Comparison of a recombinant trypsin with the porcine pancreatic extract on sperm used for the in vitro production of bovine embryos.

The objective was to compare the effects of treating bovine semen with two trypsin products (the porcine pancreas extract and a recombinant) and a control (no trypsin) on in vitro embryo production. Our hypothesis was that the trypsin treatments would not cause any significant difference in fertilization and embryo development as compared to the control. Semen was washed through a gradient system containing a porcine-origin trypsin, a recombinant bovine-sequence trypsin, or the control (no trypsin). Oocytes (n=3036) were collected from abbatoir-derived ovaries, matured for 24h, and allocated into three groups: porcine trypsin (n=1040), recombinant trypsin (n=972), and control (n=1024). Ova were inseminated with 1 x 10(6) motile sperm/mL and cultured for 18-24h. Thereafter, presumptive zygotes were cultured for 7 days in 50 microL G1/G2 micro-droplets under mineral oil. Overall, sperm motility was lower before than after each treatment (mean of 51.4% versus 70.2%, respectively; P<0.001); however, motility was not significantly different among the three groups (porcine-origin trypsin=68.8%, recombinant trypsin=69.0%, and control=72.6%). Similarly, there was no significant difference among these groups for cleavage rates (70.1, 70.9, and 73.9%), or the number of morula/blastocyst stage embryos (53.4, 53.3, and 48.7%). In conclusion, treatment of bovine sperm with either porcine-origin trypsin or recombinant trypsin prior to insemination had no detrimental effects on in vitro embryo development.

Docetaxel-based induction therapy prior to radiotherapy with or without docetaxel for non-small-cell lung cancer.

This trial aimed to assess the feasibility and tumour control of concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone after docetaxel-based induction chemotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC received two 21-day cycles of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel (85 mg m(-2), day 1) plus cisplatin (40 mg m(-2), days 1 and 2). Patients without disease progression on day 43 were randomised to radiotherapy (2 Gy for 5 days week(-1); total 60 Gy) alone or with docetaxel 20 mg m(-2) once weekly every 6 weeks. Of 108 patients who received induction chemotherapy, 104 were evaluable for response. After induction chemotherapy, the overall response rate (ORR) was 44%; 91 (88%) patients had no disease progression and 89 were subsequently randomised to local treatment. After randomised therapy, the ORR was 53% (chemoradiotherapy 58%; radiotherapy 48%). Median survival and time to progression were 14.9 and 7.8 months, respectively, for chemoradiotherapy and 14.0 and 7.5 months, respectively, for radiotherapy. The most common toxicities during induction chemotherapy and randomised therapy were grades 3-4 neutropenia and grade 3 lymphocytopenia, respectively. Docetaxel-cisplatin induction therapy followed by concurrent docetaxel and thoracic radiotherapy is a feasible treatment option, showing good clinical activity and tolerability, for locally advanced NSCLC.

Randomized study of vinorelbine--gemcitabine versus vinorelbine--carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The objective of this trial was to compare two vinorelbine-based doublets with carboplatin (CBDCA-VC) or with gemcitabine (VG) in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 316 patients with advanced NSCLC previously untreated were randomized to either vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) D1,8 with carboplatin AUC 5 D1 (VC) or vinorelbine 25mg/m(2) with gemcitabine (VG) 1000 mg/m(2) both given D1,8 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was response rate with secondary parameters being survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tolerance and clinical benefit. RESULTS: The median number of cycles was four in each arm with a total of 1268 cycles. The objective response (OR) on intent-to-treat was 20.8% in VC and 28% in VG (p=0.15). Median PFS was 3.9 months in VC and 4.4 months (mo) in VG (p=0.18). Median survival was significantly longer (p=0.01) for VG with 11.5 mo compared to 8.6 mo in VC with 1 year survival at 48.9 and 34.4%, respectively. Tolerance was better in the VG arm as compared to the VC patients. Four toxic deaths were recorded in the VC group. Clinical benefit response rate was 32.4% compared to 40.9% in 111 and 110 evaluable patients in VC and VG, respectively. CONCLUSION: VG compared to VC resulted in a similar overall response rate, favourable median survival and a better toxicity profile. For non-cisplatin-based chemotherapy, VG is a useful alternative.

