Surgical outcomes of pulmonary valve infective endocarditis: A US population-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary valve infective endocarditis (PVIE) represents a rare subset of right-sided IE. This study aimed to evaluate the population-level surgical outcomes of PVIE in the United States. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study using the 2002-2017 National Inpatient Sample database. We included hospitalizations with both IE and PV interventions. We excluded Tetralogy of Fallot, congenital PV malformation, and those who underwent the Ross procedure. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included major complications and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: We identified 677 PVIE hospitalizations that underwent surgical treatment, accounting for 0.06% of all IE hospitalizations. The mean age was 35.2 ± 1.7 years; 60.0% were White, 30.3% were women, and 11.4% were intravenous drug users. Most were treated in large-sized (70.1%) urban teaching (88.8%) hospitals. Close to 30% of patients received at least one concomitant valve procedure. The in-hospital mortality was 5.5% for the entire cohort, and the median length of stay was 16 days. Major complications included complete heart block (8.7%), acute kidney injury (8.1%), and stroke (1.3%). The differences in mortality and complications rate comparing PV repair and replacement were not statistically significant. PV repair was associated with a longer length of hospital stay compared to PV replacement (median: 25 vs. 16 days, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This study defines the population-level in-hospital outcomes after surgical intervention of PVIE. Surgically treated PVIE patients are associated with relatively low mortality and morbidities. The outcomes between PV replacement and repair are similar.

Primary Pericardial Mesothelioma: A Population-Based Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Primary pericardial mesothelioma is a rare malignancy of the mesothelial lining of the pericardium. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of these patients using a United States population-based cancer database. We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (1973-2015). Primary pericardial mesothelioma patients with complete follow-up data were included, and primary pleural mesothelioma patients were identified as controls. Propensity-score matching was used to balance individual characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests were performed to compare overall survival. Forty-one primary pericardial mesothelioma and 15,970 primary pleural mesothelioma patients were identified. Before matching, when compared to the pleural mesothelioma counterparts, primary pericardial mesothelioma patients were younger (median 57 vs 73 years, P < 0.001), more likely to be female (46.3% vs 20.2%, P < 0.001), more likely to be nonwhite (24.4% vs 8.4%, P = 0.001), and less likely to have been diagnosed in the most recent study decade (2006-2015, 34.1% vs 43.5%, P = 0.002). The overall 1- and 2-year survival rates were 22.0% and 12.2%, with a median survival of 2 months (IQR: 1-6). After 1:2 nearest neighbor propensity-score matching, 38 pericardial mesothelioma and 76 matched pleural mesothelioma cases were identified. The 2 matched groups had comparable baseline characteristics, including age, sex, race, year of diagnosis, histological type, and cancer history. Compared to their pleural mesothelioma counterparts, primary pericardial mesothelioma patients were less likely to receive chemotherapy (23.7% vs 50.0%, P = 0.01) and had worse overall survival (median survival: 2 vs 10 months, log-rank P = 0.006). Primary pericardial mesothelioma has worse survival outcomes than pleural mesothelioma, with a median survival of only 2 months. These patients should seek care from experienced multidisciplinary teams at tertiary care centers that handle high volumes of mesothelioma patients.

Primary cardiac lymphoma.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand the population-level treatment modalities and to evaluate the survival benefits of surgical resection in primary cardiac lymphoma. METHODS: We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database, which covers 35% of the US population. Patients with a histologic diagnosis of primary cardiac lymphoma from 1973 to 2015 were included. Multivariable accelerated failure time regression was performed to evaluate the associations between clinical factors and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 184 patients were identified. The median age was 68 years, 80% were White, and 46% were women. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (80%) was the most common histology, and the majority (65%) was low-stage lymphoma (Ann Arbor stage I or II). Median survival was 2.2 years. Seventy-three percent of patients received chemotherapy. Only 10% of patients received local resection or debulking. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that local resection or debulking was not independently associated with overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-1.48; P = .32). Instead, chemotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.69; P < .001) was independently associated with improved survival, whereas increasing age (adjusted hazard ratio of 5-year increment, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.22; P <.001) and advanced stage (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-3.56; P < .001) were independently associated with worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection was not independently associated with survival in patients with primary cardiac lymphoma. Chemotherapy was the predominant treatment option and associated with improved survival, whereas increasing age and advanced stage were independently associated with worse outcomes.

