Prevalence, main serovars and anti-microbial resistance profiles of non-typhoidal Salmonella in poultry samples from the Americas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Poultry and poultry-derived products such as meat and eggs are among the main sources of non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) transmission to humans. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and used random-effects meta-analyses to (1) estimate the prevalence of NTS in poultry samples from birds, products and subproducts and environmental samples, (2) examine the diversity and frequency of their serovars and (3) estimate the prevalence and profiles of anti-microbial resistance (AMR) in NTS isolates reported in studies from the Americas. We included 157 studies from 15 countries comprising 261,408 poultry samples and estimated an overall pooled prevalence of 17.9% (95% Confidence Interval: 10.8-26.3) in birds, 21.8% (17.7-26.1) in products and subproducts and 29.5% (24.2-35.1) in environmental samples. At the national level, the prevalence of NTS was heterogeneous across countries with the highest values in Mexico, the United States and Canada. In total, 131 serovars were identified from 13,388 isolates; Heidelberg, Kentucky, Enteritidis and Typhimurium were the most prevalent in the overall top 10 ranking (range 6.5%-20.8%). At the national level, Enteritidis and Typhimurium were identified in most of the countries, though with national differences in their ranks. The prevalence of AMR increased from 24.1% for 1 antibiotic to 36.2% for 2-3 antibiotics and 49.6% for ≥ 4 antibiotics. Kentucky, Heidelberg, Typhimurium and Enteritidis were the serovars with the highest prevalence of AMR. Besides, tetracycline, ampicillin, streptomycin, ceftiofur and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid were the most frequent antibiotics to which NTS showed resistance. In conclusion, NTS was distributed through the avian production chain with high and heterogeneous values of prevalence in poultry samples. Besides, there were distinctive patterns of serovars distribution across countries and an alarming prevalence of AMR among zoonotic serovars.

Impacto de la mastoidectomía en la reparación de la perforación timpánica en pacientes con otitis media crónica no colesteatomatosa con hueso mastoideo esclerótico / Impact of mastoidectomy in the repair of tympanic perforation in patients with chronic non-cholesteatomatous otitis media with sclerotic mastoid bone

Objetivo: describir las características clínicas y resultados obtenidos en pacientes a los cuales se les realizó reparación de perforación timpánica secundaria a otitis media crónica no colesteatomatosa con hueso mastoideo esclerótico, con y sin mastoidectomía. Materiales y métodos: estudio de tipo trasversal comparativo, con un muestreo no probabilístico por serie consecutiva de casos. Se revisaron los expedientes de pacientes que cumplan con los criterios de inclusión en el periodo comprendido enero del 2015 a mayo 2016. Se tomarón datos como; edad, sexo, estado de procedencia,a la otoscopia, presencia de otorrea transoperatoria y postoperatoria, estado de la mucosa, presencia de timpanoesclerosis o miringoesclerosis, perforación o retracción del injerto. Resultados: un total de 48 pacientes fueron seleccionados; 31 del sexo femenino y 17 del sexo masculino, con edad promedio de 43,25 años, el seguimiento fue de 3 meses. Al comparar al grupo de paciente con mastoidectomía y sin esta, no se encontró diferencia estadísticamente significativa en cuanto a éxito de la cirugía (perforación de injerto RR 1,2, p 1, otorrea posoperatoria RR 2,26, p 0;68 y retracción del injerto RR 0;76, p 1). Se encontró que las características durante y previa a la cirugía no influyeron en el resultado final, presentando un promedio global del 94% de integración del injerto. Conclusión: la mastoidectomía no muestra beneficio adicional en la reparación de la membrana timpánica, las características durante y previa a la cirugía no influyeron en el resultado final..(AU)

Objective: to describe the clinical characteristics and results obtained in patients who underwent repair of tympanic perforation secondary to chronic non-cholesteatomatous otitis media with sclerotic mastoid bone, with and without mastoidectomy. Material and methods: comparative cross-sectional study, with a non-probabilistic sampling by consecutive series of cases. We reviewed the files of patients who meet the inclusion criteria in the period from January 2015 to May 2016. Data was collected such as; age, sex, state of origin, history of smoking, cause of perforation, duration of dry ear, data to otoscopy, presence of transoperative and postoperative otorrhea, state of the mucosa, presence of tympanosclerosis or miringoesclerosis, perforation or retraction of the graft. Results: a total of 48 patients were selected; 31 of the female sex and 17 of the male sex, with an average age of 43.25 years, the follow-up was 3 months. When comparing the group of patients with and without mastoidectomy, no statistically significant difference was found in the success of the surgery (graft perforation RR 1.2, p 1, postoperative otorrhea RR 2.26, p 0.68 and graft retraction RR 0.76, p 1). We found that the characteristics during and before surgery did not influence the final result, presenting an overall average of 94% of graft integration. Conclusions: the mastoidectomy shows no additional benefit in tympanic membrane repair, the characteristics during and prior to surgery did not influence the final result..(AU)