[Resistance to anti-EGFR through the successive and cumulative acquisition of two new oncogenic addictions: BRAF and ALK]. / Résistance aux anti-EGFR via l'acquisition successive et cumulée de deux nouvelles addictions oncogénique BRAF et ALK.

Targeted therapies are the standard first-line treatment for metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with certain molecular abnormalities. These abnormalities are particularly common in Southeast Asia and French Polynesia. A 51-year-old Tahitian female non-smoker was diagnosed in 2018 with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma harboring a p.L858R EGFR mutation. She received gefitinib as first-line treatment. Due to locoregional progression and the presence of a resistance mutation (p.T790M of EFGR), she received osimertinib as second-line treatment, after which chemotherapy was proposed as 3rd-line treatment. An additional biopsy detected not only the previously known EGFR mutation, but also a BRAF p.V600E mutation. Following disease progression during chemotherapy, the patient received targeted therapies combining dabrafenib, trametinib and osimertinib. Due to a dissociated response after four months of treatment, a 5th line of paclitaxel bevacizumab was initiated. Subsequent to additional progression and given the ALK rearrangement shown on the re-biopsy, 6th-line treatment with alectinib was proposed. As the response was once again dissociated, a final line was proposed before stopping active treatments due to their toxicity and overall deterioration in the patient's state of health. This exceptional case is characterized by resistance to anti-EGFR through the successive and cumulative acquisition of two new oncogene addictions. The authors underline the importance of re-biopsy at each progression, leading (if at all feasible) to yet around round of targeted therapy.

Osimertinib treatment based on plasma T790M monitoring in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): EORTC Lung Cancer Group 1613 APPLE phase II randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The APPLE trial aimed to evaluate the feasibility of longitudinal plasma epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M monitoring for the best sequencing strategy of gefitinib and osimertinib. METHODS: APPLE is a randomized, non-comparative, phase II study in patients with common EGFR-mutant, treatment-naive non-small-cell lung cancer including three arms: arm A (osimertinib upfront until RECIST progression, PD), arm B [gefitinib until emergence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) EGFR T790M mutation by cobas EGFR test v2 or RECIST PD], and arm C (gefitinib until RECIST PD), and then switch to osimertinib in both arms. The primary endpoint is the progression-free survival (PFS) rate 'on osimertinib' at 18 months (PFSR-OSI-18) after randomization in arm B (H0: PFSR-OSI-18 of ≤40%). Secondary endpoints include response rate, overall survival (OS), and brain PFS. We report the results of arms B and C. RESULTS: From November 2017 to February 2020, 52 and 51 patients were randomized into arms B and C, respectively. Most patients were females (70%) and had EGFR Del19 (65%); one-third had baseline brain metastases. In arm B, 17% of patients (8/47) switched to osimertinib based on the emergence of ctDNA T790M mutation before RECIST PD, with a median time to molecular PD of 266 days. The study met its primary endpoint of PFSR-OSI-18 of 67.2% (84% confidence interval 56.4% to 75.9%) in arm B versus 53.5% (84% confidence interval 42.3% to 63.5%) in arm C, with a median PFS of 22.0 months versus 20.2 months, respectively. The median OS was not reached in arm B versus 42.8 months in arm C. Median brain PFS in arms B and C was 24.4 and 21.4 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The serial monitoring of ctDNA T790M status in advanced EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer during treatment with first-generation EGFR inhibitors was feasible, and a molecular progression before RECIST PD led to an earlier switch to osimertinib in 17% of patients with satisfactory PFS and OS outcomes.

Real-world multicentre cohort of first-line pembrolizumab alone or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer PD-L1 ≥ 50.