Volume of Pancreas-Adjacent Operations Favorably Influences Pancreaticoduodenectomy Outcomes at Lower Volume Pancreas Centers.

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses how the volume of pancreatic-adjacent operations (PAO) impacts the outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: It is well-established that regionalization benefits outcomes after PD. However, due to a multitude of factors, including geographic, financial, and personal, not all patients receive their care at high-volume pancreas surgery centers. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for pancreatic cancer patients who underwent PD. Hospital volume was calculated for PD and PAO (defined as gastric, hepatic, complex biliary, or pancreatic operations other than PD) and dichotomized as low- and high-volume centers based on the median. Three study cohorts were created: low-volume hospitals (LVH) for both PD and PAO, mixed-volume hospital (MVH) with low-volume PD but high-volume PAO, and high-volume PD hospital (HVH). RESULTS: In total, 24,572 patients were identified, with 41.5%, 7.2%, and 51.3% patients treated at LVH, MVH, and HVH, respectively. Thirty-day mortality for PD was 5.6% in LVH, 3.2% in MVH, and 2.5% in HVH. On multivariable analyses, LVH was predictive for higher 30-day mortality compared to HVH [odds ratio (OR) 2.068; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.770-2.418; P< 0.0001]. However, patients at MVH demonstrated similar 30-day mortality to patients treated at HVH (OR 1.258; 95% CI 0.942-1.680; P = 0.1203). CONCLUSIONS: PD outcomes at low-volume centers that have experience with complex cancer operations near the pancreas are similar to PD outcomes at hospitals with high PD volume. MVH provides a model for PD outcomes to improve quality and access for patients who cannot, or choose not to, receive their care at high-volume centers.

The role of racial segregation in treatment and outcomes among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: There is a long history of segregation in the U.S.A with enduring impacts on cancer outcomes today. We evaluated the impact of segregation on racial disparities in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) treatment and outcomes. METHODS: We obtained data on black and white patients with HCC from the SEER program (2005-2015) within the 100 most populous participating counties. Our exposure was the index of dissimilarity (IoD), a validated measure of segregation. Outcomes were overall survival, advanced stage at diagnosis (Stage III/IV) and surgery for localized disease (Stage I/II). Cancer-specific survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: Black patients had a 1.18 times increased risk (95%CI 1.14,1.22) of presenting at advanced stage as compared to white patients and these disparities disappeared at low levels of segregation. In the highest quartile of IoD, black patients had a significantly lower survival than white (17 months vs 27 months, p < 0.001), and this difference disappeared at the lowest quartile of IoD. CONCLUSIONS: Our data illustrate that structural racism in the form racial segregation has a significant impact on racial disparities in the treatment of HCC. Urban and health policy changes can potentially reduce disparities in HCC outcomes.

Undertreatment of Gallbladder Cancer: A Nationwide Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder cancer has a high mortality rate and an increasing incidence. The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend resection for all T1b and higher-stage cancers. This study aimed to evaluate re-resection rates and the associated survival impact for patients with gallbladder cancer. METHODS: Patients with gallbladder adenocarcinoma who underwent resection were identified from the National Cancer Database (2004-2015). Re-resection was defined as definitive surgery within 180 days after the first operation. Propensity scores were created for the odds of a patient having a re-resection. Patients were matched 1:2. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods. RESULTS: The study identified 6175 patients, and 466 of these patients (7.6%) underwent re-resection. Re-resection was associated with younger median age (65 vs 72 years; p < 0.0001), private insurance (41.6% vs 27.1%; p < 0.0001), academic centers (50.4% vs 29.7%; p < 0.0001), and treatment location in the Northeast (22.8% vs 20.4%; p = 0.0011). Compared with no re-resection, re-resection was associated with pT stage (pT2: 47.6% vs 42.8%; p = 0.0139) and pN stage (pN1-2: 28.1% vs 20.7%; p < 0.0001), negative margins on final pathology (90.1% vs 72.6%; p < 0.0001), and receipt of chemotherapy (53.7% vs 35.8%; p < 0.0001). The patients who underwent re-resection demonstrated significantly longer overall survival (OS) than the patients who did not undergo re-resection (median OS, 44.0 vs 23.0 months; p < 0.0001). After propensity score-matching, re-resection remained associated with superior survival (median OS, 44.0 vs 31.0 months; p = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: Re-resection for gallbladder cancer is associated with improved survival but remains underused, particularly for early-stage disease.

