The Effects of Safe Zone Badges in Physicians' Online Biographies: Evidence from an Experimental Study.

Earning digital badges to showcase a person's expertise or knowledge are becoming increasingly popular. A healthcare provider's displaying of a Safe Zone badge within their online profile may offer prospective patients a cue as to the kind of care they might receive if they selected that particular provider. Prior research indicates LGBTQ+ individuals are looking for these types of cues within providers' biographies to make their selections. A between subjects, 2 (Safe Zone badge present/absent) x 2 (male/female doctor) online experiment was conducted (n = 658). Results revealed a main effect for the presence of the Safe Zone badge. Participants had greater anticipated satisfaction, liking, were more likely to view the provider as approachable, and were more willing to schedule an appointment with the provider displaying a Safe Zone badge.

College student gratitude: A silver lining while evaluating a yearlong bathroom stall messaging campaign.

OBJECTIVE: Mental health concerns of college students are on the rise, prompting a need for communication campaigns to address ways to assist students. The current campaign utilized weekly bathroom stall messaging to address five key themes developed by a university's mental wellness task force.Participants: Undergraduate students at a large Midwestern university.Methods: A survey at pre and post-campaign implementation.Results: No significant shifts in attitudes, and only one significant behavioral increase (i.e., reaching out to academic advisers), were revealed. One silver lining was that college students were found to express gratitude to someone new a median of 5 times per month. Gratitude tended to be displayed most recently to those in their social circles, and primarily for receiving instrumental support.Conclusions: Narrowing the focus of future mental wellness campaigns is recommended. Additional recommendations for developing future mental wellness campaigns are also addressed.

The effectiveness of mental illness stigma-reduction interventions: A systematic meta-review of meta-analyses.

The high prevalence of stigma toward mental illnesses contributes to the worsened health and quality of life for people with mental illnesses. Different stigmas (e.g., public, self) lead to social discrimination, social isolation, and reduce the likelihood that people with mental illnesses receive adequate treatment for their conditions. In response to this, numerous social interventions have been developed to help combat the spread of stigma. Subsequently, researchers have conducted meta-analyses to determine the effectiveness of different interventions for reducing stigma toward mental illness. To date, no efforts have been made to synthesize these meta-analyses to identify gaps in the stigma-reduction literature, assess the quality of extant literature, and to identify trends in programming efforts. The present study conducted a systematic meta-review of 19 meta-analyses, drawing from the Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework, to address these gaps. Results showed that the included meta-analyses were of relatively poor quality and that interventions primarily addressed either public or self-stigma, while overlooking other stigmas. Further, meta-analyses primarily assessed the effects of contact-promotion or educational intervention strategies. There was little evidence to suggest that interventions were effective longitudinally. Implications for future research and intervention development are discussed.

When Doctors Swear, Do Patients Care? Two Experiments Examining Physicians Cursing in the Presence of Patients.

Swearing in everyday conversation has become more normalized in recent years; but less certain, however, is how accepting Americans are when a doctor swears in their presence. Two online experiments (Study 1: n = 497; Study 2: n = 1,224) were conducted with US participants to investigate the impact of a doctor swearing in the course of examining a patient's infected wound (i.e., "You've got a lot of nasty [shit/stuff] in there that we're going to want to flush out"), or swearing when dropping papers in a patient's presence while varying the intensity of a swear (i.e., "[Shit!/Damn!/Whoops!]"), with or without an apology (i.e., "I'm sorry"). Overall findings reveal a main effect for swearing, with a swearing doctor generally seen as less likable, and in Study 1, less trustworthy, approachable, and less of an expert. However, the majority of participants exposed to a swearing doctor still said they would visit that physician again. Open-ended responses from these participants revealed that they perceived a swearing doctor as more human. Results from Study 2 also found that if a doctor swore, the negative impact was lessened if the doctor apologized immediately after cursing. While results from these studies indicate it is wise for doctors to refrain from swearing, most participants were still willing to make a future appointment with a cursing doctor.

The state of health communication research: A content analysis of articles published in Journal of Health Communication and Health Communication (2010-2019).

This study presents data from a content analysis of original research articles published in Journal of Health Communication (JOHC) andHealth Communication (HC) from 2010 to 2019. The authors coded 2,050 articles using categories that identified health topics, theory, population characteristics, and methods used in each study. Distinctions between the published research in JOHCand HCare highlighted. Across both journals, articles are primarily conducted within the United States, most frequently use college student samples, often lack explicit theoretical frameworks, heavily rely on online survey methods, and most commonly use quantitative methodologies. The most frequently utilized theory across both journals wasSocial Cognitive Theory and the most studied health topic were behaviors related to smoking, tobacco, and e-cigarette use. The journals were significantly different in several areas, with HC containing more articles explicitly guided by theory and publishing more qualitative research, while JOHC had more racial diversity in its study samples. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for future research. Increased diversity in methodology and samples, as well as increased use of theory and continued use of interdisciplinary collaborations among researchers will allow for expanding and enhancing health communication knowledge going forward.

Online information seeking behaviors of breast cancer patients before and after diagnosis: From website discovery to improving website information.

