Disseminated intravascular coagulation complicating mild or asymptomatic maternal COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Hypercoagulability frequently complicates moderate or severe COVID-19 and can result in venous thromboembolism, arterial thrombosis, or microvascular thrombosis. Disseminated intravascular coagulation, however, is uncommon. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the clinical presentation and outcome in a series of pregnant patients with mild or asymptomatic COVID-19 who had disseminated intravascular coagulation. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective case series. Cases were solicited via e-mails targeted to obstetrical providers in the Mednax National Medical Group and a restricted maternal-fetal medicine Facebook page. Inclusion criteria were: hospital admission during pregnancy, positive test for SARS-CoV-2 within 2 weeks of admission, and maternal disseminated intravascular coagulation defined as ≥2 of the following: platelet count ≤100,000 per mm3, fibrinogen ≤200 mg/dL, and prothrombin time ≥3 seconds above the upper normal limit. Exclusion criteria were severe COVID-19 requiring ventilation within an hour of diagnosis of coagulopathy or use of anticoagulants at the time of diagnosis. Maternal and newborn records were abstracted and summarized with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met in 19 cases from October 2020 through December 2021. Of these, 18 had not received any COVID-19 vaccine, and 1 had unknown vaccination status. Median gestational age on hospital admission was 30 weeks (interquartile range, 29-34 weeks). The main presenting symptom or sign was decreased fetal movement (56%) or nonreassuring fetal heart rate pattern (16%). COVID-19 was asymptomatic in 79% of cases. Two of the 3 defining coagulation abnormalities were found in 89% of cases and all 3 in the remaining 11%. Aspartate aminotransferase was elevated in all cases and ≥2 times the upper normal limit in 69%. Only 2 cases (11%) had signs of preeclampsia other than thrombocytopenia or transaminase elevation. Delivery was performed on the day of admission in 74% and on the next day in the remaining 26%, most often by cesarean delivery (68%) under general anesthesia (62%) because of nonreassuring fetal heart rate pattern (63%). Postpartum hemorrhage occurred in 47% of cases. Blood product transfusions were given in 95% of cases, including cryoprecipitate (89% of cases), fresh/frozen plasma (79%), platelets (68%), and red cells (63%). Placental histopathology was abnormal in 82%, with common findings being histiocytic intervillositis, perivillous fibrin deposition, and infarcts or necrosis. Among the 18 singleton pregnancies and 1 twin pregnancy, there were 13 live newborns (65%) and 7 stillbirths (35%). Among liveborn neonates, 5-minute Apgar score was ≤5 in 54%, and among cases with umbilical cord blood gases, pH ≤7.1 was found in 78% and base deficit ≥10 mEq/L in 75%. Positive COVID-19 tests were found in 62% of liveborn infants. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be alert to the possibility of disseminated intravascular coagulation when a COVID-19 patient complains of decreased fetal movement in the early third trimester. If time allows, we recommend evaluation of coagulation studies and ordering of blood products for massive transfusion protocols before cesarean delivery if fetal tracing is nonreassuring.

Timing of birth and adverse pregnancy outcomes in cases of prenatally diagnosed vasa previa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The ideal time for birth in pregnancies diagnosed with vasa previa remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review aiming to identify the gestational age at delivery that best balances the risks for prematurity with that of pregnancy prolongation in cases with prenatally diagnosed vasa previa. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to January 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The intervention analyzed was delivery at various gestational ages in pregnancies prenatally diagnosed with vasa previa. Cohort studies, case series, and case reports were included in the qualitative synthesis. When summary figures could not be obtained directly from the studies for the quantitative synthesis, authors were contacted and asked to provide a breakdown of perinatal outcomes by gestational age at birth. METHODS: Study appraisal was completed using the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool for the respective study types. Statistical analysis was performed using a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions. RESULTS: The search identified 3435 studies of which 1264 were duplicates. After screening 2171 titles and abstracts, 140 studies proceeded to the full-text screen. A total of 37 studies were included for analysis, 14 of which were included in a quantitative synthesis. Among 490 neonates, there were 2 perinatal deaths (0.4%), both of which were neonatal deaths before 32 weeks' gestation. In general, the rate of neonatal complications decreased steadily from <32 weeks' gestation (4.6% rate of perinatal death, 91.2% respiratory distress, 11.4% 5-minute Apgar score <7, 23.3% neonatal blood transfusion, 100% neonatal intensive care unit admission, and 100% low birthweight) to 36 weeks' gestation (0% perinatal death, 5.3% respiratory distress, 0% 5-minute Apgar score <7, 2.9% neonatal blood transfusion, 29.2% neonatal intensive care unit admission, and 30.9% low birthweight). Complications then increased slightly at 37 weeks' gestation before decreasing again at 38 weeks' gestation. CONCLUSION: Prolonging pregnancies until 36 weeks' gestation seems to be safe and beneficial in otherwise uncomplicated pregnancies with antenatally diagnosed vasa previa.

