RESUMO
UNLABELLED: We determined the prevalence of osteosarcopenic obesity (loss of bone and muscle coexistent with increased adiposity) in overweight/obese postmenopausal women and compared their functionality to obese-only women. Results showed that osteosarcopenic obese women were outperformed by obese-only women in handgrip strength and walking/balance abilities indicating their higher risk for mobility impairments. INTRODUCTION: Osteosarcopenic obesity (OSO) is a recently defined triad of osteopenia/osteoporosis, sarcopenia, and adiposity. We identified women with OSO in overweight/obese postmenopausal women and evaluated their functionality comparing them with obese-only (OB) women. Additionally, women with osteopenic/osteoporotic obesity (OO), but no sarcopenia, and those with sarcopenic obesity (SO), but no osteopenia/osteoporosis, were identified and compared. We hypothesized that OSO women will have the lowest scores for each of the functionality measures. METHODS: Participants (n = 258; % body fat ≥35) were assessed using a Lunar iDXA instrument for bone and body composition. Sarcopenia was determined from negative residuals of linear regression modeled on appendicular lean mass, height, and body fat, using 20th percentile as a cutoff. Participants with T-scores of L1-L4 vertebrae and/or total femur <-1, but without sarcopenia, were identified as OO (n = 99) and those with normal T-scores, but with sarcopenia, as SO (n = 28). OSO (n = 32) included women with both osteopenia/osteoporosis and sarcopenia, while those with normal bone and no sarcopenia were classified as OB (n = 99). Functionality measures such as handgrip strength, normal/brisk walking speed, and right/left leg stance were evaluated and compared among groups. RESULTS: Women with OSO presented with the lowest handgrip scores, slowest normal and brisk walking speed, and shortest time for each leg stance, but these results were statistically significantly different only from the OB group. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate a poorer functionality in women presenting with OSO, particularly compared to OB women, increasing the risk for bone fractures and immobility from the combined decline in bone and muscle mass, and increased fat mass.
Assuntos
Força da Mão/fisiologia , Obesidade/fisiopatologia , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/fisiopatologia , Sarcopenia/fisiopatologia , Caminhada/fisiologia , Absorciometria de Fóton/métodos , Adiposidade/fisiologia , Idoso , Antropometria/métodos , Composição Corporal/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atividade Motora/fisiologia , Equilíbrio Postural/fisiologia , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Vitamina D/sangueRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine the changes in the use of health care services, physical functioning, disability, and other aspects of health status in the older U.S. population between 1984 and 1994. DESIGN AND SETTING: The 1984 and 1994 National Health Interview Survey Supplements on Aging, which were national probability samples of the civilian, noninstitutionalized population age 70 and older. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 7,541 and 9,447 persons, representing the 17.3 million and 21.8 million U.S. population age 70 and older in 1984 and 1994, respectively. MEASUREMENTS: Annual bed-limitation days, doctor visits, episodes and days of hospital stays, limitation in 10 measures of physical performance, disability in seven activities of daily living (ADLs) and six instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), and participation in social activities and exercise. RESULTS: The annual bed-limitation days and hospital stays declined significantly in both men and women between 1984 and 1994. There was a large decrease in the prevalence of limitation in physical performance and a smaller decrease in disability of IADLs. The changes were greater in women than in men. The prevalence of disability in ADLs was not changed in women in general and increased somewhat in men. Significant increases in the proportion of persons participating in certain social activities and regular exercise were found in both men and women. Jointly considering the indicators, including annual bed days and hospital stays, physical performance, ADLs, and IADLs, 4.2% more men and 3.1% more women were physically robust in 1994 than in 1984. Approximately 420,000 more older people would have lived in a severely restricted and disabled state in 1994 if the rate of limitation had not declined. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence of an overall improvement in the health status of older Americans but inconsistency in the trends existed for different disability measures and for population subgroups.
