Pylera® plus ranitidine vs Pylera® plus esomeprazole in first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: Two pilot studies.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that Pylera® (three-in-one capsules containing 140 mg bismuth potassium subcitrate, 125 metronidazole, and tetracycline 125 mg) in association with omeprazole or esomeprazole is a good option in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. In particular, the adjunction of a PPI to Pylera® may be useful to overcome metronidazole resistance. However, omeprazole and its derivatives can promote greater bismuth absorption and enhance its toxicity. The H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) ranitidine seems to induce less bismuth absorption and as a consequence less systemic toxicity. AIM: To evaluate whether Pylera® in combination with esomeprazole or with ranitidine is equally effective in the treatment of H. pylori infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two separate groups of patients were treated simultaneously. One group was treated with Pylera® three capsules qid plus esomeprazole 40 mg bid for 10 days (group A), and the other group was treated with Pylera® three capsules qid plus ranitidine 300 mg bid for 10 days (group B). H. pylori eradication was defined as a negative result in 13 C urea breath test performed at least 8 weeks after the end of treatment with a delta-over-baseline value less than 5. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were recruited for group A and thirty-three patients in group B. Eradication rates were 93.7% (30/32) and 90.9% (30/33), respectively, at intention-to-treat analysis, and 96.6% (29/30) and 93.3% (28/30), respectively, at per-protocol analysis. Adverse events occurred in 26 patients and led to the suspension of treatment in one patient in group A and in one patient in group B. CONCLUSION: The results showed that Pylera® plus a PPI or ranitidine were equally effective in the population studied. The high cure rates of bismuth triple therapy (without an antisecretory drug) and the lack of susceptibility testing make it impossible to exclude the possibility that the results would have been similar if neither the PPI nor the ranitidine were given.

Bovine lactoferrin enhances the efficacy of levofloxacin-based triple therapy as first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: an in vitro and in vivo study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the in vitro antimicrobial/antivirulence action of bovine lactoferrin and its ability to synergize with levofloxacin against resistant Helicobacter pylori strains and to analyse the effect of levofloxacin, amoxicillin and esomeprazole with and without bovine lactoferrin as the first-line treatment for H. pylori infection. METHODS: The bovine lactoferrin antimicrobial/antivirulence effect was analysed in vitro by MIC/MBC determination and twitching motility against six clinical H. pylori strains and a reference strain. The synergism was evaluated using the chequerboard assay. The prospective therapeutic trial was carried out on two separate patient groups, one treated with esomeprazole/amoxicillin/levofloxacin and the other with esomeprazole/amoxicillin/levofloxacin/bovine lactoferrin. Treatment outcome was determined with the [13C]urea breath test. RESULTS: In vitro, bovine lactoferrin inhibited the growth of 50% of strains at 10 mg/mL and expressed 50% bactericidal effect at 40 mg/mL. The combination of levofloxacin and bovine lactoferrin displayed a synergistic effect for all strains, with the best MIC reduction of 16- and 32-fold for levofloxacin and bovine lactoferrin, respectively. Bovine lactoferrin at one-fourth MIC reduced microbial motility significantly for all strains studied. In the in vivo study, 6 of 24 patients recruited had treatment failure recorded with esomeprazole/amoxicillin/levofloxacin (75% success, 95% CI 57.68%-92.32%), and in the group with esomeprazole/amoxicillin/levofloxacin/bovine lactoferrin, 2 out of 53 patients recruited had failure recorded (96.07% success, 95% CI 90.62%-101.38%). CONCLUSIONS: Bovine lactoferrin can be considered a novel potentiator for restoring susceptibility in resistant H. pylori strains. Bovine lactoferrin added to a triple therapy in first-line treatment potentiates the therapeutic effect.

Esophagitis and its causes: Who is "guilty" when acid is found "not guilty"?

