"To Call or Not to Call" Communication Preferences Among Pediatric Hospital Medicine Team Leaders.

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric Hospital Medicine fellowship programs need to abide by Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements regarding communication and supervision. Effective communication is critical for safe patient care, yet no prior research has explored optimal communication practices between residents, fellows, and attending hospitalists. Our objective is to explore communication preferences among pediatric senior residents (SRs), Pediatric Hospital Medicine fellows, and hospitalists on an inpatient team during clinical decision-making. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study at 6 institutions nationwide. We developed 3 complementary surveys adapted from prior research, 1 for each population: 200 hospitalists, 20 fellows, and 380 SRs. The instruments included questions about communication preferences between the SR, fellow, and hospitalist during clinical scenarios. We calculated univariate descriptive statistics and examined paired differences in percent agreement using χ2 tests, accounting for clustering by institution. RESULTS: Response rates were: 53% hospitalists; 100% fellows; 39% SRs. Communication preferences varied based on role, scenario, and time of day. For most situations, hospitalists preferred more communication with the fellow overnight and when a patient or family is upset than expressed by fellows (P < .01). Hospitalists also desired more communication between the SR and fellow for an upset patient or family than SRs (P < .01), but all respondents agreed the SR should call the fellow for adverse events. More fellows and hospitalists felt that the SR should contact the fellow before placing a consult compared with SRs (95%, 86% vs 64%). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalists, fellows, and SRs may have differing preferences regarding communication, impacting supervision, autonomy, and patient safety. Training programs should consider such perspectives when creating expectations and communication guidelines.

Defining Supervision Preferences and Roles Within a New Subspecialty: Pediatric Hospital Medicine.

OBJECTIVE: To describe supervision preferences among pediatric hospitalists, Pediatric Hospital Medicine (PHM) fellows, and senior residents (SRs), and to better define the ideal role of a PHM fellow. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study at 6 institutions nationwide. We developed 3 complementary surveys, one for each population (hospitalists, fellows, SRs). We calculated univariate descriptive and bivariate statistics for categorical variables using Chi-square tests with the Rao-Scott correction to account for clustering by institution. RESULTS: Survey respondents included 106 of 200 hospitalists (53%), all 20 fellows (100%), and 149 of 380 SRs (39%). Most hospitalists and all fellows preferred the supervising hospitalist to have 3+ years of experience or be fellowship-trained. Nearly all fellows preferred the attending round in-person providing progressive independence; while hospitalists and SRs desired greater attending presence on rounds. Hospitalists and fellows wanted more frequent communication when the attending does not round with the team, and more hospitalists desired at least 2 points of contact regardless of attending presence on rounds. Fifty-five percent of SRs reported experiencing much less/less autonomy when on with a fellow than when supervised by a hospitalist only. Regarding the fellow's role, most participants agreed SRs should lead rounds and contact the fellow first with questions. The majority agreed teaching should be a shared responsibility but lacked consensus about how to provide feedback. CONCLUSIONS: Study results reveal preferences about supervising fellows in this new subspecialty. Hospitalists, fellows, and SRs may have differing opinions regarding workflow, communication, and teaching, impacting team leadership and autonomy.

Using simulation to increase resident comfort discussing social determinants of health.

BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health (SDoH) play an important role in pediatric health outcomes. Trainees receive little to no training on how to identify, discuss and counsel families in a clinical setting. The aim of this study was to determine if a simulation-based SDoH training activity would improve pediatric resident comfort with these skills. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of a curricular intervention involving simulation cases utilizing standardized patients focused on four social determinants (food insecurity, housing insecurity, barriers to accessing care, and adverse childhood experiences [ACEs]). Residents reported confidence levels with discussing each SDoH and satisfaction with the activity in a retrospective pre-post survey with five-point Likert style questions. Select residents were surveyed again 9-12 months after participation. RESULTS: 85% (33/39) of residents expressed satisfaction with the simulation activity. More residents expressed comfort discussing each SDoH after the activity (Δ% 38-47%; all p < .05), with the greatest effect noted in post-graduate-year-1 (PGY-1) participants. Improvements in comfort were sustained longitudinally during the academic year. More PGY-1 participants reported engaging in ≥ 2 conversations in a clinical setting related to food insecurity (43% vs. 5%; p = .04) and ACEs (71% vs. 20%; p = .02). DISCUSSION: Simulation led to an increased resident comfort with discussing SDoH in a clinical setting. The greatest benefit from such a curriculum is likely realized early in training. Future efforts should investigate if exposure to the simulations and increased comfort level with each topic correlate with increased likelihood to engage in these conversations in the clinical setting.