Assuntos
Idoso , Nível de Saúde , Atividades Cotidianas , Feminino , Humanos , Relações Interpessoais , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Esforço Físico , Estados UnidosRESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the association between serum ferritin and death from all causes, cardiovascular diseases (CVD), CHD and myocardial infarction (MI). Positive body iron stores have been proposed as a risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). While most epidemiologic studies using serum ferritin and other measures of body iron stores have not found an association between iron and heart disease risk, the hypothesis remains controversial. As a result, we examined the relationship of serum ferritin, the principle blood measure of body iron stores, to risk of death in a cohort with a standardized exam and long follow-up. METHODS: The baseline data for this prospective cohort study were collected in 1976-1980 as part of the second National Health and Nutrition Examination Study (NHANES II) with mortality follow-up using the National Death Index (NDI) through December 31, 1992. The analytic sample (n = 1604) consisted of 128 black men, 658 white men, 100 black women and 718 white women 45-74 years of age at baseline who, based on self-reported data, were free of coronary heart disease at baseline and had no missing data. The main outcome measures were the relative risk of death for persons with serum ferritin levels: <50 microg/L; or 100-199 microg/L; or > or =200 microg/L was compared to persons with serum ferritin levels of 50-99 microg/L adjusted for possible confounding using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Most of the deaths were among white men (n = 254) and women (n = 168). There were relatively few deaths among black men (n = 50) and too few in women (n = 23) to reliably model. The largest number of CVD (n = 119), CHD (n = 82), and MI (n = 49) deaths were in white men while there were 69 CVD, 45 CHD and 13 MI deaths in white women. Black men with a serum ferritin level of <50 microg/L had a significantly higher adjusted risk of death from all causes (RR = 3.1 with 95% confidence limits of 1.5-6.5). There were no other statistically significant associations for all causes mortality for the other three race/sex groups. Additionally, there were no statistically significant associations between serum ferritin and any of the cardiovascular endpoints for any of the groups. There was an apparent but nonsignificant u-shaped association between serum ferritin and all causes mortality in black men and between serum ferritin and CVD death in white women. However, in both cases very wide confidence limits preclude further interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results do not support the hypothesis that positive body iron stores, as measured by serum ferritin, are associated with an increased risk of CVD, CHD or MI death or between serum ferritin and all causes mortality. Most of the research to date with serum ferritin has been conducted in European men or in European American men. Our results are consistent with the primarily negative results for that race/sex group. More research is needed in women and minority groups, including an explanation of why such an association would exist in these groups but not in white men before an association can be established in them.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/sangue , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Doença das Coronárias/sangue , Doença das Coronárias/mortalidade , Ferritinas/sangue , Infarto do Miocárdio/sangue , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Causas de Morte , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the dosing requirements and international normalized ratios (INRs) associated with two bioequivalent crystalline warfarin sodium products in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. METHODS: A multicenter, single-blind (prescriber), randomized, crossover evaluation of Apothecon warfarin and DuPont warfarin (Coumadin) was conducted in consenting adults with chronic or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who had been receiving DuPont warfarin chronically for the prevention of thromboembolism. Patients were randomly assigned to initially either continue DuPont warfarin or receive Apothecon warfarin for four weeks, with weekly evaluation of dosage and INR changes, safety, and efficacy. Subsequently, patients crossed over and received the other product for four weeks. RESULTS: There were 113 patients randomized to receive study treatment. Neither the propensity for a dosage change or an INR change nor the magnitude of a dosage change or INR change appeared related to a particular warfarin product (NS for each variable after each study period). After four weeks of treatment, the same number of patients (n = 7) experienced a > or = 20% change in warfarin dosage from the respective baseline with each product. The number of patients with INRs outside the desired protocol range after four weeks of treatment was similar for both groups (< 1.8, n = 9 for both products, or > 3.2, n = 9 for DuPont, n = 10 for Apothecon). No major hemorrhagic or thromboemoblic events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that Apothecon warfarin and DuPont warfarin provide equivalent anticoagulation in patients with chronic or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Varfarina/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Doença Crônica , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Varfarina/administração & dosagem , Varfarina/efeitos adversosRESUMO