Esophagitis is mainly a consequence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, one of the most common diseases affecting the upper digestive tract. However the esophageal mucosa can also be targeted by some infectious, systemic or chemical conditions. Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated inflammatory disease, characterized by eosinophilic infiltration in the mucosa. Esophageal localization of Crohn's disease is not very common, but it should always be considered in patients with inflammatory bowel disease complaining of upper digestive tract symptoms. There are also forms of infectious esophagitis (e.g., Herpes simplex virus or Candida albicans) occurring in patients with a compromised immune system, either because of specific diseases or immunosuppressive therapies. Another kind of damage to esophageal mucosa is due to drug use (including oncologic chemotherapeutic regimens and radiotherapy) or caustic ingestion, usually of alkaline liquids, with colliquative necrosis and destruction of mucosa within a few seconds. Dysphagia is a predominant symptom in EoE, while infectious, drug-induced and caustic damages usually cause chest pain and odynophagia. Endoscopy can be useful for diagnosing esophagitis, although no specific pattern can be identified. In conclusion when a patient refers upper gastrointestinal tract symptoms and the diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease is not convincing we should always carefully investigate the patient's clinical history to consider possibilities other than the gastric refluxate.

Rifabutin Containing Triple Therapy and Rifabutin with Bismuth Containing Quadruple Therapy for Third-Line Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection: Two Pilot Studies.

AIM: To evaluate the therapeutic gain of the addition of bismuth to a rifabutin containing triple therapy with amoxicillin and pantoprazole at standard dosages for the treatment of third-line Helicobacter pylori infection after a preliminary susceptibility test. METHODS: Two separate groups of patients in two pilot studies which were carried out simultaneously. One group was treated with rifabutin 150 mg b.i.d., pantoprazole 20 mg b.i.d., and amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. for 10 days and the other group with rifabutin 150 mg b.i.d., pantoprazole 20 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., and bismuth subcitrate 240 mg b.i.d. for 10 days. All patients underwent to culture and susceptibility testing prior to their inclusion in the study. A successful outcome was confirmed with an Urea Breath test performed 8 weeks after the end of treatment. A blood cell count was performed for all patients at the start and after 5 days of treatment since rifabutin has been shown to inhibit the growth of leucocytes. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were recruited in the pantoprazole, amoxicillin, rifabutin group and 30 in the pantoprazole, amoxicillin, rifabutin, and bismuth subcitrate group. All patients had a positive H. pylori culture and the susceptibility test used showed H. pylori sensitivity to rifabutin and amoxicillin. H. pylori eradication during follow-up was 18/27 (66.7%, 95% CI: 47.7-85.7%) in the pantoprazole, amoxicillin, rifabutin group and 28/29 (96.6%, 95% CI: 89.5-100.0%) in the pantoprazole, amoxicillin, rifabutin, and bismuth subcitrate group. Both treatments were well-tolerated with no reported side effects. Blood cell count remained normal in all patients. CONCLUSION: The addition of bismuth subcitrate to a triple therapy that includes proton pump inhibitors, amoxicillin, and rifabutin in patients who are treated for the third time for H. pylori infection resulted in a 30% therapeutic gain.

In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori to nine antibiotics currently used in Central Italy.

OBJECTIVE: Helicobacter pylori expresses an increased resistance in respect to antimicrobials currently used in therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial profiles of H. pylori isolates to nine conventional antibiotics used in a Central Region (Abruzzo) of Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biopsies were taken from antrum and fundus of 112 adult and 3 children with Urea Breath Test positive with dyspeptic symptoms and analyzed for H. pylori culture and antibacterial activity. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed for clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, amoxicillin, ampicillin, and rifabutin by a modified agar dilution susceptibility test. RESULTS: Bacterial culture was successful in 100 out of 115 patients. Helicobacter pylori strains were isolated from 98 antrum and 83 fundus samples. The rate of recovery of H. pylori strains was 90.50% (181/200). The percentages of resistance were as follows: clarithromycin 72.44% antrum, 72.28% fundus; metronidazole 34.69% antrum, 42.16% fundus; levofloxacin 42.85% antrum, 53.01% fundus; moxifloxacin 37.35% antrum, 46.57% fundus; ciprofloxacin 39.47% antrum, 44.28% fundus; tetracycline 2.63% antrum, 2.85% fundus; amoxicillin 1.02% antrum, 1.20% fundus; ampicillin 0% antrum and fundus and rifabutin 0% antrum, 1.20% fundus. A total of 35 subjects harbored multi-resistant strains. CONCLUSIONS: This study underlines the high rate of resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole and quinolones, which may reflect an overuse of them. Culture and susceptibility test, should be performed to prevent the emergence of multi-resistance and to assess an efficacious regimen.