The Impact of Residential Segregation on Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment, and Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in pancreatic cancer outcomes between black and white patients are well documented. This study aimed to use a more novel index to examine the impact of racial segregation on the diagnosis, management, and outcomes of pancreatic cancer in black patients compared with white patients. METHODS: Black and white adults with pancreatic cancer in urban counties were identified using data from the 2018 submission of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program and the 2010 Census. The racial index of dissimilarity (IoD), a validated proxy of racial segregation, was used to assess the evenness with which whites and blacks are distributed across census tracts in each county. Multivariate Poisson regression was performed, and stepwise models were constructed for each of the outcomes. Overall survival was studied using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The study enrolled 60,172 adults with a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer between 2005 and 2015. Overall, the black patients (13.8% of the cohort) lived in more segregated areas (IoD, 0.67 vs 0.61; p < 0.05). They were less likely to undergo surgery for localized disease (relative risk [RR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.83) and more frequently had a diagnosis of advanced-stage disease (RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.19) with increasing segregation. They also had shorter survival times (9.8 vs 11.4 months; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in advanced-stage disease at diagnosis, surgery for localized disease, and overall survival are directly related to the degree of residential segregation, a proxy for structural racism. In searching for solutions to this problem, it is important to account for the historical marginalization of black Americans.

Cancer stage at presentation for incarcerated patients at a single urban tertiary care center.

Patients who are incarcerated are a vulnerable patient population and may suffer from less access to routine cancer screenings compared to their non-incarcerated counterparts. Therefore, a thorough evaluation of potential differences in cancer diagnosis staging is needed. We sought to examine whether there are differences in cancer stage at initial diagnosis between non-incarcerated and incarcerated patients by pursuing a retrospective chart review from 2010-2017 for all patients who were newly diagnosed with cancer at an urban safety net hospital. Incarceration status was determined by insurance status. Our primary outcome was incarceration status at time of initial cancer diagnosis. Overall, patients who were incarcerated presented at a later cancer stage for all cancer types compared to the non-incarcerated (+.14 T stage, p = .033; +.23 N stage, p < .001). Incarcerated patients were diagnosed at later stages for colorectal (+0.93 T stage, p < .001; +.48 N stage, p < .001), oropharyngeal (+0.37 N stage, p = .003), lung (+0.60 N stage, p = .018), skin (+0.59 N stage, p = 0.014), and screenable cancers (colorectal, prostate, lung) as a whole (+0.23 T stage, p = 0.002; +0.17 N stage, p = 0.008). Incarcerated patients may benefit from more structured screening protocols in order to improve the stage at presentation for certain malignancies.

Vitamin D deficiency and its relationship to cancer stage in patients who underwent thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid carcinoma.

PURPOSE: As imaging technology improves and more thyroid nodules and malignancies are identified, it is important to recognize factors associated with malignancy and poor prognosis. Vitamin D has proven useful as a prognostic tool for other cancers and may be similarly useful in thyroid cancer. This study explores the relationship of Vitamin D to papillary thyroid carcinoma stage while accounting for socioeconomic covariates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of all patients who underwent thyroidectomy at one institution between 2000 and 2015 were reviewed. Subjects with non-papillary thyroid cancer pathology, prior malignancy, and without Vitamin D levels were excluded. The remaining 334 patient records were examined for cancer stage, Vitamin D levels, Vitamin D deficiency listed in history, and demographic and comorbid factors. RESULTS: Vitamin D laboratory values showed no significant relationship to cancer stage (p = 0.871), but patients with Vitamin D deficiency documented in the medical record were more likely to have advanced disease (28.6% versus 14.7%; p = 0.028). The patients with documented Vitamin D deficiency also had lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D nadirs (21.5 ng/mL versus 26.5 ng/mL, p = 0.008) and were more likely to be on Vitamin D supplementation (92.6% versus 41.8%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that Vitamin D deficiency may have value as a negative prognostic indicator in papillary thyroid cancer and that pre-operative laboratory evaluation may be less useful. This is important because Vitamin D deficiency is modifiable. While different racial subgroups had different rates of Vitamin D deficiency, neither race nor socioeconomic status showed correlation with cancer stage.