INTRODUCTION: Pembrolizumab alone (IO-mono) or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (CT-IO) is first-line standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50%. This retrospective multicentre study assessed real-world use and efficacy of both strategies. METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC PD-L1 ≥ 50% from eight hospitals who had received at least one cycle of IO-mono or CT-IO were included. Overall survival (OS) and real-word progression-free-survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs, and a Cox model with inverse propensity treatment weighting was carried out. RESULTS: Among the 243 patients included, 141 (58%) received IO-mono and 102 (42%) CT-IO. Younger patients, those with symptomatic disease and brain metastases were more likely to be proposed CT-IO. With a median follow-up of 11.5 months (95% CI 10.4-13.3), median OS was not reached, but no difference was observed between groups (p = 0.51). Early deaths at 12 weeks were 11% (95% CI 4.6-16.9) and 15.2% (95% CI 9.0-20.9) in CT-IO and IO groups (p = 0.32). After adjustment for age, gender, performance status, histology, brain metastases, liver metastases and tobacco status, no statistically significant difference was found for OS between groups, neither in the multivariate adjusted model [HR 1.07 (95% CI 0.61-1.86), p = 0.8] nor in propensity adjusted analysis [HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.60-1.65), p = 0.99]. Male gender (HR 2.01, p = 0.01) and PS ≥ 2 (HR 3.28, p < 0.001) were found to be negative independent predictive factors for OS. CONCLUSION: Younger patients, those with symptomatic disease and brain metastases were more likely to be proposed CT-IO. However, sparing the chemotherapy in first-line does not appear to impact survival outcomes, even regarding early deaths.

Safety and efficacy of pralsetinib in RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer including as first-line therapy: update from the ARROW trial.

BACKGROUND: RET fusions are present in 1%-2% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pralsetinib, a highly potent, oral, central nervous system-penetrant, selective RET inhibitor, previously demonstrated clinical activity in patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC in the phase I/II ARROW study, including among treatment-naive patients. We report an updated analysis from the ARROW study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ARROW is a multi-cohort, open-label, phase I/II study. Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 (later 0-1). Patients initiated pralsetinib at the recommended phase II dose of 400 mg once daily until disease progression, intolerance, consent withdrawal, or investigator's decision. The co-primary endpoints (phase II) were overall response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review and safety. RESULTS: Between 17 March 2017 and 6 November 2020 (data cut-off), 281 patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC were enrolled. The ORR was 72% [54/75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 60% to 82%] for treatment-naive patients and 59% (80/136; 95% CI 50% to 67%) for patients with prior platinum-based chemotherapy (enrolment cut-off for efficacy analysis: 22 May 2020); median duration of response was not reached for treatment-naive patients and 22.3 months for prior platinum-based chemotherapy patients. Tumour shrinkage was observed in all treatment-naive patients and in 97% of patients with prior platinum-based chemotherapy; median progression-free survival was 13.0 and 16.5 months, respectively. In patients with measurable intracranial metastases, the intracranial response rate was 70% (7/10; 95% CI 35% to 93%); all had received prior systemic treatment. In treatment-naive patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC who initiated pralsetinib by the data cut-off (n = 116), the most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were neutropenia (18%), hypertension (10%), increased blood creatine phosphokinase (9%), and lymphopenia (9%). Overall, 7% (20/281) discontinued due to TRAEs. CONCLUSIONS: Pralsetinib treatment produced robust efficacy and was generally well tolerated in treatment-naive patients with advanced RET fusion-positive NSCLC. Results from the confirmatory phase III AcceleRET Lung study (NCT04222972) of pralsetinib versus standard of care in the first-line setting are pending.

Results of screening in early and advanced thoracic malignancies in the EORTC pan-European SPECTAlung platform.

Access to a comprehensive molecular alteration screening is patchy in Europe and quality of the molecular analysis varies. SPECTAlung was created in 2015 as a pan-European screening platform for patients with thoracic malignancies. Here we report the results of almost 4 years of prospective molecular screening of patients with thoracic malignancies, in terms of quality of the program and molecular alterations identified. Patients with thoracic malignancies at any stage of disease were recruited in SPECTAlung, from June 2015 to May 2019, in 7 different countries. Molecular tumour boards were organised monthly to discuss patients' molecular and clinical profile and possible biomarker-driven treatments, including clinical trial options. FFPE material was collected and analysed for 576 patients with diagnosis of pleural, lung, or thymic malignancies. Ultimately, 539 patients were eligible (93.6%) and 528 patients were assessable (91.7%). The turn-around time for report generation and molecular tumour board was 214 days (median). Targetable molecular alterations were observed in almost 20% of cases, but treatment adaptation was low (3% of patients). SPECTAlung showed the feasibility of a pan-European screening platform. One fifth of the patients had a targetable molecular alteration. Some operational issues were discovered and adapted to improve efficiency.