Typical and atypical symptoms of gastro esophageal reflux disease: Does Helicobacter pylori infection matter?

AIM: To analyze whether the presence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection could affect the quality of symptoms in gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients. METHODS: one hundred and forty-four consecutive patients referred to our Unit for suspected GERD were recruited for the study. All patients underwent esophageal pH-metric recording. For those with a positive test, C13 urea breath test was then performed to assess the H. pylori status. GERD patients were stratified according to the quality of their symptoms and classified as typical, if affected by heartburn and regurgitation, and atypical if complaining of chest pain, respiratory and ears, nose, and throat features. H. pylori-negative patients were also asked whether they had a previous diagnosis of H. pylori infection. If a positive response was given, on the basis of the time period after successful eradication, patients were considered as "eradicated" (E) if H. pylori eradication occurred more than six months earlier or "recently eradicated" if the therapy had been administered within the last six months. Patients without history of infection were identified as "negative" (N). χ (2) test was performed by combining the clinical aspects with the H. pylori status. RESULTS: one hundred and twenty-nine of the 144 patients, including 44 H. pylori-positive and 85 H. pylori-negative (41 negative, 21 recently eradicated, 23 eradicated more than 6 mo before), were eligible for the analysis. No difference has been found between H. pylori status and either the number of reflux episodes (138 ± 23 vs 146 ± 36, respectively, P = 0.2, not significant) or the percentage of time with pH values < 4 (6.8 ± 1.2 vs 7.4 ± 2.1, respectively, P = 0.3, not significant). The distribution of symptoms was as follows: 13 typical (30%) and 31 atypical (70%) among the 44 H. pylori-positive cases; 44 typical (52%) and 41 atypical (48%) among the 85 H. pylori-negative cases, (P = 0.017 vs H. pylori+; OR = 2.55, 95%CI: 1.17-5.55). Furthermore, clinical signs in patients with recent H. pylori eradication were similar to those of H. pylori-positive (P = 0.49; OR = 1.46, 95%CI: 0.49-4.37); on the other hand, patients with ancient H. pylori eradication showed a clinical behavior similar to that of H. pylori-negative subjects (P = 0.13; OR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.77-6.51) but different as compared to the H. pylori-positive group (P < 0.05; OR = 3.71, 95%CI: 0.83-16.47). CONCLUSION: Atypical symptoms of GERD occur more frequently in H. pylori-positive patients than in H. pylori-negative subjects. In addition, atypical symptoms tend to decrease after H. pylori eradication.

