Abdominal computed tomography scoring systems and experienced radiologists in the radiological diagnosis of small bowel and mesenteric injury.

PURPOSE: Blunt bowel and/or mesenteric injury requiring surgery presents a diagnostic challenge. Although computed tomography (CT) imaging is standard following blunt trauma, findings can be nonspecific. Most studies have focused on the diagnostic value of CT findings in identifying significant bowel and/or mesenteric injury (sBMI). Some studies have described scoring systems to assist with diagnosis. Little attention, has been given to radiologist interpretation of CT scans. This study compared the discriminative ability of scoring systems (BIPS and RAPTOR) with radiologist interpretation in identifying sBMI. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of trauma patients with suspected sBMI. CT images were reviewed in a blinded fashion to calculate BIPS and RAPTOR scores. Sensitivity and specificity were compared between BIPS, RAPTOR, and the admission CT report with respect to identifying sBMI. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-two patients were identified, 72 (44%) underwent laparotomy and 43 (26.5%) had sBMI. Sensitivity and specificity were: BIPS 49% and 87%, AUC 0.75 (0.67-0.81), P < 0.001; RAPTOR 46% and 82%, AUC 0.72 (0.64-0.79), P < 0.001; radiologist impression 81% and 71%, AUC 0.82(0.75-0.87), P < 0.001. The discriminative ability of the radiologist impression was higher than RAPTOR (P = 0.04) but not BIPS (P = 0.13). There was not a difference between RAPTOR vs. BIPS (P = 0.55). CONCLUSION: Radiologist interpretation of the admission CT scan was discriminative of sBMI. Although surgical vigilance, including evaluation of the CT images and patient, remains fundamental to early diagnosis, the radiologist's impression of the CT scan can be used in clinical practice to simplify the approach to patients with abdominal trauma.

Evolution of postoperative pituitary adenoma resection cavities assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and implications regarding radiotherapy timing and modality.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the temporal evolution of the spatial relationship between the pituitary adenoma transsphenoidal surgical cavity and the adjacent optic chiasm and discusses implications on timing and choice of radiotherapy modality. METHODS: This retrospective observational review analyzed factors that might influence the postoperative relationship between the surgical cavity and the optic chiasm, including tumor type, craniocaudal tumor and resection cavity dimensions, the preoperative distance between tumor and the optic chiasm, the presence of cavernous sinus invasion, and the choice of intraoperative packing material. Changes observed on magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative, immediate (within 72 h), and delayed (≥3 months) postoperative periods were compared. RESULTS: Sixty-five patient histories were analyzed. Preoperatively, the pituitary adenoma was apposed to the optic chiasm in 43 patients (66%). Postoperatively, 34 patients (52%) in the immediate postoperative period and 54 patients (83%) in the delayed postoperative period had a distance ≥2 mm between the resection cavity and the optic chiasm. This distance provides a greater margin of safety with adjuvant radiosurgery. Preoperative tumor size showed a strong association with postoperative descent of the optic chiasm. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative tumor size and degree of mass effect on the optic chiasm predict postoperative changes. In this study, the distance between the resection cavity and the optic chiasm was greater at ≥3 months postoperatively than in the immediate postoperative period, regardless of preoperative mass effect, indicating radiotherapy planning should be deferred to ≥3 months postoperatively when not precluded by aggressive histological characteristics that necessitate more immediate treatment. PRECIS: To investigate the temporal relationship between the postoperative sellar surgical cavity and the adjacent optic apparatus after transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas and the implications for radiotherapy.

Pneumomediastinum in blunt trauma: If aerodigestive injury is not seen on CT, invasive workup is not indicated.

BACKGROUND: Pneumomediastinum following blunt trauma is often observed on CT imaging, and concern for associated aerodigestive injury often prompts endoscopy and/or fluoroscopy. In recent years, adoption of multi-detector CT technology has resulted in high resolution images that may clearly identify aerodigestive injuries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of multi-detector CT in the identification of blunt aerodigestive injuries. METHODS: Over five years, patients with pneumomediastinum following blunt trauma were identified from the registry of a level 1 trauma center. All CT imaging of trauma patients during this time period was accomplished with 64-slice scanners. RESULTS: 127 patients with blunt traumatic pneumomediastinum were identified. Five airway injuries were identified, and all injuries were evident on CT imaging. No patient was found to have airway injury by endoscopy that was not evident on CT. No patient had an esophageal injury. CONCLUSION: Multi-detector CT imaging identifies aerodigestive injuries associated with pneumomediastinum following blunt trauma. The absence of a recognizable aerodigestive injury by CT effectively rules out the presence of such injury.

A rare opportunity for conservative treatment in a case of blunt trauma to the supradiaphragmatic inferior vena cava.

Injuries to the inferior vena cava (IVC) secondary to blunt trauma are rare and occur in only 1-10% of all blunt trauma patients. Management of these injuries has not been subjected to major studies, but several case reports and small retrospective studies have demonstrated that management can be tailored to the hemodynamic status of the patient; this is similar to the management of blunt liver injuries. Stable patients whose injuries have achieved local venous tamponade have been successfully treated without surgical intervention, while unstable patients require operative management. Regardless of patient status, however, IVC injuries are highly fatal with mortality rates between 70 and 90%. This report describes the case of a patient with a blunt traumatic injury to the supradiaphragmatic IVC with development of a pseudoaneurysm who was successfully managed conservatively.