Prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia through care bundles: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) represents a common hospital-acquired infection among mechanically ventilated patients. We summarized evidence concerning ventilator care bundles to prevent VAP. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Randomized controlled trials and controlled observational studies of adults undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV) for at least 48 h were considered for inclusion. Outcomes of interest were the number of VAP episodes, duration of MV, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and mortality. A systematic search was conducted in the MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science between 1985 and 2022. Results are reported as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022341780. Results: Thirty-six studies including 116,873 MV participants met the inclusion criteria. A total of 84,031 participants underwent care bundles for VAP prevention. The most reported component of the ventilator bundle was head-of-bed elevation (n=83,146), followed by oral care (n=80,787). A reduction in the number of VAP episodes was observed among those receiving ventilator care bundles, compared with the non-care bundle group (OR=0.42, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.54). Additionally, the implementation of care bundles decreased the duration of MV (MD=-0.59, 95% CI: -1.03, -0.15) and hospital length of stay (MD=-1.24, 95% CI: -2.30, -0.18) in studies where educational activities were part of the bundle. Data regarding mortality were inconclusive. Conclusions: The implementation of ventilator care bundles reduced the number of VAP episodes and the duration of MV in adult ICUs. Their application in combination with educational activities seemed to improve clinical outcomes.

Impact of air pollution on respiratory microbiome: A narrative review.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory microbiome composition depends on an intricate balance between host characteristics, diet, and environmental factors. Some studies indicate a bidirectional relationship between respiratory microbiota and disease. Air pollution is consistently associated with increased respiratory morbidity and mortality in different populations and across different ages. The aim of this review was to report a summary of the evidence regarding the impact of air pollution on the upper and lower respiratory tract microbiome. METHODS: A literature search from interaction between air pollution and respiratory microbiome was performed (2010-2022). RESULTS: Sixteen studies demonstrated changes in microbiome with both environmental and household air pollution. Increasing levels of air pollutants are associated with lower relative abundance of Corynebacterium and increasing levels of pathogen colonization, such as Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii, altering the incidence and clinical course of respiratory infections. This ultimately leads to an excess of morbidity and mortality due to antimicrobial resistance. CONCLUSION: Changes of air pollution on the respiratory microbiome may influence respiratory infections in critical care. Use of probiotics may restore the diversity of baseline microbiome, preventing infections by resistant organisms in the critical care setting. Using protective equipment decreased the effect of air pollutants on increasing potentially pathogenic microorganisms.

The effect of sex inequality on solid organ transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sex disparities are related to biological differences, which may have significant impact on patient and allograft outcomes. The aim was to investigate the impact of sex on clinical and safety outcomes after solid organ transplantation (SOT). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Observational studies comparing females vs. males after SOT were considered for inclusion after a systematic search of the Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases conducted from 2016 to 2021. Primary outcome was mortality. PROSPERO register number: CRD42021282615. RESULTS: After retrieving 1103 studies, 22 observational studies (1,045,380 subjects) were finally deemed eligible for inclusion. Females accounted 36.3% of SOT recipients, but presented significantly lower mortality (odds ratio (OR): 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-0.92, I2=78%). In subgroup analyses, mortality was significantly lower in females undergoing liver (OR: 0.89 95%CI: 0.86-0.92, I2=0%) or kidney transplantation (OR: 0.82 95%CI: 0.76-0.89, I2=72%). Male sex was consistently reported as a protective factor against hospital readmission. Among the outcomes, allograft dysfunction was influenced by a combination of donor-recipient sex and age. Data on overall infections were inconclusive. Several reports suggest a higher risk of malignancy among males. CONCLUSIONS: Females represent one-third of SOT recipients but have higher survival rates than males after liver and kidney transplantation. The impact on graft dysfunction was heterogeneous. While further research is warranted, our findings should encourage clinicians and researchers to consider sex as a factor when taking decisions regarding SOT management.

Varicella-Zoster virus reactivation following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination or infection: New insights.