Evaluation of a novel screening method for fetal aneuploidy using cell-free DNA in maternal plasma.

Objective: To evaluate the test performance of a novel sequencing technology using molecular inversion probes applied to cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy. Methods: Two cohorts were included in the evaluation; a risk-based cohort of women receiving diagnostic testing in the first and second trimesters was combined with stored samples from pregnancies with fetuses known to be aneuploid or euploid. All samples were blinded to testing personnel before being analyzed, and validation occurred after the study closed and results were merged. Results: Using the new sequencing technology, 1414 samples were analyzed. The findings showed sensitivities and specificities for the common trisomies and the sex chromosome aneuploidies at >99% (Trisomy 21 sensitivity 99.2 CI 95.6­99.2; specificity 99.9 CI 99.6­99.9). Positive predictive values among the trisomies varied from 85.2% (Trisomy 18) to 99.0% (Trisomy 21), reflecting their prevalence rates in the study. Comparisons with a meta-analysis of recent cell-free DNA screening publications demonstrated equivalent test performance. Conclusion: This new technology demonstrates equivalent test performance compared with alternative sequencing approaches, and demonstrates that each chromosome can be successfully interrogated using a single probe.

Estimating risk of severe neonatal morbidity in preterm births under 32 weeks of gestation.

Background: A large recent study analyzed the relationship between multiple factors and neonatal outcome and in preterm births. Study variables included the reason for admission, indication for delivery, optimal steroid use, gestational age, and other potential prognostic factors. Using stepwise multivariable analysis, the only two variables independently associated with serious neonatal morbidity were gestational age and the presence of suspected intrauterine growth restriction as a reason for admission. This finding was surprising given the beneficial effects of antenatal steroids and hazards associated with some causes of preterm birth. Multivariable logistic regression techniques have limitations. Without testing for multiple interactions, linear regression will identify only individual factors with the strongest independent relationship to the outcome for the entire study group. There may not be a single "best set" of risk factors or one set that applies equally well to all subgroups. In contrast, machine learning techniques find the most predictive groupings of factors based on their frequency and strength of association, with no attempt to identify independence and no assumptions about linear relationships.Objective: To determine if machine learning techniques would identify specific clusters of conditions with different probability estimates for severe neonatal morbidity and to compare these findings to those based on the original multivariable analysis.Materials and methods: This was a secondary analysis of data collected in a multicenter, prospective study on all admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit between 2013 and 2015 in 10 hospitals. We included all patients with a singleton, stillborn, or live newborns, with a gestational age between 23 0/7 and 31 6/7 week. The composite endpoint, severe neonatal morbidity, defined by the presence of any of five outcomes: death, grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and ≥28 days on ventilator, periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), or stage III necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), was present in 238 of the 1039 study patients. We studied five explanatory variables: maternal age, parity, gestational age, admission reason, and status with respect to antenatal steroid administration. We concentrated on Classification and Regression Trees because the resulting structure defines clusters of risk factors that often bear resemblance to clinical reasoning. Model performance was measured using area under the receiver-operator characteristic curves (AUC) based on 10 repetitions of 10-fold cross-validation.Results: A hybrid technique using a combination of logistic regression and Classification and Regression Trees had a mean cross-validated AUC of 0.853. A selected point on its receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve corresponding to a sensitivity of 81% was associated with a specificity of 76%. Rather than a single curve representing the general relationship between gestational age and severe morbidity, this technique found seven clusters with distinct curves. Abnormal fetal testing as a reason for admission with or without growth restriction and incomplete steroid administration would place a 20-year-old patient on the highest risk curve.Conclusions: Using a relatively small database and a few simple factors known before birth it is possible to produce a more tailored estimate of the risk for severe neonatal morbidity on which clinicians can superimpose their medical judgment, experience, and intuition.

