Reliability and validity of the online application of London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale in assessing dyspnea-related functional impairment in individuals after hospitalization for COVID-19.

PURPOSE: To investigate the test-retest reliability and construct validity of the LCADL scale applied via online form in individuals after hospitalization for COVID-19. METHODS: Methodological study. After hospitalization for COVID-19 individuals completed the LCADL via online form at two separate times. They also answered the post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale (PCFS), dyspnea, fatigue, and health perception scales, modified Medical Research Council (MRCm), Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36). Hospitalization data were collected from the individual's medical record. RESULTS: 104 individuals participated in the study (57 men, 45.2 ± 11.9 years). The LCADL showed moderately to high test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.73-0.86; p < 0.001), there was no difference in scores between test and retest (p > 0.05), the mean difference between the applications was smaller than the standard error of measurement and the internal consistency was adequate (Cronbach's α = 0.70-0.94). In addition, it demonstrated adequate construct validity, showing correlations with PCFS, dyspnea perception, fatigue and health scales, mMRC, SF-36, and length of stay in the Intensive Care Unit (p < 0.05). The LCADL as percentage of the total score presented a significant floor effect (25%). CONCLUSION: The LCADL applied online was reliable and valid for assessing limitations due to dyspnea in ADL in individuals after hospitalization for COVID-19.

The London Chest Activity of Daily Living Scale applied online is a method of evaluation of dyspnea-related ADL limitations that is valid and reliable after hospitalization for COVID-19 and can be used both in the telerehabilitation environment and in-person rehabilitation;The online form provides a more sustainable means of data storage, since no paper is needed, and saves time during in-person rehabilitation.

Comparison of the modified shuttle walk test in children with cystic fibrosis and healthy controls.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare performance in the modified shuttle walk test (MSWT) with cardiorespiratory parameters and respiratory muscle strength in children with cystic fibrosis (CF) and healthy controls. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with children divided into the CF group (CFG) and healthy control group (HCG). Two MSWTs were performed and the data from the test with the longest distance walked and its cardiorespiratory parameters (blood pressure, respiratory rate, heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation, and dyspnea sensation) were considered, the last three every 4 levels. Respiratory muscle strength was evaluated using a manometer. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the parameters before and after the MSWT, and the Mann-Whitney and independent t-tests were applied to compare the data between the groups. The distance walked and its association with the variation in cardiorespiratory parameters and respiratory muscle strength were analyzed by Spearman's correlation. RESULTS: Sixty-two children (31 in each group) participated, with an average age of 10.2 (2.1) years. Children with CF had poorer performance in the average distance walked (CFG 716.7 (274.3)) when compared to the HCG (948.0 (202.8)). Both groups exhibited an increase in all the cardiorespiratory parameters at the end of the test, but the CFG displayed less variation in some parameters. Children with CF presented a positive correlation between distance walked and respiratory muscle strength, HR variation, and systolic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in respiratory muscle strength between the groups. In the CFG, the greater the respiratory muscle strength, the better the performance in the MSWT. The CFG exhibited less variation in cardiorespiratory parameters than the HCG.

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and construct validity of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Basic Psychological Needs in Exercise Scale.

RESULTS: 59 patients were included (61% with COPD and 39% with ILD). BPNES factor scores were not significantly different between raters' assessments (p > 0.05). The internal consistency was 0.70 for autonomy, 0.76 for competence, and 0.80 for relatedness. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability were good to very good for autonomy (ICC = 0.78, 95%CI 0.62-0.87; ICC = 0.75, 95%CI 0.57-0.86, respectively), competence (ICC = 0.81, 95%CI 0.68-0.89; ICC = 0.65, 95%CI 0.43-0.80, respectively), and relatedness (ICC = 0.79, 95%CI 0.65-0.88; ICC = 0.70, 95%CI 0.50-0.83, respectively). Significant correlations were observed between BPNES factors and quality of life, anxiety, depression, and functional status. In conclusion, this study confirmed the reliability and construct validity of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the BPNES in patients with COPD and ILD.

Minimally Important Difference of the 20-m 6-Minute Walk Test in Individuals With COPD.

