RESUMO
DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with integrated enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) helps reduce length of stay and improve surgical outcomes. As these procedures have become more prevalent over time, pharmacists are in key positions to manage medications in the perioperative space to help optimize transitions of care and reduce safety events. Here we identify several clinical areas across phases of care for these procedures in which the knowledge and guidance of pharmacists, as members of the interprofessional team, are paramount. SUMMARY: Perioperative pharmacy expertise is often required for MIS procedures in the areas of acid suppression, antithrombotic management, blood glucose control, drug formulation, immunosuppressant optimization, pain mitigation, and postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention and treatment. For each MIS procedure, pharmacists should identify and consider diet and anatomical changes as well as patient- and surgery-specific risk factors. Pharmacists can then utilize their knowledge of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of individual medications along with evidence-based medicine to recommend selection of appropriate agents. CONCLUSION: Pharmacist contributions to perioperative medication management for MIS procedures can improve care as surgical patients navigate transitions through the perioperative setting. Pharmacists can further incorporate medication expertise through development and implementation of institutional MIS protocols within the context of ERPs. As such, any pharmacist should feel empowered to aid in the care of surgical patients.
RESUMO
Background: The conventional dose of 10 units of intravenous (IV) regular insulin to treat hyperkalemia has been associated with hypoglycemia. There have been retrospective studies evaluating weight-based dose vs conventional dose of IV regular insulin but the comparative efficacy and safety is not well established. Objective: Evaluate the difference in weight-based dosing of IV regular insulin between patients who experienced hypoglycemia vs. patients who did not experience hypoglycemia after the administration of IV regular insulin. Methods: This was a retrospective, electronic chart review at a single academic medical center which included patients ≥18 years of age with an emergency department or inpatient encounter who were administered IV regular insulin within 6 hours of a pre-treatment potassium of ≥5 mmol/L. Results: There was no significant difference in the weight-based insulin dose between patients who experienced a hypoglycemic event and patients who did not experience a hypoglycemic event (.14 vs .22 units/kg; P = .44). The potassium-lowering effect was similar between the two groups (1.02 vs .96 mmol/L; P = .56). A regression analysis revealed that female sex, low baseline blood glucose (glucose <140 mg/dL), and those who received a repeat dose of IV regular insulin were independent risk factors for development of hypoglycemia. Conclusion: This study found no difference in hypoglycemic events and potassium lowering based on IV weight-based regular insulin dosing, however other risk factors may predict hypoglycemia.