Phase II study of exatecan mesylate (DX-8951f) as first line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Exatecan mesylate (DX-8951f) is a water soluble analogue of camptothecin that inhibits topoisomerase I. This multi-centre phase II study evaluated the activity of single agent exatecan in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically or cytologically proven stage IIIb or IV NSCLC were treated with exatecan 0.5 mg/m(2) per day by 30 min intra-venous (i.v.) infusion for 5 days every 3 weeks to a maximum of six cycles. Measurable disease was documented prior to study entry and patients were re-staged every two cycles. Pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was performed during cycle one. RESULTS: 39 patients (32 patients ECOG performance status 0 or 1; 29 male and ten female; mean age 63 years) were entered into the study. Thirty-three completed at least two cycles of exatecan and 11 completed six cycles. Two patients (5.1%, 95% C.I. 0.3-21.3%) had a partial response, 7 (18.0%) minor response and 8 (20.5%) stable disease. Median time to tumour progression (TTP) was 88 days and median overall survival 262 days. The main toxicity was reversible neutropenia. PK analysis of exatecan demonstrated a mean clearance of 2.28 l/h per m(2), volume of distribution 18.2 l/m(2) and mean elimination half-life of 7.9 h. CONCLUSIONS: Exatecan mesylate has limited activity in advanced NSCLC and is not recommended for further evaluation as a single agent in this tumour type. PK data from this trial supports results established in phase I studies.

ALIMTA (pemetrexed disodium) as second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate ALIMTA (pemetrexed disodium, LY231514), a multi-targeted antifolate with first-line activity against non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), in a second-line setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with NSCLC were eligible for this phase II study if they had progressive disease within 3 months after first-line chemotherapy or progression while being treated with first-line chemotherapy. In 81 patients studied, two cohorts of patients were assigned based on whether the first-line therapy had included a platinum regimen. ALIMTA was administered at 500 mg/m2 by 10-min intravenous infusion once every 21 days. RESULTS: The response rate in the 79 evaluable patients with poor prognostic features was 8.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6% to 15.1%]. The response rate in the platinum-pretreated group was 4.5% and 14.1% in the non-platinum-pretreated group. The median duration of response was 6.8 months (95% CI 3.4-7.8 months, 0% censoring). The median survival time was 5.7 months (95% CI 4.0-8.3 months, 7.6% censoring). The probability of survival for at least 6 months was estimated to be 48%. The median time to disease progression was 2 months (95% CI 1.4-2.8 months, 0% censoring). The principal toxicity was myelosuppression, which was reversible. CONCLUSIONS: ALIMTA is active in a second-line setting in non-platinum-pretreated NSCLC patients progressing within 3 months of first-line chemotherapy. This study demonstrates that it is possible to evaluate new drugs against NSCLC in a second-line setting.

Docetaxel as neoadjuvant therapy for radically treatable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a multinational randomised phase III study.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel (Taxotere) is a potent anticancer agent, with proven efficacy as first-line therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this large randomised multicentre phase III study was to evaluate docetaxel in the neoadjuvant (pre-operative) setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIA or locally treatable IIIB NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive neoadjuvant docetaxel (n = 134) or no chemotherapy (n = 140) before surgery/curative-intention radiotherapy. Patients received up to three 3-weekly cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m(2)) as 1-h intravenous infusions. RESULTS: Median survival was 14.8 months in the docetaxel group and 12.6 months in the control group. Median times to disease progression were 9.0 months (docetaxel arm) and 7.6 months (control arm). There were three complete responses and 25 partial responses in patients treated with docetaxel who were evaluable for response (n = 101). Docetaxel was well-tolerated: 103 patients (77%) received all three planned cycles. The major toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia (69 patients, 55%) and neutropenic fever (eight patients, 6%). Radiotherapy was well-tolerated after docetaxel administration. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant docetaxel is generally well-tolerated and shows a promising trend towards longer survival in patients with NSCLC.