BACKGROUND: The 20-m 6-min-walk test (6MWT20) is a valid, reliable alternative for functional capacity assessment; however, its responsiveness and minimally important difference (MID) have yet to be investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the responsiveness and MID of the 6MWT20 in individuals with COPD. METHODS: Fifty-three subjects completed the study from August 2011-March 2020. The following were assessed: lung function, activities of daily living (ADLs), functional capacity 6MWT20, dyspnea, health status, quality of life, and limitations in ADLs. The primary outcome was the 6MWT20 distance. RESULTS: The study demonstrated that the 6MWT20 is responsive to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), with an average improvement of 39 ± 36.3 m (P < .001) and an effect size of 1.07. The learning effect declined to 1.45% after PR, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-0.99). The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated a cutoff point of 20 m for the MID of the 6MWT20 based on the MIDs for the modified St George Respiratory Questionnaire (sensitivity 87%, specificity 69%, area under the curve 0.80 [95% CI 0.66-0.90], P < .001, Youden index 0.56) and the number of steps (sensitivity 92%, specificity 73%, area under the curve 0.83 [95% CI 0.70-0.92], P < .01, Youden index 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: The 6MWT20 is responsive to PR, and the MID for the test is 20 m (17-47 m).

Slow chest compression acutely reduces dynamic hyperinflation in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized cross-over trial.

BACKGROUND: Strategies to minimize dynamic hyperinflation (DH) and dyspnea, such as slow chest compression (SCC), are relevant in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). OBJECTIVES: To analyze the acute effects of SCC after exercise on DH and dyspnea in people with COPD and to identify responders to the technique. METHODS: This is a cross-over study with 40 patients. Two six-minute step tests (6MSTs) were performed followed by a one-minute application of SCC (6MSTSCC) or rest (6MSTCONTROL), at random. End-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and dyspnea were assessed. A difference ≥76 ml in ΔEELV between SCC and control characterized the responders. RESULTS: The performance in 6MSTSCC and 6MSTCONTROL were similar. There was a greater reduction in EELV after 6MSTSCC compared to 6MSTCONTROL (124 ± 193 ml vs. 174 ± 183 ml; p = .049), while there was no difference in change in dyspnea between the SCC and control groups. Twenty-one participants were SCC responders and had higher functional residual capacity [FRC: 5.36 ± 1.09 vs. 4.58 ± 0.94; p = .02; cutoff point: 4.56; sensitivity = 76%; specificity = 53%; AUC = 0.71 (95%CI: 0.54 to 0.87); p = .02]. CONCLUSION: SCC applied immediately after exercise reduced DH, but did not reduce dyspnea in people with COPD. The technique is beneficial only for some patients and FRC can help to identify them.

Reliability and validity of the Upper Limb Functional Test (ULIFT) for women after breast cancer surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and convergent validity of the Upper Limb Functional Test (ULIFT) in women after breast cancer surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study with 25 women (mean age 50 ± 7.3 years) with breast cancer submitted to a surgery intervention within a minimum period of three years. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess the test-retest reliability. A Bland-Altman plot examined the agreement between the times to complete two tests. Validity was established by correlating the ULIFT and DASH total score. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the cut-off point for ULIFT in order to discriminate patients with some level of upper limb dysfunction. RESULTS: The ULIFT showed high reproducibility (ICC = 0.89; p < 0.001), learning effect of 7.21%, and a moderate correlation with the DASH total score (r = 0.536; R2 = 0.28; p = 0.006). The standard error of measurement was 6.9 s and the smallest real difference was 19.1 s. The ROC curve indicated a cut-off point of 109.2 s (sensitivity = 68.7%; specificity = 77.8%; area under ROC curve = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: The ULIFT could be a valid and reliable test to assess upper limb functionality in patients submitted to breast cancer surgery.Implications for rehabilitationThe ULIFT is a reliable and valid test to assess upper limb function in women after breast cancer surgery, considering specifically the lifting and range of motion construct of unilateral upper limb function.The ULIFT could help identify those most at risk of developing upper limb dysfunction after breast cancer surgery and could benefit the follow-up of a postoperative rehabilitation program.Two ULIFTs should be performed in order to achieve patient's best performance.

