Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Urge Urinary Incontinence and Overactive Bladder: Narrative Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Applicability to Implantable Devices.

The tibial nerve is an established target for neuromodulation in the management of overactive bladder (OAB) and its associated symptoms, including urge urinary incontinence (UUI). Technologies are currently available to deliver tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) through percutaneous devices or through implantable devices. The benefits and safety of percutaneous TNS have led to it as a guideline-recommended therapy. However, patient compliance is limited by the burden of weekly office visits and the need for maintenance treatments. Further, insurance often only covers a limited number of lifetime visits for percutaneous TNS. These factors and others have led to the development, study, and utilization of implantable TNS devices. Implantable TNS devices deliver the same therapeutic mechanism of action for nerve stimulation with a permanent implanted device that provides at-home stimulation rather than in-office therapy delivery. Additionally, there is an added potential for dynamic and patient-centered stimulation. There is a large body of high-quality evidence published for TNS, including numerous randomized controlled trials published on percutaneous TNS which have consistently demonstrated superior efficacy to sham and similar efficacy to that of anticholinergic medications. Percutaneous TNS also performs better than conservative therapy including pelvic floor muscle training. The percutaneous and implantable approaches deliver nerve stimulation to the same target nerve, using the same mechanism of action. Therefore, data from randomized trials of percutaneous TNS are informative for implantable TNS devices. At the time of this article's publication, at least two implantable TNS devices have received marketing authorization from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The objective of this review is to discuss the mechanism of action for TNS and summarize the published literature from clinical trials of percutaneous TNS as a foundation of high-quality evidence for implantable devices targeting the tibial nerve.

A randomized trial of retropubic vs single-incision sling among patients undergoing vaginal prolapse repair.

BACKGROUND: The choice of midurethral sling type may impact efficacy and complications in women undergoing transvaginal native tissue repair of pelvic organ prolapse. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to determine if the single-incision sling is noninferior to retropubic sling for the management of stress urinary incontinence among patients undergoing reconstructive or obliterative native tissue vaginal repair. The secondary aims were to compare adverse events and surgeon ease of use with sling assignment. STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter, noninferiority, randomized trial of women with ≥ stage II pelvic organ prolapse and objectively confirmed stress urinary incontinence undergoing reconstructive or obliterative vaginal repair was performed. Women were randomized to concomitant single-incision (Altis sling, Coloplast Minneapolis, MN) with suprapubic sham incisions or retropubic slings. The primary dichotomous outcome was abnormal lower urinary tract function within 12 months postsurgery, defined as bothersome stress urinary incontinence symptoms (>1 Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory question no. 17); retreatment for stress urinary incontinence or treatment for urinary retention. Secondary outcomes were adverse events, Patient Global Impression of Improvement of bladder function, and surgeon ease of use (1, worst; 10, best). All subjects completed validated questionnaires and underwent a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification, cough stress test, and postvoid residual preoperatively, at 6 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. Assuming a subjective cure rate for retropubic of 82%, 80% power, and 1-sided 5% significance level, we estimated that 127 patients in each arm were needed to declare noninferiority of the single-incision sling if the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval for the between-group difference per protocol in abnormal bladder function was <12%. Assuming a 10% loss to follow-up, the total enrollment goal was 280. RESULTS: Between December 2018 and January 2023, 280 subjects were enrolled across 7 sites, and 255 were randomized: 126 were for single-incision, and 129 were for retropubic sling. There were no preoperative or operative characteristic differences between groups. Overall, 81% had reconstructive, and 19% had obliterative native tissue repairs. The primary outcome, abnormal lower urinary tract function at 12 months, occurred in 29 (25%) of single-incision vs 24 (20%) of the retropubic sling group (risk difference, 0.04472 [95% confidence interval, -0.03 to 0.1133]; P=.001 for noninferiority). Bothersome stress urinary incontinence occurred in 20% vs 17% (P=.27) and was retreated in 4% vs 2% (P=.44) of single-incision vs retropubic groups, respectively. Adverse events were reported in 24 (16%) of single-incision vs 14 (9%) of the retropubic group (95% confidence interval, 0.95-3.29; P=.70) and included de novo or worsening urgency incontinence symptoms, urinary tract infection, mesh exposure, need for prolonged catheter drainage, and de novo pain, without differences between groups. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (very satisfied and satisfied) was 71% vs 67% (P=.43), and median surgeon ease of sling use was 8 (7-10) vs 9 (8-10), P=.03 in single-incision vs retropubic, respectively. CONCLUSION: For women undergoing vaginal repair, single-incision was noninferior to retropubic sling for stress urinary incontinence symptoms, and complications, including treatment for urinary retention, did not differ.