A Triple and Quadruple Therapy with Doxycycline and Bismuth for First-Line Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Tetracycline-containing triple therapy has been suggested as an alternative first-line therapy for H. pylori infection. AIM: To evaluate the effect of two dosages of doxycycline (DOX) associated with amoxicillin and esomeprazole with and without bismuth subcitrate as first-line treatment of H. pylori infection. METHODS: Helicobacter pylori-positive patients underwent a 10-day therapy randomized into four groups: Group A received esomeprazole, amoxicillin, and DOX-100 mg b.i.d. (EAD-100), Group B a quadruple therapy with esomeprazole, amoxicillin, DOX-100 mg b.i.d. and bismuth subcitrate (EADB-100), Group C a triple therapy with esomeprazole, amoxicillin, and DOX-200 mg b.i.d. (EAD-200) and Group D a quadruple therapy with esomeprazole, amoxicillin, DOX-200 mg b.i.d., and bismuth subcitrate (EADB-200). Success was accessed by (13)C urea breath test 2 months after the end of treatment. The number of patients to be recruited for each group had to be at least 50 subjects. Treatment success of 80% or less was considered unacceptable. Stopping rules therefore were anytime six failures had occurred. RESULTS: In the EAD-100 group and in EAD-200 group, the recruitment was stopped at the 14th and 15th patient, respectively. Fifty-two patients entered in the EADB-100 group and 51 in the EADB-200 group. Intention to treat eradication was in EADB-100 group 46/52 (88.5%, 95% CI 76.6-95.6); in the EADB-200 group 47/51 (92.1%, 95% CI: 81.1-97.8) (n.s.). Side effects were absent. CONCLUSION: The adjunction of bismuth subcitrate to a triple therapy that includes esomeprazole, amoxicillin, and DOX in patients who are treated for the first time for the H. pylori infection potentiates the therapeutic effect. This regimen, however, deserves to be optimized in terms of duration and dose of DOX.

CEUS and Fibroscan in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.

AIM: To determine intra-hepatic blood flow and liver stiffness in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) using contrast-enhanced ultrasound and fibroscan. METHODS: This prospective study included 15 patients with NAFLD, 17 patients with NASH and 16 healthy controls. In each patient, real-time ultrasound was used to locate the portal vein (PV) and the right liver lobe, and 5 mL of SonoVue(®) was then injected intravenous in a peripheral vein of the left arm over a 4-s span. Digital recording was performed for 3 min thereafter. The recording was subsequently retrieved to identify an area of interest in the PV area and in the right liver parenchyma (LP) to assess the blood flow by processing the data using dedicated software (Qontrast(®), Bracco, Italy). The following parameters were evaluated: percentage of maximal contrast activity (Peak%), time to peak (TTP, s), regional blood volume (RBV, cm(3)), regional blood flow (RBF, cm(3)/s) and mean transit time (MTT, s). At 24-48 h post-injection, liver stiffness was evaluated using Fibroscan and measured in kPa. The statistical evaluation was performed using Student's t test. RESULTS: In the PV, the Peak%, RBV and RBF were significantly reduced in the NAFLD and NASH patients compared with the controls (Peak%: NAFLD 26.3 ± 6.6, NASH 28.1 ± 7.3 vs controls 55.8 ± 9.9, P < 0.001; RBV: NAFLD 4202.3 ± 3519.7, NASH 3929.8 ± 1941.3 vs controls 7473 ± 3281, P < 0.01; RBF: NAFLD 32.5 ± 10.8, NASH 32.7 ± 12.1 vs controls 73.1 ± 13.9, P < 0.001). The TTP in the PV was longer in both patient groups but reached statistical significance only in the NASH patients compared with the controls (NASH 79.5 ± 37.8 vs controls 43.2 ± 30, P < 0.01). In the LP, the Peak%, RBV and RBF were significantly reduced in the NAFLD and NASH patients compared with the controls (Peak%: NAFLD 43.2 ± 7.3, NASH 41.7 ± 7.7 vs controls 56.6 ± 6.3, P < 0.001; RBV: NAFLD 4851.5 ± 2009, NASH 5069.4 ± 2292.5 vs controls 6922.9 ± 2461.5, P < 0.05; RBF: NAFLD 55.7 ± 10.1, NASH 54.5 ± 12.1 vs controls 75.9 ± 10.5, P < 0.001). The TTP was longer in both patient groups but did not reach statistical significance. The MTT in both the PV and LP in the NAFLD and NASH patients was not different from that in the controls. Liver stiffness was significantly increased relative to the controls only in the NASH patients (NASH: 6.4 ± 2.2 vs controls 4.6 ± 1.5, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Blood flow derangement within the liver present not only in NASH but also in NAFLD suggests that a vascular flow alteration precedes liver fibrosis development.