Cervical Pessary versus Expectant Management for the Prevention of Delivery Prior to 36 Weeks in Women with Placenta Previa: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective This multicenter randomized controlled trial compared cervical pessary (CP) versus expectant management (EM) in women with placenta previa between 22.0 and 32.0 in prolonging gestation until ≥ 36.0 weeks' gestation. Study Design This study took place from November 2016 to June 2018. Women were randomized to receive either the Bioteque CP or EM. The pessary was removed at ≥ 36.0 weeks unless indicated. The primary outcome was gestational age (GA) at delivery, with secondary outcomes including need for transfusion, number and duration of antepartum admissions, type of delivery, and neonatal outcomes. A total of 140 patients were needed to show a 3-week prolongation of pregnancy in the pessary group; however, the trial was stopped early due to budgetary issues. Results Of the 33 eligible women, 17 were enrolled. Although not statistically significant, the mean GA at delivery in the CP group was greater than women in the EM group (36.5 ± 1.23 vs. 36.0 ± 2.0; p = 0.1673). The number and duration of antepartum admissions was greater in the EM group (2.7 ± 0.58 vs. 16.0 ± 22.76 days; p = 0.1264) as well. Conclusion Although the study was underpowered to determine the primary outcome, safety and feasibility of CP in pregnancies complicated with previa were demonstrated.

A multicenter prospective study of neonatal outcomes at less than 32 weeks associated with indications for maternal admission and delivery.

BACKGROUND: Counseling for patients with impending premature delivery traditionally has been based primarily on the projected gestational age at delivery. There are limited data regarding how the indications for the preterm birth affect the neonatal outcome and whether this issue should be taken into account in decisions regarding management and patient counseling. OBJECTIVE: We performed a prospective study of pregnancies resulting in premature delivery at less than 32 weeks to determine the influence of both the indications for admission and their associated indications for delivery on neonatal mortality and complications of prematurity. STUDY DESIGN: This is a multicenter, prospective study in 10 hospitals where all data from the neonatal intensive care unit routinely was imported to a deidentified data warehouse. Maternal data were collected prospectively at or near the time of delivery. Eligible subjects included singleton deliveries in these hospitals between 23 0/7 and 31 6/7 weeks. The primary hypothesis of the study was to determine whether there was a difference in the primary outcome, which was defined as neonatal composite morbidity, between those neonates delivered after admission for premature labor vs premature rupture of membranes, because these were expected to be the 2 most frequent diagnoses leading to premature birth. The sample size was calculated based on a 10% difference in outcomes for these 2 entities. We based this hypothesis on the knowledge that premature rupture of membranes has a greater incidence of intra-amniotic infection and inflammation than premature labor and that outcomes for premature neonates are worse when delivery is associated with intra-amniotic infection. Additional outcomes were analyzed for all other indications for admission and delivery. Composite morbidity was defined as ≥1 of the following: respiratory distress syndrome (oxygen requirement, clinical diagnosis, and consistent chest radiograph), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (requirement for oxygen support at 28 days of life), severe intraventricular hemorrhage (grades 3 or 4), periventricular leukomalacia, blood culture-proven sepsis present within 72 hours of birth, necrotizing enterocolitis, or neonatal death before discharge from the hospital. A secondary composite of serious neonatal morbidity also was defined prospectively. RESULTS: The study included 1089 mother/baby pairs. Composite morbidity between those with premature labor (77.2%) and premature rupture of membranes (73.2%) was not significantly different (P = .29). A few neonatal complications were associated with indications for admission and delivery, but on logistic regression adjusting for gestational age and other confounders, suspected intrauterine growth restriction was the only indication for admission or delivery associated with an increase in serious morbidity (odds ratio 4.5, [2.1 to 9.8], P < .003). Other factors not related to the indications for admission including cesarean delivery, and low 5-minute Apgar were associated with an increase in morbidity. CONCLUSION: Studies of many single factors related to the indications for preterm delivery have been shown to be associated with adverse neonatal outcome. In this study evaluating all of the most frequent indications, however, we found only suspected intrauterine growth restriction as an indication for admission and delivery was found to be so. Thus, it seems that in almost all situations counseling patients can be based primarily on gestational age along with other factors including estimated fetal weight, sex, race, plurality, and completion of a course of antenatal corticosteroids.

Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the risks of stillbirth and neonatal complications by gestational age in uncomplicated monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases (until December 2015). REVIEW METHODS: Databases were searched without language restrictions for studies of women with uncomplicated twin pregnancies that reported rates of stillbirth and neonatal outcomes at various gestational ages. Pregnancies with unclear chorionicity, monoamnionicity, and twin to twin transfusion syndrome were excluded. Meta-analyses of observational studies and cohorts nested within randomised studies were undertaken. Prospective risk of stillbirth was computed for each study at a given week of gestation and compared with the risk of neonatal death among deliveries in the same week. Gestational age specific differences in risk were estimated for stillbirths and neonatal deaths in monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies after 34 weeks' gestation. RESULTS: 32 studies (29 685 dichorionic, 5486 monochorionic pregnancies) were included. In dichorionic twin pregnancies beyond 34 weeks (15 studies, 17 830 pregnancies), the prospective weekly risk of stillbirths from expectant management and the risk of neonatal death from delivery were balanced at 37 weeks' gestation (risk difference 1.2/1000, 95% confidence interval -1.3 to 3.6; I(2)=0%). Delay in delivery by a week (to 38 weeks) led to an additional 8.8 perinatal deaths per 1000 pregnancies (95% confidence interval 3.6 to 14.0/1000; I(2)=0%) compared with the previous week. In monochorionic pregnancies beyond 34 weeks (13 studies, 2149 pregnancies), there was a trend towards an increase in stillbirths compared with neonatal deaths after 36 weeks, with an additional 2.5 per 1000 perinatal deaths, which was not significant (-12.4 to 17.4/1000; I(2)=0%). The rates of neonatal morbidity showed a consistent reduction with increasing gestational age in monochorionic and dichorionic pregnancies, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit was the commonest neonatal complication. The actual risk of stillbirth near term might be higher than reported estimates because of the policy of planned delivery in twin pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: To minimise perinatal deaths, in uncomplicated dichorionic twin pregnancies delivery should be considered at 37 weeks' gestation; in monochorionic pregnancies delivery should be considered at 36 weeks. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42014007538.

Vasa previa: diagnosis and management.

BACKGROUND: Vasa previa is a rare condition that is associated with a high rate of fetal or neonatal death when not diagnosed antenatally. The majority of available studies are either small, do not include antepartum data, limited to single institutions, or are biased by inclusion of patients from registries and online vasa previa support groups. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic and management strategies for this potentially catastrophic entity and to describe further maternal and placental risk factors that may aid in the establishment of a screening protocol for vasa previa. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective multicenter descriptive study that included all pregnancies that were complicated by vasa previa that delivered between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2012. Nine maternal fetal medicine practices and the hospitals in which they practice participated in data collection of diagnosis, treatment, and maternal-neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty-eight pregnancies were identified that included the diagnosis of vasa previa or "possible vasa previa" either in the ultrasound record or in the hospital record at the time of delivery. Four cases (5.8%) appeared to resolve on repeat ultrasound examination. Fifteen of the 64 cases that were suspected of having vasa previa could not be verified or were not documented at delivery. Of the remaining 49 cases, where vasa previa was documented, 47 cases (96%) were diagnosed by ultrasound scanning antenatally. Known risk factors for vasa previa were present in 41 of 47 cases (87%). Of the 49 cases, 41 were delivered by planned cesarean delivery at a mean gestational age of 34.7 weeks, and 8 cases required emergent cesarean delivery at a mean gestational age of 34.6 weeks (range, 32.4-36.0 weeks gestation). Seven of these emergent cesarean deliveries had been diagnosed previously; 1 case had not. All of the emergent cesarean deliveries were for vaginal bleeding; 1 case was also for a concerning fetal heart rate, but only 1 of the known cases had a documented ruptured fetal vessel. None of these cases were found to have cervical shortening before the onset of bleeding. One of the undiagnosed cases resulted in a ruptured fetal vessel and a baby with no heart beat at birth who survived but had periventricular leukomalacia at 1 month of age with mild white-matter atrophy. Of the remaining neonates in this group, there were no deaths and no major complications beyond mild respiratory distress syndrome in 9 cases. There were no other major neonatal complications, which included no cases of periventricular leukomalacia, neonatal sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, or any grade of intraventricular hemorrhage in the confirmed cases of vasa previa. CONCLUSION: This study confirms most current recommendations that include risk-based ultrasound screening, early hospitalization at 30-34 weeks gestation, antenatal corticosteroids at 30-32 weeks gestation, and elective delivery at 33-34 weeks gestation. Thus, with these recommendations for current identification and management of vasa previa in this series of geographically diverse mostly private practice maternal fetal medicine practices, we have confirmed recent reports that show a dramatic improvement in neonatal survival and complications compared with earlier reports.