Despite the internet being a common place breast cancer patients seek information, navigating this Wild West of content can be challenging. The present study analyzed open-ended data from breast cancer survivors (n = 77) regarding their online information seeking behaviors when looking for breast cancer information to help inform the creation of improved online educational materials. Participants were asked what prompted them to seek information, which websites and search terms they used both before and after diagnosis, what information was useful, what misinformation was found, and what they would like to see improved. Results indicated symptoms, tests, or diagnoses prompt women to seek breast cancer information online, and that many different search terms and websites are used. More search terms and websites were utilized after diagnosis compared to before diagnosis, but the most common search terms and websites did not change much from before to after diagnosis. Cancer specific and general medical websites were the most popular. The most useful information related to treatment, obtaining information from other breast cancer survivors, statistics, and positively-valenced information. Though misinformation was not reported by many participants, some mentioned outdated survival rates, inaccurate information about alternative treatments, and other breast cancer patients' experiences that did not align with their own. Participants desired improvements in treatment information, more factual information, a guide, and information that is easy to understand. Creation of a guide and use of search engine optimization to help breast cancer patients navigate this online information could be beneficial.

Exploring the Effects of Source Credibility and Message Framing on STI Screening Intentions: An Application of Prospect and Protection Motivation Theory.

Roughly half of all new sexually transmitted infections (STI) occur in adolescent and college-aged populations. College students tend to underestimate their personal risks of contracting STIs. Consequently, many college students do not engage in protective behaviors that would reduce STI transmission rates. This study examined the effect of source credibility (high vs. low) and message framing (positive vs. negative) on college students' behavioral intentions to get screened for STIs via a 2 × 2 experiment (n = 207). Further, drawing on both Prospect Theory and Protection Motivation Theory, the study tested whether coping and threat appraisals mediated the effects of source credibility and message framing on behavioral intentions. Results reveal that both highly credible sources and negatively framed messages influenced behavioral intentions to screen for STIs. However, the interaction term of source credibility by message frame was not significant. Mediation models suggested that efficacy perceptions partially explained the effect of source credibility on behavioral intentions, but not for the effect of message framing. Perceptions of severity and susceptibility did not mediate the effect of either source credibility or message framing. Practical and theoretical implications of the results are discussed.

Preventive/office visit patient knowledge and their insurance information gathering perceptions.

OBJECTIVES: To better understand patients' levels of health literacy regarding what constitutes no-cost preventive visits versus possibly costly office visits and their ease of obtaining information about coverage and costs from providers and health insurance companies. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional online survey of 866 participants aged 18 to 82 years from 49 states. METHODS: Participants' knowledge of preventive versus office visits was assessed through a series of true/false questions. Participants rated their ease of obtaining information from health insurance providers and doctors about costs and coverage. They also described phone calls with their health insurance companies via an open-ended question. Logistic regression was used to predict how the ease of obtaining information is related to being erroneously charged for a medical visit. RESULTS: About two-thirds of participants were unable to answer all knowledge questions correctly regarding the differences between preventive and office visits. Participants reporting a greater ease of obtaining information from health insurance providers were less likely to indicate being erroneously charged for medical visits. About 15% rated their calls with insurance companies as negative. CONCLUSIONS: Many Americans have limited health literacy regarding what constitutes a preventive care visit. Support must continue to educate the population about preventive care visits and improve the ease of obtaining information from health insurance companies about preventive coverage.

Hashtag Health: College Health on Social Media and Students' Motivations to Follow, Interact, and Share Their Social Media Content.

Social media are advocated as a prime channel through which to reach college students with health-related information. However, how well are colleges and universities utilizing social media as it was intended-a means to be truly social and not just promotional? Social media can only be effective if students actually follow, interact, and share the content being produced. The following study completed a census of student health center Facebook accounts in the United States as well as investigated students' motivations to follow, interact with, and share health-related content. Facebook pages were found for about 20% of student health centers, and about two thirds posted content within the past 14 days. However, their median number of "likes" was between 191 and 496 despite being in existence for an average of 6 years. Additionally, the majority of these centers' most recent posts were promotional, instead of trying to socially engage with their followers. Students indicated that they would be likely to follow, interact, or share social media content from college health accounts if they were incentivized to do so, if they thought the content could be relevant to them, or if they simply knew that the account existed. Unless more attention is given to growing their followings, resources used by student health organizations to consistently post content might be better placed elsewhere. Recommendations for increasing engagement with students are discussed.

Concise Consent Forms Appreciated-Still Not Comprehended: Applying Revised Common Rule Guidelines in Online Studies.

As informed consent documents have historically gotten lengthier, recent revisions to federal Common Rule guidelines now require consent forms that are "concise" and presented in ways that "facilitate comprehension." The current research sought to apply these guidelines by developing a consent process for an online study that was only 71 words and also allowed participants a choice to either continue directly to the study or learn more about the study to which they were consenting. All participants (100%, N = 429) decided to continue directly to the study, choosing to forgo additional information about the study and the institutional review board (IRB) approval process. Participants indicated they liked this streamlined consent process, even though on average they only comprehended about half of the information this streamlined process contained. A plurality of participants indicated they would like to see this style of streamlined consent continued in future online studies. However, if we want to continue referring to informed consent as informed, future research should be welcomed and supported by IRBs to seek ways to apply the newest Common Rule guidelines while increasing comprehension; otherwise, informed consent will likely always remain an oxymoron.