CONTEXT: The population is aging and life expectancy is increasing, but whether morbidity and disability late in life also increase is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the use of health care services, disability and cognitive function, and overall quality of life in the year before death among older adults has changed over time. DESIGN AND SETTING: The 1986 and 1993 National Mortality Followback Surveys, which were probability samples of all deaths in the United States with response rates of next of kin of 90% and 88% for those aged 65 years and older. PARTICIPANTS: Next of kin were asked to report the health status of a total of 9179 decedents who were 65 years and older in 1986 and 6735 in 1993, representing 1.5 and 1.6 million decedents aged 65 years and older. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Days of hospital or nursing home stays, number and length of disability in 5 activities of daily living, duration of impairment in 3 measures of cognitive function, and an overall sickness score among individuals aged 65 through 84 years and those aged 85 years and older. RESULTS: Women used significantly fewer hospital and nursing home services in the last year of life in 1993 vs 1986 (mean reduction, 3.3 nights for both age groups for hospital services; mean reduction 18.4 nights for nursing home for women aged 65-84 years and 42.3 nights for women > or =85 years). Men had no changes except those aged 85 years and older had a decline in nursing home nights of 32.6. The proportion of women aged 85 years and older with restriction of at least 2 activities of daily living decreased from 62.5% in 1986 to 52.1% in 1993 (P<.01), and those with normal cognitive function increased from 50.3% to 56.2% (P<.05). Their mean overall sickness score decreased and quality-of-life improved. Among women aged 65 through 84 years, the number with normal cognitive function increased and the mean sickness score decreased, but those with at least 2 activities of daily living impairments increased and the overall quality of life declined. A similar pattern of change was found in the oldest-old men except that cognitive function worsened. Most parameters for men aged 65 through 84 years did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Men and women at least 85 years old in the US experienced a better overall quality of life in the last year of life in 1993 than those in 1986. Most measures for men and women aged 65 through 84 years improved or did not change.
Assuntos
Avaliação Geriátrica , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Casas de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade de Vida , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cognição , Pessoas com Deficiência , Feminino , Geriatria/tendências , Humanos , Longevidade , Masculino , Morbidade , Distribuição por Sexo , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Índice de Massa Corporal , Mortalidade , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/mortalidade , RiscoRESUMO
The authors used prospective data from two supplemental studies of the National Health Interview Survey, the 1988 Alcohol Supplement and the 1990 Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Supplement, to examine the relation between alcohol intake and mortality. Their study included 17,821 men and 25,874 women aged 40 years or older at baseline; during an average of 6 years of follow-up, 5,540 deaths occurred. The alcohol-mortality relation was U-shaped for men and J-shaped for women. On the basis of categorical analyses adjusted for age, race, smoking, and baseline diseases, men who drank 2 drinks per day had a significantly lower risk of death compared with abstainers (relative risk = 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45, 0.82). The relative risk was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.55, 1.03) after further adjustment for marital status, education, and self-perceived health status. For women, the corresponding relative risks were 0.69 (95% CI: 0.61, 0.78) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.90) for those who drank less than 1 drink per day. When drinking category was considered as an ordinal variable and fitted with a quadratic function in the Cox model, the estimated optimal alcohol intake was approximately less than 1 to 1 drink per day for men and lifetime infrequent to less than 1 drink per day for women. Data from these representative US cohorts demonstrated that less than 2 drinks per day for men and less than 1 drink per day for women are associated with the lowest all-cause mortality.
Assuntos
Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/mortalidade , Feminino , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess the mortality of the adult Asian and Pacific Islander population in the United States. METHODS: Cohort study using data from the National Health Interview Survey (1986 to 1994) and the National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Deaths were ascertained by matching the National Death Index with average follow-ups of 5.3 and 9 years, respectively, for the two studies. RESULTS: Respondents from the pooled National Health Interview Surveys included 532,794 non-Hispanic whites, 94,242 blacks, 52,725 Hispanics, and 16,936 Asians and Pacific Islanders, all of whom were at least 18 years of age at baseline. The National Longitudinal Mortality Study included 373,397 non-Hispanic whites, 41,262 blacks, 23,356 Hispanics, and 8,390 Asians and Pacific Islanders. Overall age-standardized mortality was the lowest in Asians/Pacific Islanders, whose risk of death was about 40% lower than whites'. Adjustment for differences in education levels had a minimal influence on the mortality advantage in Asians/Pacific Islanders. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal cohorts provide an important source of health status information on Asians and Pacific Islanders. These two studies from representative national samples suggest that overall mortality is substantially lower among Asians and Pacific Islanders than in all other major ethnic groups.