Functional Tests As Predictors Of Balance, Fear, And Risk Of Falling In Healthy Subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Verify which test, Glitttre-ADL test (TGlittre) or six-minute walk test (6MWT), better predicts balance, fear, and risk of falling in middle-aged and older adults. METHOD: Twenty-eight individuals (15 women) completed the study protocol, which included: anthropometric assessment, spirometry, Falls Efficacy Scale-International-Brazil (FES-I-Brazil), Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), TGlittre, and 6MWT. The Shapiro Wilk test investigated the distribution of the data. To verify if there was a correlation between the performance in TGlittre and 6MWT and the balance, fear, and risk of falling variables, the Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient were used. Simple linear regression and stepwise multiple linear regression were conducted to identify which functional capacity test better predicts balance, fear, and risk of falling. RESULTS: Both TGlittre and 6MWT correlated (r = 0.44, p = .02 and r = -0.59, p = .003, respectively) and were able to predict the TUG (R2 = 0.17 and R2 = 0.26, p < .005, respectively). However, when analyzed in a multiple regression model, the 6MWT was better predictor of TUG (26%). Only TGlittre correlated (r = 0.39 and r = -0.38, p = .04) and was able to predict the FES-I-Brazil and BBS scores (17%), suggesting that TGlittre better reflects the worry about falls and balance in multiple ADL contexts. CONCLUSIONS: The 6MWT and the TGlittre are able to predict balance assessed by the TUG. However, the 6MWT has proved to be more effective in predicting TUG results.

Performance in the Glittre-ADL Test is Associated with the Pulmonary Function of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

The relationship between lung function and performance in some functional tests, as the six-minute walk test (6MWT) and Glittre-ADL test (TGlittre) are still discrepant in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to verify which test better correlates and is better explained by the pulmonary function, and which test better discriminates patients regarding the severity of the disease. Seventy-four patients with moderate to very severe COPD (54 men; 66 ± 9 years; FEV1: 37.2 ± 14.3%pred) were included. Spirometry, 6MWT and TGlittre were performed. The results showed weak to moderate correlation between pulmonary function variables and 6MWT (0.36 ≤ r ≤ 0.45) and TGlittre (-0.44 ≤ r ≤ -0.53). In patients with performance of ≤400 m in the 6MWT, a strong correlation was observed between TGlittre with FEV1 (%pred) (r = -0.82; p < .001). The pulmonary function variable that better predict the functional tests performance was FEV1 (R2 = 0.17). Both functional tests were able to discriminate patients with COPD GOLD 4 from the other classifications. When compared to GOLD 2 patients, GOLD 4 patients presented higher time spent on TGlittre (p < .001). When compared to GOLD 3 patients, GOLD 4 patients had higher TGlittre (p = .001). No statistical differences were found in the 6MWT between GOLD 3 and 4, as well as between GOLD 2 and 3. In conclusion, the pulmonary function presents stronger correlations and better explain the variability of TGlittre than of the 6MWT, especially in patients with greater functional impairment. The TGlittre seems to better discriminate patients with COPD regarding the severity of lung function.

Modified Medical Research Council and COPD Assessment Test Cutoff Points.

BACKGROUND: The modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) are assessment instruments associated with level of physical activity of daily living (PADL) in patients with COPD. This study aimed to identify mMRC and CAT cutoff points to discriminate sedentary behavior and PADL level of subjects with COPD and verify whether these cutoff points differentiate pulmonary function, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), functional status, and mortality index in subjects with COPD. METHODS: Subjects (N = 131, FEV1: 36.7 ± 16.1% predicted) were assessed for lung function, mMRC, CAT, HRQOL, functional status, and mortality index. PADL was monitored using a triaxial accelerometer, and subjects were classified as sedentary/nonsedentary (cutoff point of 8.5 h/d in PADL < 1.5 metabolic equivalent of task [MET]), physically active/inactive (cutoff point of 80 min/d in PADL ≥ 3 METs), and with/without severe physical inactivity (cutoff point of 4,580 steps/d), according to variables provided by accelerometer. RESULTS: ROC curve indicated mMRC cutoff point of ≥ 2 (P < .05) for physical inactivity (sensitivity = 66%, specificity = 56%, AUC = 0.62), severe physical inactivity (sensitivity = 81%, specificity = 66%, AUC = 0.76), and sedentary behavior (sensitivity = 61%, specificity = 70%, AUC = 0.65). The identified CAT cutoff points were ≥ 16 and ≥ 20, considering severe physical inactivity (sensitivity = 76%, specificity = 54%, AUC = 0.69, P < .001) and sedentary behavior (sensitivity = 51%, specificity = 90%, AUC = 0.71, P = .001), respectively. Subjects who had mMRC ≥ 2 and CAT ≥ 16 or ≥ 20 presented worse pulmonary function, HRQOL, functional status, and mortality index compared with those who scored mMRC < 2 and CAT <16 or < 20. CONCLUSIONS: mMRC cutoff point of ≥ 2 is recommended to discriminate PADL level and sedentary behavior, whereas CAT cutoff points of ≥ 16 and ≥ 20 discriminated severe physical inactivity and sedentary behavior, respectively. These cutoff points differentiated subjects with COPD regarding all the outcomes assessed in this study.

