Atypical White Matter Hyperintensities Markedly Impact Plasma Neurofilament Light Chain Variability in GRN Patients.

GRN mutations, causing frontotemporal dementia, can be associated with atypical white matter hyperintensities (WMH). We hypothesized that the presence of WMH may impact neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels, markers of neuroaxonal damage. We analyzed plasma NfL in 20 GRN patients and studied their association to visually-scored WMH burden. The 12 patients displaying atypical WMH had significantly higher NfL levels (98.4±34.9 pg/mL) than those without WMH (47.2±29.4 pg/mL, p = 0.003), independently from age, disease duration and Fazekas-Schmidt grade. NfL correlated with WMH burden (rho = 0.55, p = 0.01). This study prompts considering WMH burden as a variability factor when evaluating NfL levels in GRN patients.

Plasma NfL levels and longitudinal change rates in C9orf72 and GRN-associated diseases: from tailored references to clinical applications.

OBJECTIVE: Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a promising biomarker in genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). We evaluated plasma neurofilament light chain (pNfL) levels in controls, and their longitudinal trajectories in C9orf72 and GRN cohorts from presymptomatic to clinical stages. METHODS: We analysed pNfL using Single Molecule Array (SiMoA) in 668 samples (352 baseline and 316 follow-up) of C9orf72 and GRN patients, presymptomatic carriers (PS) and controls aged between 21 and 83. They were longitudinally evaluated over a period of >2 years, during which four PS became prodromal/symptomatic. Associations between pNfL and clinical-genetic variables, and longitudinal NfL changes, were investigated using generalised and linear mixed-effects models. Optimal cut-offs were determined using the Youden Index. RESULTS: pNfL levels increased with age in controls, from ~5 to~18 pg/mL (p<0.0001), progressing over time (mean annualised rate of change (ARC): +3.9%/year, p<0.0001). Patients displayed higher levels and greater longitudinal progression (ARC: +26.7%, p<0.0001), with gene-specific trajectories. GRN patients had higher levels than C9orf72 (86.21 vs 39.49 pg/mL, p=0.014), and greater progression rates (ARC:+29.3% vs +24.7%; p=0.016). In C9orf72 patients, levels were associated with the phenotype (ALS: 71.76 pg/mL, FTD: 37.16, psychiatric: 15.3; p=0.003) and remarkably lower in slowly progressive patients (24.11, ARC: +2.5%; p=0.05). Mean ARC was +3.2% in PS and +7.3% in prodromal carriers. We proposed gene-specific cut-offs differentiating patients from controls by decades. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of gene-specific and age-specific references for clinical and therapeutic trials in genetic FTD/ALS. It supports the usefulness of repeating pNfL measurements and considering ARC as a prognostic marker of disease progression. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT02590276 and NCT04014673.