Quadruple therapy with moxifloxacin and bismuth for first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori.

AIM: To compare triple therapy vs quadruple therapy for 10 d as first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. METHODS: Consecutive H. pylori positive patients never treated in the past for this infection were randomly treated with triple therapy of pantoprazole (PAN) 20 mg bid, amoxicillin (AMO) 1 g bid and moxifloxacin (MOX) 400 mg bid for 10 d (PAM) or with quadruple therapy of PAN 20 mg bid, AMO 1 g bid, MOX 400 mg bid and bismuth subcitrate 240 mg bid for 10 d (PAMB). All patients were found positive at 13 C-Urea breath test (UBT) performed within ten days prior to the start of the study. A successful outcome was confirmed with an UBT performed 8 wk after the end of treatment. χ(2) analysis was used for statistical comparison. Per protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) values were also calculated. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in the PAM group and 50 in the PAMB group. One patient in each group did not return for further assessment. Eradication was higher in the PAMB group (negative: 46 and positive: 3) vs the PAM group (negative: 44 and positive: 12). The H. pylori eradication rate was statistically significantly higher in the PAMB group vs the PAM group, both with the PP and ITT analyses (PP: PAMB 93.8%, PAM 78.5%, P < 0.02; ITT: PAMB 92%, PAM 77.1 %, P <0.03). CONCLUSION: The addition of bismuth subcitrate can be considered a valuable adjuvant to triple therapy in those areas where H. pylori shows a high resistance to fluoroquinolones.

Helicobacter pylori isolates from proximal and distal stomach of patients never treated and already treated show genetic variability and discordant antibiotic resistance.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment failure of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection may be mainly because of antibiotic resistance and the presence of a mixed infection in the same patient. AIM: To investigate the incidence of mixed infection and discordant antibiotic resistance in patients never treated and already treated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Susceptibility test to amoxicillin, rifabutin, tinidazole, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin was conducted on H. pylori strains culture from 76 patients never treated and 72 patients already treated unsuccessfully. DNA fingerprinting was determined on H. pylori strains harboring in the same patient with a discordant resistance to the same antibiotic. RESULTS: Forty percent of patients never treated and 53% of patients already treated showed a pangastric infection. The overall resistance to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and tinidazole was significantly higher in patients with pangastric infection in comparison with those with the infection in the antrum (P<0.05). Discordant resistance was present in 33% of patients never treated, and 21% of patients already treated. DNA fingerprinting showed substantial differences among DNA patterns suggesting a mixed infection. CONCLUSION: Culture and susceptibility test should be performed when necessary not only in the antrum but also in the fundus of patients with H. pylori infection.

(13)C-octanoic acid breath test (OBT) with a new test meal (EXPIROGer): Toward standardization for testing gastric emptying of solids.

BACKGROUND: Standardization of the (13)C-octanoic acid breath test is still lacking. AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of the (13)C-octanoic acid breath test using a new standardized ready-to-eat, gluten-, glucose-, and lactose-free muffin. METHODS: Healthy subjects were recruited and sorted by sex and age. Patients with diabetic gastroparesis and untreated celiac disease with known gastric motility disorders were also tested with the new labelled muffin. Expired breath (13)CO(2) was analysed and t(1/2) was calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 131 healthy subjects were enrolled. The reference range of t(1/2) was 88+/-29min with the value of 146min as the upper limit of normal range. No significant difference in t(1/2) was found among subjects sorted by sex or age. The within-subject variability of t(1/2) was 17%. Mean (+/-standard deviation) t(1/2) values were 179+/-50min in patients with diabetic gastroparesis (n=8) and 151+/-20min in those with untreated celiac disease (n=11) (p

Detection of Helicobacter pylori in saliva and esophagus.