Reliability and validity of the Glittre-ADL test to assess the functional status of patients with interstitial lung disease.

The study objective was to investigated the reliability and validity of the ADL-Glittre test (TGlittre) to assess the functional status of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Twenty-one individuals with ILD participated (age: 63 ± 11 years; DLCO: 51.0 ± 12.6%predicted), evaluated with body plethysmography, Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire, modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale, six-minute walk test (6MWT) and monitoring of physical activity of daily living. Two TGlittre were performed, with an interval of 30 minutes between them. The TGlittre demonstrated high test-retest reliability, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.90 (95%CI: 0.75-0.96; p < 0.001). Nineteen patients (90.5%) performed better on the second test (mean difference between TGlittre 1 and 2: -0.57 ± 0.96 minute; p = 0.001), with a learning effect of 11.6%. The time in TGlittre correlated with 6MWT (r = -0.70; p = 0.002) and with the total energy expenditure in physical activity of daily living (r = -0.52; p = 0.02). In %predicted, TGlittre and 6MWT also correlated (r = -0.50; p = 0.04). Correlations were observed between TGlittre and pulmonary function variables (r = -0.47 to -0.57; p = 0.01 to p = 0.04). There was no difference in the physiological response between TGlittre 1 and 2, and between TGlittre and 6MWT (p > 0.05). In conclusion, the TGlittre is reliable and valid for assessing functional status of patients with ILD.

Reliability and Learning Effect of the Glittre ADL-Test in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

The Glittre ADL-test (TGlittre) is a multiple-task test designed to assess functional limitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although few studies have investigated the TGlittre learning effect, the results are still conflicting. This study aimed to investigate the test-retest reliability and learning effect on TGlittre and to identify predicting factors of the learning effect in patients with COPD. Patients performed the TGlittre twice with a 30-minutes resting period between trials. TGlittre consists in measuring the time to complete five laps of a multiple ADL-like activities circuit: walking stairs, carrying a backpack, lifting objects, bending down and rising from a seated position. 124 patients with COPD were assessed [81 men; 66 ± 8 years, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 37.1 ± 15.0%pred; TGlittre 120 ± 60%pred; six-minute walking test 75.5 ± 17.4%pred]. The time spent in TGlittre presented excellent reliability (ICC = 0.96; 95%CI 0.92 - 0.98; p < 0.001; SEM 0.46 min; MDC 1.28 min) and decreased in the retest (5.24 ± 2.31 min to 4.85 ± 2.02 min; p < 0.001). Patients presented a learning effect of 6.11 ± 11.1% in TGlittre. A lower FEV1 (r2=0.10; p < 0.001) and a worse performance in the first TGlittre (r2=0.28; p < 0.001) are related to the improvement in performance of the second TGlittre. Although the TGlittre is reliable, patients improve their performance when performing the second test probably because they underestimate their functional capacity. These results should encourage professionals to assess TGlittre twice when using this test as an outcome measure.

Baseline Characteristics of Subjects with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Associated to the Improvement in Activities of Daily Living after Exercise Training.

This study aimed to identify baseline variables predicting improvement in ADLs following an exercise training program in subjects with COPD. Sixty-seven patients with COPD underwent assessment of spirometry, modified Medical Research Council scale, COPD Assesment Test (CAT), Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT), London Chest Activity of Daily Living (LCADL) scale and Glittre-ADL test (TGlittre). After 24 sessions, they were reassessed for limitation in ADLs (LCADL and TGlittre). The main outcome was the achieving of minimal important difference (MID) of TGlittre, LCADL and both (ADLs). The cut-off points to discriminate the subjects who achieved the MID of TGlittre, LCADL and ADLs were established using the ROC curve. A cut-off point of 3.7 min in baseline TGlittre was able to discriminate subjects who achieved the MID of TGlittre (AUC = 0.77). Subjects with baseline TGlittre ≥3.7 min were 6.92 (95%CI 2.2-20.9) times more likely to achieve the MID of TGlittre post-exercise training. A cut-off point of 32% in LCADL was able to discriminate subjects who achieved the MID of LCADL (AUC = 0.81) and in ADLs (AUC = 0.78). Subjects with baseline LCADL ≥32% were 12.3 (95% CI 2.50 - 60.7) times more likely to achieve the MID of LCADL. In conclusion, the baseline variables that best predict the improvement of individuals after exercise training are TGlittre and LCADL, showing that subjects with significant functional impairment are more likely to clinically significantly improve their ADLs.

