RESUMO
Background: Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in multiple sclerosis (MS) can be a significant source of disability. Despite this, its prevalence as a patient-reported outcome in this condition has not been well established, and its causes are not well understood. Methods: We prospectively assessed EDS as part of an observational study for patients referred for diagnostic neuro-ophthalmological testing. EDS was evaluated by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and visual data were also collected as part of a research protocol. Analysis with patient data was performed following the exclusion of patients with known primary sleep disorders. Results: A total of 69 patients with MS were included in the analysis. The mean ESS was 6.5 with a SD of 4.3. ESS ≥ 10 was present in 23% of the cohort even in the presence of minimal mean neurological disability (Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) = 1.5). The ESS score was not associated with age, sex, disease-related disability, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), or optic neuritis (ON), but displayed an association with visual dysfunction. Conclusions: There is an increased prevalence of EDS in MS. The increased values of the ESS are not explained by other sleep disorders, suggesting separate mechanisms. Further study of the underlying mechanisms is warranted.
RESUMO
Demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) often have neuro-ophthalmological manifestations, and retinal examination can be helpful in making the diagnosis. The latest iteration of optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based criteria for optic neuritis in multiple sclerosis has been developed in the research realm, but its application to clinical practice, and to the more uncommon demyelinating diseases requires further study. The ability to use OCT data to distinguish between various CNS demyelinating disorders could provide additional paraclinical tools to accurately diagnose patients. Furthermore, neuro-ophthalmological testing can define the extent of inflammatory damage in the CNS, independent of patient-reported history. New referrals for OCT at a tertiary multiple sclerosis and neuro-immunology referral centre (n = 167) were analysed retrospectively for the self-reporting of optic neuritis, serological test results, and diagnosis. Only approximately 30% of patients with a clinical history of unilateral optic neuritis solely had a unilateral optic neuropathy, nearly 40% of those subjects actually having evidence of bilateral optic neuropathies. Roughly 30% of patients reporting a history of bilateral optic neuritis did not have any evidence of structural disease, with 20% of these patients having a separate, intervenable diagnosis noted on macular scans. OCT is a useful adjunct diagnostic tool in the evaluation of demyelinating disease and has the ability to aid in a more accurate diagnosis for patients. Application of the international interocular difference thresholds to a clinical patient population generally reproduces the original results, emphasising their appropriateness. The analysis distinguishing the demyelinating diseases needs to be replicated in a blinded, multi-centre setting.
RESUMO
Parkinson's disease (PD) results in progressively worsening gait and balance dysfunction that can be measured using computerized devices. We utilized the longitudinal database of the Parkinson's Disease Biomarker Program to determine if baseline gait and balance measures predict future rates of symptom progression. We included 230, 222, 164, and 177 PD subjects with 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of follow-up, respectively, and we defined progression as worsening of the following clinical parameters: MDS-UPDRS total score, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, PDQ-39 mobility subscale, levodopa equivalent daily dose, Schwab and England score, and global composite outcome. We developed ridge regression models to independently estimate how each gait or balance measure, or combination of measures, predicted progression. The accuracy of each ridge regression model was calculated by cross-validation in which 90% of the data were used to estimate the ridge regression model which was then tested on the 10% of data left out. While the models modestly predicted change in outcomes at the 6-month follow-up visit (accuracy in the range of 66-71%) there was no change in the outcome variables during this short follow-up (median change in MDS-UPDRS total score = 0 and change in LEDD = 0). At follow-up periods of 12, 18, and 24 months, the models failed to predict change (accuracy in the held-out sets ranged from 42 to 60%). We conclude that this set of computerized gait and balance measures performed at baseline is unlikely to help predict future disease progression in PD. Research scientists must continue to search for progression predictors to enhance the performance of disease modifying clinical trials.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Visual acuity has been a significant outcome measure in clinical trials for patients suffering from neuro-ophthalmological diseases and multiple sclerosis; however, there are limited data on the comparison of various testing strategies in pediatric patients with these disorders. Clinical trials using vision as an outcome could include a variety of tools to assess the acuity, including 2-m and 4-m standardized retroilluminated charts. METHODS: We investigated the difference in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scores obtained using 2-m and 4-m charts, as well as the impact of optic neuritis, use of vision correction, age, and gender on visual acuity data from 71 patients with pediatric neuroimmunological conditions in a cross-sectional study. RESULTS: We determine that the ETDRS letter scores obtained using 4-m charts are on average 3.43 points less (P = 0.0034) when testing monocular ETDRS letter scores and on average 4.14 points less (P = 0.0008) when testing binocular ETDRS letter scores, relative to that obtained using the 2-m charts. However, we find that when performing monocular testing, optic neuritis in the eye being tested did not result in a statistically significant difference between 2-m and 4-m ETDRS letter scores. CONCLUSIONS: Although visual acuity charts are formatted by the distance, there are significant differences in the number of letters correctly identified between 2-m and 4-m charts. Although the differences may not impact the clinical acuity, research protocols should consider these differences before collapsing data across disparate studies.
