Comparative analysis of the biomechanical behavior of the maxillary central incisors restored with glass fiber post and cast metal post and core submitted to orthodontic forces: A study with finite elements.

INTRODUCTION: Different types of intraradicular restorations and their insertion have an impact on teeth biomechanics. This study aimed to analyze the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored with glass fiber post (GFP) and cast metal post and core (CMP) subjected to buccolingual and mesiodistal orthodontic forces using the finite element method. METHODS: Two models of the maxillary central incisor with periodontal ligament, cortical bone, and trabecular bone were made. One of the models included intraradicular restoration with GFP, whereas, in the other, the incisor was restored with CMP. After creating the tridimensional mesh of finite elements, applying 2 orthodontic forces were simulated: 65 g of buccolingual force and 70 g of mesiodistal force. The forces were applied parallel to the palatal plane in the region of the bracket slot, located 4 mm to the incisal edge. RESULTS: The maximum stresses generated in the GFP-restored root were 3.642 × 10-1 MPa and 4.755 × 10-1 MPa from the buccolingual and mesiodistal forces, respectively. Likewise, the stresses in the CMP restored root were 2.777 × 10-1MPa and 3.826 × 10-1MPa. The radicular area with higher stress on both models was located in the cervical third: on the buccal surface when the buccolingual force was applied and on the mesial surface when the mesiodistal force was applied. The highest stress levels were found on the CMP structure. CONCLUSIONS: The incisor restored with cast metal post revealed lower stress values transferred to the root than the one restored with GFP. The stresses on the structure of the GFP were lower and more homogeneous than the ones found on the cast metal post. The difference among the stress values in the materials is within a safe margin for using both materials in relation to orthodontic forces.

Influence of the hyrax expander screw position on displacement and stress distribution in teeth: A study with finite elements.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to simulate the different positions of the hyrax appliance expander screw and evaluate tooth displacement and the stress distribution standard on the periodontal ligament using the finite element method. METHODS: Part of the maxilla with anchorage teeth, periodontal ligament, midpalatal suture, and the hyrax appliance was modeled, and finite element method models were created to simulate 6 different screw positions. There were 2 vertical positions at distances of 20 mm and 15 mm from the occlusal plane. Another position was anteroposterior, the center of the screw placed between and equidistant from the mesial face of the first molar and the distal face of the first premolar, aligned to the center of the crown of the first molar, with the anterior edge of the screw aligned to the distal face of the first molar. A 1 mm activation of the expander screw was simulated. The displacement (total, vertical, and buccolingual) and the stress distribution on the periodontal ligament of supporting teeth in each model were registered. RESULTS: The model simulating the expander screw in a more occlusal and anterior position presented higher displacement values and higher stress concentration, followed by the model with the screw in a more posterior but same vertical position. With the exception of the first premolar, the teeth presented cervical-apical displacement in the vestibular face and apical-cervical displacement in palatal faces. This displacement is compatible with the vestibular inclination associated with the activation of the expander screw. The first premolar presented an atypical tendency for the mesial and lingual displacement of the vestibular surface and counterclockwise rotation. CONCLUSIONS: The supporting teeth presented a tendency for vestibular crown displacement and lingual root displacement associated with compression areas in the vestibular-cervical region and tensile strength in the linguoapical region. Placing the expander screw in a more occlusal and anterior position generated more mechanical stress transfer, resulting in greater dental displacement.