Reproducibility of the 6-Min Step Test in Subjects With COPD.

BACKGROUND: Test-retest reproducibility of the 6-min step test (6MST) is controversial in patients with COPD because the decision to perform a second test is influenced by interruptions, physiological overload, and the patient's exercise tolerance. The aim of this study was to analyze the reproducibility of performance on the 6MST (ie, number of steps climbed and interruptions) and physiological variables in subjects with COPD, with and without poor exercise tolerance, and with and without interruptions during the test. METHODS: Subjects performed 2 6MST (6MST1, 6MST2) with a minimum of 30 min rest between tests. Physiological variables were assessed with a gas analyzer. Subjects who performed ≤ 78 steps in the 6MST1 and ≤ 86 steps in the test with the higher number of steps performed (6MSTBEST) were considered to have poor exercise tolerance. Subjects were also stratified according to those who interrupted the 6MSTBEST and those who did not interrupt the 6MSTBEST. RESULTS: 40 subjects (31 men; FEV1 percent of predicted = 50.4 ± 13.5) participated in the study. The number of steps, interruptions, and physiological variables showed moderate to high reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.70-0.99, P < .001). Thirty-one (77.5%) subjects had a better performance during 6MST2 than 6MST1 (mean difference: 4.65 ± 5.59, P < .001). Although the number of times subjects were interrupted was similar between the 2 tests (P = .66), the duration of these interruptions was shorter during 6MST2 (mean difference: -0.12 ± 0.39 s, P = .040). The difference in the number of steps (6MST2 - 6MST1) did not differ between subjects who performed ≤78 steps (mean difference: 5.64 ± 5.32 steps; 10.3%; P < 0.001) and ≥ 79 steps (3.00 ± 5.82 steps; 6.13%; P = 0.08) on the 6MST1 (P = 0.15) and between subjects who performed ≤ 86 steps (5.39 ± 5.14 steps; 9.39%; P < 0.001) and ≥ 87 steps (2.92 ± 6.43 steps; 2.74%; P = 0.14) steps on the 6MSTBEST (P = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Performance and physiological variables in the 6MST were reproducible, and a second test did not impose greater physiological overload. Two tests were essential for patients with poor exercise tolerance.

Performance difference on the six-minute walk test on tracks of 20 and 30 meters for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: validity and reliability.

BACKGROUND: Functional capacity assessment is important in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It can be performed by the six-minute walk test (6MWT) on a 30-meter track. However, such space is not always available in clinical settings. OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance between the 6MWT on a 30- (6MWT30) and 20-meter (6MWT20) track; to evaluate the validity and reliability of the 6MWT30 and the 6MWT20; and to determine for which patients track length has the greatest impact on performance. METHODS: Patients with COPD randomly performed two 6MWT30 and two 6MWT20 on two different days and were also assessed using the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale. RESULTS: Thirty patients (23 men; mean ±â€¯standard deviation FEV1%pred: 45.6 ±â€¯12.1) participated in the study. They walked a greater distance on the 6MWT30 than on the 6MWT20 [mean difference: 22.1 m (95% CI: 12, 32 m)]. The longer the 6MWT30 distance, the greater the difference between the 2 tests (r = 0.51; p = 0.004). The 6MWT20 showed high reliability [ICC: 0.96 (95% CI: 0.77, 0.99)] and the results were associated with the distance walked on the 6MWT30 (r = 0.86), CAT (r = -0.53), and mMRC (r = -0.62). Patients who walked ≥430 m in the 6MWT30 presented a difference between the tests greater than those who walked <430 m (34.5 ±â€¯23.3 m vs. 12.6 ±â€¯24.1 m; respectively; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Performance was higher on the 6MWT30, with the difference increasing as performance improved. Therefore, the 6MWT20 is valid and reliable to evaluate functional capacity but should not be considered interchangeable with the 6MWT30, especially for the less disabled patients with COPD.

A performance comparison of the 20 and 30 meter six-minute walk tests among middle aged and older adults.

