Sex Distributions in Non-ABCA4 Autosomal Macular Dystrophies.

Purpose: We sought to explore whether sex imbalances are discernible in several autosomally inherited macular dystrophies. Methods: We searched the electronic patient records of our large inherited retinal disease cohort, quantifying numbers of males and females with the more common (non-ABCA4) inherited macular dystrophies (associated with BEST1, EFEMP1, PROM1, PRPH2, RP1L1, and TIMP3). BEST1 cases were subdivided into typical autosomal dominant and recessive disease. For PRPH2, only patients with variants at codons 172 or 142 were included. Recessive PROM1 and recessive RP1L1 cases were excluded because these variants give a more widespread or peripheral degeneration. The proportion of females was calculated for each condition; two-tailed binomial testing was performed. Where a significant imbalance was found, previously published cohorts were also explored. Results: Of 325 patients included, numbers for BEST1, EFEMP1, PROM1, PRPH2, RP1L1, and TIMP3 were 152, 35, 30, 50, 14, and 44, respectively. For autosomal dominant Best disease (n = 115), there were fewer females (38%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 29-48%; P = 0.015). For EFEMP1-associated disease (n = 35), there were significantly more females (77%; 95% CI, 60%-90%; P = 0.0019). No significant imbalances were seen for the other genes. When pooling our cohort with previous large dominant Best disease cohorts, the proportion of females was 37% (95% CI, 31%-43%; P = 1.2 × 10-5). Pooling previously published EFEMP1-cases with ours yielded an overall female proportion of 62% (95% CI, 54%-69%; P = 0.0023). Conclusions: This exploratory study found significant sex imbalances in two autosomal macular dystrophies, suggesting that sex could be a modifier. Our findings invite replication in further cohorts and the investigation of potential mechanisms.

RETINAL NONPERFUSION IN THE EARLY TREATMENT DIABETIC RETINOPATHY STUDY SEVEN FIELDS COMPARED WITH WIDEFIELD FLUORESCEIN ANGIOGRAPHY: Correlation and Use of Extrapolation Factor.

BACKGROUND: In previous landmark studies on central retinal vein occlusion, retinal nonperfusion assessments were obtained using 7-field (7F) angiography. The widespread current use of widefield imaging allows better visualization of the peripheral retina and more comprehensive estimation of the total area of nonperfusion. The relationship between nonperfusion measurement of 7F and widefield angiography (WFA) in central retinal vein occlusion has not been studied. We aim to identify the correlation of retinal nonperfusion measured within the 7F and on WFA in eyes with central retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: Retinal nonperfusion in participants with central retinal vein occlusion was determined using a 7F Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study template and the concentric rings method. RESULTS: A total of 153 eyes were included. Pearson correlation test showed a near-perfect positive, linear correlation between the nonperfusion found in the 7F and total retinal nonperfusion on WFA (0.985 95% CI [0.793, 0.999]) The regression line equation for nonperfusion on 7F and WFA was y = 37 + 3.2x. Eyes with 0 disk areas (DA), >0 DA to 10 DA and >10 DA of nonperfusion on 7-fields had on average 23 DA 95% CI (19.20, 27.06), 45 DA 95% CI (35.75, 55.18), and 115 DA 95% CI (88.89, 142.05) on widefield respectively. CONCLUSION: There is a positive and linear relationship between nonperfusion measured by 7F and WFA in central retinal vein occlusion with more than 3-times the amount of nonperfusion identified on WFA. Despite <10 DA no areas of nonperfusion on 7F, there is typically at least 35 DA of nonperfusion on WFA whereas eyes with >10 DA of nonperfusion on 7F had at least 88 DA on WFA.