Evaluation of Intradermal and Subcutaneous Infusion Set Performance Under 24-Hour Basal and Bolus Conditions.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to assess the function and delivery reliability of intradermal (ID) infusion sets used with commercial insulin pumps. METHOD: Healthy subjects (n = 43) were randomized to either ID or subcutaneous (SC) arms, and received basal/bolus placebo delivery for 24 hours. Subjects received 4 of 8 infusion set combinations (ID: microneedle design A or B, with 2 pump brands [Animas or MiniMed]; SC: Teflon Quickset or steel Rapid-D, Animas pump only, with or without overtaping) and were evaluated for pump occlusion alarms, fluid leakage, pain, and tissue tolerability. A novel algorithm was developed to determine flow consistency based on fluid pressure, and the duration and occurrence rate for periods of unalarmed but interrupted flow ("silent occlusions'") were compared. RESULTS: ID delivery was successfully maintained over the 24-hour infusion period. The number of silent occlusions was lower for ID microneedle cannula design B than A (P < .01) and lower for Rapid-D SC device compared to Quick-set (P = .03). There was no significant difference in the number of occlusion alarms between the ID and SC devices with the Animas pump. However, the pumps tested with ID devices had significantly different alarm rates (MiniMed 29.5%, Animas 0%, P < .001). Leakage and tissue tolerability were comparable across devices. CONCLUSION: The ID infusion set reliably delivered diluent for an extended 24-hour period in healthy subjects and was well tolerated. Silent occlusion flow interruptions could be detected in both ID and SC infusion sets using a proprietary algorithm. This algorithm is a promising method for quantitatively evaluating infusion set flow performance.

Intradermal insulin infusion achieves faster insulin action than subcutaneous infusion for 3-day wear.

Rapid uptake previously demonstrated by intradermal (ID) drug administration indicates compound delivery within the dermis may have clinical and pharmacological advantages for certain drug therapies. This study is the first clinical trial to evaluate continuous microneedle-based drug infusion, device wearability, and intradermal microneedle insulin kinetics over a multi-day (72 h) wear period. This was a single center, open-label, two-period crossover study in T1DM patients on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Patients received treatment during interventional visits: one SC and one ID basal/bolus infusion of insulin aspart (NovoRapid® U-100) administered over 3 days in a randomized order. Twenty-eight patients were randomized and exposed to trial product, and 23 completed the study. Bolus insulin infusions were given prior to standardized breakfast and lunch test meals on each of the three treatment days. Blood samples were drawn at predefined time points for measurements of insulin aspart and blood glucose in serum. The primary endpoint insulin Tmax demonstrated that ID bolus infusion was associated with a significantly shorter Tmax with statistically significantly smaller intra-subject variability, compared to SC infusion, and this difference was maintained over three treatment days. Analyses of secondary PK endpoints corresponded with the primary endpoint findings. Postprandial glycemic response was significantly less pronounced after ID bolus: For most endpoints ID vs. SC, differences were statistically significant within the 0-1.5 or 0-2 h time period. Intradermal delivery of insulin is a viable delivery route alternative providing reduced time for insulin absorption with less intra-subject variability and lower glycemic response.

Pharmacokinetics and postprandial glycemic excursions following insulin lispro delivered by intradermal microneedle or subcutaneous infusion.

BACKGROUND: Intradermal (ID) delivery has been shown to accelerate insulin pharmacokinetics (PK). We compared the PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of insulin lispro administered before two daily standardized solid mixed meals (breakfast and lunch), using microneedle-based ID or traditional subcutaneous (SC) delivery. METHOD: The study included 22 subjects with type 1 diabetes in an eight-arm full crossover block design. One arm established each subject's optimal meal dose. In six additional arms, the optimal, higher, and lower doses (+30%, -30%) were each given ID and SC delivery, in random order. The final arm assessed earlier timing for the ID optimal dose (-12 versus -2 min). The PK/PD data were collected for 6 h following meals. Intravenous basal regular insulin was given throughout, and premeal blood glucose (BG) adjusted to 115 mg/dl. RESULTS: The primary end point, postprandial time in range (70-180 mg/dl), showed no route-based differences with a high level of overall BG control for both SC and ID delivery. Secondary insulin PK end points showed more rapid ID availability versus SC across doses and meals (∆Tmax -16 min, ∆T50rising -7 min, ∆T50falling -30 min, all p < .05). Both intrasubject and intersubject variability for ID Tmax were significantly lower. Intradermal delivery showed modest, statistically significant secondary PD differences across doses and meals, generally within 90-120 min postprandially (∆12 mg/dl BG at 90 min, ∆7 mg/dl BGmax, ∆7 mg/dl mean BG 0-2 h, all p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that ID insulin delivery is superior to SC delivery in speed of systemic availability and PK consistency and may improve postprandial glucose control.

Intrinsic fibrillation of fast-acting insulin analogs.