Burkholderia cepacia Sepsis in a Previously Healthy Full-Term Infant.

Burkholderia cepacia causes sepsis in neonates who are immunocompromised or exposed via nosocomial transmission. We report a case of B. cepacia sepsis in a previously healthy 5-week-old male originally treated for bacterial pneumonia per chest X-ray findings and 3 days of fevers. Regardless of appropriate antibiotics and an initial negative blood culture, he developed severe hypoglycemia, circulatory collapse with disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, and expired. A second blood culture taken following transfer to the intensive care unit resulted positive for B. cepacia postmortem. Review of the newborn screen and family history was otherwise normal. Subsequent postmortem autopsy showed multifocal bilateral pneumonia with necrotizing granulomatous and suppurative portions of lung tissue. Additionally, there was a prominent cavitary lesion 2.5 cm in the right lower lobe with branching and septate fungal hyphae. Stellate microabscesses with granulomas were present in the liver and spleen. These findings plus B. cepacia bacteremia are highly suggestive of an immunocompromised status. Review of the literature shows that its presence has been associated with chronic granulomatous disease. Therefore, in a persistently febrile infant not responding to antibiotics for common microbes causing community-acquired pneumonia, immunodeficiency workup should ensue in addition to respective testing for chronic granulomatous disease especially if B. cepacia culture-positive as it is strongly associated with neutrophil dysfunction.

Association between cumulative exposure to adverse childhood experiences and childhood obesity.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) is associated with many childhood diseases and poor health outcomes in adulthood. However, the association with childhood obesity is inconsistent. We investigated the association between reported cumulative ACE score and body mass index (BMI) in a large sample of patients at a single institution. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included children aged 2-20 years that were screened in a general pediatrics clinic for ACEs utilizing the Center for Youth Wellness ACEs questionnaire between July 2017 and July 2018. Overall ACE score was categorized as 'no exposure' (score = 0), 'low exposure' (score = 1), and 'high exposure' (score≥ 2). BMI was categorized as overweight/obese (BMI percentile ≥ 85) or non-obese (BMI percentile < 85). The association between ACEs score and obesity was determined using univariate and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 948 patients included in the study, 30% (n = 314) were overweight/obese and 53% (n = 504) had no ACE exposure, 19% (n = 179) had low ACE exposure, and 28% (n = 265) had high ACE exposure. High ACE exposure was associated with increased odds of obesity (OR = 1.47, 95%CI = 1.07-2.03, p = 0.026). However, after adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, insurance type, and birth weight, the association attenuated and was null (OR = 1.01, 95%CI = 0.70-1.46, p = 0.97). CONCLUSION: The study findings may suggest an association between ACE and childhood obesity. However, the association attenuated after adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, insurance type, and birth weight. Larger prospective studies are warranted to better understand the association.

Implementing Standardized Screening for Adverse Childhood Experiences in a Pediatric Resident Continuity Clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Exposure to adversity in childhood has been shown to impact the development of children and increase their risk of poor early childhood mental health and chronic medical conditions in young children, and developing chronic diseases, mental health disorders, and substance abuse disorders as adults. The recognition of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and provision of behavioral-based interventions can help children build resilience. We implemented a screening method to help providers better assess patients' exposure to adversity. Our goal was to increase the screening for ACEs utilizing a standardized ACEs screening tool from 0% to 80% of children presenting for annual well-child visits within 1 year. METHODS: We implemented a screening tool to determine a child's exposure to ACEs within our general pediatrics clinic. A variety of interventions, including resident, faculty, and staff-focused educational lectures, simulation, and process changes were performed to increase screening. Also, we surveyed resident physicians and faculty about their experiences with ACEs screening. RESULTS: Over 1 year, we screened 1,206 patients for exposure to ACEs and increased screening from 0% to 60%. Provider comfort with discussing abuse with patients and familiarity with resources for children exposed to ACEs did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Patients can successfully be screened in a resident-led, general pediatric clinic using a standardized ACEs screening tool. Such an approach can successfully identify patients with high-risk ACE scores. Additionally, education on and implementation of the tool may improve provider comfort with screening for ACEs.