Study protocol for IMPRoVE: a multicentre prospective observational cohort study of the incidence, impact and mechanisms of perioperative right ventricular dysfunction in non-cardiac surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Perioperative myocardial injury evidenced by elevated cardiac biomarkers (both natriuretic peptides and troponin) is common after major non-cardiac surgery. However, it is unclear if the rise in cardiac biomarkers represents global or more localised cardiac injury. We have previously shown isolated right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in patients following lung resection surgery, with no change in left ventricular (LV) function. Given that perioperative RV dysfunction (RVD) can manifest insidiously, we hypothesise there may be a substantial burden of covert yet clinically important perioperative RVD in other major non-cardiac surgical groups. The Incidence, impact and Mechanisms of Perioperative Right VEntricular dysfunction (IMPRoVE) study has been designed to address this knowledge gap. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre prospective observational cohort study across four centres in the West of Scotland and London. One hundred and seventy-five patients will be recruited from five surgical specialties: thoracic, upper gastrointestinal, vascular, colorectal and orthopaedic surgery (35 patients from each group). All patients will undergo preoperative and postoperative (day 2-4) echocardiography, with contemporaneous cardiac biomarker testing. Ten patients from each surgical specialty (50 patients in total) will undergo T1-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging preoperatively and postoperatively. The coprimary outcomes are the incidence of perioperative RVD (diagnosed by RV speckle tracking echocardiography) and the effect that RVD has on days alive and at home at 30 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include LV dysfunction and clinical outcomes informed by Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine consensus definitions. T1 CMR will be used to investigate for imaging correlates of myocardial inflammation as a possible mechanism driving perioperative RVD. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval was gained from Oxford C Research Ethics Committee (REC reference 22/SC/0442). Findings will be disseminated by various methods including social media, international presentations and publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05827315.

Recommendations for anatomical structures to identify on ultrasound for the performance of intermediate and advanced blocks in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.

Recent recommendations describe a set of core anatomical structures to identify on ultrasound for the performance of basic blocks in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA). This project aimed to generate consensus recommendations for core structures to identify during the performance of intermediate and advanced blocks. An initial longlist of structures was refined by an international panel of key opinion leaders in UGRA over a three-round Delphi process. All rounds were conducted virtually and anonymously. Blocks were considered twice in each round: for "orientation scanning" (the dynamic process of acquiring the final view) and for "block view" (which visualizes the block site and is maintained for needle insertion/injection). A "strong recommendation" was made if ≥75% of participants rated any structure as "definitely include" in any round. A "weak recommendation" was made if >50% of participants rated it as "definitely include" or "probably include" for all rounds, but the criterion for strong recommendation was never met. Structures which did not meet either criterion were excluded. Forty-one participants were invited and 40 accepted; 38 completed all three rounds. Participants considered the ultrasound scanning for 19 peripheral nerve blocks across all three rounds. Two hundred and seventy-four structures were reviewed for both orientation scanning and block view; a "strong recommendation" was made for 60 structures on orientation scanning and 44 on the block view. A "weak recommendation" was made for 107 and 62 structures, respectively. These recommendations are intended to help standardize teaching and research in UGRA and support widespread and consistent practice.

International consensus on anatomical structures to identify on ultrasound for the performance of basic blocks in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.

There is no universally agreed set of anatomical structures that must be identified on ultrasound for the performance of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) techniques. This study aimed to produce standardized recommendations for core (minimum) structures to identify during seven basic blocks. An international consensus was sought through a modified Delphi process. A long-list of anatomical structures was refined through serial review by key opinion leaders in UGRA. All rounds were conducted remotely and anonymously to facilitate equal contribution of each participant. Blocks were considered twice in each round: for "orientation scanning" (the dynamic process of acquiring the final view) and for the "block view" (which visualizes the block site and is maintained for needle insertion/injection). Strong recommendations for inclusion were made if ≥75% of participants rated a structure as "definitely include" in any round. Weak recommendations were made if >50% of participants rated a structure as "definitely include" or "probably include" for all rounds (but the criterion for "strong recommendation" was never met). Thirty-six participants (94.7%) completed all rounds. 128 structures were reviewed; a "strong recommendation" is made for 35 structures on orientation scanning and 28 for the block view. A "weak recommendation" is made for 36 and 20 structures, respectively. This study provides recommendations on the core (minimum) set of anatomical structures to identify during ultrasound scanning for seven basic blocks in UGRA. They are intended to support consistent practice, empower non-experts using basic UGRA techniques, and standardize teaching and research.

Impact of anaemia in oesophago-gastric cancer patients undergoing curative treatment by means of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery.

BACKGROUND: The present study investigated factors associated with pre-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and pre-operative anaemia, and examined their impact on outcomes in patients with oesophago-gastric cancer treated with curative intent. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with oesophago-gastric cancer (January 2010 to December 2015) and treated with curative intent by NAC then surgery at a tertiary centre were included. Patients were grouped by the presence of anaemia (haemoglobin <130 mg/L in males and <120 mg/L in females) and into microcytic (MCV <80 fL), normocytic (80-100 fL) and macrocytic (>100 fL) subgroups. Categorical data were analysed by chi-squared test and overall survival by univariate and multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS: 99/295 (34%) patients who received NAC were diagnosed with pre-NAC anaemia, and 157/268 (59%) of patients who subsequently underwent surgery were diagnosed with pre-operative anaemia. Normocytic anaemia was the most common, with 76 (26%) in pre-NAC and 107 (40%) in pre-operative groups. Pre-NAC anaemia was associated with increasing clinical N stage (p = 0.022), higher modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) (p = 0.006), and a higher rate of intra-operative transfusion (p = 0.030). Pre-operative anaemia was associated with pre-NAC anaemia (p = 0.004), increasing age (p = 0.026), higher pre-operative mGPS (p = 0.021), and a higher rate of intra-operative transfusion (p = 0.021). Anaemia before NAC and surgery was associated with poorer overall survival in patient following R0 resection, independent of stage (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.02-1.54, p = 0.030). CONCLUSION: Anaemia was associated with poorer overall survival and greater requirement for intra-operative blood transfusion in oesophago-gastric cancer patients undergoing treatment with curative intent.

Effect of body mass index on angle of needle insertion during ultrasound-guided lateral sagittal infraclavicular brachial plexus block.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to establish the angle of needle insertion from the anterior chest wall during ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block and to examine for any correlation between body mass index (BMI) and insertion angle. DESIGN: This is a prospective observational study. SETTING: The setting is at an operating room, university-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS: The patients are 23 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1-3 patients scheduled to undergo elbow, forearm, or hand surgery under regional anesthesia with or without general anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention is infraclavicular brachial plexus block with or without perineural catheter insertion. MEASUREMENTS: The measurement is the angle of needle insertion in relation to the anterior chest wall, BMI, and needle visibility as graded by the anesthesiologist. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were studied. The mean (SD) BMI was 28.5 (5.4). The median (range) of angle of needle insertion was 50 (33-60). The Pearson correlation coefficient for BMI and angle of needle insertion was 0.357. There were no reported complications. CONCLUSIONS: The median (range) angle of needle insertion in relation to chest for our study patients was 50° (33°-60°). The needle visibility was rated difficult, requiring hydrolocation or "heeling-in," in 39% of cases. There was a moderate correlation between BMI and angle of insertion. Despite difficulties with needle visualization, the ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block provided reliable analgesia.