Final efficacy and safety data, and exploratory molecular profiling from the phase III ALUR study of alectinib versus chemotherapy in crizotinib-pretreated ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: At the primary data cut-off, the ALUR study demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and central nervous system (CNS) objective response rate (ORR) with alectinib versus chemotherapy in pretreated, advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. We report final efficacy and safety data, and exploratory molecular profiling. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who received prior platinum-doublet chemotherapy and crizotinib were randomized 2 : 1 to receive alectinib 600 mg twice daily (n = 79) or chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 or docetaxel 75 mg/m2, every 3 weeks; n = 40) until progressive disease, death or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary endpoints included ORR, CNS ORR and safety. Plasma samples were collected at baseline, then every 6 weeks until progressive disease; molecular factors detected by next-generation sequencing were correlated with outcomes. RESULTS: Investigator-assessed PFS was significantly longer with alectinib than chemotherapy (median 10.9 versus 1.4 months; hazard ratio 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.33; P < 0.001). ORR was 50.6% with alectinib versus 2.5% with chemotherapy (P < 0.001). In patients with measurable CNS metastases at baseline, CNS ORR was 66.7% with alectinib versus 0% with chemotherapy (P < 0.001). No new safety signals were seen. ALK rearrangement was identified in 69.5% (n = 41/59) of baseline plasma samples. Confirmed partial responses were observed with alectinib in 6/11 patients with a secondary ALK mutation and 4/6 patients with a non-EML4-ALK (where EML4 is echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4) fusion. Detection of mutant TP53 in baseline plasma resulted in numerically shorter PFS with alectinib (hazard ratio 1.88, 95% confidence interval 0.9-3.93). CONCLUSIONS: Final efficacy data from ALUR confirmed the superior PFS, ORR and CNS ORR of alectinib versus chemotherapy in pretreated, advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Alectinib prolonged PFS versus chemotherapy in patients with wild-type or mutant TP53; however, alectinib activity was considerably decreased in patients with mutant TP53.

Consolidation nivolumab and ipilimumab versus observation in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer after chemo-radiotherapy - results from the randomised phase II ETOP/IFCT 4-12 STIMULI trial.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is the standard treatment in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC), with 5-year overall survival (OS) of only 25% to 33%. PATIENTS AND METHODS: STIMULI is a 1:1 randomised phase II trial aiming to demonstrate superiority of consolidation combination immunotherapy versus observation after chemo-radiotherapy plus PCI (protocol amendment-1). Consolidation immunotherapy consisted of four cycles of nivolumab [1 mg/kg, every three weeks (Q3W)] plus ipilimumab (3 mg/kg, Q3W), followed by nivolumab monotherapy (240 mg, Q2W) for up to 12 months. Patient recruitment closed prematurely due to slow accrual and the statistical analyses plan was updated to address progression-free survival (PFS) as the only primary endpoint. RESULTS: Of the 222 patients enrolled, 153 were randomised (78: experimental; 75: observation). Among the randomised patients, median age was 62 years, 60% males, 34%/65% current/former smokers, 31%/66% performance status (PS) 0/1. Up to 25 May 2020 (median follow-up 22.4 months), 40 PFS events were observed in the experimental arm, with median PFS 10.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.0-not estimable (NE)] versus 42 events and median 14.5 months (8.2-NE) in the observation, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.02 (0.66-1.58), two-sided P = 0.93. With updated follow-up (03 June 2021; median: 35 months), median OS was not reached in the experimental arm, while it was 32.1 months (26.1-NE) in observation, with HR = 0.95 (0.59-1.52), P = 0.82. In the experimental arm, median time-to-treatment-discontinuation was only 1.7 months. CTCAE v4 grade ≥3 adverse events were experienced by 62% of patients in the experimental and 25% in the observation arm, with 4 and 1 fatal, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The STIMULI trial did not meet its primary endpoint of improving PFS with nivolumab-ipilimumab consolidation after chemo-radiotherapy in LD-SCLC. A short period on active treatment related to toxicity and treatment discontinuation likely affected the efficacy results.