Clinical Outcomes After Unilateral Adrenalectomy for Primary Aldosteronism.

Importance: In addition to biochemical cure, clinical benefits after surgery for primary aldosteronism depend on the magnitude of decrease in blood pressure (BP) and use of antihypertensive medications with a subsequent decreased risk of cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular morbidity and drug-induced adverse effects. Objective: To evaluate the change in BP and use of antihypertensive medications within an international cohort of patients who recently underwent surgery for primary aldosteronism. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cohort study was conducted across 16 referral medical centers in Europe, the United States, Canada, and Australia. Patients who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism between January 2010 and December 2016 were included. Data analysis was performed from August 2017 to June 2018. Unilateral disease was confirmed using computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and/or adrenal venous sampling. Patients with missing or incomplete preoperative or follow-up data regarding BP or corresponding number of antihypertensive medications were excluded. Main Outcomes and Measures: Clinical success was defined based on postoperative BP and number of antihypertensive medications. Cure was defined as normotension without antihypertensive medications, and clear improvement as normotension with lower or equal use of antihypertensive medications. In patients with preoperative normotensivity, improvement was defined as postoperative normotension with lower antihypertensive use. All other patients were stratified as no clear success because the benefits of surgery were less obvious, mainly owing to postoperative, persistent hypertension. Clinical outcomes were assessed at follow-up closest to 6 months after surgery. Results: On the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 435 patients (84.6%) from a cohort of 514 patients who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy were eligible. Of these patients, 186 (42.3%) were women; mean (SD) age at the time of surgery was 50.7 (11.4) years. Cure was achieved in 118 patients (27.1%), clear improvement in 135 (31.0%), and no clear success in 182 (41.8%). In the subgroup classified as no clear success, 166 patients (91.2%) had postoperative hypertension. However, within this subgroup, the mean (SD) systolic and diastolic BP decreased significantly by 9 (22) mm Hg (P < .001) and 3 (15) mm Hg (P = .04), respectively. Also, the number of antihypertensive medications used decreased from 3 (range, 0-7) to 2 (range, 0-6) (P < .001). Moreover, in 75 of 182 patients (41.2%) within this subgroup, the decrease in systolic BP was 10 mm Hg or greater. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, for most patients, adrenalectomy was associated with a postoperative normotensive state and reduction of antihypertensive medications. Furthermore, a significant proportion of patients with postoperative, persistent hypertension may benefit from adrenalectomy given the observed clinically relevant and significant reduction of BP and antihypertensive medications.

Scholarly impact of student authorship on surgical research.

BACKGROUND: Student authorship (SA) in research utilizes the H-index (Hi), to measure scholarly impact. We analyzed SA rates over time in the Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS). METHODS: We compared Hi of corresponding authors (CA) for articles over time (2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014), comparing those with (SA) and without (nSA) student authors. RESULTS: SA doubled over time (70-146; P = 0.02) as did first or second SA rates (21-44; P = 0.22). Mean and Median CA Hi were similar independent of SA involvement. The change in Hi for CAs in 2006, 2008 and 2010 to current Hi (2016) was similar for SA and nSA groups (2006: 22.4 vs. 20.7; 2008: 20.2 vs. 20.6; 2010: 19.2 vs. 18.3; all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The number of SA in JACS publications is increasing, without detriment to CA scholarly advancement. Involving students in surgical research should be encouraged.