The route of Helicobacter pylori transmission remains unclear and the currently suggested route is person-to-person transfer by faecal-oral and oral-oral mode. The aim of this study was to verify the presence of H. pylori in esophagus and saliva of humans. Saliva samples, mucosal biopsies from esophagus, gastric antrum and fundus were collected from 19 patients with positive Urea Breath Test (UBT). Gastric biopsies were used for H. pylori colture and antimicrobial susceptibility tests whereas saliva samples were collected to detect H. pylori with a Nested-PCR targeting 16S rRNA gene as well as esophagus biopsies which were also investigated with immunohistochemical staining. Helicobacter pylori was isolated in 18 patients both in gastric antrum and fundus. The molecular analysis, confirmed by comparative sequences evaluation, gave positive results in all saliva and esophageal samples whereas the immunohistochemistry revealed the presence of H. pylori in 15.8% (3/19) of the esophagus samples. Our data suggest that saliva and esophagus may be considered reservoirs for H. pylori in humans and emphasize the need to use more susceptible techniques for H. pylori detection, in particular in over-crowded sites. Identification of the transmission route of H. pylori is crucial in developing an effective plan of surveillance by finding new means of disease management.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection.

Antibiotic resistance has resulted in unsatisfactory eradication results with dual and now triple therapy in many countries. Newer antibiotics and changes in dosing and duration of therapy may overcome resistant strains but may only provide limited improvement in eradication rates. Sequential therapy with amoxicillin (1 g twice a day) and a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (twice a day) given for 5 days followed by a PPI plus clarithromycin (500 mg twice a day) and tinidazole (500 mg twice a day) for 5 days is now a first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori in some countries. Standard triple therapy is effective in regions where clarithromycin resistance is low. Levofloxacin based triple therapy is an effective alternative to quadruple therapy in second-line treatment. Adjuvant therapy may reduce side-effects and improve compliance. Molecular and genomic research on H. pylori may result in the development of targeted antibiotic therapy; however, more research is required in this field. Further research in vaccination is also necessary before this can become an option in clinical practice.

Role of the preliminary susceptibility testing for initial and after failed therapy of Helicobacter pylori infection with levofloxacin, amoxicillin, and esomeprazole.

BACKGROUND: Levofloxacin has been proposed as an alternative to classic therapy in secondary resistance to Helicobacter pylori. AIM: To evaluate primary and secondary resistance of H. pylori to levofloxacin, and to test the role of susceptibility test on the efficacy of levofloxacin-based triple therapy. METHODS: Eighty consecutive dyspeptic patients with positive (13)C-urea breath test never treated were randomly allocated into group A(1) (40 patients) and group B(1) (39 patients). Eighty-three patients already treated unsuccessfully with positive (13)C-urea breath test were divided into group A(2) (51 patients) and group B(2) (32 patients). Patients in group A(1) and group A(2) underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for H. pylori susceptibility test to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, tinidazole, rifabutin, and levofloxacin. These patients were treated with levofloxacin (500 mg b.i.d.), amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.) and esomeprazole (20 mg b.i.d.) for 10 days if sensitive to these two antibiotics. If H. pylori was found resistant to amoxicillin and/or levofloxacin the treatment was based on the indications of the susceptibility test. Patients in group B(1) and group B(2) were treated empirically with levofloxacin, amoxicillin, and esomeprazole at the same dose and duration as group A. All patients underwent (13)C-urea breath test 2 months after the end of therapy. RESULTS: The antibiotic resistance of H. pylori strains in group A(1) and group A(2) was (%): amoxicillin: 2.4, 10; clarithromycin: 21.9, 43.1; tinidazole: 31.7, 70; rifabutin: 2.4, 4; and levofloxacin: 9.7, 12.2, respectively. In group A(1) with susceptibility test-driven therapy, eradication was 97.2%, and in group B(1) with empirical treatment, 94.1% (n.s.). In group A(2) with susceptibility test, eradication was 97.5%, whereas in group B(2) with empirical treatment 81.2% (p < .01). CONCLUSION: Primary and secondary resistance of H. pylori to levofloxacin is approximately 10% of the tested strains. The susceptibility test does not influence therapeutic outcome of triple therapy with amoxicillin and levofloxacin in patients never treated, while it is determinant for patients who were previously treated without success.