IFCT-1502 CLINIVO: real-world evidence of long-term survival with nivolumab in a nationwide cohort of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy using inhibitors targeting immune checkpoint programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is currently the standard of care in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a nationwide cohort retrospective study of consecutive patients with advanced, refractory NSCLC who received nivolumab as second to later lines of treatment as part of the expanded access program. Key objectives were to assess the efficacy and safety of nivolumab and the efficacy of first post-nivolumab treatment. RESULTS: Nine hundred and two patients were enrolled: 317 (35%) with squamous cell carcinoma and 585 (65%) with non-squamous cell carcinoma. Median age was 64 years; there were 630 (70%) men, 795 (88%) smokers, 723 (81%) patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0/1, 197 (22%) patients with brain metastases, and 212 (27%) with liver metastases. Best response was partial response for 16.2% and stable disease (SD) for 30.5%. Progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) rates at 2, 3, and 5 years were 8% and 25%, 6% and 16%, and 4% and 10%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, ECOG PS ≥2 [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.13, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.78-2.55, P < 0.001], squamous histology (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.01-1.36, P = 0.04), and presence of central nervous system metastases (HR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.08-1.54, P = 0.005) were significantly associated with lower OS. Four hundred and ninety-two patients received at least one treatment after discontinuation of nivolumab, consisting of systemic therapies in 450 (91%). Radiation therapy was delivered to 118 (24%) patients. CONCLUSION: The CLINIVO cohort represents the largest real-world evidence cohort with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor in advanced, metastatic NSCLC after failure of first-line chemotherapy, with long-term follow-up and analysis of subsequent therapies. Our data confirm the efficacy of nivolumab in a cohort larger than that reported in landmark clinical trials and identify prognostic factors, which reinforces the need for accurate selection of patients for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Our data indicate that oligoprogression is frequent after nivolumab exposure and provide a unique insight into the long-term survival.

[Survival and epidemiological characteristics of women with lung cancer in Reunion]. / Survie et caractéristiques épidémiologiques des femmes atteintes de cancer pulmonaire à La Réunion.

Lung cancer is a common disease throughout the world, representing the main cause of death from cancer. Its incidence in the female population is increasing. In metropolitan France and Reunion Island, the main risk factor remains tobacco smoking. However, environmental, genetic and hormonal factors appear to play a role in bronchial oncogenesis and the survival of affected women is better than that of men. We studied retrospectively the survival and characteristics of a cohort in Reunion Island, diagnosed with lung cancer between January 2017 and December 2018. In total, 501 patients were included over the period including 166 women. The median overall survival was 23 months in women against 11 months in men (P<0.0005). Male sex has been identified as a poor prognostic factor for overall survival (HR=1.338; 95% CI=1.007-1.778) regardless of disease stage. Women smoked less often than men 85.4% of them had adenocarcinoma, with more EGFR mutations than men, and their environmental exposures were lower. The female population of Reunion Island in our study had better overall survival than the men. Smoking status, environmental exposures, histological and molecular characteristics varied by sex.

Severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: Clinical, functional and imaging outcomes at 4 months.