Long-Term Costs of Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy Compared to Native Tissue Vaginal Repair With Concomitant Hysterectomy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term costs of hysterectomy with minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MISCP) versus uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) for primary uterovaginal prolapse repair. DESIGN: A hospital-based decision analysis model was built using TreeAge Pro (TreeAge Software Inc, Williamstown, MA). Those with prolapse were modeled to undergo either vaginal hysterectomy with USLS or minimally invasive total hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy (MISCP). We modeled the chance of complications of the index procedure, prolapse recurrence with the option for surgical retreatment, complications of the salvage procedure, and possible second prolapse recurrence. The primary outcome was cost of the surgical strategy. The proportion of patients living with prolapse after treatment was the secondary outcome. SETTING: Tertiary center for urogynecology. PATIENTS: Female patients undergoing surgical repair by the same team for primary uterovaginal prolapse. INTERVENTIONS: Comparison analysis of estimated long-term costs was performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Our primary outcome showed that a strategy of undergoing MISCP as the primary index procedure cost $19 935 and that undergoing USLS as the primary index procedure cost $15 457, a difference of $4478. Furthermore, 21.1% of women in the USLS group will be living with recurrent prolapse compared to 6.2% of MISCP patients. Switching from USLS to MISCP to minimize recurrence risk would cost $30 054 per case of prolapse prevented. Additionally, a surgeon would have to perform 6.7 cases by MISCP instead of USLS in order to prevent 1 patient from having recurrent prolapse. CONCLUSION: The higher initial costs of MISCP compared to USLS persist in the long term after factoring in recurrence and complication rates, though more patients who undergo USLS live with prolapse recurrence.

Long-Term Mesh Exposure 5 Years Following Minimally Invasive Total Hysterectomy and Sacrocolpopexy.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to assess long-term mesh complications following total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: In this second extension study, women from a multicenter randomized trial were followed for more than 36 months after surgery. Owing to COVID-19, participants were assessed through either in-person visits or telephone questionnaires. The primary outcome was the incidence of permanent suture or mesh exposure. Secondary outcomes included surgical success and late adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Out of the 200 initially enrolled participants, 82 women took part in this second extension study. Among them, 46 were in the permanent suture group, and 36 in the delayed absorbable group. The mean follow-up duration was 5.3 years, with the cumulative mesh or suture exposure of 9.9%, involving 18 cases, of which 4 were incident cases. Surgical success after more than 5 years stood at 95%, with few experiencing bothersome bulge symptoms or requiring retreatment. No serious adverse events occurred, including mesh erosion into the bladder or bowel. The most common adverse events were vaginal pain, bleeding, dyspareunia, and stress urinary incontinence, with no significant differences between suture types. CONCLUSION: The study found that mesh exposure risk gradually increased over time, reaching nearly 10% after more than 5 years post-surgery, regardless of suture type. However, surgical success remained high, and no delayed serious adverse events were reported.

Anterior approach sacrospinous hysteropexy: native tissue compared with mesh-augmented repair for primary uterovaginal prolapse management.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Anterior sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH) was popularized by transvaginal mesh kits. Following mesh-kit market withdrawal, we hypothesized similar efficacy through native-tissue reattachment of the pubocervical fascia with fixation of the anterior cervix to the sacrospinous ligament. Few analyses for anterior native-tissue versus mesh-augmented SSH exist. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of women who underwent transvaginal anterior SSH between 01 January 2016 and 31 December 2022 was performed. Women who underwent a mesh-augmented (Uphold Lite Vaginal Support System™) versus native-tissue repair were compared. Composite success was defined as no bulge symptoms, no retreatment, and no recurrence beyond the hymen with apex nondescended > one third of the total vaginal length. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were obtained as indicated. RESULTS: Of 223 women screened, inclusion criteria were met by 124 (40 mesh-augmented; 84 native-tissue). There was no difference in pre-operative characteristics between groups. Composite success was demonstrated in 95.2% of women with a median follow-up of 224 days (range: 30-988). Two women in the mesh-augmented group reported bulge symptoms and underwent re-treatment with a pessary. Four women in the native-tissue group reported bulge symptoms; 3 underwent re-treatment (2 pessary, 1 surgery). There were no differences in composite success rates between groups (p=0.954). There were additionally no differences in intra-operative (p=0.752) or post-operative (p=0.292) complication rates between the groups. There were no mesh-related complications, including exposure or chronic pelvic pain. CONCLUSIONS: Ninety-five percent of women achieved surgical success and the use of mesh augmentation did not confer added benefit in terms of efficacy or complications when compared with native tissue. Further long-term data are needed to continue our assessment of native-tissue anterior SSH.