Assuntos
Asiático , Mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade/tendências , Ilhas do Pacífico/etnologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Statistical models used to predict personal risk of death from coronary heart disease (CHD) have been based on studies among white populations. We compared the predictive functions derived from black and white men and women, using the pooled data of 2 national cohorts: the First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I) Epidemiologic Follow-up Study and the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II) Mortality Study. The participants included 6,937 white men, 940 black men, 9,202 white women, and 1,463 black women aged 30 to 74 years who were free of CHD at baseline. The 2 cohorts were followed for 20 and 15 years, respectively. There were no significant differences between blacks and whites in the magnitude of the Cox coefficients for most of the personal risk factors (i.e., age, systolic blood pressure, serum total cholesterol, smoking, and diabetes mellitus status) for men and women. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, with all risk factors considered collectively, suggest that the models have similar ability to rank personal relative risk among blacks and whites. The areas under the ROC curve were 0.77 and 0.76 for white and black men, respectively, and 0.84 and 0.82 for white and black women, respectively. However, the equation derived from white men overestimated the 15-year cumulative CHD mortality in black men by about 60%. Thus, predictive functions derived from 1 demographic group (e.g., whites) can be applied to another subgroup (e.g., blacks) to rank personal risk. However, prediction of absolute risk is less accurate.
Assuntos
População Negra , Doença das Coronárias/etnologia , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Doença das Coronárias/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Curva ROC , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
To assess black-white differences in disability and morbidity in the last years of life, the authors analyzed data from the National Health Interview Survey from 1986 to 1994, with mortality follow-up through December 1995. A baseline household interview was conducted for 10,187 decedents aged 50 years and over within 2 years before death. Data collected included long-term limitation of activity, number of chronic conditions, number of bed days, doctor visits, and days of short hospital stay during the year preceding the interview. For both blacks and whites, educational attainment was inversely associated with disability/morbidity indices. Black decedents had greater morbidity compared with whites, and this difference was consistent across educational levels. Adjustment for education reduced the black-white difference in limitation of activity score by 32%, bed days by 59%, and hospital stay days by 40%. This study from a national representative US sample indicates that black decedents experienced greater disability/morbidity and worse quality of life through their last few months or years of life. Educational attainment was associated with morbidity before death and accounted for much of the black-white difference.
Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas com Deficiência/estatística & dados numéricos , Escolaridade , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Visita a Consultório Médico , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effect of socioeconomic status, as characterized by level of education, on morbidity and disability in the last years of life. METHODS: The analysis used data from the National Health Interview Survey (1986-1990), with mortality follow-up through December 1991. RESULTS: Among 10,932 decedents 50 years or older at baseline interview, educational attainment was inversely associated with long-term limitation of activity, number of chronic conditions, number of bed days, and days of short hospital stay during the year preceding the interview. CONCLUSIONS: Decedents with higher socioeconomic status experienced lower morbidity and disability and better quality of life even in their last years of life.
