Radiotherapy Patterns of Care for Locally-advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the Pre- and Post-durvalumab Era: A Region-wide Survey in a Japanese Prefecture.

The promising results of the PACIFIC study led to the approval of consolidation durvalumab for coverage by the National Health Insurance (NHI) in 2018 for patients with locally-advanced unresectable non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). However, the effect of NHI coverage on the patterns of care for this population remains unclear. Here, we conducted a questionnaire-based survey to determine the patterns of care for patients with stage II-III NSCLC treated with definitive radiotherapy in 2017 (pre-durvalumab era) or in 2019 (post-durvalumab era). Data were obtained from 11 radiotherapy facilities in Gunma prefecture, which has a population of 1.94 million. We identified 80 and 83 patients with stage II-III NSCLC who received definitive radiotherapy in Gunma in 2017 and 2019, respectively. At a given facility, CCRT was the treatment of choice in a significantly greater proportion of patients in 2019 than in 2017 (66% ± 20% vs 51% ± 29%, P = 0.041). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was more frequent in 2019 than in 2017 (24% vs 1.2%). Carboplatin plus paclitaxel was used for CCRT at higher rate in 2019 than in 2017 (73% vs 44%). Consolidation durvalumab was performed in 73% (40/55) of CCRT-treated patients in 2019, and the treatment was performed for the planned 12 months in 45% (18/40) of patients. These data indicate that NHI coverage of durvalumab might be a possible reason for choosing CCRT in patients with stage II-III NSCLC in the real-world setting.

Phase I study of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) plus carboplatin in combination with thoracic radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Weekly nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin was administered intravenously for 6 weeks. Doses of each drug were planned as follows: level 1, 40/2; level 2, 60/2; level 3, 80/2 (nab-paclitaxel [mg/m2]/carboplatin [area under the plasma concentration time curve mg/ml/min]). Concurrent thoracic radiotherapy was administered in 2-Gy fractions 5 times weekly, to a total dose of 60 Gy. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were enrolled in the present study. Eleven (78%) patients received full cycles (6 cycles) of chemotherapy, and 12 (86%) patients received 60 Gy of thoracic radiotherapy. At level 1, none of 3 patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). At level 2, 2 of 7 patients developed grade 3 diarrhea, grade 3 hyponatremia, grade 3 fatigue, and grade 3 esophagitis. Therefore, 4 patients were started at dose level 3 and none developed a DLT. No pulmonary toxicities, such as interstitial pneumonitis and treatment-related deaths, were observed at either level. Therefore, level 3 was considered the MTD and level 3 was defined as the RD. An objective response was observed in 71.4% of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen is feasible and well tolerated for the treatment of patients with unresectable locally advanced NSCLC.

Comparison of the efficacy of radiotherapy between postoperative mediastinal lymph node recurrence and stage III disease in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

PURPOSE: It is unknown if local treatment is equally effective in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with postoperative mediastinal lymph node recurrence or primary stage III disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy, in patients with postoperative mediastinal lymph node recurrence. METHODS: Patient characteristics, treatment response and survival were compared between NSCLC patients with mediastinal lymph node metastases treated between 2002-2009 by radiotherapy alone or by chemoradiotherapy (group A, N=33) and those with primary stage III disease (group B, N = 157). RESULTS: Men accounted for 60.6% of group A and 78.9% of group B (p=0.04 patients). ECOG performance status 0 was detected in 78.7% of group A and 57.3% of group B (p=0.02). The response rates in groups A and B were 66.6 and 72.3%, respectively (p=0.64). Progression-free survival (PFS) was similar between groups A and B (median 15.0 vs 11.0 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.78; 95% CI 0.51-1.20; p=0.26). However, overall survival (OS) was better in group A than in group B (median 67.0 vs 39.0 months; HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.29-0.97; p=0.03). Postoperative PFS (median 12.5 vs 19.0 months; HR 1.50; 95% CI 0.64-3.49; p=0.34) and OS (median, 67.0 vs 60.0 months; HR 1.22; 95% CI 0.36-4.14; p=0.74) were similar between the group A treatments (radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, respectively). CONCLUSION: Postoperative mediastinal lymph node recurrent NSCLC demonstrated distinctive features including better OS compared to patients with primary stage III disease, despite similar response rates and PFS.

Comparison of platinum combination re-challenge therapy and docetaxel monotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients previously treated with platinum-based chemoradiotherapy.

Platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a standard front-line treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, no clinical trials have compared the efficacy and toxicity of platinum combination and docetaxel as subsequent re-challenge chemotherapies after cancer recurrence following CRT. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of platinum combination chemotherapy versus docetaxel monotherapy in NSCLC patients previously treated with platinum-based CRT. From September 2002 to December 2009, at three participating institutions, 24 patients with locally advanced NSCLC, who had previously received platinum-based CRT, were treated with platinum combination re-challenge therapy, whereas 61 received docetaxel monotherapy. We reviewed their medical charts to evaluate patient characteristics and data regarding treatment response, survival, and toxicity. The response rates were 16.7% and 6.6% in the platinum combination chemotherapy and docetaxel monotherapy groups, respectively (p = 0.09), whereas disease control rates were 58.3% and 57.4%, respectively (p = 0.82). Progression-free survival was similar between the two groups (median, 4.2 vs. 2.3 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.51-1.29; p = 0.38), as was overall survival (median, 16.5 vs. 13.0 months; HR = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.47-1.41; p = 0.47). The incidence and severity of toxicity was also similar between the two groups. Hematological toxicity, particularly leukopenia and neutropenia, was more frequent in the docetaxel group. Our results indicated that platinum combination re-challenge was equivalent to docetaxel for relapsed patients previously treated with platinum-based CRT.

Phase II study of oral S-1 and cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of oral S-1 in combination with cisplatin and thoracic radiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: S-1 (50mg/m(2)) was administered orally twice daily for 14 days, with cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 of each cycle every 3 weeks, for 2-4 cycles. Thoracic radiation therapy was administered in 2 Gy fractions five times weekly for a total dose of 60 Gy. The primary endpoint was the response rate, and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival and safety. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were enrolled in this study. The objective response rate was 87.8% (98% CI: 77.8-97.8%). The median progression-free survival was 467 days (15.4 months), and the median survival time was 904 days (29.7 months). The overall survival rates at 1- and 2-years were 85.7% and 52.9%, respectively. Hematological toxicities included grade 3/4 neutropenia (17%) and grade 3/4 leukopenia (27%). No grade 3 febrile neutropenia was detected, and grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities were also mild. A grade 3 gastrointestinal hemorrhage was observed in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of oral S-1 plus cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy is a promising treatment with a high efficacy and lower toxicity in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

[Radiation-induced apoptosis in vivo: therapeutic significance of apoptosis in radiation therapy].

Apoptotic cell death is frequently found in certain tumor cells after irradiation; however, the incidence is not always high in vivo. Seven tumors were transplanted to nude mice, and their organs were histologically examined after irradiation to study the therapeutic significance of apoptosis in radiation therapy. A high incidence of apoptosis was found only in radiosensitive tumors or normal cells with wild-type p53, but the peak incidence in most cells was only a few percent or less. However, the calculated total incidence of apoptotic cell death was much higher than the actual peak incidence, because the half-life of apoptosis is very short. Even in radioresistant tumors, total radiation-induced apoptosis was estimated to be about 10 percent. These results suggest that apoptotic cell death in radiotherapy may be more important in vivo than previously estimated.