Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of AMG 986 Tablet and Capsule Formulations in Healthy Adult Subjects: A Phase I, Open-Label, Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: AMG 986 is a first-in-class, novel apelin receptor small molecule agonist initially developed for the treatment of heart failure. The current phase I study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single-dose 200-mg capsule formulation of AMG 986 relative to the tablet formulation in 12 healthy subjects. METHODS: In a two-period, two-way crossover design, eligible subjects were randomized 1:1 to tablet/capsule or capsule/tablet treatment sequences; each treatment sequence lasted for approximately 6 days and comprised six subjects. RESULTS: Following a single oral dose of AMG 986, the geometric mean maximum observed concentration (Cmax) values were 9670 ng/mL and 6920 ng/mL and the geometric mean area under the curve from time zero to 120 h (AUC0-120h) values were 68,000 ng*h/mL and 59,900 ng*h/mL for the tablet and capsule, respectively. The geometric least squares means (90% confidence interval [90% CI]) for the ratios of capsule/tablet were 0.88 (90% CI 0.81-0.96) and 0.72 (90% CI 0.57-0.91) for AUC0-120h and Cmax, respectively. AMG 986 had an acceptable safety profile; all adverse events were grade 1 or 2 in severity. CONCLUSION: There was a modest 12% decrease in AUC0-120h and a 28% decrease in Cmax with the AMG 986 capsule versus the tablet. These differences are not considered to be clinically relevant, suggesting the capsule formulation can be used in subsequent clinical studies of AMG 986.

A Phase 1, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Effect of Food and Concomitant Itraconazole Administration on the Pharmacokinetics of AMG 986 in Healthy Subjects.

This phase 1, open-label study evaluated the effect of food and administration of the cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitor itraconazole (ITZ) on the pharmacokinetics of AMG 986. In cohort 1, 12 healthy subjects received a single oral dose of AMG 986 200 mg ± food on days 1 and 10. In cohort 2, 15 healthy subjects received oral ITZ 200 mg once daily on days 8 to 15 and a single oral dose of AMG 986 10 mg on days 1 and 11. The geometric least squares mean ratios of fed/fasted for AMG 986 maximum observed concentration (Cmax ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf ) were 0.76 (90%CI, 0.61-0.95) and 1.07 (90%CI, 0.94-1.22), respectively. The geometric least squares mean ratios of AMG 986 10 mg plus ITZ 200 mg/AMG 986 10 mg alone for AMG 986 Cmax and AUCinf were 1.36 (90%CI, 1.25-1.48) and 5.13 (90%CI, 4.71-5.59), respectively. Overall, 3 subjects experienced mild treatment-related adverse events; there were no serious or fatal adverse events. In conclusion, food had no apparent effect on the exposure of AMG 986 200 mg; therefore, food restrictions are not required. Potent cytochrome P450 3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein inhibitors may warrant AMG 986 dose reduction and should be coadministered with caution in patients with heart failure treated with AMG 986.

A Phase I, Open-label, Single-Dose Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of AMG 986 in Healthy Japanese Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: AMG 986 is a first-in-class, novel apelin receptor small molecule agonist initially developed as a treatment for patients with heart failure (HF). Previously, a first-in-human study of AMG 986 was conducted in healthy and HF subjects; however, AMG 986 was not evaluated in Japanese subjects. METHODS: This was a phase I, open-label, single-dose, single-center study conducted to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of AMG 986 200 mg and 400 mg in 12 healthy Japanese subjects. Six subjects received AMG 986 200 mg and six subjects received AMG 986 400 mg. RESULTS: Following oral administration, median time to maximum observed plasma concentration (tmax) was 1.0 h for both the AMG 986 200 mg and 400 mg groups, and mean terminal half-life (t½) was 15.1 h and 17.6 h, respectively. When comparing the AMG 986 200 mg and 400 mg groups, 1.33-fold and 1.18-fold higher maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) and AUC∞, respectively, were observed for the 2-fold increase in dose. AMG 986 exhibited an acceptable safety and tolerability profile; all adverse events were mild in severity. CONCLUSION: AMG 986 exposure increased with increasing dose, and the increase was less than dose proportional in healthy Japanese subjects. The results of this study could facilitate the subsequent clinical development of AMG 986 for the treatment of Japanese patients with HF.

Effect of Severe Renal Impairment on the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of AMG 986.