Assuntos
Pessoas com Deficiência , Escolaridade , Nível de Saúde , Morbidade , Pobreza , Absenteísmo , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Pessoas com Deficiência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Avaliação Geriátrica , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Previous models used to predict individual risk of death from coronary heart disease (CHD) were developed from data of 3 decades ago from the Framingham Heart Study. CHD mortality rates have declined markedly since that period as a result of improvement in both risk factor status and medical interventions. Generalization of the results from this one study to the population at large remains a matter of concern. We compared predictive functions derived from the major risk factors for CHD from Framingham and 2 more recent national cohorts, the First and Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I and NHANES II). METHODS AND RESULTS: The participants included 1846 men and 2323 women 35 to 69 years of age and free of CHD at the fourth examination (1954 to 1958) from the Framingham Study; 2753 men and 3858 women from the NHANES I (1971 to 1975); and 2655 men and 3050 women from NHANES II (1976 to 1980). The 3 cohorts were monitored for 24, 20, and 15 years, respectively. Significant heterogeneity existed among studies in the magnitude of the Cox coefficients for the individual factors (ie, age, systolic blood pressure, serum total cholesterol, and smoking status), especially among men. When risk factors were considered collectively, however, functions derived from and applied to different cohorts had a similar ability to rank individual risk. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0. 71 to 0.76 in men and 0.76 to 0.81 in women when different risk functions were applied to their own population or to a second population. The cumulative CHD survival observed in women in the 2 national cohorts was close to what was predicted from the Framingham equation. However, Framingham overestimated the cumulative CHD mortality rates in men in NHANES I and NHANES II. CONCLUSIONS: The Framingham risk model for the prediction of CHD mortality rates provides a reasonable rank ordering of risk for individuals in the US white population for the period 1975 to 1990. However, prediction of absolute risk is less accurate.
Assuntos
Doença das Coronárias/mortalidade , Vigilância da População , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
The authors examined the relation between self-reported health status and mortality among the following racial/ethnic groups: Native Americans, Asian/Pacific Islanders, blacks, whites, and Hispanics. They pooled 1986-1994 data from the National Health Interview Survey to obtain information on more than 700,000 cohort participants. Although fewer than 5,000 Native Americans are included in this cohort, the data provide information previously unavailable for this group. Also included are almost 17,000 Asian/Pacific Islanders, over 90,000 blacks, and over 50,000 Hispanics. The authors found strong associations between self-reported health status and both socioeconomic status and subsequent mortality. A self-report of fair or poor health was associated with at least a twofold increased risk of mortality for all racial/ethnic groups. Even after adjustment for socioeconomic status and measures of comorbidity, a significant relation was found between self-reported health status and subsequent mortality. The authors found that self-reported health status is a strong prognostic indicator for subsequent mortality for both genders and all racial/ethnic groups examined. These results emphasize the utility of using simple filter questions in population research.
Assuntos
Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Nível de Saúde , Mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Coleta de Dados/métodos , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Classe Social , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether constant body mass index (BMI) standards are appropriate in genetically similar populations. DESIGN: Data are taken from the International Collaborative Study of Hypertension in Blacks (ICSHIB), an observational study. SUBJECTS: Individuals of African descent who were included in ICSHIB. Subjects lived in eight different sites: Barbados; Cameroon (urban and rural); Jamaica; Manchester, UK; Maywood, IL; urban Nigeria; and St Lucia. MEASUREMENTS: Weight and height. RESULTS: Constant BMI standards effectively argue for the constancy of slope of the linear regression equations of In(weight) on In(height) across populations. Linear regression results indicate that the height/weight relationship implied by the use of constant BMI standards, is not found in these populations and that there is much variation across groups. CONCLUSION: The use of constant BMI standards in classifying individuals prognostically may be unwise, even in genetically similar populations.