Financial analysis of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair with concomitant hysterectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MISCP) is increasingly used for uterovaginal prolapse, but comparative cost data of MISCP versus native tissue vaginal repair (NTR) are lacking. The objective was to determine the cost difference, from a hospital perspective, between MISCP and NTR performed with hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care center of women who underwent NTR or MISCP with concomitant hysterectomy in 2021. Hospital charges, direct and indirect costs, and operating margin (revenue minus costs) were obtained from Strata Jazz and compared using SPSS. RESULTS: A total of 82 women were included, 33 MISCP (25 robotic, 8 laparoscopic) versus 49 NTR. Demographic and surgical data were similar, except that MISCP had younger age (50.5 vs 61.1 years, p<0.01). Same-day discharge and estimated blood loss were similar, but operative time was longer for MISCP (204 vs 161 min, p<0.01). MISCP total costs were higher (US$17,422 vs US$13,001, p<0.01). MISCP had higher direct costs (US$12,354 vs US$9,305, p<0.01) and indirect costs (US$5,068 vs US$3,696, p<0.01). Consumable supply costs were higher with MISCP (US$4,429 vs US$2,089, p<0.01), but the cost of operating room time and staff was similar (US$7,926 vs US$7,216, p=0.07). Controlling for same-day discharge, anti-incontinence procedures and smoking, total costs were higher for MISCP (adjusted beta = US$4,262, p<0.01). Mean charges (US$102,060 vs US$97,185, p=0.379), revenue (US$22,214 vs US$22,491, p=0.929), and operating margin (US$8,719 vs US$3,966, p=0.134) were not statistically different. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy had higher costs than NTR; however, charges, reimbursement, and operating margins were not statistically significantly different between the groups.

Long-Term Pain After Minimally Invasive Total Hysterectomy and Sacrocolpopexy.

IMPORTANCE: There are limited long-term data on patient-reported pain after surgical treatment of uterovaginal prolapse. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate pain in women undergoing minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy with a lightweight polypropylene Y-mesh (Upsylon) >2 years after surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This is a planned secondary analysis of a 5-site randomized trial comparing permanent versus absorbable suture for vaginal attachment of a lightweight polypropylene Y-mesh during total laparoscopic hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy in women with stage ≥2 uterovaginal prolapse. Our primary outcome was patient-reported pain or dyspareunia at >2 years. RESULTS: Of the 185 participants eligible for enrollment in the e-PACT study, 106 enrolled; 98 participants (96%) completed either in-person examinations or study questionnaires regarding pain and are included in this analysis. At >2 years, 28% reported any pain: 14% reported dyspareunia on questionnaires, 5% reported pelvic pain on questionnaires, and 14% of those who had an in-person examination reported pain. Of participants who reported pain or dyspareunia at baseline before surgery, 59% reported resolution of their symptoms >2 years. On multiple logistic regression controlling for age and baseline pain or dyspareunia, baseline pain or dyspareunia was associated with a nearly 3-fold increased risk of reporting any pain >2 years (adjusted odds ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-6.9). No women had repeat surgical intervention for pain. CONCLUSIONS: Although 60% of women report pain resolution >2 years after surgery, de novo pain was present in 1 of 5 women. Baseline history of pain or dyspareunia is the only factor associated with an increased likelihood of experiencing pain >2 years after surgery.

Differences in Surgical Practice Patterns of Vaginal Native Tissue Repair for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Between Urologists and Gynecologists.