INTRODUCTION: Given the pathophysiology of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), persistent pulmonary abnormalities are likely. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in severe COVID-19 patients who had oxygen saturation<94% and were primarily admitted to hospital. We aimed to describe persistent gas exchange abnormalities at 4 months, defined as decreased diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLco) and/or desaturation on the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), along with associated mechanisms and risk factors. RESULTS: Of the 72 patients included, 76.1% required admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), while 68.5% required invasive mechanical ventilation (MV). A total of 39.1% developed venous thromboembolism (VTE). After 4 months, 61.4% were still symptomatic. Functionally, 39.1% had abnormal carbon monoxide test results and/or desaturation on 6MWT; high-flow oxygen, MV, and VTE during the acute phase were significantly associated. Restrictive lung disease was observed in 23.6% of cases, obstructive lung disease in 16.7%, and respiratory muscle dysfunction in 18.1%. A severe initial presentation with admission to ICU (P=0.0181), and VTE occurrence during the acute phase (P=0.0089) were associated with these abnormalities. 41% had interstitial lung disease in computed tomography (CT) of the chest. Four patients (5.5%) displayed residual defects on lung scintigraphy, only one of whom had developed VTE during the acute phase (5.5%). The main functional respiratory abnormality (31.9%) was reduced capillary volume (Vc<70%). CONCLUSION: Among patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia who were admitted to hospital, 61% were still symptomatic, 39% of patients had persistent functional abnormalities and 41% radiological abnormalities after 4 months. Embolic sequelae were rare but the main functional respiratory abnormality was reduced capillary volume. A respiratory check-up after severe COVID-19 pneumonia may be relevant to improve future management of these patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors versus second line chemotherapy for patients with lung cancer refractory to first line chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Anti Programmed Death-ligand (PD1/PD-L1) directed immune-checkpoint-inhibitors (ICI) are widely used to treat patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progress after first line chemotherapy. The best strategy after early progression under first line has not been specifically studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study including all consecutive NSCLC patients progressing within the first 3 months following introduction of first-line chemotherapy and being treated with second line ICI monotherapy or chemotherapy between March 2010 and November 2017. We analysed the clinicopathological data and outcome under second line chemotherapy vs. second line ICI: objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS. RESULTS: We identified 176 patients with refractory disease, 99 who received subsequent immunotherapy and 77 undergoing chemotherapy. The 2 populations were comparable regarding the main prognostic criteria, median age was 60, main histology was adenocarcimoma (68.2%). PFS was not significantly different between both treatments 1.9 [1.8-2.1] versus 1.6 month [1.4-2.0] (P=0.125). Compared to chemotherapy, ICI treated patients had a superior OS (P=0.03) (Median [95% CI] OS 4.6 [2.8-6.7] versus 4.2 months [3.4-5.9] and a non-significant improvement in ORR (17.2% versus 7.9%, respectively, P=0.072). Poor performance status (ECOG PS≥2) and a higher number of metastatic sites (≥3) were associated with poorer prognosis. KRAS-mutated patients did not seem to benefit more from ICI than chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: ICI appears to be the preferred second-line treatment for patients who are refractory to first line chemotherapy.

[Anti-PD1 immunotherapy followed by tuberculosis infection or reactivation]. / Tuberculose pulmonaire sous traitement par immunothérapie type anti-PD1.

INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapy is now a standard of care in oncology. There is a need to improve our knowledge about immune-related adverse events, especially infectious diseases. CASE REPORT: We describe the case of a 49-year old male who received anti-PD1 therapy, to treat metastatic melanoma with pulmonary metastasis. After 3 cycles of nivolumab, computed tomography scanning showed a decrease of the pulmonary metastasis in the upper left lobe, but revealed new pulmonary lesions such as tree-in-bud and a lung cavity in the same lobe. This was diagnosed as pulmonary tuberculosis with no antibiotic resistance identified. The patient continued the immunotherapy and was initiated onto a standard anti-tuberculosis therapy. In the absence of an initial positive IFN-γ release assay (Quantiferon) test, but as there might have been a history of primary infection during childhood, a reactivation of tuberculosis was considered to be likely. CONCLUSIONS: This is the ninth case of tuberculosis infection under immunotherapy and it underlines the need to consider infection risks in patients undergoing immunotherapy. An INF-γ release assay screening test should be considered an essential part of the pre-treatment work-up.

Proposals for managing patients with thoracic malignancies during COVID-19 pandemic.

The objective of this document is to formalize a degraded mode management for patients with thoracic cancers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The proposals are based on those of the French High Council for Public Health, on published data outside the context of COVID-19, and on a concerted analysis of the risk-benefit ratio for our patients by a panel of experts specialized on thoracic oncology under the aegis of the French-Language Society of Pulmonology (SPLF)/French-language oncology group. These proposals are evolving (10 April 2020) according to the situations encountered, which will enrich it, and are to be adapted to our institutional organisations and to the evolution of resources during the COVID-19 epidemic. Patients with symptoms and/or COVID-19+ are not discussed in this document and are managed within the framework of specific channels.