Assuntos
Estatura , Índice de Massa Corporal , Peso Corporal , África Ocidental/etnologia , Barbados , Estatura/genética , Peso Corporal/genética , Camarões , Feminino , Humanos , Jamaica , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Nigéria , Obesidade/diagnóstico , Santa Lúcia , Reino Unido , Estados UnidosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To calculate for two measures of obesity, the Metropolitan Relative Weight (MRW) and body mass index (BMI), the value at which minimum mortality occurs. This was done to retest the hypothesis, in the Framingham Heart Study data, that the association between obesity and mortality can be obscured by an interaction between the measure of obesity and smoking. In the original analysis of the Framingham data it was suggested that there was a U- or J-shaped relationship between MRW and death in smokers but a linear relationship in nonsmokers. The design and setting were those of the NHLBI Framingham Heart Study. METHODS: The 5209 members of the Framingham Heart Study underwent a baseline examination in 1948-1952 (Exam 1) and they were reexamined at approximately two-year intervals over a 30-year period. The study included both men (n = 2336) and women (n = 2873) in the age range of 28 to 62 years. After excluding persons with missing baseline data, the analytic sample size was 5163. Additional analyses were conducted by deleting persons with cardiovascular disease (CVD) at baseline (n = 135), the sample used by the original paper by Garrison and colleagues, and persons who died within the first four years of follow-up (n = 62). The main outcome measures consisted of thirty-year survival through Exam 16, approximately in 1980, as influenced by MRW or BMI, age, and smoking status at baseline (Exam 1). RESULTS: We were able to show that the sample sizes of male nonsmokers were too small to test the hypothesis within age groups < 40 and 40-49 years. In men ages 50-62 there was a significant age-adjusted quadratic relationship between BMI or MRW, and risk of death. The estimated BMI at the minimum risk of death for smokers (24.5) and nonsmokers (23.8) were not statistically different. Identical results were found for MRW (minimum: smokers = 112.5, nonsmokers = 111.4). In men and women ages 28-62 there appeared to be a u- or j-shaped relationship between the 30-year crude mortality rate and MRW. After excluding persons with missing data, CVD at baseline, and persons who died within the first four years of follow-up, the age adjusted estimated BMI value at the minimum risk of death was nearly identical for men and women and for smokers and nonsmokers (Men: smokers = 22.8, nonsmokers = 22.8; Women: smokers = 22.9, nonsmokers = 23.3). Additionally, the estimates of the minimum were always below the mean. Identical results were found without deleting persons with CVD at baseline and deaths in the first four years of follow-up. Identical results were found for MRW. CONCLUSIONS: Reanalysis of the Framingham Heart Study data does not support the hypothesis that there is an interaction between smoking and measures of obesity. Moreover, the estimated BMI or MRW at the minimum risk of death was similar for men and women smokers and nonsmokers alike even after deleting prevalent cases of CVD and deaths within the first four years of follow-up.
Assuntos
Obesidade/mortalidade , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
In this paper, the authors model the nonmonotonic relation between body mass index (BMI) (weight (kg)/height2 (m2)) and mortality in 13,242 black and white participants in the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study in order to estimate the BMI at which minimum mortality occurs. The BMI of minimum mortality was 27.1 for black men (95% confidence interval (CI) 24.8-29.4), 26.8 for black women (95% CI 24.7-28.9), 24.8 for white men (95% CI 23.8-25.9), and 24.3 for white women (95% CI 23.3-25.4). Each confidence interval included the group average. Analyses conducted by smoking status and after exclusion of persons with baseline illness and persons who died during the first 4 years of follow-up led to virtually identical estimates. The authors determined the range of values over which risk of all-cause mortality would increase no more than 20% in comparison with the minimum. This interval was nine BMI units wide, and it included 70% of the population. These results were confirmed by parallel analyses using quantiles. The model used allowed the estimation of parameters in the BMI-mortality relation. The resulting empirical findings from each of four race/sex groups, which are representative of the US population, demonstrate a wide range of BMIs consistent with minimum mortality and do not suggest that the optimal BMI is at the lower end of the distribution for any subgroup.
Assuntos
População Negra , Índice de Massa Corporal , Mortalidade , População Branca , Adulto , Idoso , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the mortality pattern of the adult Hispanic population in the United States. METHODS: This was a cohort study using data from the National Health Interview Survey from 1986 through 1990. Deaths were ascertained by matching the National Death Index through 1991. RESULTS: This representative national sample included 297,640 non-Hispanic Whites, 53,552 Blacks, and 27,239 Hispanics, all aged 18 years or older at baseline. Different matching criteria resulted in modest differential estimates of the number of deaths by ethnic groups; these differences were quantitatively more important for Hispanics. Overall age-standardized mortality was lower among Hispanics. A prominent age by race interaction was apparent. The Hispanic: White mortality ratio was 1.33, 0.92, and 0.76 among men aged 18 through 44, 45 through 64, and 65 and older, respectively. Among women in the same age groups the Hispanic: White mortality ratio was 1.22, 0.75, and 0.70, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal cohorts provide an important source of health status information on Hispanics. These results suggest that overall mortality is lower among Hispanics than among non-Hispanic Whites, especially in the oldest age group. Among younger and middle-aged persons, the mortality of Hispanics is similar to or even higher than that of Whites.