Objective: To compare the performance of the Six-Minute Walk Test on 20-meter (6MWT20) and 30-meter (6MWT30) tracks and to test the validity and reliability of the 6MWT20 in middle-aged and older adults.Method: The subjects underwent lung function assessment and performed the 6MWT30 and 6MWT20. Student´s t-tests or Wilcoxon tests were used to compare the variables. The Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the validity of the 6MWT20 and the reliability of the 6MWT20. The 6MWT30 was tested by the two-way mixed model of the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC 3,1).Results: Twenty-five subjects (age: 60 ± 10 years) walked, on average, 11.0 ± 21.9 m more in the 6MWT30 than in the 6MWT20 (p < .05). The walking distance, the number of steps, the energy expenditure and the movement intensity between the 6MWT20 and 6MWT30 was correlated (r = 0.95; r = 0.81; r = 0.91; r = 0.67; respectively, p < .001). The walking distances showed high reliability and were similar between test and re-test in the 6MWT30 (544 ± 72.1 vs. 551 ± 70.5; p < .05; ICC = 0.97) and in the 6MWT20 (533 ± 73.1 vs. 532 ± 59.1; p < .05; ICC = 0.87).Conclusion: The 6MWT20 performance is lower than the 6MWT30 However, this difference is not clinically relevant. Additionally, the 6MWT20 is a valid and reproducible test to assess the functional capacity of middle-aged and older adults.

The COVID-19 Pandemic Confronts the Motivation Fallacy within Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs.

Social distancing and quarantines have been implemented worldwide to reduce the spread of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). However, social distancing has had far-reaching health consequences, considering that the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed people to the hazard of physical inactivity and sedentary behavior. For patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), which is one of the main diseases at risk for COVID-19, the impact is even greater since outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs are temporarily closed. More than ever, patients' behavior change to exercise calls for urgent debate. We propose a theoretical discussion in light of Self-Determination Theory, aiming to make PR a setting that supports autonomous forms of motivation. The scenario will not be changed in the short-term; but if other conditions hinder the development of PR in its most traditional form, the PR community will be better prepared to overcome the barriers to maintain physical exercise.

Breast cancer surgery does not impact long-term pulmonary function and respiratory muscle strength / A cirurgia para o câncer de mama não compromete a função pulmonar e a força muscular respiratória a longo-prazo

INTRODUCTION: Long-term disabilities are frequently related to postoperative complications on breast cancer patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of breast cancer surgery on pulmonary function and respiratory muscle strength over the course of 60 days after the surgery. METHODS: Prospective study with 32 women. Pulmonary function was evaluated using spirometry and respiratory muscle strength was evaluated using manovacuometry. The evaluations were performed in preoperative period, between 12 to 48h after surgery, 30 and 60 days after the surgery. RESULTS: Vital capacity (VC) and inspiratory capacity (IC) were diminished 48h after surgery (VC: 2.18±0.63; IC: 1.71±0.49; p<0.01 vs baseline), returned to the baseline parameters after 30 days (VC: 2.76±0.60; CI: 2.16±0.57; p<0.01 vs PO48h) and were maintained after 60 days of the surgery (VC: 2.64±0.60; CI: 2.11±0.62; p<0.01 vs PO48h). No difference was observed in tidal volume over the evaluations, except when comparing 60 days to the 48h after surgery values (0.84±0.37 vs 0.64±0.19, respectively; p=0.028). Respiratory muscle strength was reduced 48h after surgery (MIP: -33.89±12.9 cmH2O; MEP: 39.72±21.0 cmH2O; p<0.01 vs basal) and returned to baseline values after 30 (MIP: -50.1±21.2 cmH2O; MEP: 59.86±24.7 cmH2O; p<0.01 vs PO48h) and 60 days of the surgery (MIP: -50.78±19.2 cmH2O; MEP: 61.67±23.4 cmH2O; p<0.01vs PO48h). CONCLUSION: Breast cancer surgery does not impact pulmonary function and respiratory muscle strength 30 days after the surgery.