[Management of a patient with a double EGFR and MET anomaly by combined treatment]. / Prise en charge d'un patient par traitement combiné d'une double anomalie EGFR et MET.

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer displays molecular anomalies for which targeted therapies are the standard first line treatment. The EGFR mutation is present in 10% of cases of non-small cell lung cancer in Caucasians. MET amplification associated with an exon 19 EGFR mutation has been identified though it is usually regarded as a mechanism of resistance. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 74-year-old never-smoking woman who was diagnosed with stage IV bronchial adenocarcinoma showing both EGFR mutation and MET amplification. Initial treatment with gefitinib did not control the disease. Platinum-based chemotherapy with pemetrexed maintenance allowed a temporary response. Treatment with durvalumab for 27 months was associated with disease stability. Single agent crizotinib was associated with a slight response followed by progression. The concomitant introduction of crizotinib and gefitinib led to a spectacular and durable response with no safety issues. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the efficacy of concomitant treatment in a patient with two oncogenic drivers.

Somatic profile in lung cancers is associated to reproductive factors in never-smokers women: Results from the IFCT-1002 BioCAST study.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer in women is on the rise, with a higher proportion occurring in lifelong never-smokers. Lung cancer in never-smokers (LCINS) exhibits a high frequency of driver oncogene alterations. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether exposure to reproductive factors in women with LCINS may modulate the molecular pattern. METHODS: All newly diagnosed LCINSs were included in a prospective, observational study (IFCT-1002 BioCAST). Each patient responded to a questionnaire including reproductive factors. Biomarker test results were also collected. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty women were included in this analysis, and 166 alterations were characterized. EGFR mutation frequency proved greater among patients with late menarche (74% in age>14 vs. 40% and 41% for 12-14 and ≤12 years, respectively; P=0.020) and tended to decrease with increasingly late age at menopause. In multivariate analysis, EGFR mutation frequency increased by 23% per increment of 1 year of age at menarche (P=0.048), and by 9% for each year at age at first birth (P=0.035). ALK alteration frequency was greater in women with high parity (50% in≥5 vs. 12% and 7% for 1-4 and nulliparity, respectively; P=0.021). CONCLUSION: In a cohort of women LCINSs, female hormonal factors appear to impact molecular pattern.

The prognostic impact of immune-related adverse events during anti-PD1 treatment in melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer: a real-life retrospective study.

Background: Nivolumab and pembrolizumab, two PD1 inhibitors, trigger immune-related adverse events in approximately 50% of patients. Our objective was to determine whether these immune-related adverse events are associated with patient outcomes. Patients and Methods: Retrospective cohort study, realized at the Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, of all the patients treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab off clinical trials. We included patients (i) diagnosed with unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma or with recurrent stage IIIB or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (ii) on nivolumab 3mg/kg or pembrolizumab 2mg/kg every 2 or 3 weeks respectively. Results: Of the 311 patients included (of 641 eligible subjects), 120 (38.6%) had melanoma and 191 (61.4%) had non-small cell lung cancer; 241 (77.5%) were treated with nivolumab with a median follow-up of 24 months (20-29). We observed 166 immune-related adverse events in 116 (37.3%) patients, categorized as "early" (onset before 12 weeks in melanoma and before 8 weeks in lung cancer) in 63 (54.3%) patients. Early and late adverse events were significantly associated with an increase in overall survival: adjusted hazard ratio 0.58 [0.41-0.84] (p = .003) and 0.28 [0.16-0.50] (p < .001) respectively. The overall response rate was significantly increased in patients with an immune-related adverse event (53.9% vs 12.9%, p < .001) Conclusions: This study validates the association between immune-related adverse events and anti-PD1 efficacy in real-life, especially if these events are delayed. Our results, along with further studies on the place of immunosuppressive drugs in the therapeutic strategy, could improve the management of these adverse events.

