric α, ß, and δ subunits. Here we use a combination of biophysical methods, site-directed mutagenesis, and bioinformatics to show that the human eIF2Bα subunit is in fact a homodimer, at odds with the current trimeric model for the eIF2Bα/ß/δ regulatory complex. eIF2Bα dimerizes using the same interface that is found in the homodimeric archaeal eIF2Bα/ß/δ homolog aIF2B and related metabolic enzymes. We also present evidence that the eIF2Bß/δ binding interface is similar to that in the eIF2Bα2 homodimer. Mutations at the predicted eIF2Bß/δ dimer interface cause genetic neurological disorders in humans. We propose that the eIF2B regulatory subcomplex is an α2ß2δ2 hexamer, composed of one α2 homodimer and two ßδ heterodimers. Our results offer novel insights into the architecture of eIF2B and its interactions with the G-protein eIF2.

Roles of helicases in translation initiation: a mechanistic view.

The goal of this review is to summarize our current knowledge about the helicases involved in translation initiation and their roles in both general and mRNA-specific translation. The main topics covered are the mechanisms of helicase action, with emphasis on the roles of accessory domains and proteins; the functions performed by helicases in translation initiation; and the interplay between direct and indirect effects of helicases that also function in steps preceding translation initiation. Special attention is given to the dynamics of eIF4A binding and dissociation from eIF4F during mRNA unwinding. It is proposed that DHX29, as well as other helicases and translation initiation factors could also cycle on and off the translation initiation complexes, similar to eIF4A. The evidence in favor of this hypothesis and its possible implications for the mechanisms of translation initiation is discussed. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: The biology of RNA helicases - Modulation for life.

The C-terminal domain of eukaryotic initiation factor 5 promotes start codon recognition by its dynamic interplay with eIF1 and eIF2ß.

Recognition of the proper start codon on mRNAs is essential for protein synthesis, which requires scanning and involves eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) eIF1, eIF1A, eIF2, and eIF5. The carboxyl terminal domain (CTD) of eIF5 stimulates 43S preinitiation complex (PIC) assembly; however, its precise role in scanning and start codon selection has remained unknown. Using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, we identified the binding sites of eIF1 and eIF2ß on eIF5-CTD and found that they partially overlapped. Mutating select eIF5 residues in the common interface specifically disrupts interaction with both factors. Genetic and biochemical evidence indicates that these eIF5-CTD mutations impair start codon recognition and impede eIF1 release from the PIC by abrogating eIF5-CTD binding to eIF2ß. This study provides mechanistic insight into the role of eIF5-CTD's dynamic interplay with eIF1 and eIF2ß in switching PICs from an open to a closed state at start codons.

Common conformational changes induced in type 2 picornavirus IRESs by cognate trans-acting factors.

Type 2 internal ribosomal entry sites (IRESs) of encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV), foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) and other picornaviruses comprise five major domains H-L. Initiation of translation on these IRESs begins with specific binding of the central domain of initiation factor, eIF4G to the J-K domains, which is stimulated by eIF4A. eIF4G/eIF4A then restructure the region of ribosomal attachment on the IRES and promote recruitment of ribosomal 43S pre-initiation complexes. In addition to canonical translation factors, type 2 IRESs also require IRES trans-acting factors (ITAFs) that are hypothesized to stabilize the optimal IRES conformation that supports efficient ribosomal recruitment: the EMCV IRES is stimulated by pyrimidine tract binding protein (PTB), whereas the FMDV IRES requires PTB and ITAF(45). To test this hypothesis, we assessed the effect of ITAFs on the conformations of EMCV and FMDV IRESs by comparing their influence on hydroxyl radical cleavage of these IRESs from the central domain of eIF4G. The observed changes in cleavage patterns suggest that cognate ITAFs promote similar conformational changes that are consistent with adoption by the IRESs of comparable, more compact structures, in which domain J undergoes local conformational changes and is brought into closer proximity to the base of domain I.

Bypassing of stems versus linear base-by-base inspection of mammalian mRNAs during ribosomal scanning.