Evaluation of pleural disease using MR and CT. With special reference to malignant pleural mesothelioma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate MR imaging and CT in differentiating malignant pleural mesothelioma from other malignancies or benign pleural disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients (18 pleural mesotheliomas, 9 other malignancies, 7 benign pleural diseases) were examined using enhanced CT and MR. Two radiologists reviewed the CT and two others the MR images. Comparisons were made between the diagnostic groups and the imaging methods. RESULTS: The abnormalities commonly found in malignant disease, but significantly less frequently in benign pleural disease, were focal thickening and enhancement of interlobar fissures. In mesothelioma, enhancement of interlobar fissures, tumour invasion of the diaphragm, mediastinal soft tissue or chest wall, were significantly more often observed than in other malignancies and MR was the most sensitive method. In other malignancies, invasion of bony structures was a more common finding and was also better shown by MR. The contrast-enhanced T1 fat-suppressed (CET1fs) sequence detected these features better than other MR sequences. CONCLUSION: MR, especially the CET1fs sequence in three planes, gave more information than enhanced CT. Focal thickening and enhancement of interlobar fissures were early abnormalities indicating malignant pleural disease. MR could be clinically useful for differentiating mesothelioma from other pleural diseases.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel in non--small cell lung cancer.

Based on proven activity and survival benefit in advanced non--small cell lung cancer, docetaxel has been introduced into neoadjuvant therapy. In a large, phase III randomized trial in 274 stage IIIA and IIIB patients, treatment with an induction regimen of 100 mg/m(2) docetaxel for three cycles before definitive surgery or radiotherapy was associated with an encouraging trend towards longer median survival. Overall 1-year survival was 59% compared with 51% in the control group. Docetaxel in the neoadjuvant setting was well tolerated and did not compromise later radical local therapy. The incidence of grade (3/4) esophagitis, for example, was less than 1% in patients who had had induction docetaxel followed by curative radiotherapy. This also was true for pneumonitis. Neoadjuvant docetaxel in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin is being evaluated in phase II trials which have reported response rates of 66% to 82% and rates of complete resection ranging from 69% to 79%. Docetaxel also is being investigated in combination with both cisplatin and gemcitabine in phase I/II studies. Phase III trials will further define the promising role of docetaxel alone and in combination in neoadjuvant therapy. Semin Oncol 28 (suppl 9):33-36.

Pulmonary infection caused by an unusual, slowly growing nontuberculous Mycobacterium.

Mycobacterium triplex, a recently described slowly growing nontuberculous mycobacterium, was isolated from a Finnish patient with pulmonary mycobacteriosis. The disease was successfully treated with antimycobacterial drugs. The strain isolated, which was similar to the type strain but differed slightly from the species description, was regarded as a variant of M. triplex sensu stricto. According to present knowledge this variant of the species has never been isolated before.

Gene expression profiling of malignant mesothelioma cell lines: cDNA array study.

To reveal genes relevant for malignant mesothelioma (MM), we carried out cDNA array experiments on 4 MM cell lines and 2 primary mesothelial cell cultures established from pleural fluid of non-cancer patients. Human cancer gene filters including 588 genes were used for the cDNA array experiments. Our study revealed 26 over-expressed genes that play a role in the regulation of cell fate, cell cycle, cell growth and DNA damage repair and 13 under-expressed genes encoding growth factors, receptors and proteins involved in cell adhesion, motility and invasion to be common to 3 or 4 MM cell lines. We confirmed the cDNA array results using RT-PCR for 5 of the over-expressed genes and for 3 of the under-expressed genes. Our study presents gene expression profiles in MM cell lines and shows the involvement of several genes, such as those encoding JAGGED1, ser/thr protein kinase NIK, Ku80 and cyclin D2, novel in MM.

Phase III comparative study of high-dose cisplatin versus a combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: New effective chemotherapy is needed to improve the outcome of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Paclitaxel administered as a single agent or in combination with cisplatin has been shown to be a potentially new useful agent for the treatment of NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1995 and April 1996, 414 patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were randomized to received either a control arm of high-dose cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)) or a combination of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2), 3-hour infusion) and cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)) every 21 days. RESULTS: Compared with the cisplatin-only arm, there was a 9% improvement (95% confidence interval, 0% to 19%) in overall response rate for the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm (17% v 26%, respectively; P=.028). Median time to progression was 2.7 and 4.1 months in the control and paclitaxel/cisplatin arm, respectively (P=.026). The study, however, failed to show a significant improvement in median survival for the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm (8.6 months in the control arm v 8.1 months in the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm, P=.862). There was more hematotoxicity, peripheral neuropathy, and arthralgia/myalgia on the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm, whereas the high-dose cisplatin arm produced more ototoxicity, nausea, vomiting, and nephrotoxicity. Quality of life (QOL) was similar overall between the two arms. CONCLUSION: This large randomized phase III trial failed to show a significant improvement in survival for the paclitaxel/cisplatin combination compared with high-dose cisplatin in patients with advanced NSCLC. However, the paclitaxel/cisplatin combination did produce a better clinical response, resulting in an increased time to progression while providing a similar QOL.

Phase II study of docetaxel in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in routine daily practice.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel as first- and second-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) under routine clinical conditions. Two hundred and three patients with advanced NSCLC received docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (1-h intravenous infusion) every 3 weeks, with oral corticosteroid pre-medication, of whom 173 were eligible. Median age was 60 (29-78) years and median Karnofsky performance status was 80% (60-100). A total of 77% of patients had metastatic disease, 33% had bone metastases and 18% had liver metastases. The treatment was second-line or more for 72 patients (35%). Overall response rates in the eligible population were 19.7% [95% CI, 12.5-23.0] for both treatments, 22.6% for first-line treatment and 13.8% for second-line treatment. Median survival was 8.3 months and 1-year survival was 35% for the overall population (8.7 months and 38%, respectively, for patients receiving first-line treatment and 7.2 months and 27%, respectively, for patients receiving second-line treatment). Neutropenia, grade 3 and 4, occurred in 57% of the cycles and 5% of patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Alopecia (62% of patients), neuro-sensory symptoms (32%), asthenia (28%), diarrhea (22%), nausea (22%) and nail disorders (20%) were the most common non-hematological adverse effects. A total of 33% of patients suffered fluid retention, despite the use of corticosteroid pre-medication, but this was only severe in 1.5% of patients. It was possible to confirm the efficacy of docetaxel as a single agent for first- and second-line chemotherapy in a large patient population treated in a community setting.

Docetaxel and irinotecan (CPT-11) in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma--a feasibility study.

We chose to treat malignant pleural mesothelioma with a combination of docetaxel and irinotecan (CPT-11), because there have been preliminary reports that CPT-11 is active against mesothelioma, and docetaxel and CPT-11 were the most active agents in our in vitro experiments in human mesothelioma cell lines. Fifteen previously untreated patients with pleural mesothelioma (IMIG Stage III-IV) were given docetaxel 60 mg/m2 followed by CPT-11 190 mg/m2 on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. All the patients were evaluable for toxicity and 13 patients were evaluated for response. No objective responses (complete or partial) were achieved, but there were two minor responses (overall response rate 15%) each of a duration of 4 months. Three patients had stable disease (23%); median time to progression was 7 months. Median survival in all the patients was 8.5 months from the first chemotherapy cycle and 11 months from diagnosis. Toxicity was severe with seven of 15 patients suffering neutropenic fever and six of 15 patients grade 3-4 diarrhea. The trial was discontinued because of toxicity and lack of activity. We do not recommend the combination of docetaxel and CPT-11 using the schedule presented here for further investigation in malignant mesothelioma. However, CPT-11 and docetaxel, individually, still warrant further study in this disease, especially in combination with cisplatin.

Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether treatment with single-agent docetaxel would result in longer survival than would best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who had previously been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Secondary end points included assessment of response (docetaxel arm only), toxicity, and quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with performance statuses of 0 to 2 and stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer with either measurable or evaluable lesions were eligible for entry onto the study if they had undergone one or more platinum-based chemotherapy regimens and if they had adequate hematology and biochemistry parameters. They were excluded if they had symptomatic brain metastases or if they had previously been treated with paclitaxel. Patients were stratified by performance status and best response to cisplatin chemotherapy and were then randomized to treatment with docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) (49 patients) or 75 mg/m(2) (55 patients) or best supportive care. Patients in both arms were assessed every 3 weeks. RESULTS: One hundred four patients (103 of whom were eligible for entry onto the study) were well balanced for prognostic factors. Of 84 patients with measurable lesions, six (7. 1%) achieved partial responses (three patients at each dose level). Time to progression was longer for docetaxel patients than for best supportive care patients (10.6 v 6.7 weeks, respectively; P <.001), as was median survival (7.0 v 4.6 months; log-rank test, P =.047). The difference was more significant for docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) patients, compared with corresponding best supportive care patients (7.5 v 4.6 months; log-rank test, P =.010; 1-year survival, 37% v 11%; chi(2) test, P =.003). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 11 patients treated with docetaxel 100 mg/m(2), three of whom died, and in one patient treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2). Grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity, with the exception of diarrhea, occurred at a similar rate in both the docetaxel and best supportive care groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment with docetaxel is associated with significant prolongation of survival, and at a dose of 75 mg/m(2), the benefits of docetaxel therapy outweigh the risks.

In vitro sensitivity of normal human mesothelial and malignant mesothelioma cell lines to four new chemotherapeutic agents.

In this study, we used four human mesothelioma cell lines (M14K, M24K, M25K and M38K), one transformed human mesothelial cell line (MeT-5A) and one primary mesothelial culture (UPL) to test for in vitro sensitivity to docetaxel, paclitaxel, SN-38 [an active metabolite of irinotecan (CPT-11)] and gemcitabine, as single agents. Subconfluent cell cultures were treated with 2x10(-9), 5x10(-9), 10(-8), 2x10(-8) and 5x10(-8) M concentrations of each drug for 48 h. The sensitivity was measured in terms of cell viability using the Trypan blue exclusion method. All four drugs were potent inhibitors of mesothelioma cell growth, but cell lines from different patients diverged in their sensitivity to the individual agents. In most cases docetaxel, paclitaxel and SN-38 were more potent killers of mesothelioma cells than gemcitabine. The induction of DNA damage was investigated using the Comet assay; cells from two cell lines (M14K and M25K) were treated with subtoxic 10(-8) M concentrations of each drug for 4, 24 and 48 h. Each of the agents caused a slight increase in DNA single-strand breaks at a concentration of 10(-8) M.

Interferon-alpha and 13-cis-retinoic acid as maintenance therapy after high-dose combination chemotherapy with growth factor support for small cell lung cancer--a feasibility study.

This randomized phase II multi-center study was designed to determine the time to progression, duration of response and the feasibility of an intensified maintenance regime consisting of a combination of interferon (IFN)-alpha and retinoic acid after high-dose combination chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer. The patients received four courses of combination chemotherapy consisting of ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide, with higher doses of ifosfamide and carboplatin given in the first course, with routine growth factor support. Responding patients were then randomly assigned to one of three maintenance therapy arms. All patients with limited disease (LD) were given thoracic radiotherapy before maintenance therapy and those who had also achieved a complete response (CR) or minimal residual disease (MRD) received prophylactic cranial irradiation. In Arm 1 patients received IFN-alpha-2a, 6 MIU s.c. TIW for 4 weeks, followed by 3 MIU s.c. TIW, and 13-cis-retinoic acid 1 mg/kg/day p.o. BID daily. In Arm 2 patients received trophosphamide 100-150 mg/day p.o. BID. No maintenance treatment was given in Arm 3, the control group. Maintenance therapy was continued for 1 year. Eighty-five patients were treated according to the protocol. Twenty-one patients achieved CR, four achieved MRD and forty-two achieved partial responses to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Sixty patients (71%) were randomly assigned for maintenance treatment. Median survival was 17.1 months in the IFN-alpha-retinoic acid arm, 12.4 months in the trophosphamide arm and 13.5 months in the control arm. One-year survival rates were 82, 56 and 55%, respectively. Duration of response was 6.5, 5.5 and 4.7 months, respectively. Time to progression was 8.6, 8.0 and 6.8 months, respectively The differences were not statistically significant. The IFN-alpha-retinoic acid maintenance treatment was well tolerated. Patients who received IFN-alpha-retinoid maintenance therapy lived longer after the onset of progressive disease. The treatment regime was effective, feasible and well tolerated.