Vemurafenib in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with BRAFV600 and BRAFnonV600 mutations.

BACKGROUND: BRAF mutations occurring in 1%-5% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are therapeutic targets for these cancers but the impact of the exact mutation on clinical activity is unclear. The French National Cancer Institute (INCA) launched the AcSé vemurafenib trial to assess the efficacy and safety of vemurafenib in cancers with various BRAF mutations. We herein report the results of the NSCLC cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tumour samples were screened for BRAF mutations in INCA-certified molecular genetic centres. Patients with BRAF-mutated tumours progressing after ≥1 line of treatment were proposed vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily. Between October 2014 and July 2018, 118 patients were enrolled in the NSCLC cohort. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR) assessed every 8 weeks (RECIST v1.1). A sequential Bayesian approach was planned with an inefficacy bound of 10% for ORR. If no early stopping occurred, the treatment was of interest if the estimated ORR was ≥30% with a 90% probability. Secondary outcomes were tolerance, response duration, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of the 118 patients enrolled, 101 presented with a BRAFV600 mutation and 17 with BRAFnonV600 mutations; the median follow-up was 23.9 months. In the BRAFnonV600 cohort, no objective response was observed and this cohort was stopped. In the BRAFV600 cohort, 43/96 patients had objective responses. The mean Bayesian estimated success rate was 44.9% [95% confidence intervals (CI) 35.2%-54.8%]. The ORR had a 99.9% probability of being ≥30%. Median response duration was 6.4 months, median PFS was 5.2 months (95% CI 3.8-6.8), and OS was 10 months (95% CI 6.8-15.7). The vemurafenib safety profile was consistent with previous publications. CONCLUSION: Routine biomarker screening of NSCLC should include BRAFV600 mutations. Vemurafenib monotherapy is effective for treating patients with BRAFV600-mutated NSCLC but not those with BRAFnonV600 mutations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02304809.

[Third degree atrio-ventricular blockade during a myocarditis occurring under anti-PD1 : Case report and literature review]. / Bloc atrio-ventriculaire de grade III compliquant une myocardite au décours d'un traitement par anti-PD1 : observation d'un cas et revue de la littérature.

INTRODUCTION: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) therapy is now a standard of care in numerous cancers with very promising results. Nevertheless, adverse events, and especially immune-related adverse events (irAEs) not reported during clinical trials, are emerging and can be life-threatening. OBSERVATION: We report here a teachable case of a 80 year-old man, of third-degree atrioventricular block consecutive to myocarditis associated with the administration of nivolumab (anti-PD1) monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Myocarditis occurring during ICI treatment is a rare but potentially lethal event. Daily serum troponin level seems to predict ICI-related myocarditis but interpretation could be difficult in the context of associated myositis. Echocardiography and cardiac MRI are also useful but can remain negative. Electrocardiogram is a cornerstone of myocarditis diagnosis. In case of cardiac involvement, continuous heart rhythm monitoring should be performed in addition to the administration of high-dose corticosteroids therapy and the cessation of ICI therapy. Add-on treatments should be discussed with a well-trained multidisciplinary team.

[Immune-related adverse events after immune checkpoints inhibitors in 2019: An update]. / Toxicités immunologiques induites par les inhibiteurs de checkpoint en 2019 : mise au point.

Use of checkpoint inhibitors to treat cancer was one of the most important revolution these last years and an increasing number of new types of tumors is currently under investigation with these new treatments. However, immune-related adverse events associated with these agents frequently affect various organs, mimicking auto-immune or inflammatory diseases. Some of these effects can be severe, often requiring hospitalization and specialized treatment (immunosuppression). Most known agents are ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4 antibody) nivolumab and pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1 antibodies). New molecules are now approved or in development as anti-PD-L1 antibodies, anti-LAG-3 or anti-TIM-3 antibodies, increasing the probability and new description of immune-related adverse events. With his experience in auto-immune diseases, the immunologist/internal medicine specialist has an important role in the management of these toxicities. The goal of this review is to focus on the incidence, diagnostic assessment and recommended management of the most relevant immune-related adverse events.