17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate for preterm rupture of the membranes: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Preterm rupture of membranes (PROM) is associated with an increased risk of preterm birth and neonatal morbidity. Prophylactic 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17OHP-C) reduces the risk of preterm birth in some women who are at risk for preterm birth. We sought to test whether 17OHP-C would prolong pregnancy or improve perinatal outcome when given to mothers with preterm rupture of the membranes. STUDY DESIGN: This is a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. The study included singleton pregnancies with gestational ages from 23(0/7) to 30(6/7) weeks at enrollment, documented PROM, and no contraindication to expectant management. Consenting women were assigned randomly to receive weekly intramuscular injections of 17OHP-C (250 mg) or placebo. The primary outcome was continuation of pregnancy until a favorable gestational age, which was defined as either 34(0/7) weeks of gestation or documentation of fetal lung maturity at 32(0/7) to 33(6/7) weeks of gestation. The 2 prespecified secondary outcomes were interval from randomization to delivery and composite adverse perinatal outcome. The planned sample size was 222 total women. RESULTS: From October 2011 to April 2014, 152 women were enrolled; 74 women were allocated randomly to 17OHP-C, and 78 were allocated randomly to placebo. The trial was stopped when results of a planned interim analysis suggested that continuation was futile. The primary outcome was achieved in 3% of the 17OHP-C group and 8% of the placebo group (P = .18). There was no significant between-group difference in the prespecified secondary outcomes, randomization-to-delivery interval (17.1 ± 16.1 vs 17.0 ± 15.8 days, respectively; P = .76) or composite adverse perinatal outcome (63% vs 61%, respectively; P = .93). No significant differences were found in other outcomes, which included rates of chorioamnionitis, postpartum endometritis, cesarean delivery, individual components of the composite outcome, or prolonged neonatal length of stay. CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, weekly 17OHP-C injections did not prolong pregnancy or reduce perinatal morbidity in patients with PROM in this trial.

Removal versus retention of cerclage in preterm premature rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The decision of whether to retain or remove a previously placed cervical cerclage in women who subsequently rupture fetal membranes in a premature gestation is controversial and all studies to date are retrospective. We performed a multicenter randomized controlled trial of removal vs retention of cerclage in these patients to determine whether leaving the cerclage in place prolonged gestation and/or increased the risk of maternal or fetal infection. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective randomized multicenter trial of 27 hospitals was performed. Patients included were those with cerclage placement at ≤23 weeks 6 days in singleton or twin pregnancies, with subsequent spontaneous rupture of membranes between 22 weeks 0 days and 32 weeks 6 days. Patients were randomized to retention or removal of cerclage. Patients were then expectantly managed and delivered only for evidence of labor, chorioamnionitis, fetal distress, or other medical or obstetrical indications. Management after 34 weeks was at the clinician's discretion. RESULTS: The initial sample size calculation determined that a total of 142 patients should be included but after a second interim analysis, futility calculations determined that the conditional power for showing statistical significance after randomizing 142 patients for the primary outcome of prolonging pregnancy was 22.8%. Thus the study was terminated after a total of 56 subjects were randomized with complete data available for analysis, 32 to removal and 24 to retention of cerclage. There was no statistical significance in primary outcome of prolonging pregnancy by 1 week comparing the 2 groups (removal 18/32, 56.3%; retention 11/24, 45.8%) P = .59; or chorioamnionitis (removal 8/32, 25.0%; retention 10/24, 41.7%) P = .25, respectively. There was no statistical difference in composite neonatal outcomes (removal 16/33, 50%; retention 17/30, 56%), fetal/neonatal death (removal 4/33, 12%; retention 5/30, 16%); or gestational age at delivery (removal mean 200 days; retention mean 198 days). CONCLUSION: Statistically significant differences were not seen in prolongation of latency, infection, or composite neonatal outcomes. However, there was a numerical trend in the direction of less infectious morbidity, with immediate removal of cerclage. These findings may not have met statistical significance if the original sample size of 142 was obtained, however they provide valuable data suggesting that there may be no advantage to retaining a cerclage after preterm premature rupture of membranes and a possibility of increased infection with cerclage retention.

Noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal trisomies 21, 18, 13 and the common sex chromosome aneuploidies from maternal blood using massively parallel genomic sequencing of DNA.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to validate the clinical performance of massively parallel genomic sequencing of cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid contained in specimens from pregnant women at high risk for fetal aneuploidy to test fetuses for trisomies 21, 18, and 13; fetal sex; and the common sex chromosome aneuploidies (45, X; 47, XXX; 47, XXY; 47, XYY). STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective multicenter observational study of pregnant women at high risk for fetal aneuploidy who had made the decision to pursue invasive testing for prenatal diagnosis. Massively parallel single-read multiplexed sequencing of cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid was performed in maternal blood for aneuploidy detection. Data analysis was completed using sequence reads unique to the chromosomes of interest. RESULTS: A total of 3430 patients were analyzed for demographic characteristics and medical history. There were 137 fetuses with trisomy 21, 39 with trisomy 18, and 16 with trisomy 13 for a prevalence rate of the common autosomal trisomies of 5.8%. There were no false-negative results for trisomy 21, 3 for trisomy 18, and 2 for trisomy 13; all 3 false-positive results were for trisomy 21. The positive predictive values for trisomies 18 and 13 were 100% and 97.9% for trisomy 21. A total of 8.6% of the pregnancies were 21 weeks or beyond; there were no aneuploid fetuses in this group. All 15 of the common sex chromosome aneuploidies in this population were identified, although there were 11 false-positive results for 45,X. Taken together, the positive predictive value for the sex chromosome aneuploidies was 48.4% and the negative predictive value was 100%. CONCLUSION: Our prospective study demonstrates that noninvasive prenatal analysis of cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid from maternal plasma is an accurate advanced screening test with extremely high sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 21 (>99%) but with less sensitivity for trisomies 18 and 13. Despite high sensitivity, there was modest positive predictive value for the small number of common sex chromosome aneuploidies because of their very low prevalence rate.

Fetal fibronectin versus cervical length as predictors of preterm birth in twin pregnancy with or without 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin (FFN) versus transvaginal sonographic cervical length as predictors of preterm birth in twin pregnancy and to test whether 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17OHPc) modifies the predictive value of FFN. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a randomized trial of 17OHPc versus placebo in dichorionic-diamniotic twins, analyzing the subset with screening FFN (N = 198) and/or cervical length (N = 214) at 24 to 26 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: Positive FFN was found in 7%, cervical length ≤ 25 mm in 8%, and both positive FFN and cervical length ≤ 25 mm in 3%. Birth < 32, < 34, and < 37 weeks occurred in 8, 30, and 67%, respectively. In logistic regression analysis controlling for FFN, cervical length, prior preterm birth, and treatment group, positive FFN was significantly associated with birth < 30 and < 32 weeks (odds ratio 55.0 [95% confidence interval 5.2-582], 18.1 [3.3-99], respectively, p < 0.001 for both) but cervical length ≤ 25 mm was not (odds ratio 0.1 [0.002-1.6], 0.6 [0.1-4.3]). CONCLUSION: Positive FFN was stronger than cervical length ≤ 25 mm in predicting early preterm birth in twins, regardless of 17OHPc use. Treatment with 17OHPc did not appear to alter the predictive value of FFN.

