Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Biol Pharm Bull ; 46(9): 1217-1222, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37661401

RESUMO

Heart failure is a prevalent comorbidity in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). However, it is unclear whether the risk factors for heart failure in DM patients treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are the same as those for the general population. In this study, we evaluated the factors of new-onset heart failure in working-age patients with diabetes who started DPP-4 inhibitor therapy. This study included 7938 working-age patients. The primary endpoint of the study was the proportion of patients developing heart failure within 12 months of starting DPP-4 inhibitor therapy, which was found to be 1.89% (n = 150). In these patients, risk factors of new-onset heart failure were aging, history of atrial fibrillation, and hypertension but not sex, smoking, high body mass index, weight gain of over 10 kg from 20 years of age, levels of low-density lipoprotein or glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), history of angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, and chronic kidney disease. We confirmed that cardiovascular comorbidities are risk factors for new-onset heart failure in patients with DM, while general risk factors are not. In conclusion, physicians and pharmacists need to carefully monitor working-age patients with cardiovascular history who start DPP-4 inhibitor therapy even if they do not exhibit general risk factors for heart failure.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Humanos , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/efeitos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco , Antivirais
2.
Drugs Real World Outcomes ; 10(4): 521-529, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37526854

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Several oral drugs are recommended to be taken with large amounts of water for reasons such as peptic ulcer prophylaxis. On the other hand, there are many patients with diseases that restrict water intake, and the actual frequency of patients receiving prescriptions in these conflicting situations is not clear. OBJECTIVE: Using a large claims database in Japan, this study aimed to determine the proportion of patients aged ≥ 75 years on fluid restriction who received drugs whose drug package insert mentioned "a large amount of water intake is needed when taking the drug". METHODS: We performed a prescription survey of older patients over 75 years of age using the Japan Medical Data Centre (JMDC) claims database. Out of approximately 8800 oral drugs used in Japan, we defined 29 drugs for which package inserts noted that a large amount of water intake is recommended during drug administration. We defined diagnosis codes for some common diseases for which restricted water intake is likely recommended: heart failure (NYHA class III or IV), liver cirrhosis with ascites, and chronic kidney disease stage 5, including dialysis patients. RESULTS: Of 5968 patients aged ≥ 75 years (men 47.7%), 320 (5.4%) patients with heart failure (2.8%, n = 170), liver cirrhosis (0.7%, n = 40), or chronic kidney disease (1.9%, n = 113), diagnoses likely associated with the need for fluid restriction, were prescribed drugs for which abundant fluid at intake was recommended. Among 29 identified drugs, 15 drugs were administered to older patients over 75 years with fluid restriction due to said diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Of patients 75 years and older with disease likely requiring water restriction, 5.4% faced the dilemma of following advice to restrict fluid intake due to their diagnoses or to adhere to instructions in drug package inserts to have abundant fluid intake when taking the drug. Our study raises awareness regarding the dilemma of water restriction and intake in clinical settings, highlighting the importance of considering individual patient needs. These real-world findings emphasize the need for information and guidelines to assist healthcare professionals in navigating this dilemma and making informed decisions for the benefit of their patients.

3.
Biol Pharm Bull ; 45(9): 1373-1377, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36047207

RESUMO

This study aimed to identify the components of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or potassium-competitive acid blocker (PCAB) that lead to cardiovascular events in individuals of working age. We analyzed large claims data of individuals who were administered PPIs or PCAB. We enrolled working-age individuals administered PPI or PCAB without cardiovascular history with a 12-month screening and 12-month observation period and determined the proportion of cardiovascular events and the predictive factors of cardiovascular events in this population. Among the eligible individuals, 0.5% (456/91098) had cardiovascular events during the 12-month observation period. Predictive factors for cardiovascular events were age for +1 year (p < 0.0001), male sex (p < 0.0001), hypertension (p = 0.0056), and diabetes mellitus (p < 0.0001). The cardiovascular disease risk was higher in working-age individuals administered lansoprazole than in those administered other drugs (vs. rabeprazole; p = 0.0002, vs. omeprazole; p = 0.0046, vs. vonoprazan; p < 0.0001, and vs. esomeprazole; p < 0.0001). We identified the risk for cardiovascular events in individuals being treated with lansoprazole. Lansoprazole is known for its higher CYP2C19 inhibition activity compared with other PPIs or PCAB. A possible mechanism by which lansoprazole may lead to cardiovascular events is inhibiting the generation of epoxyeicosatrienoic acids from arachidonic acids, an intrinsic cardioprotective activator via CYP2C19 inhibition. Thus, we recommend avoiding administering lansoprazole to working-age individuals require PPIs or PCAB.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons , Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19 , Humanos , Lansoprazol , Masculino , Potássio , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Rabeprazol , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Clin Case Rep ; 10(4): e05718, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35474996

RESUMO

Most hypotension during chemotherapy is caused by an allergic mechanism. Conversely, non-allergic hypotension due to chemotherapy is rare. In this case report, we present a patient who suffered severe hypotension followed by the administration of irinotecan-based chemotherapy and some supportive care such as steroids for preventing emesis. A 71-year-old man with hypertension was diagnosed with stage IV small cell lung cancer (sT1cN3M0). Severe hypotension occurred in the patient after every administration of chemotherapy. Finally, he was able to receive all four courses of chemotherapy as planned along with the medical staff's support care. This case provides that a regimen that contained irinotecan and steroid could cause hypotension and the mechanism is partially explained by inhibiting choline esterase and adrenal insufficiency. We should be careful about non-allergic hypotension when we administer irinotecan-based chemotherapy.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA