Scleral Buckle, Vitrectomy, or Combined Surgery for Inferior Break Retinal Detachment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

TOPIC: To compare outcomes of scleral buckle (SB), pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), and combined PPV-SB to treat rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs) with inferior retinal breaks (IRBs). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Rhegmatogenous retinal detachments with IRBs are not uncommon; their management is challenging with higher risk of failure. There is no consensus about their treatment, specifically whether SB, PPV, or PPV-SB should be performed. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials, case-control, and prospective/retrospective series (if n > 50) in English were eligible. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched up to January 23, 2023. Standard systematic review methods were followed. The following outcomes at 3 (± 1) and 12 (± 3) months were evaluated: number of eyes with retinal reattachment after ≥ 1 surgeries, change in best-corrected visual acuity from preoperative to postoperative levels, and number of eyes with improvement of > 10 and > 15 ETDRS letters after surgery. Authors of eligible studies were asked for individual participant data (IPD) and IPD meta-analysis was undertaken. Risk of bias was assessed using National Institutes of Health study quality assessment tools. This study was registered prospectively in PROSPERO (CRD42019145626). RESULTS: A total of 542 studies were identified: 15 were eligible and included and 60% were retrospective. Individual participant data was obtained from 8 studies (1017 eyes). Given that only 26 patients had received SB alone, these data were not considered in the analysis. There was no evidence for differences between treatment groups (PPV versus PPV-SB) in the probability of having a flat retina at 3 or 12 months postoperatively after 1 (P = 0.067; odds ratio [OR], 0.47; P = 0.408; OR 2.55; respectively) or > 1 (OR, 0.54; P = 0.21; OR, 0.89; P = 0.926; respectively) surgery. Pars plana vitrectomy-SB showed less improvement in vision postoperatively at 3 months (estimate, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.35; P = 0.044), but this difference was no longer observed at 12 months (estimate, -0.07; 95% confidence interval, -0.27, 0.13; P = 0.479). CONCLUSION: Available evidence suggests a lack of benefit of adding SB to PPV to treat RRDs with IRBs. Evidence, however, comes mainly from retrospective series and, thus, despite the large number of eyes included, should be interpreted with caution. Further research is needed. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Retinal Ischaemia in Diabetic Retinopathy: Understanding and Overcoming a Therapeutic Challenge.

BACKGROUND: Retinal ischaemia is present to a greater or lesser extent in all eyes with diabetic retinopathy (DR). Nonetheless, our understanding of its pathogenic mechanisms, risk factors, as well as other characteristics of retinal ischaemia in DR is very limited. To date, there is no treatment to revascularise ischaemic retina. METHODS: Review of the literature highlighting the current knowledge on the topic of retinal ischaemia in DR, important observations made, and underlying gaps for which research is needed. RESULTS: A very scarce number of clinical studies, mostly cross-sectional, have evaluated specifically retinal ischaemia in DR. Interindividual variability on its natural course and consequences, including the development of its major complications, namely diabetic macular ischaemia and proliferative diabetic retinopathy, have not been investigated. The in situ, surrounding, and distance effect of retinal ischaemia on retinal function and structure and its change over time remains also to be elucidated. Treatments to prevent the development of retinal ischaemia and, importantly, to achieve retinal reperfusion once capillary drop out has ensued, are very much needed and remain to be developed. CONCLUSION: Research into retinal ischaemia in diabetes should be a priority to save sight.

Outcomes and Complications of Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Tractional Retinal Detachment in People With Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Importance: Tractional retinal detachment (TRD) occurs in approximately 5% of people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy and poses a threat to vision. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) is the treatment of choice for TRD. Objective: To determine anatomic and functional outcomes of PPV for the treatment of TRD in people with diabetes (dTRD). Data Sources: MEDLINE and Embase were searched systematically from January 1, 2000, to February 20, 2022. In addition, a reference list of eligible studies were screened. Study Selection: Eligible studies were those published in English, those reporting outcomes of PPV for dTRD, and those that included more than 25 eyes and with a minimum follow-up of 3 months. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for data extraction/synthesis were followed, and the National Institute for Health quality assessment tool was used to assess risk of bias. Study eligibility was determined independently by 2 reviewers; data extraction was conducted by 1 reviewer and entries checked for accuracy by another. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes included rate of failure of retinal reattachment following 1 surgery and final visual acuity (VA). The association of baseline patient characteristics and surgical maneuvers with postoperative surgical outcomes was investigated. Results: Of the 406 studies identified, 38 (3839 eyes) were eligible and included for analysis. Patients had a median (IQR) age of 52.2 (49.6-55.7) years. In the studies reporting patient sex (31 of 38 studies), 1441 were female individuals (50.1%). The overall failure rate of retinal reattachment after 1 surgery was 5.9% (95% CI, 1.4%-8.3%), and the mean final VA was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.82-1.05) logMAR (approximate Snellen equivalent, 6/53; 95% CI, 6/39-6/71). People with higher preoperative VA achieved higher postoperative vision (0.66 logMAR worse final vision; 95% CI, 0.39-0.84 per 1.0 logMAR worse at baseline; P <.001). On multivariable analysis, no other patient characteristics or surgical variables had a statistically significant association with outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that PPV was an effective strategy to achieve retinal reattachment in people with dTRD. Given that higher preoperative VA was the only factor associated with higher postoperative vision, early intervention should be considered and discussed in detail with patients. Overall, final postoperative VA remains low, and patients should be counseled on the guarded prognosis of dTRD.

PREDICTIVE FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH ANATOMICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AFTER PANRETINAL PHOTOCOAGULATION IN PEOPLE WITH PROLIFERATIVE DIABETIC RETINOPATHY.

PURPOSE: To determine effects of baseline characteristics and laser type performed on outcomes in people with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) undergoing panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). METHODS: Medical records of all consecutive patients with PDR naïve to PRP, identified using an electronic database, evaluated at the Macula Clinic, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, receiving their first PRP between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2017, and followed for a minimum of 6 months after stabilization of PDR, were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes included time to stabilization after PRP, progression of PDR, and mean change in the best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to the last follow-up. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for the effect of baseline characteristics and type of laser on outcomes after treatment. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen patients (135 eyes) with a mean age of 56.9 (SD: 12.9) years were included, 67% males. People receiving pattern or mixed laser had a statistically significantly delayed stabilization (HR: 0.57, P = 0.020; and HR: 0.44, P ≤ 0.001, respectively) and increased risk of progression (HR: 1.87, P = 0.045; and HR: 1.96, P = 0.028, respectively) when compared with those receiving standard laser. Among other potential predictors in multivariable regression analysis, only vitreous hemorrhage and fibrosis or traction at baseline increased the risk of progression (HR: 1.58, P = 0.047; and HR: 4.29, P ≤ 0.001, respectively). Baseline characteristics and type of laser had no statistically significant effect on vision. CONCLUSION: These findings should be considered when selecting laser treatment, planning surveillance, and counselling patients with PDR undergoing PRP.