Clinical audit research and evaluation of motor neuron disease (CARE-MND): a national electronic platform for prospective, longitudinal monitoring of MND in Scotland.

Objectives: Launched in 1989, the Scottish Motor Neuron Disease Register (SMNDR) has provided a resource for prospective clinical data collection. However, in 2015 we aimed to evolve a system to allow: i) A patient-centered approach to care based on recognized standards, ii) Harmonized data sharing between Scottish health professionals in "real-time", iii) Regular audit of care to facilitate timely improvements in service delivery, and iv) Patient participation in a diverse range of observational and interventional research studies including clinical trials. Methods: We developed a standardized national electronic data platform-Clinical Audit Research and Evaluation of MND (CARE-MND) which integrates clinical audit and research data fields. Data completion pre- and post-CARE-MND were compared, guided by recently published National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommendations. Statistical difference in data capture between time periods was assessed using Z-test of proportions. Results: Data field completion for the historical 2011-2014 period ranged from 4 to 95%; median 50%. CARE-MND capture ranged from 32 to 98%; median 87%. 15/17 fields were significantly more complete post-CARE-MND (p < 0.001). All MND nurse/allied health specialists in Scotland use the CARE-MND platform. Management of MND in Scotland is now coordinated through a standardized template. Conclusions: Through CARE-MND, national audits of MND care and interventions have been possible, leading to protocols for harmonized service provision. Stratification of the MND population is facilitating participation in observational and interventional studies. CARE-MND can act as a template for other neurological disorders.

Longitudinal evaluation of quality of life in 288 patients with neurofibromatosis 2.

Advances in molecular biology have resulted in novel therapy for neurofibromatosis 2-related (NF2) tumours, highlighting the need for robust outcome measures. The disease-focused NF2 impact on quality of life (NFTI-QOL) patient questionnaire was assessed as an outcome measure for treatment in a multi-centre study. NFTI-QOL was related to clinician-rated severity (ClinSev) and genetic severity (GenSev) over repeated visits. Data were evaluated for 288 NF2 patients (n = 464 visits) attending the English national NF2 clinics from 2010 to 2012. The male-to-female ratio was equal and the mean age was 42.2 (SD 17.8) years. The analysis included NFTI-QOL eight-item score, ClinSev graded as mild, moderate, or severe, and GenSev as a rank order of the number of NF2 mutations (graded as mild, moderate, severe). The mean (SD) 8.7 (5.4) score for NFTI-QOL for either a first visit or all visits 9.2 (5.4) was similar to the published norm of 9.4 (5.5), with no significant relationships with age or gender. NFTI-QOL internal reliability was good, with a Cronbach's alpha score of 0.85 and test re-test reliability r = 0.84. NFTI related to ClinSev (r = 0.41, p < 0.001; r = 0.46 for all visits), but weakly to GenSev (r = 0.16, p < 0.05; r = 0.15 for all visits). ClinSev related to GenSev (r = 0.41, p < 0.001; r = 0.42 for all visits). NFTI-QOL showed a good reliability and ability to detect significant longitudinal changes in the QOL of individuals. The moderate relationships of NFTI-QOL with clinician- and genetic-rated severity suggest that NFTI-QOL taps into NF2 patient experiences that are not encompassed by ClinSev rating or genotype.