Evaluation of Different Techniques and Materials for Filling in 3-dimensional Printed Teeth Replicas with Perforating Internal Resorption by Means of Micro-Computed Tomography.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the filling ability of 2 obturation techniques in 3-dimensional (3D) printed teeth with perforating internal resorption (PIR). METHODS: A maxillary central incisor was instrumented and scanned by micro-computed tomographic (micro-CT) imaging. The 3D model was exported in the stereolithographic format and, with the aid of OrtogOnBlender software (Cícero Moraes, Sinop, SP, Brazil), a PIR in the middle third of the root canal was designed. Thirty-two replicas were printed in surgical resin and distributed into 4 groups (n = 8) according to the obturation technique and the material used: 2 groups used the hybrid technique, 1 with Bio-C Sealer (BCS; Angelus, Londrina, PR, Brazil)/gutta-percha (GP; VDW GmbH, Munich, Germany) + Bio-C Repair (BCR; Angelus, Londrina, PR, Brazil) and the other with BioRoot (BR; Septodont, Saint Maur des Fosses, France)/gutta-percha (GP) + Biodentine (BD; Septodont, Saint Maur des Fosses, France), and 2 groups used the incremental technique, 1 with BCR and the other with BD. Postobturation micro-CT imaging was performed to measure the percentage volume of voids and laser confocal microscopy to measure the surface roughness (µm) of the repair cements. Data were compared using analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: Regarding the filling volume in the apical third, the BCS/GP + BCR (89.70 ± 5.15), BR/GP + BD (87.70 ± 8.43), and BCR (84.20 ± 9.00) groups showed the highest percentages compared with the BD group (69.70 ± 6.88) (P < .05). In the area of internal resorption, the BCS/GP + BCR (96.00 ± 2.64) and BCR (95.30 ± 2.93) groups showed the highest percentages compared with the BR/GP + BD group (91.50 ± 1.35) (P < .05). The BD group showed intermediate values that were sometimes similar to the BCS/GP + BCR and BCR groups and similar to the BR/GP + BD group (P > .05). Regarding the quality of the filling in the perforation area, the BCR group showed better results compared with the BD group (P < .001). Regarding roughness, the BCR group (1.66 ± 0.65) showed lower surface roughness compared with the BD group (2.51 ± 0.89) (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The capacity and quality of the filling in teeth with PIR were superior with the incremental technique with BCR and the hybrid technique with BCS/GP + BCR.

Quantitative Assessment of 2-dimensional Parameters in Tomographic Images by Using Different Segmentation Methods.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of 2-dimensional morphometric parameters of root canals on different cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images using 2 segmentation methods (operator dependent and Otsu's automatic), considering micro-computed tomographic (micro-CT) images as the reference standard. METHODS: Ten mandibular molars were scanned by micro-CT imaging and 3 different CBCT devices: Accuitomo (J Morita Corporation, Kyoto, Japan), NewTom 5G (CEFLA, Imola, Italy), and NewTom VGi evo (CEFLA). The images were standardized and recorded using MeVisLab software (MeVis Medical Solutions AG, Bremen, Germany). Two calibrated examiners assessed the images of axial reconstructions quantitatively by 2-dimensional parameters (area, perimeter, roundness, and largest and smallest diameter). Fleiss kappa was performed to check interrater and intrarater reliability. The absolute error was calculated as the means and standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance was performed for comparison between the methods used by the operator and Otsu's automatic thresholding. To determine the accuracy of CBCT devices, the absolute error rate of each parameter was calculated using micro-CT measurements as the reference value with thresholding determined by the operator. RESULTS: The thresholding method performed by the operator had lower absolute error values for area, perimeter, and major and minor diameters, differing (P < .05) from Otsu's automatic method, with no differences between the CBCT machines. CONCLUSIONS: An overestimation of area, roundness, and major and minor diameters and an underestimation of the perimeter were shown for the 3 CBCT machines evaluated. Thresholding determined by the operator is more accurate than that determined by Otsu's automatic method for the assessment of 2-dimensional morphometric parameters, which could direct influence in the diagnosis and endodontic treatment plan.

Micro-computed Tomographic Evaluation of the Shaping Ability of XP-endo Shaper, iRaCe, and EdgeFile Systems in Long Oval-shaped Canals.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the shaping ability of the XP-endo Shaper (FKG Dentaire SA, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland), iRaCe (FKG Dentaire SA), and EdgeFile (EdgeEndo, Albuquerque, NM) systems using micro-computed tomographic (micro-CT) technology. METHODS: Thirty long oval-shaped canals from mandibular incisors were matched anatomically using micro-CT scanning (SkyScan1174v2; Bruker-microCT, Kontich, Belgium) and distributed into 3 groups (n = 10) according to the canal preparation protocol (ie, XP-endo Shaper, iRaCe, and EdgeFile systems). Coregistered images, before and after preparation, were evaluated for morphometric measurements of the volume, surface area, structure model index (SMI), untouched walls, area, perimeter, roundness, and diameter. Data were statistically compared between groups using the 1-way analysis of variance post hoc Tukey test and within groups with the paired sample t test (α = 5%). RESULTS: Within groups, preparation significantly increased all tested parameters (P < .05). No statistical difference was observed in the mean percentage increase of the volume (〜52%) and surface area (10.8%-14.2%) or the mean percentage of the remaining unprepared canal walls between groups (8.17%-9.83%) (P > .05). The XP-endo Shaper significantly altered the overall geometry of the root canal to a more conical shape (SMI = 2.59) when compared with the other groups (P < .05). After preparation protocols, changes in area, perimeter, roundness, and minor and major diameters of the root canals in the 5 mm of the root apex showed no difference between groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The XP-endo Shaper, iRaCe, and EdgeFile systems showed a similar shaping ability. Despite the XP-endo Shaper had significantly altered the overall geometry of the root canal to a more conical shape, neither technique was capable of completely preparing the long oval-shaped canals of mandibular incisors.