Analysis of genetic variability, antimicrobial susceptibility and virulence markers in Helicobacter pylori identified in Central Italy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between the presence of mixed infection of Helicobacter pylori and both antimicrobial susceptibility and virulence markers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with H. pylori infection were included in the study. Three colonies were selected from each positive biopsy sample collected from each host for a total of 108 H. pylori strains. The genetic variability was evaluated through the amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis; the antibiotic susceptibility to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, moxifloxacin, rifabutin and tinidazole was determined using the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) with the agar dilution method. Moreover, the vacA, cagA, iceA and babA2 statuse were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: There was a strong connection between mixed H. pylori infection and antimicrobial resistance. In particular, H. pylori strains with genetic variability, in the same host, expressed more resistance to clarithromycin, moxifloxacin and tinidazole than that expressed in strains with a unique genetic host pattern. VacA s1m1/s1m2 genotypes were found in 70% of strains isolated in mixed infection, whereas the same allelic combinations were found in 42% of strains, isolated in single infection. The cagA(+) status prevailed both in patients with mixed (97%) and in those with single infection (85%) without significant differences. The iceA1 status was more commonly found in patients with mixed infection, whereas the babA2 status was significantly prevalent in single H. pylori infection. CONCLUSIONS: Mixed H. pylori infection harbouring in one patient is significantly related to strains that are more resistant to antibiotics and with a more virulent genotype (vacA s1m1/s1m2, cagA, iceA1) than strains responsible for single infection.

Premedication with tramadol in patients undergoing colonoscopy: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study.

Colonoscopy is often disturbed by poor patient tolerance; benzodiazepines or opiates are routinely used to overcome such problems, despite the possibility of undesired effects. Tramadol, an opiate analogue with potentially fewer side effects, has not been tested yet to this end. The aim of the study was therefore to evaluate the efficacy of tramadol as a premedication for the colonoscopic procedure. Fifty patients were randomly allocated to receive an i.v. infusion of 100 ml saline, with 100 mg tramadol or alone, before endoscopy. At the end of the procedure patients were asked to score the discomfort experienced and to give an exam evaluation. The endoscopist also analyzed his performance. Tramadol patients reported a pain score of 39 +/- 10 (mean +/- SE), compared to 45 +/- 8 for the placebo group (P = 0.25); the evaluation of endoscopy was also similar (tramadol, 66 +/- 12; placebo, 70 +/- 9; P = 0.15). The endoscopist also reported a similar score (65 +/- 4 after tramadol; 69 +/- 4 after placebo; P = 0.2). No significant sex- or age-related differences were detected. We conclude that tramadol, at least as a monotherapy, seems scarcely effective for controlling pain evoked by colonoscopy.

Identification of a novel mutation affecting domain V of the 23S rRNA gene in Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND: This study analyzes clarithromycin resistance status and 23S rRNA gene mutations in Helicobacter pylori strains from Central Italian patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: H. pylori strains from 235 dyspeptic patients (205 with no history of clarithromycin exposure and 30 referred for failure of eradication therapy) were tested for clarithromycin resistance by screening agar method and E-test. Resistant strains were analyzed for mutations of the 23S rRNA gene by PCR-RFLP and sequencing. RESULTS: Primary resistance was observed in strains from 43/205 (21%) patients with no history of clarithromycin exposure and secondary resistance in 30/30 (100%) strains from previously treated patients. A single mutant strain was detected in 54/73 (74%) cases, a mixture of one or more mutant(s) plus the wild type in the remaining 19/73 (26%) cases. One 23S rRNA gene mutation (A-->T transversion at nucleotide 2144) in the peptidyltransferase region of domain V was novel. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows: (a) a high prevalence of H. pylori strains with primary or secondary clarithromycin resistance in an urban area of Central Italy; (b) colonization by both mutant and wild-type H. pylori in the same patient; (c) a novel variant of the H. pylori 23S rRNA gene.