IMPORTANCE: Surgeon specialty training may influence the combination of transvaginal procedures for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair. Isolated transvaginal anterior compartment repair (AR) without concurrent apical suspension (ApS) is a known risk factor for POP recurrence. OBJECTIVES: Our primary aim was to compare the prevalence of isolated AR between urologists versus gynecologists. Our secondary aim was to compare associated postoperative complications. STUDY DESIGN: We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for vaginal POP repair procedures (Current Procedural Terminology codes 57240, 57260, 57265, 57268, 57282, 57283) over a 5-year period by designated surgical specialty. We analyzed the relationships between specialty, vaginal repair type, operative details, and 30-day postoperative complications. RESULTS: Between January 2015 and December 2019, we included 16,093 women who underwent transvaginal POP repair, 90% performed by gynecologists and 10% by urologists. Urologists were more likely to perform an isolated AR without concurrent ApS (56% vs 47%, P < 0.0001). Gynecologists performed more isolated ApS (11% vs 9%) and combined AR with ApS (43% vs 35%, P < 0.0001). Overall, concurrent urethral sling placement was performed in 27% of cases, regardless of POP repair type, with no difference between specialties (P > 0.05). There were no differences in 30-day reoperations, readmissions, surgical site infections, urinary tract infections, or hospital stay lengths between specialties (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Urologists perform a minority of vaginal POP repairs and were more likely to perform isolated AR than gynecologists. The absence of concurrent ApS may increase the likelihood of prolapse recurrence. Immediate complication rates for each procedure did not differ.

Long-term mesh exposure after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to evaluate total and incident mesh exposure rates at least 2 years after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy. Secondary aims were to evaluate surgical success and late adverse events. METHODS: This extension study included women previously enrolled in the multicenter randomized trial of permanent vs delayed-absorbable suture with lightweight mesh for > stage II uterovaginal prolapse. Owing to COVID-19, women were given the option of an in-person (questionnaires and examination) or telephone visit (questionnaires only). The primary outcome was total and incident suture or mesh exposure, or symptoms suggestive of mesh exposure in women without an examination. Secondary outcomes were surgical success, which was defined as no subjective bulge, no prolapse beyond the hymen, and no pelvic organ prolapse retreatment, and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 182 out of 200 previously randomized participants were eligible for inclusion, of whom 106 (58%) women (78 in-person and 28 via questionnaire only) agreed to the extension study. At a mean of 3.9 years post-surgery, the rate of mesh or suture exposure was 7.7% (14 out of 182) of whom only 2 were incident cases reported after 1-year follow-up. None reported vaginal bleeding or discharge, dyspareunia, or penile dyspareunia. Surgical success was 93 out of 106 (87.7%): 13 out of 94 (13.8%) failed by bulge symptoms, 2 out of 78 (2.6%) by prolapse beyond the hymen, 1 out of 85 (1.2%) by retreatment with pessary, and 0 by retreatment with surgery. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of incident mesh exposure between 1 and 3.9 years post-surgery was low, success rates remained high, and there were no delayed serious adverse events.

Small-Fiber Polyneuropathy Is Prevalent in Patients With Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome.

IMPORTANCE: The pathophysiology of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) is imperfectly understood. Recent studies reported that small-fiber polyneuropathy (SFPN) is common in fibromyalgia, a condition commonly comorbid with IC/BPS. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of SFPN in a large cohort of IC/BPS patients. METHODS: Adults diagnosed with IC/BPS scheduled to undergo either therapeutic hydrodistention (n = 97) or cystectomy with urinary diversion (n = 3) were prospectively recruited to this study. A skin biopsy obtained from the lower leg was used for intraepidermal nerve fiber density measurement. Small-fiber polyneuropathy (+/-) status was determined by comparing linear intraepidermal nerve fiber density (fibers/mm2) with normative reference values. Demographic information, medical history, and diagnoses for 14 conditions (both urologic and nonurologic) known to co-occur with IC/BPS were documented from self-report and electronic medical record. RESULTS: In this large cohort of patients with IC/BPS, 31% (31/100) were positive for SFPN. Intraepidermal nerve fiber density was below the median for age and sex in 81% (81/100) of patients. Approximately one-third (31%) of SFPN+ patients reported co-occurring chronic fatigue syndrome, compared with 10.6% of the SFPN- group (P = 0.034). Small-fiber polyneuropathy-positive patients reported significantly fewer allergies than SFPN- patients (37.9% vs 60.6%; P = 0.047). There were no significant differences in bladder capacity or Hunner lesion status between the SFPN+ and SFPN- subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Small-fiber polyneuropathy is a common finding in patients with IC/BPS, and SFPN status is significantly correlated with co-occurring chronic fatigue syndrome and negatively correlated with the presence of allergies in this population.