INTRODUÇÃO: Mulheres com câncer de mama podem apresentar complicações a longo-prazo relacionadas ao procedimento cirúrgico. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a função pulmonar e a força muscular respiratória em mulheres submetidas a tratamento cirúrgico para câncer de mama ao longo de 60 dias. MÉTODOS: Estudo longitudinal com 32 mulheres. A função pulmonar e a força muscular respiratória foram avaliadas utilizando espirometria e manovacuometria, respectivamente, no pré-operatório, de 12 a 48h no período pós-operatório, 30 dias e 60 dias após a cirurgia. RESULTADOS: A capacidade vital (CV) e a capacidade inspiratória (CI) apresentaram redução significante no pós-operatório de até 48h (CV: 2,18±0,63; CI: 1,71±0,49; p<0,01 vs basal), com retorno aos parâmetros basais em 30 dias após a cirurgia (CV: 2,76±0,60; CI: 2,16±0,57; p<0,01 vs PO48h) e manutenção destes no pós-operatório de 60 dias (CV: 2,64±0,60; CI: 2,11±0,62; p< 0,01 vs PO48h). Não foi observada diferença estatisticamente significante entre os valores de volume corrente nos quatro períodos avaliados, exceto quando comparado o período pós-operatório de 60 dias com o pós-operatório de até 48h (0,84±0,37 vs 0,64±0,19, respectivamente; p=0,028). Todos os valores de força muscular respiratória apresentaram-se significantemente reduzidos no pós-operatório de até 48h (PImax: -33,89±12,9 cmH2O; PEmax: 39,72±21,0 cmH2O; p<0,01 vs basal), com retorno aos valores basais em 30 (PImax: -50,1±21,2 cmH2O; PEmax: 59,86±24,7 cmH2O; p<0,01 vs PO48h) e 60 dias (PImax -50,78±19,2 cmH2O; PEmax 61,67±23.4 cmH2O; p<0,01 vs PO48h). CONCLUSÃO: A cirurgia para tratamento do câncer de mama não impacta na função pulmonar e força muscular respiratória 30 dias após a cirurgia.

Minimal important difference for London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the minimal important difference (MID) for the London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale (LCADL) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), focusing on the percentage of the total score (LCADL%total), using an anchor-based method in addition to distribution-based methods. DESIGN: Non-controlled before-and-after study. SETTING: Two outpatient centres. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-seven patients with COPD (GOLD II-IV, 47 males, forced expiratory volume in 1second mean 37 (SD 14) % predicted). INTERVENTIONS: Aerobic training and localised training for upper and lower limbs was conducted for 24 sessions, three times per week. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was LCADL score pre- and post-exercise training. The MID was established using distribution and anchor-based methods. The modified Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire was the anchor for the analysis of sensitivity and specificity of the MID. RESULTS: The established MIDs ranged from -2.1 to -5.9 points for LCADLtotal and from -2 to -6 points for LCADL%total. The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated a cut-off point of -3 points for LCADLtotal (sensitivity 51%, specificity 82%; P=0.01) and -4 points for LCADL%total (sensitivity 56%, specificity 82%; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest -3 points and -4 points as the MIDs for LCADLtotal and LCADL%total, respectively. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03251781.

Physiological Responses to the 6-min Step Test in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

PURPOSE: To describe physiological responses during the 6-min step test (6MST) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), to investigate whether COPD severity and test interruptions could determine different physiological responses, and to test the reproducibility of 6MST performance. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. Patients with moderate to very severe COPD underwent lung function assessment and 2 6MSTs, with physiological responses measurement by a gas analyzer and a near-infrared spectroscopy device. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (29 men; forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration [FEV1] = 51.1 ± 13.6%pred) participated in the study. Most of the physiological variables stabilized between the second and fourth minutes of the 6MST, except the respiratory rate and heart rate (HR), which stabilized after the fifth minute. The patients who interrupted the 6MST showed higher minute ventilation to maximal voluntary ventilation ratio ((Equation is included in full-text article.)E/MVV; all test minutes) and HR (first and second minutes) (P < .05) and worse pulmonary function (FEV1 = 1.37 ± 0.37 L vs 1.82 ± 0.41 L, P = .002, and 47.2 ± 13.2%pred vs 56.6 ± 12.4%pred, P = .04, respectively) than those who did not interrupt the 6MST. However, their performance was similar (P = .11). 6MST performance and physiological variables were reproducible, and there was a learning effect of 6.28%. CONCLUSIONS: The 6MST showed a stabilization of the most physiological variables. In addition, interruptions were usually made by patients with a greater impairment of lung function and they presented greater increased ventilatory demand during the 6MST. However, these interruptions do not interfere with 6MST physiological responses. Moreover, the 6MST is a reliable test to evaluate the functional capacity of patients with COPD.