Repeat prenatal corticosteroid prior to preterm birth: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis for the PRECISE study group (prenatal repeat corticosteroid international IPD study group: assessing the effects using the best level of evidence) - study protocol.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis is to assess whether the effects of repeat prenatal corticosteroid treatment given to women at risk of preterm birth to benefit their babies are modified in a clinically meaningful way by factors related to the women or the trial protocol. METHODS/DESIGN: The Prenatal Repeat Corticosteroid International IPD Study Group: assessing the effects using the best level of Evidence (PRECISE) Group will conduct an IPD meta-analysis. The PRECISE International Collaborative Group was formed in 2010 and data collection commenced in 2011. Eleven trials with up to 5,000 women and 6,000 infants are eligible for the PRECISE IPD meta-analysis. The primary study outcomes for the infants will be serious neonatal outcome (defined by the PRECISE International IPD Study Group as one of death (foetal, neonatal or infant); severe respiratory disease; severe intraventricular haemorrhage (grade 3 and 4); chronic lung disease; necrotising enterocolitis; serious retinopathy of prematurity; and cystic periventricular leukomalacia); use of respiratory support (defined as mechanical ventilation or continuous positive airways pressure or other respiratory support); and birth weight (Z-scores). For the children, the primary study outcomes will be death or any neurological disability (however defined by trialists at childhood follow up and may include developmental delay or intellectual impairment (developmental quotient or intelligence quotient more than one standard deviation below the mean), cerebral palsy (abnormality of tone with motor dysfunction), blindness (for example, corrected visual acuity worse than 6/60 in the better eye) or deafness (for example, hearing loss requiring amplification or worse)). For the women, the primary outcome will be maternal sepsis (defined as chorioamnionitis; pyrexia after trial entry requiring the use of antibiotics; puerperal sepsis; intrapartum fever requiring the use of antibiotics; or postnatal pyrexia). DISCUSSION: Data analyses are expected to commence in 2011 with results publicly available in 2012.

Progestogens to prevent preterm birth in twin pregnancies: an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is the principal factor contributing to adverse outcomes in multiple pregnancies. Randomized controlled trials of progestogens to prevent preterm birth in twin pregnancies have shown no clear benefits. However, individual studies have not had sufficient power to evaluate potential benefits in women at particular high risk of early delivery (for example, women with a previous preterm birth or short cervix) or to determine adverse effects for rare outcomes such as intrauterine death. METHODS/DESIGN: We propose an individual participant data meta-analysis of high quality randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of progestogen treatment in women with a twin pregnancy. The primary outcome will be adverse perinatal outcome (a composite measure of perinatal mortality and significant neonatal morbidity). Missing data will be imputed within each original study, before data of the individual studies are pooled. The effects of 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate or vaginal progesterone treatment in women with twin pregnancies will be estimated by means of a random effects log-binomial model. Analyses will be adjusted for variables used in stratified randomization as appropriate. Pre-specified subgroup analysis will be performed to explore the effect of progestogen treatment in high-risk groups. DISCUSSION: Combining individual patient data from different randomized trials has potential to provide valuable, clinically useful information regarding the benefits and potential harms of progestogens in women with twin pregnancy overall and in relevant subgroups.

17-Hydroxyprogesterone caproate to prolong pregnancy after preterm rupture of the membranes: early termination of a double-blind, randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Progestational agents may reduce the risk of preterm birth in women with various risk factors. We sought to test the hypothesis that a weekly dose of 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17P) given to women with preterm rupture of the membranes (PROM) will prolong pregnancy and thereby reduce neonatal morbidity. METHODS: Double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. Women with PROM at 23.0 to 31.9 weeks of gestation were randomly assigned to receive a weekly intramuscular injection of 17P (250 mg in 1 mL castor oil) or placebo (1 mL castor oil). The primary outcome was the rate of continuing the pregnancy until 34.0 weeks of gestation or until documentation of fetal lung maturity at 32.0 to 33.9 weeks of gestation. Planned secondary outcomes were duration of latency period and rate of composite neonatal morbidity. Enrollment of 111 participants per group, 222 total, was planned to yield 80% power to detect an increase in the primary outcome from 30% with placebo to 50% with 17P. RESULTS: Twelve women were enrolled of whom 4 were randomly assigned to receive 17P and 8 to receive placebo. The trial was terminated prematurely because of two separate issues related to the supply of 17P. No adverse events attributable to 17P were identified. CONCLUSION: Because of premature termination, the trial does not have adequate statistical power to evaluate efficacy or safety of 17P in women with PROM. Nonetheless, ethical principles dictate that we report the results, which may contribute to possible future metaanalyses and systematic reviews. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01119963Supported by a research grant from the Center for Research, Education, and Quality, Pediatrix Medical Group, Sunrise, FL.

