Most hospitalized patients with significant tricuspid regurgitation have advanced disease preventing transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention.

BACKGROUND: More than moderate tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with high mortality. Surgical tricuspid valve repair and replacements are rarely performed due to high operative mortality risk, mainly attributed to late presentation. Novel transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) devices are being developed as an alternative to surgery. The population of patients presenting to tertiary care centers who can benefit from TTVI has not been well defined. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 12,677 consecutive 2D echocardiograms completed at our tertiary care center between March 2021 and March 2022 and identified hospitalized patients with more than moderate TR. A total of 569 patients were included in this study. Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected by individual chart review. We used the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on the management of valvular disease to retrospectively assign patients to medical, surgical, or transcatheter therapy. RESULTS: 458 patients (80.5 %) were assigned to medical therapy, 57 (10.0 %) were assigned to TTVI, and 54 (9.5 %) were assigned to tricuspid valve surgery. Of note, 75.7 % (431/569) of patients were precluded from any intervention due to advanced disease, and only 4.7 % (27/569) presented too early for intervention, being both asymptomatic and without RV dilatation. CONCLUSION: Only 10.0 % of patients presenting to a tertiary care center with significant TR would be candidates for TTVI when these technologies are approved in the United States. Earlier identification and treatment of TR could increase the number of patients who may benefit from interventions including TTVI.

When should fractional flow reserve be performed to assess the significance of borderline coronary artery lesions: Derivation of a simplified scoring system.

OBJECTIVES: To derive a simplified scoring system (SSS) that can assist in selecting patients who would benefit from the application of fractional flow reserve (FFR). BACKGROUND: Angiographers base decisions to perform FFR on their interpretation of % diameter stenosis (DS), which is subject to variability. Recent studies have shown that the amount of myocardium at jeopardy is an important factor in determining the degree of hemodynamic compromise. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multivariable analysis to identify independent predictors of hemodynamic compromise in 289 patients with 317 coronary vessels undergoing FFR. A SSS was derived using the odds ratios as a weighted factor. The receiver operator characteristics curve was used to identify the optimal cutoff (≥3) to discern a functionally significant lesion (FFR≤0.8). RESULTS: Male gender, left anterior descending artery apical wrap, disease proximal to lesion, minimal lumen diameter and % DS predicted abnormal FFR (≤0.8) and lesion location in the left circumflex predicted a normal FFR. Using a cutoff score of ≥3 on the SSS, a specificity of 90.4% (95% CI: 83.0-95.3) and a sensitivity of 38.0% (95% CI: 31.5-44.9) was generated with a positive predictive value of 89.0% (95% CI: 80.7%-94.6%) and negative predictive value of 41.6% (95% CI: 35.1%-48.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The decision to use FFR should be based not only on the % DS but also the size of the myocardial mass jeopardized. A score of ≥3 on the SSS should prompt further investigation with a pressure wire.

Limitations of embolic protection in saphenous vein graft intervention: insights from 202 consecutive patients.

Between January 2003 and September 2006, a total of 2,541 patients had percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Of these, 202 (226 grafts) had at least one saphenous vein graft (SVG) intervention. Adjunctive distal embolic protection (DEP) devices were attempted in 123 SVGs (54.4%). The 30-day major adverse cardiac event (occurrence of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization) rate in the overall group was 11.9%. The presence of angiographic thrombus independently predicted DEP use while the presence of in-stent restenosis predicted no DEP use. Although the presence of all angiographic technical feasibility criteria independently predicted DEP use, only 72 (32.4%) and 33 (14.6%) of the SVGs would have been eligible for the occlusive balloon- and filter-based distal embolic criteria, respectively. The most common technical reason for ineligibility was a graft size smaller than 3.0 mm, followed by the lack of a long enough landing zone. In a subset of 21 (9.3%) completely occluded lesions which would have excluded DEP use, angiographic success was 66.7%, and that was predicated on successful debulking with rheolytic thrombectomy in 13 (61.9%) with subsequent DEP in 5 (23.8%). In conclusion, not all grafts can be protected, and even in those that can, such protection may be incomplete. Newer embolic protection devices, such as the Proxis((R)), were recently introduced to expand the applicability to a wider population of vein grafts. However, further design improvements such as device miniaturizations applicable to sub-3.0-mm vessels and better particle removing/filtering mechanisms are needed in order to expand the use of embolic protection to reduce the persistently high complication rates associated with this difficult- to-treat subset of patients.

Percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction during pregnancy: a new trend?

Recent studies report that American women are increasingly delaying their first births. While the proportion of births in older women has been increasing, there is also increased prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and complications of pregnancy with increasing maternal age. We present 2 cases of acute myocardial infarction occurring during pregnancy. The mothers were both over 35 years old, and had significant risk factors for coronary disease. Both were found to have atherosclerotic coronary lesions, and were managed with coronary intervention with successful reperfusion. One woman successfully delivered a healthy infant at term. The other had a spontaneous abortion shortly after discharge from the hospital. Given current demographic trends, it is likely that such cases will be more commonly seen.