Phase II study of docetaxel alternating with cisplatin in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

The objective of this study was to evaluate a regimen of full doses of docetaxel and cisplatin, using an alternating schedule, as first-line therapy for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The standard concomitant schedule does not allow full doses of both drugs to be administered. We wanted to see if there was an advantage to be gained by administering full doses of both docetaxel and cisplatin, using a different schedule. Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 was given once every 6 weeks from week 1 and cisplatin (120 mg/m2 for two doses and 100 mg/m2 thereafter) once every 6 weeks from week 4, for six cycles (three docetaxel and three cisplatin). Thirty-six of the 44 patients enrolled were evaluable for efficacy. Forty-eight percent of the patients had good (KPS 90-100%) performance status. A median of five cycles was administered, for which no dose reductions were necessary. There were 13 of 36 partial responses (36%; 95% CI 21-54%) and 15 of 36 patients achieved stable disease (42%). The median duration of response was 10.5 months, the median time to progression was 4.5 months and the median survival was 9 months. The 1 and 2 year survival rates were 39 and 16%, respectively. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were nausea (23% of patients), vomiting (18%) and neutropenia (77%). Infections were also common, but not severe. The alternating schedule produced response, toxicity and survival figures that compared favorable with those using the concomitant schedule. This study could serve as a model for future studies of non-cisplatin-containing regimens, in which full doses of docetaxel could alternate with full doses of other new agents active against NSCLC.

A broad amplification pattern at 3q in squamous cell lung cancer--a fluorescence in situ hybridization study.

Frequent DNA copy number gain at 3q, with minimal overlapping area at 3q24-qter, has previously been reported in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (SQCC), implicating the importance of genes at 3q in the tumorigenesis of SQCC. To further characterize the gain of DNA sequences at 3q, we performed interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on 16 paraffin-embedded SQCC tumor samples that had previously been studied by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Eleven yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) probes located at 3q25-q27 and a chromosome 3-specific centromeric probe were used in the analysis. All SQCC tumors showed increase in DNA sequence copy number with 9-11 probes. In 5 tumors (31%) the number of centromeric signals varied from 3 to 5 and the YAC/centromeric signal ratio was 1.0, suggesting that the increase in DNA sequence copy number at 3q in these cases resulted from polysomy of chromosome 3. In 11 tumors (69%), the YAC/centromeric signal ratio varied between 1.5 and 4.7, indicating that the increase in DNA sequence copy number was due to intrachromosomal gain of DNA sequences at 3q. In each case, several YACs showed increased number of signals, demonstrating that the gained area was relatively large. Our findings therefore suggest that multiple genes located at 3q25-q27 are involved in the tumorigenesis of SQCC.

Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The Hoosier Oncology Group has previously reported the results of its phase II trial of the combination of cisplatin plus gemcitabine. In that study of 27 assessable patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the response rate was 33%, with a median survival of 8.4 months. Based on such favorable results, the Hoosier Oncology Group designed this randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with cisplatin alone in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive either cisplatin (100 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 of a 28-day cycle) or the combination of cisplatin (100 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1) plus gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle). RESULTS: From August 1995 to February 1997, 522 assessable chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized. Toxicity was predominantly hematologic and was more pronounced in the combination arm, with grade 4 neutropenia occurring in 35.3% of patients compared with 1.2% of patients on the cisplatin monotherapy arm. The incidence of neutropenic fevers was less than 5% in both arms. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 25. 4% of patients on the combination arm compared with 0.8% of patients on the cisplatin monotherapy arm. No serious hemorrhagic events related to thrombocytopenia were reported for either arm. The combination of gemcitabine plus cisplatin demonstrated a significant improvement over single-agent cisplatin with regard to response rate (30.4% compared with 11.1%, respectively; P <.0001), median time to progressive disease (5.6 months compared with 3.7 months, respectively; P =.0013), and overall survival (9.1 months compared with 7.6 months, respectively; P =.004). CONCLUSIONS: For the first-line treatment of NSCLC, the regimen of gemcitabine plus cisplatin is superior to cisplatin alone in terms of response rate, time to disease progression, and overall survival.