Assuntos
Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Differential mortality exists in the United States both between racial/ethnic groups and along gradients of socioeconomic status. The specification of statistical models for processes underlying these observed disparities has been hindered by the fact that social and economic quantities are distributed in a highly nonrandom manner throughout the population. We sought to provide a substantive foundation for model development by representing the shape of the income-mortality relation by racial/ethnic group. We used data on black and white men and women from the longitudinal component of the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), 1986-1990, which provided 1,191,824 person-years of follow-up and 12,165 mortal events. To account for family size when considering income, we used the ratio of annual family income to the federal poverty line for a family of similar composition. To avoid unnecessary categorizations and prior assumptions about model form, we employed kernel smoothing techniques and calculated the continuous mortality surface across dimensions of adjusted income and age for each of the gender and racial/ethnic groups. Representing regions of equal mortality density with contour plots, we observed interactions that need to be accommodated by any subsequent statistical models. We propose two general theories that provide a foundation for more elaborate and testable hypotheses in the future.
Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Renda , Modelos Estatísticos , Mortalidade , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Classe Social , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We sought to estimate the coronary heart disease (CHD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality experience of U.S. Hispanics. BACKGROUND: Limited information is available concerning the mortality from CHD among U.S. Hispanics, the nation's second largest minority group. METHODS: The study used data from the National Health Interview Survey (1986 to 1994), including representative national samples of 246,239 non-Hispanic whites, 38,042 blacks and 14,965 Hispanics who were > or = 45 years old at baseline. Mean follow-up of mortality was 5 years (range 1 to 10). RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 27,702 whites (11%), 4,976 blacks (13%) and 1,061 Hispanics (7%) died. Among men, the age-adjusted total mortality per 100,000 person-years was 3,089 in whites and 2,466 in Hispanics, and among women, it was 1,897 and 1,581 in whites and Hispanics, respectively. The Hispanic/white mortality rate ratio for CHD was 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64 to 0.93) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.01) for men and women, respectively. The rate ratio was 0.79 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.91) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.94), respectively, for mortality from cardiovascular diseases. Given the lower all-cause mortality in Hispanics, the proportion of total deaths due to CHD and CVD was similar between the two populations for the same gender and were, respectively, 29.7% and 44.7% in white men, 28.1% and 44.3% in Hispanic men, 24.9% and 43.2% in white women and 24.1% and 41% in Hispanic women. CONCLUSIONS: These data from a cohort of a large national sample are consistent with vital statistics that show that all-cause, CHD and CVD mortality is approximately 20% lower among adult Hispanics than among whites in the United States.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Doença das Coronárias/mortalidade , Hispânico ou Latino , Idoso , População Negra , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etnologia , Doença das Coronárias/etnologia , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População BrancaRESUMO
A large number of epidemiologic studies have focused on racial/ethnic differences, particularly between blacks and whites. Because health endpoints and racial categorizations are associated with socioeconomic status, investigators generally adjust for socioeconomic indicators. The intention is usually to control for confounding, thereby making groups comparable and excluding socioeconomic status as an alternative explanation to hypotheses of innate physiologic differences. A threat to the validity of these analyses is therefore the presence of residual confounding. We identify four potential sources of residual confounding in this analytical design: categorization of socioeconomic status variables, measurement error in socioeconomic indicators, use of aggregated socioeconomic status measures, and incommensurate socioeconomic indicators. Using simulations and examples from the literature, we demonstrate that the effect of residual confounding is to bias interpretation of data toward the conclusion of independent racial/ethnic group effects. Investigators often refer to possible "genetic" differences on the basis of models that control for socioeconomic status. We propose that such conclusions on the basis of this analytical strategy are generally unwarranted. Racial/ethnic differences in disease are a pressing public health concern, but the current approach does not often provide a basis for inference about putative biological factors in the etiology of this disparity.