Initiation codon selection in eukaryotes involves base-by-base inspection of the 5'-untranslated region of mRNA by scanning ribosomal 43S preinitiation complexes. We employed in vitro reconstitution to investigate factor requirements for this process and report that in the absence of eIF1 and DHX29, eIFs 4A, 4B and 4G promote efficient bypassing of stable stems by scanning 43S complexes and formation of 48S initiation complexes on AUG codons immediately upstream and downstream of such stems, without their unwinding. However, intact stems are not threaded through the entire mRNA Exit channel of the 40S subunit, resulting in incorrect positioning of mRNA upstream of the ribosomal P site in 48S complexes formed on AUG codons following intact stems, which renders them susceptible to dissociation by eIF1. In 48S complexes formed on AUG codons preceding intact stems, the stems are accommodated in the A site. Such aberrant complexes are destabilized by DHX29, which also ensures that mRNA enters the mRNA-binding cleft in a single-stranded form and therefore undergoes base-by-base inspection during scanning.

Position of eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF1A on the 40S ribosomal subunit mapped by directed hydroxyl radical probing.

The universally conserved eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF), eIF1A, plays multiple roles throughout initiation: it stimulates eIF2/GTP/Met-tRNA(i)(Met) attachment to 40S ribosomal subunits, scanning, start codon selection and subunit joining. Its bacterial ortholog IF1 consists of an oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding (OB) domain, whereas eIF1A additionally contains a helical subdomain, N-terminal tail (NTT) and C-terminal tail (CTT). The NTT and CTT both enhance ribosomal recruitment of eIF2/GTP/Met-tRNA(i)(Met), but have opposite effects on the stringency of start codon selection: the CTT increases, whereas the NTT decreases it. Here, we determined the position of eIF1A on the 40S subunit by directed hydroxyl radical cleavage. eIF1A's OB domain binds in the A site, similar to IF1, whereas the helical subdomain contacts the head, forming a bridge over the mRNA channel. The NTT and CTT both thread under Met-tRNA(i)(Met) reaching into the P-site. The NTT threads closer to the mRNA channel. In the proposed model, the NTT does not clash with either mRNA or Met-tRNA(i)(Met), consistent with its suggested role in promoting the 'closed' conformation of ribosomal complexes upon start codon recognition. In contrast, eIF1A-CTT appears to interfere with the P-site tRNA-head interaction in the 'closed' complex and is likely ejected from the P-site upon start codon recognition.

Topology and regulation of the human eIF4A/4G/4H helicase complex in translation initiation.

The RNA helicase eIF4A plays a key role in unwinding of mRNA and scanning during translation initiation. Free eIF4A is a poor helicase and requires the accessory proteins eIF4G and eIF4H. However, the structure of the helicase complex and the mechanisms of stimulation of eIF4A activity have remained elusive. Here we report the topology of the eIF4A/4G/4H helicase complex, which is built from multiple experimentally observed domain-domain contacts. Remarkably, some of the interactions are continuously rearranged during the ATP binding/hydrolysis cycle of the helicase. We show that the accessory proteins modulate the affinity of eIF4A for ATP by interacting simultaneously with both helicase domains and promoting either the closed, ATP-bound conformation or the open, nucleotide-free conformation. The topology of the complex and the spatial arrangement of the RNA-binding surfaces offer insights into their roles in stimulation of helicase activity and the mechanisms of mRNA unwinding and scanning.

Selective pharmacological targeting of a DEAD box RNA helicase.

RNA helicases represent a large family of proteins implicated in many biological processes including ribosome biogenesis, splicing, translation and mRNA degradation. However, these proteins have little substrate specificity, making inhibition of selected helicases a challenging problem. The prototypical DEAD box RNA helicase, eIF4A, works in conjunction with other translation factors to prepare mRNA templates for ribosome recruitment during translation initiation. Herein, we provide insight into the selectivity of a small molecule inhibitor of eIF4A, hippuristanol. This coral-derived natural product binds to amino acids adjacent to, and overlapping with, two conserved motifs present in the carboxy-terminal domain of eIF4A. Mutagenesis of amino acids within this region allowed us to alter the hippuristanol-sensitivity of eIF4A and undertake structure/function studies. Our results provide an understanding into how selective targeting of RNA helicases for pharmacological intervention can be achieved.