Correlating pre-operative vitamin D status with post-thyroidectomy hypocalcemia.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between pre-operative vitamin D status and post-thyroidectomy hypocalcemia. METHODS: Retrospective study examining 264 total and completion thyroidectomies conducted between 2007 and 2011. Subjects included had a recorded 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) level within 21 days prior to or 1 day following surgery, did not have a primary parathyroid gland disorder, and were not taking 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (calcitriol) prior to surgery. Some subjects were repleted with vitamin D pre-operatively if a low 25(OH)D level (typically below 20 ng/mL) was identified. Pre-operative 25(OH)D, concurrent neck dissection, integrity of parathyroid glands, final pathology, postoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium nadir and repletion, and length of stay were examined. RESULTS: The mean pre-operative 25(OH)D for all subjects was 25 ng/mL, and the overall rate of post-operative hypocalcemia was 37.5%. Lower pre-operative 25(OH)D did not predict postoperative hypocalcemia (P = .96); however, it did predict the need for postoperative 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 administration (P = .01). Lower postoperative PTH levels (P = .001) were associated with postoperative hypocalcemia. CONCLUSION: Pre-operative 25(OH)D did not predict a postoperative decrease in serum calcium, although it did predict the need for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 therapy in hypocalcemic subjects. We recommend that 25(OH)D be assessed and, if indicated, repleted pre-operatively in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy.

Minimally invasive management of lesser sac bronchogenic cyst.

Bronchogenic cysts rarely develop in the abdomen they typically reside in the mediastinum. We present a unique case of a bronchogenic cyst within the lesser sac. Endoscopic ultrasound proved to be a critical diagnostic tool, and the patient underwent a laparoscopic resection of the lesion.

Treatment options for Graves disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: First-line treatment for Graves disease is frequently 18 months of antithyroid medication (ATM). Controversy exists concerning the next best line of treatment for patients who have failed to achieve euthyroidism; options include lifelong ATM, radioactive iodine (RAI), or total thyroidectomy (TT). We aim to determine the most cost-effective option. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing these different strategies. Treatment efficacy and complication data were derived from a literature review. Costs were examined from a health-care system perspective using actual Medicare reimbursement rates to an urban university hospital. Outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). Costs and effectiveness were converted to present values; all key variables were subjected to sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: TT was the most cost-effective strategy, resulting in a gain of 1.32 QALYs compared with RAI (at an additional cost of 9,594 US dollars) and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 7,240 US dollars/QALY. RAI was the least costly option at 23,600 US dollars but also provided the least QALY (25.08 QALY). Once the cost of TT exceeds 19,300 US dollars, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of lifelong ATM and TT reverse and lifelong ATM becomes the more cost-effective strategy at 15,000US dollars/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first formal cost-effectiveness study in the US of the optimal treatment for patients with Graves disease who fail to achieve euthyroidism after 18 months of ATM. Our findings demonstrate that TT is more cost effective than RAI or lifelong ATM in these patients; this continues until the cost of TT becomes > 19,300 US dollars.

Multiple unilateral adrenal adenomas in a patient with primary hyperaldosteronism.

OBJECTIVE: To report a rare case of multiple unilateral adrenal adenomas in which immunohistochemistry results confirmed primary hyperaldosteronism in each of 3 adenomas. METHODS: We present the clinical, laboratory, radiographic, and pathologic findings of a case of multiple unilateral adrenal adenomas. RESULTS: Although multiple nodules in both adrenal glands are fairly common in patients with bilateral hyperplasia, multiple unilateral nodules are extremely rare. A 45-year-old woman with a long-standing history of severe hypertension was found to have biochemical parameters consistent with primary hyperaldosteronism, multiple unilateral adrenal adenomas, and immunohistochemical test results confirming primary hyperaldosteronism arising from each of 3 adrenal nodules (measuring 2.2 x 2.2 cm, 1.7 x 0.7 cm, and 0.5 x 0.5 cm). CONCLUSION: This case illustrates the rare presentation of primary hyperaldosteronism as multiple unilateral adrenal adenomas in which immunohistochemistry results can confirm the suspected preoperative diagnosis as suggested by biochemical and radiographic evidence.