INTRODUCTION: Varicella zoster virus (VZV) reactivation has been reported following vaccination for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but the real extent remains unknown. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to summarize evidence of VZV reactivation or infection following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Episodes after coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) were also identified. Related articles were identified in PubMed and EMBASE databases till December 31, 2021 using the terms "varicella zoster" and "COVID-19″. PROSPERO Register Number: CRD42021289399. RESULTS: The search revealed 314 articles, of which 55 met the inclusion criteria. VZV manifestations were documented in 179 (82.1%) subjects following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and in 39 (17.9%) patients with COVID-19. Among the vaccinated, median (IQR) age was 56.5 (42-70) years, and 56.8% were female. Twenty-one (16.8%) were immunosuppressed. The median (IQR) latency time after vaccination was 6 (3-10) days, and 84.4% received mRNA vaccines. VZV reactivation occurred following a first dose (68.2%), a second dose (12.8%) or a booster (0.6%). The most important VZV manifestation was dermatome herpes zoster rash, which accounted for 86.4% of events in vaccinated subjects. Twenty patients (11.3%) presented serious VZV events after vaccination, with Herpes Zoster ophthalmicus (5.6%) and post-herpetic neuralgia (3.4%) predominating. No VZV pneumonia or deaths were recorded. Antiviral prescriptions were made in 96.2% of vaccinated subjects. No significant differences between vaccinated and infected subjects were found. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the occurrence of VZV reactivation is clinically relevant. However, our findings suggest that COVID-19 vaccination is safe, and remains strongly recommended.

Ribavirin for Treatment of Subjects with Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Related Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-associated diseases have caused an estimated 1.8 million hospital admissions and 40,000 deaths among children. RSV can cause lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in all age groups, adults with comorbidities, and immunocompromised patients. The aim was to summarize the evidence concerning efficacy and safety of ribavirin in subjects diagnosed with RSV associated with LRTI. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Eligible studies were observational (> 10 subjects) and randomized-controlled trials of subjects with aerosol/oral ribavirin for RSV-LRTI. Comparator was supportive care or placebo. Systematic search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was conducted between January 2001 and January 2022. PROSPERO register number: CRD42022308147. RESULTS: After retrieving 907 studies, 10 observational studies and 1 randomized controlled trial were included (4/11 high quality of evidence). Seven studies included subjects with haematological malignancy/stem cell transplant, two lung transplants, and two healthy individuals. A total of 788 subjects diagnosed with RSV infection were included; 14.3% of them presented with only LRTI. Among 445 subjects treated with ribavirin, 195 (43.8%) received an aerosolized formulation. Pooled meta-analysis showed no differences in mortality [risk ratio (RR): 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28-1.42] in all subjects treated with aerosol/oral ribavirin compared to supportive care. In subgroup analysis, mortality was significantly lower in haematological subjects (RR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.14-0.71), but did not differ significantly in lung transplant recipients (RR: 0.89; 95% CI 0.31-2.56). Oral ribavirin (vs. supportive care) was associated with increased viral clearance (RR: 2.60; 95% CI: 1.35-4.99). Seventeen adverse events were reported among 119 subjects, but none were severe. CONCLUSION: Ribavirin should be considered for treatment of RSV-LRTI in haematological subjects. There is a lack of evidence to support its use in lung transplant recipients. Oral formulation appears to be an easier, safe, and cost-effective alternative to aerosolized ribavirin. Further advances needs to focus on newer antivirals.

Solid organ transplantation from donors with recent or current SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Solid-organ transplantation (SOT) from SARS-CoV-2 positive donors could be a life-saving opportunity worth grasping. We perform a systematic review to evaluate the recipient outcomes of SOT from donors with recent or current SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: Search strategy was performed in PubMed, Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, and Web of Science databases from the 1st of January 2019 to the 31st of December 2021. SOT adult recipients from a donor with past or current SARS-CoV-2 infection were elegible for inclusion. Outcomes were viral transmission, COVID-19 symptoms, mortality, hospital stay, and complications. PROSPERO Register Number: CRD42022303242 FINDINGS: Sixty-nine recipients received 48 kidneys, 18 livers and 3 hearts from 57 donors. Six additional transplants from positive lungs were identified. IgG+ anti-SARS-CoV-2 titers were detected among 10/16 recipients; only 4% (3/69) recipients were vaccinated. Non-lung transplant recipients received organs from 10/57 (17.5%) donors with persistent COVID-19. In 18/57 donors, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected (median 32 Cycle threshold [Ct]) at procurement. Among non-lung transplant recipients, SARS-CoV-2 viral transmission was not documented. Four patients presented delayed graft dysfunction, two patients acute rejection, and two patients died of septic shock. The median (IQR) hospital stay was 18 (11-28) days in recipients from symptomatic donors. Viral transmission occurred from three lung donors to their recipients, who developed COVID-19 symptoms. One of the recipients subsequently died. CONCLUSION: Use of non-lung (kidney, liver and heart) organs from SARS-CoV-2 positive donors seem to be a safe practice, with a low risk of transmission irrespective of the presence of symptoms at the time of procurement. Low viral replication (Ct > 30) was safe among non-lung donors, even if persistently symptomatic at procurement.