An analysis of diversity within academic urology leadership.

INTRODUCTION: Women, underrepresented minorities, and international medical graduates are underrepresented in urology. We sought to compare demographics of leaders in academic urology to urology faculty and academic medical faculty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Association of American Medical Colleges provided academic medical faculty demographics. Women, underrepresented minorities, and international medical graduates in leadership roles (department/division chair or full professor) were identified. Fisher's exact tests were performed to compare proportions of those groups in urology leadership to academic urology, academic medicine leadership, and academic medicine. RESULTS: In 2019, there were 179,105 faculty in academic medicine with 41,766 in leadership and 1,614 faculty in urology with 567 in leadership. Significantly fewer women were in urology leadership compared to academic urology (7.4% vs. 22.0%, p < 0.0001), academic medical leadership (7.4% vs. 25.0%, p < 0.0001), and academic medicine (7.4% vs. 42.0%, p < 0.0001). Significantly fewer underrepresented minorities were in urology leadership compared to academic medicine (6.9% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.04) with no significant difference when compared to urology faculty (6.9% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.4) or medical faculty leadership (6.9% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.6). Significantly more international medical graduates were in urology leadership compared to across academic urology, (32% vs. 24%, p = 0.0006), but significantly fewer than those in leadership across all medical specialties (32% vs. 40%, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Women and underrepresented minorities are significantly underrepresented in academic urologic leadership while international medical graduates are statistically overrepresented. Considering calls for diversity, equity, and inclusion, these data highlight a need for increased representation in leadership positions in academic urology.

Examining the Role of Nonsurgical Therapy in the Treatment of Geriatric Urinary Incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of physical function impairments on the change in urinary incontinence (UI) symptoms after pelvic floor muscle training in older women. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of 70 community-dwelling participants, older than age 70 years, with at least moderate incontinence symptoms. A comprehensive pelvic floor and physical function assessment was done at baseline. Individualized pelvic floor muscle training prescriptions with behavioral management strategies to reduce incontinence episodes were provided for 12 weeks. Baseline physical function was determined using the SPPB (Short Physical Performance Battery). A total score of 9 or lower out of 12 indicated impaired physical function, and scores higher than 9 indicated normal physical function. A 3-day bladder diary established daily incontinence episodes. The between-group difference in the change in number of UI episodes, from baseline to 6 weeks, was our primary outcome. Descriptive analyses compared important demographic and clinical characteristics. Longitudinal mixed model linear regression analyses determined the change in incontinence episodes and estimates of improvement based on the presence of impaired physical function and adjusted for age, race, and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: Participants' mean±SD age was 76.9±5.4 years, and 15.7% identified as African American, with no significant differences in age or race between groups. Participants with impaired physical function had higher mean±SD BMI (33.6±14.5 vs 27.4±5.8; P=.03) and more baseline incontinence episodes (4.5±2.9 vs 2.7±2.1 episodes per day; P=.005) than in women without functional impairment. After 6 weeks of pelvic floor exercises, the change in number of incontinence episodes per day was not different between participants with physical functional impairment compared with women with normal physical function (mean [95% CI] -1.2 [-2.0 to -0.5] vs -0.4 [-1.1 to 0.3], P=.31). Overall, after 12 weeks of pelvic floor muscle training, complete satisfaction with incontinence symptom improvement was low for both groups (41.8% with physical function impairments vs 44.8% with normal physical function; P=.90). CONCLUSION: Behavioral therapy including pelvic floor muscle training may not significantly decrease UI symptoms to a degree that is satisfactory in women who are older than 70 years and are seeking treatment for UI, regardless of the presence of physical function impairments. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03057834.

Patient Satisfaction, Provider Productivity, and Efficacy of a Standardized Preparatory Toolkit With Broad Telemedicine Adaptation in an Outpatient Urology Clinic.