17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate for twin pregnancy: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether prophylactic treatment with 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17Pc) in twin pregnancy will reduce neonatal morbidity (primary outcome) by prolonging pregnancy (secondary outcome). STUDY DESIGN: This was a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Mothers carrying dichorionic-diamniotic twins were randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) to weekly injections of 250 mg of 17Pc or placebo, starting at 16-24 weeks and continued until 34 weeks. RESULTS: In all, 160 women were randomized to 17Pc and 80 to placebo. Composite neonatal morbidity occurred with similar frequency in the 17Pc and placebo groups (14% vs 12%, respectively, P = .62). Mean gestational age at delivery was not affected by 17Pc (35.3 vs 35.9 weeks, P = .10), but a 3-day difference in median gestational age favored placebo (P = .02). There were no perinatal deaths with 17Pc and 3 with placebo. CONCLUSION: In twin pregnancy, prophylactic treatment with 17Pc did not prolong gestation or reduce neonatal morbidity.

Failure of 17-hydroxyprogesterone to reduce neonatal morbidity or prolong triplet pregnancy: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17P) will reduce neonatal morbidity by increasing gestational age at delivery in triplet pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Mothers carrying trichorionic-triamniotic triplets were randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) to weekly injections of 250 mg of 17P or placebo, starting at 16-22 weeks and continued until 34 weeks. Primary outcome was composite neonatal morbidity. RESULTS: Fifty-six women were randomized to 17P and 25 to placebo. Composite neonatal morbidity occurred with similar frequency in the 17P and placebo groups (38% vs 41%, respectively; P = .71). Mean gestational age at delivery was not affected by 17P (31.9 vs 31.8 weeks; P = .36). There were 13 midtrimester fetal losses with 17P vs none with placebo (P < .02). CONCLUSION: In triplet pregnancy, prophylactic treatment with 17P did not reduce neonatal morbidity or prolong gestation but was associated with increased midtrimester fetal loss.

Impact of a 'rescue course' of antenatal corticosteroids: a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies using repetitive courses of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) have demonstrated marginal or no benefit and concern over potential risk. No prior prospective or randomized studies have evaluated the option of a single rescue course of ACS on neonatal outcome. STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial was performed from May 2003 through February 2008 in 18 private (15) and university (3) medical centers. Patients with singletons or twins < 33 weeks who had completed a single course of ACS before 30 weeks and at least 14 days before inclusion, and were judged to have a recurring threat of preterm delivery in the coming week, were included. Patients were randomized to receive a single rescue course of betamethasone, 2 12-mg doses 24 hours apart, or placebo. Exclusion criteria included: premature rupture of membranes, advanced dilation (> 5 cm), chorioamnionitis, and other steroid use. RESULTS: In all, 437 patients were randomized (223 rescue steroid group and 214 placebo group). A total of 55% of patients in each group delivered at < 34 weeks. There was a significant reduction in the primary outcome of composite neonatal morbidity < 34 weeks in the rescue steroid group vs placebo (43.9% vs 63.6%; odds ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.75; P = .002) and significantly decreased respiratory distress syndrome, ventilator support, and surfactant use. Perinatal mortality and other morbidities were similar in each group. Including all neonates in the analysis (regardless of gestational age at delivery) still demonstrated a significant reduction in composite morbidity in the rescue course group (32.1% vs 42.6%, odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.97; P = .0034) and improvement in respiratory morbidities. CONCLUSION: Administration of a single rescue course of ACS before 33 weeks improves neonatal outcome without apparent increased short-term risk.