Therapeutic strategies after coronary stenting in chronically anticoagulated patients: the MUSICA study.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the therapeutic regimens used at discharge in patients receiving oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) who undergo stenting percutaneous coronary intervention and stent implantation (PCI-S), and to assess the safety and efficacy associated with different therapeutic regimens according to thromboembolic risk. DESIGN: A prospective multicentre registry. SETTING: In hospital, after discharge and follow-up by telephone call. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 405 patients (328 male/77 female; mean (SD) age 71 (9) years) receiving OAT who underwent PCI-S between November 2003 and June 2006 from nine catheterisation laboratories of tertiary care teaching hospitals in Spain and one in the United Kingdom were included. RESULTS: Three therapeutic regimens were identified at discharge: triple therapy (TT) -- that is, any anticoagulant (AC) plus double antiplatelet therapy (DAT; 278 patients (68.6%); AC and a single antiplatelet (AC+AT; 46 (11.4%)) and DAT only (81 (20%)). At 6 months, patients receiving TT showed the greatest rate of bleeding events. No patients receiving DAT at low thromboembolic risk presented a bleeding event (14.8% receiving TT, 11.8% receiving AC+AT and 0% receiving DAT, p = 0.033) or cardiovascular event (6.7% receiving TT, 0% receiving AC+AT and 0% receiving DAT, p = 0.126). The combination of AC+AT showed the worst rate of adverse events in the whole cohort, especially in patients at moderate-high thromboembolic risk. CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving OAT, TT was the most commonly used regimen after PCI-S. DAT was associated with the lowest rate of bleeding events and a similar efficacy to TT in patients at low thromboembolic risk. TT should probably be restricted to patients at moderate-high thromboembolic risk.

The use of ultrasonography as the initial diagnostic exploration in blunt renal trauma.

Fifty-four patients with blunt renal trauma underwent abdominal ultrasound as their initial diagnostic exploration if their hemodynamic status and associated injuries did not contraindicate unnecessary delays. Renal ultrasound allowed us to diagnose the injuries and to identify which patients required a more aggressive radiological exploration to obtain a diagnosis of certainty. At the same time we were able to certify that this technique is highly accurate in the diagnosis of lesions associated with gross hematuria. The noninvasiveness and low cost of this procedure makes it, in our experience, the technique of choice in the initial workup of blunt renal trauma.