Outcomes of men with HIV and germ cell cancer: Results from an international collaborative study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that men with HIV and germ cell cancer (HIV-GCC) have inferior overall survival (OS) in comparison with their HIV-negative counterparts. However, little information is available on treatments and outcomes of HIV-GCC in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). METHODS: This study examined men living with HIV who were 18 years old or older and had a diagnosis of histologically proven germ cell cancer (GCC). The primary outcomes were OS and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Data for 89 men with a total of 92 HIV-GCCs (2 synchronous GCCs and 1 metachronous bilateral GCC) were analyzed; among them were 64 seminomas (70%) and 28 nonseminomas (30%). The median age was 36 years, the median CD4 T-cell count at GCC diagnosis was 420 cells/µL, and 77% of the patients on cART had an HIV RNA load < 500 copies/mL. Stage I disease was found in 44 of 79 gonadal GCCs (56%). Among 45 cases with primary disseminated GCC, 78%, 18%, and 4% were assigned to the good-, intermediate-, and poor-prognosis groups, respectively, of the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group. Relapses occurred in 14 patients. Overall, 12 of 89 patients (13%) died. The causes of death were refractory GCC (n = 5), an AIDS-defining illness (n = 3), and other causes (n = 4). After a median follow-up of 6.5 years, the 5- and 10-year PFS rates were 81% and 73%, respectively, and the 5- and 10-year OS rates were 91% and 85%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 5- and 10-year PFS and OS rates of men with HIV-GCC were similar to those reported for men with HIV-negative GCC. Patients with HIV-GCC should be managed identically to HIV-negative patients. LAY SUMMARY: Men living with HIV are at increased risk for germ cell cancer (GCC). Previous studies have shown that the survival of men with HIV-associated germ cell cancer (HIV-GCC) is poorer than the survival of their HIV-negative counterparts. This study examined the characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of 89 men with HIV-GCC in the era of effective combination antiretroviral therapies. The long-term outcomes of men with HIV-GCC were similar to those reported for men with HIV-negative GCC. Patients with HIV-GCC should be managed identically to HIV-negative patients.

A phase II trial of first-line sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma unwilling to receive or with early intolerance to immunotherapy: SOGUG Study 06-01.

AIMS: Our aim was to evaluate first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with sorafenib in patients unwilling to receive immunotherapy or with early intolerance to immunotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had clear-cell mRCC with good or intermediate risk status, were unsuited to cytokine therapy due to preference or intolerance (based on <4 weeks prior immunotherapy) and had not received antiangiogenic agents. Patients received sorafenib 400 mg twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Twenty-six evaluable patients were enrolled at six centres between March and July 2006. The most common metastatic sites were lung and bone; nine patients had one or two metastatic lesions. Median PFS was 7.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.1-17.5) and overall survival (OS) 15.4 months (95% CI 12.9-17.4). Among 21 patients evaluable for response, 19 (90.5%) experienced disease control (including one complete response; four partial responses; 14 stable disease). The majority of adverse events were grade 1-2 (87.3%). The most common were asthenia (53.0%) and diarrhoea (50.0%). CONCLUSION: In patients with mRCC who were unwilling to receive or intolerant to immunotherapy, treatment with sorafenib led to a high rate of disease control with toxicities that were generally mild and manageable. The PFS achieved in this essentially treatment-naïve population compares favourably with that obtained in the randomised first-line phase II study.

Neoadjuvant temsirolimus effectiveness in downstaging advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

A 35-year-old woman presented with a 12-cm right renal mass with retroperitoneal lymph node involvement and pulmonary and bone metastases. Renal mass biopsy revealed an unclassified high-grade non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with eosinophilic cells. Due to the extent of the disease, neoadjuvant temsirolimus was initiated. After 6 wk of treatment, a significant downstaging of the disease and complete disappearance of the metastases were noticed on computed tomography scan. Three months later, a laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and lymphadenectomy was performed. Final pathology confirmed a high-grade non-clear cell RCC, with necrotic changes on lymph node specimens, pT1bN0Mx.

A phase II study of vinorelbine and estramustine in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: This phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of vinorelbine in combination with estramustine in patients with chemotherapy-naïve hormone-refractory prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients received vinorelbine (i.v. 25 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks and estramustine (oral, 600 mg/m2) daily. Eligible patients were required to have progressive metastatic disease following the first hormonal manipulation. RESULTS: Of the 51 patients enrolled (median age = 69 years), 84% presented bone involvement and 75% had at least two organs involved at the time of study entry and 47 were evaluable for treatment efficacy. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) response (> or =50% decrease) which was the primary efficacy criterion was reported in 21 patients (41.2%) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and in 20 patients (48.8%) in the per protocol (PP) population. Of the 7 patients with measurable disease, 2 achieved partial response. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.7 months (range: 1.9-8.6) and 14.3 months (range: 4.2-21.2), respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was reported in 6.1% of patients and in 1% of cycles. The incidence of complicated neutropenia (febrile neutropenia reported in 1 patient and septic shock with severe neutropenia reported in 2 patients) was 5.8%. The most frequent grade 3-4 non-haematological events (% of patients > or =5%) included anorexia (10%), thrombosis/embolism (8%), vomiting and hypotension (6% each). There were 3 toxic deaths (5.9 %) resulting from pulmonary embolism, angina pectoris, and septic shock. The impact of combined chemotherapy on the quality-of-life (QL) of the patients was assessed between baseline and the first evaluation scheduled at 6 weeks indicated a marked reduction in pain while the rest of the symptoms remained stable. Overall, health status improved slightly over the treatment period. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that the combination of vinorelbine and estramustine is an active regimen in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer who had not been treated previously with chemotherapy. Main toxicities included complicated neutropenia even though the incidence of severe neutropenia was low. We observed a higher incidence of toxic deaths which could have been related to the regimen of estramustine used in the study.