INTRODUCTION: AMG 986 is a first-in-class, novel apelin receptor small molecule agonist initially developed for the treatment of heart failure (HF). The safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of AMG 986 in participants with renal impairment (RI) remains unknown. METHODS: This phase 1 study compared the safety and PK of AMG 986 200 mg in six participants with severe RI (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 15-29 mL/min/1.73 m2) versus six participants with normal renal function (eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2). RESULTS: Following a single oral dose of AMG 986 200 mg on day 1, the maximum observed concentration increased 1.41-fold (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-2.27) and the area under the curve from time zero to infinity increased 1.23-fold (90% CI 0.73-2.06) in participants with severe RI versus normal renal function. AMG 986 had an acceptable safety profile; all adverse events were mild in severity. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the enrollment of HF patients with RI to clinical trials of AMG 986 without the need for dose adjustments. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03318809 (registered: October 24, 2017).

Sotorasib for Lung Cancers with KRAS p.G12C Mutation.

BACKGROUND: Sotorasib showed anticancer activity in patients with KRAS p.G12C-mutated advanced solid tumors in a phase 1 study, and particularly promising anticancer activity was observed in a subgroup of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: In a single-group, phase 2 trial, we investigated the activity of sotorasib, administered orally at a dose of 960 mg once daily, in patients with KRAS p.G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC previously treated with standard therapies. The primary end point was objective response (complete or partial response) according to independent central review. Key secondary end points included duration of response, disease control (defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease), progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Exploratory biomarkers were evaluated for their association with response to sotorasib therapy. RESULTS: Among the 126 enrolled patients, the majority (81.0%) had previously received both platinum-based chemotherapy and inhibitors of programmed death 1 (PD-1) or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). According to central review, 124 patients had measurable disease at baseline and were evaluated for response. An objective response was observed in 46 patients (37.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 28.6 to 46.2), including in 4 (3.2%) who had a complete response and in 42 (33.9%) who had a partial response. The median duration of response was 11.1 months (95% CI, 6.9 to could not be evaluated). Disease control occurred in 100 patients (80.6%; 95% CI, 72.6 to 87.2). The median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 8.2), and the median overall survival was 12.5 months (95% CI, 10.0 to could not be evaluated). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 88 of 126 patients (69.8%), including grade 3 events in 25 patients (19.8%) and a grade 4 event in 1 (0.8%). Responses were observed in subgroups defined according to PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, and co-occurring mutations in STK11, KEAP1, or TP53. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase 2 trial, sotorasib therapy led to a durable clinical benefit without new safety signals in patients with previously treated KRAS p.G12C-mutated NSCLC. (Funded by Amgen and the National Institutes of Health; CodeBreaK100 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03600883.).

An integrated analysis of safety and tolerability of etelcalcetide in patients receiving hemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism.

BACKGROUND: Calcimimetics have been shown to be effective and safe therapies for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT), a serious complication of disordered mineral metabolism associated with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease. Etelcalcetide, a recently approved intravenous calcimimetic, reduces serum parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium, phosphorus, and fibroblast growth factor-23 concentrations. Here we report the first integrated safety profile of etelcalcetide using pooled data from five pivotal clinical trials. METHODS: This analysis included data from patients receiving hemodialysis with moderate to severe sHPT enrolled in two randomized, placebo-controlled trials; a randomized active-controlled (with cinacalcet) trial; and two single-arm, open-label extension trials. Patients initially received etelcalcetide intravenously 5 mg three times weekly (TIW) after hemodialysis; with potential dose increases of 2.5 or 5 mg at 4-week intervals to a maximum dose of 15 mg TIW, depending on serum PTH and calcium levels. The nature, frequency, and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and changes in laboratory parameters were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, we evaluated 1023 patients from the placebo-controlled trials, 683 from the active-controlled trial, and 1299 from open-label extensions. The frequency and nature of common treatment-emergent AEs reported for the etelcalcetide arm were consistent among the placebo-controlled and active-controlled trials. The most common AEs were those related to mineral metabolism (decreased blood calcium, hypophosphatemia, muscle spasms) or gastrointestinal abnormalities (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting). Hypocalcemia leading to discontinuation of either calcimimetic was experienced in ≤ 1% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: This integrated safety assessment of etelcalcetide across placebo- and active-controlled trials showed an overall favorable risk/benefit profile, with safety similar to that of cinacalcet. Consistent with its mechanism of action, the most important risks associated with etelcalcetide were serum calcium reductions and hypocalcemia-related AEs; no new safety findings were identified in the pooled long-term extension trials.