IMPORTANCE: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted telemedicine adoption. In March 2020, we developed an implementation toolkit with a nursing protocol for patient preparation before tertiary care urology clinic visits. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to determine patient satisfaction after implementation of a telemedicine toolkit. Our secondary objective was to assess downstream productivity generated from telehealth visits. STUDY DESIGN: We prospectively conducted a postvisit survey that included the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire, a validated survey assessing patient satisfaction, for all patients with documented completion of the nursing protocol to assess patient experience and satisfaction. We then performed a retrospective chart review of all telemedicine visits to determine downstream outcomes, including imaging and procedure scheduling. RESULTS: Between April and May 2020, 1,422 visits were completed, of which 265 had complete nursing protocol documentation. Eighteen of 265 (6.8%) reported setup assistance. Four (1.8%) were unsuccessful and converted to a nonvisual phone visit. Overall, 186 (70.1%) completed the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire with a mean score of 118.31 ± 23.44. High satisfaction was reported regardless of race, marital status, income, education, employment status, or travel distance. Younger age ( P = 0.017) and female sex ( P = 0.017) were associated with greater satisfaction. Of 1,422 total visits, imaging was ordered in 29%, office procedures scheduled in 14%, and surgery scheduled in 14%. New visits were more likely to result in procedure and surgery scheduling than returns ( P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our telemedicine toolkit designed to maximize patient engagement was successful in achieving patient-provider connectivity in 98% of patients with high satisfaction. Telemedicine visits are effective to provide comprehensive urologic care with implications beyond the pandemic.

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy for Pain Management in Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome: A Proof-of-Concept Case Series.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy for symptom and pain management in women with non-bladder centric interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). METHODS: Women with non-bladder centric IC/BPS and a numeric rating scale score for pelvic pain ≥6 underwent twice-daily 8-minute full body PEMF therapy sessions for 4 weeks. The primary outcome metric was a reduction in pelvic pain score ≥2 points. A 7-day voiding diary (collected at baseline and conclusion), 3 validated symptom scores, and the Short Form-36 Quality of Life questionnaire (completed at baseline, conclusion of treatment, and 8-week follow-up), were used to assess secondary outcomes. Treatment effects were analyzed via Wilcoxon-signed rank test; P < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The 4-week treatment protocol was completed by 8 of 10 enrolled patients, and 7:8 (87.5%) had a significant reduction in pelvic pain (-3.0 points, P = .011) after 4 weeks. There was also a significant decrease in scores on all validated IC/BPS questionnaires, daily number of voids, and nocturia symptom score (P < .05). Significant increases in several quality-of-life questionnaire sub-scores were also identified at 4 weeks (P < .05). At 8-week post-therapy, the positive effects were somewhat attenuated, yet 4:8 patients (50%) continued to have significant pain reduction (P = .047). No adverse events or side effects were reported. CONCLUSION: Whole body pulsed electromagnetic field therapy is an alternative treatment option for women with chronic bladder pain syndrome that warrants investigation through comparative trials.

Chemokine therapy for anal sphincter injury in a rat model: a pilot study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To determine whether delayed administration of CXCL12 alters anorectal manometric pressures and histology in rats following anal sphincterotomy compared to primary surgical repair alone. METHODS: Adult female rats were divided into three groups: A, a control group that did not undergo surgery; B, anal sphincterotomy with primary surgical repair; C, anal sphincterotomy with primary surgical repair and intra-sphincteric injection of CXCL12 at 6 weeks post-injury. All rats underwent anal manometry measurements at baseline and at 6 and 12 weeks post-injury. Histologic analysis of the anal sphincters was also performed. RESULTS: At baseline and 6 weeks, there were no statistically significant differences among D, Tmax and P∆ of Groups A, B and C. At 12-week manometry, the total duration of contractions on anal manometry was significantly less in Group C compared to Groups A and B (3.65, 5.5, 5.3 p < 0.01) as was time to peak of contraction at 12 weeks (1.6, 2.1, 3.1, p < 0.01); however, group C had a significantly higher P∆ at 12 weeks compared to Groups A and B (2.25, 1.4, 0.34, p < 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in the ratio of muscle to collagen at the site of injury; however, muscle fibers were significantly smaller in group C and less per bundle than the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of chemokine therapy at 6 weeks post-repair using CXCL12 enhanced the magnitude of anal sphincter contractions in a rat model of anal sphincter injury but decreased overall duration of contraction. Increased anal sphincter contraction magnitude was not explained by histologic differences in explanted specimens.

Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation Using an Anchor Versus Suture-Capturing Device: A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare rates of persistent gluteal and posterior thigh pain, procedural efficacy, and postoperative complications at 1 year after sacrospinous ligament fixation using either an anchor-based or suture-capturing device. METHODS: This prospective cohort study evaluated outcomes 1 year after operation in patients previously enrolled in a randomized controlled trial comparing an anchor-based versus suture-capturing device for sacrospinous fixation. Symptom scores were evaluated via Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire 7. Pain was evaluated using the Numerical Rating Scale. Composite surgical failure was defined as prolapse beyond the hymen or C-point greater than one half down the vagina, vaginal bulge symptoms, or a need for prolapse retreatment via surgery or pessary management. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were performed. RESULTS: Forty three (21 anchors, 22 sutures) of the original 47 patients (91%) returned for follow-up. The mean follow-up time was 15.4 months, age was 69 years old, body mass index was 30, and preoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage was 2.7. No patients reported significant increase in pain at sacrospinous fixation site above baseline, and there was no significant difference in posterior thigh or gluteal pain on the side of fixation compared with baseline in the anchor-based or suture-capture groups (-0.2 ± 0.9 and -0.5 ± 1.6, respectively, P = 0.719). Two patients demonstrated surgical failure (anchor group) due to bulge symptoms (P = 0.233). The devices similarly improved Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (-71.0 ± 45.5 vs -66.3 ± 64.4, P = 0.652) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire 7 (-40.6 ± 62.4 vs -26.4 ± 65.7, P = 0.768) scores. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent gluteal or posterior thigh pain and surgical failure is uncommon 12 months after sacrospinous fixation and was not associated with the type of fixation device.

Mesh Exposure Following Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Sacrocolpopexy.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To compare vaginal mesh exposure rates, adverse events and composite failure within 1 year postoperatively in patients who undergo vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal mesh attachment (TVH) versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with abdominal mesh attachment (TLH) for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study is a secondary analysis of data collected retrospectively at one institution and the multicenter randomized control PACT trial. Women were excluded for no follow-up between 9 months and 2 years postoperatively or undergoing concurrent non-urogynecologic procedures. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2019, 182 patients underwent TLH and 132 TVH. There were 15 (4.8%) vaginal mesh exposures: 12 (6.6%) in the TLH and 3 (2.3%) in the TVH group (p = 0.133) with zero mesh erosions. Logistic regression analysis for mesh exposure in the TLH vs. TVH groups controlling for BMI, posterior repair and surgeon training also showed no significant difference (OR 4.8, 95% CI 0.94, 24.8, p = 0.059). The overall intraoperative complication rate was low (19/314, 6.1%) with a higher rate of bladder injury in the TLH group (4.4% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.049). The TLH group had a higher rate of UTI (8.2% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.027) and clean intermittent catheterization (11% vs. 3%, p = 0.009). At 1-year follow-up, there was no difference in composite failure (6%), bulge symptoms (5%) or retreatment (1%) between groups. CONCLUSIONS: At 1 year, there is no significant difference in vaginal mesh exposure rates between vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal mesh attachment and laparoscopic hysterectomy with abdominal mesh attachment. Both groups have equal efficacy with low rates of complications.

Functional genomic analyses of IC/BPS patient subgroups: a pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: To further facilitate understanding of disease pathophysiology and patient stratification in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), we utilized molecular phenotyping to compare three clinically distinct IC/BPS patient subgroups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total RNA (miRNA and mRNA) was isolated via standard protocols from IC/BPS patient bladder biopsies and assayed on whole genome and microRNA expression arrays. Data from three patient subgroups (n = 4 per group): (1) low bladder capacity (BC; ≤ 400 cc) without Hunner's lesion, (2) low BC with Hunner's lesion, and (3) non-low BC (> 400 cc) were used in comparative analyses to evaluate the influence of BC and HL on gene expression profiles in IC/BPS. RESULTS: The BC comparison (Group 1 v 3) identified 54 miRNAs and 744 mRNAs. Eleven miRNAs mapped to 40 genes. Hierarchical clustering of miRNA revealed two primary clusters: (1) 3/4 low BC patients; (2) 4/4 non-low and 1/4 low BC patients. Clustering of mRNA provided clear separation based on BC. The HL comparison (Group 1 v 2) identified 16 miRNAs and 917 mRNAs. 4 miRNAs mapped to 13 genes. Clustering of miRNA and mRNA revealed clear separation based on HL status. CONCLUSIONS: Significant molecular differences in IC/BPS were found to be associated with the low BC phenotype (e.g., an upregulation of cell proliferation and inflammation marker genes), as well as additional molecular findings that further define the HL+ phenotype (e.g., upregulation of genes involved in bioenergetics reactions) and suggest oxidative stress may play a role.