BACKGROUND: Aggregation of insulin into insoluble fibrils (fibrillation) may lead to complications for diabetes patients such as reduced insulin potency, occlusion of insulin delivery devices, or potentially increased immunological potential. Even after extensive investigation of fibril formation in regular human insulin, there are little published data about the intrinsic fibrillation of fast-acting analogs. This article investigates and compares the intrinsic fibrillation of three fast-acting insulin analogs--lispro, aspart, and glulisine--as a function of their primary protein structure and exclusive of the stabilizing excipients that are added to their respective commercial formulations. METHODS: The insulin analogs underwent a buffer exchange into phosphate-buffered saline to remove formulation excipients and then were heated and agitated to characterize intrinsic fibrillation potentials devoid of excipient stabilizing effects. Different analytical methods were used to determine the amount of intrinsic fibrillation for the analogs. After initial lag times, intrinsic fibrillation was detected by an amyloid-specific stain. Precipitation of insulin was confirmed by ultraviolet analysis of soluble insulin and gravimetric measurement of insoluble insulin. Electron microscopy showed dense fibrous material, with individual fibrils that are shorter than typical insulin fibrils. Higher resolution kinetic analyses were carried out in 96-well plates to provide more accurate measures of lag times and fibril growth rates. RESULTS: All three analogs exhibited longer lag times and slower intrinsic fibrillation rates than human insulin, with glulisine and lispro rates slower than aspart. This is the first study comparing the intrinsic fibrillation of fast-acting insulin analogs without the stabilizing excipients found in their commercial formulations. CONCLUSIONS: Data show different intrinsic fibrillation potentials based on primary molecular structures when the formulation excipients that are critical for stability are absent. Understanding intrinsic fibrillation potential is critical for evaluating insulin analog stability and device compatibility.

Intradermal microneedle delivery of insulin lispro achieves faster insulin absorption and insulin action than subcutaneous injection.

BACKGROUND: This study compared insulin lispro (IL) pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) delivered via microneedle intradermal (ID) injection with subcutaneous (SC) injection under euglycemic glucose clamp conditions. METHODS: Ten healthy male volunteers were administered 10 international units (IU) of IL at 3 microneedle lengths (1.25, 1.50, or 1.75 mm) in a randomized, crossover fashion on Days 1-3 followed by a repetitive ID 1.5-mm microneedle dose (Day 4) and an SC dose (Day 5). RESULTS: Microneedle ID delivery resulted in more rapid absorption of IL, with decreased time to maximum insulin concentration (ID vs. SC: 36.0-46.4 vs. 64.3 min, P < 0.05) and higher fractional availability at early postinjection times. ID produced more rapid effects on glucose uptake with shorter times to maximal and early half-maximal glucose infusion rates (GIRs) (ID vs. SC: time to maximum GIR, 106-112 vs. 130 min, P < 0.05; early half-maximal GIR, 29-35 vs. 42 min), increased early GIR area under the curve (AUC), and faster offset of insulin action (shorter time to late half-maximal GIR: 271-287 vs. 309 min). Relative total insulin bioavailability (AUC to 360 min and AUC to infinite measurement) did not significantly differ between administration routes. ID PK/PD parameters showed some variation as a function of needle length. Delivery of ID IL was generally well tolerated, although transient, localized wheal formation and redness were observed at injection sites. CONCLUSIONS: Microneedle ID insulin lispro delivery enables more rapid onset and offset of metabolic effect than SC therapy and is safe and well tolerated; further study for insulin therapy is warranted.

Continuous glucose monitoring using a novel glucose/galactose binding protein: results of a 12-hour feasibility study with the becton dickinson glucose/galactose binding protein sensor.

AIM: This study evaluated the performance characteristics of a prototype Becton Dickinson (BD) (Franklin Lakes, NJ) glucose/galactose binding protein (GGBP) sensor placed intradermally (BD-ID) or subcutaneously (BD-SC) for continuous glucose monitoring. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The performance characteristics of the prototype BD GGBP sensor after intradermal or subcutaneous placement were assessed, and its accuracy was compared with that of a glucose oxidase (GOx)-based sensor and a standard laboratory method (YSI STAT2300 analyzer, Yellow Springs Instrument, Yellow Springs, OH) under glucose clamp conditions and during an off-clamp meal challenge in 40 patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes in a 12-h feasibility study. RESULTS: BD-ID and BD-SC sensors performed as well as or better than the GOx-based sensor (differences in median absolute percentage error 2-4 points in hyperglycemic and euglycemic regions, ≥ 10 points in the hypoglycemic region). For glucose values ≤ 100 mg/dL, the percentage of measurement values in consensus error plot Zone A was substantially higher with the GGBP sensors than the GOx-based sensor. CONCLUSIONS: The BD prototype sensor demonstrated competitive accuracy relative to a GOx-based sensor and a YSI blood standard with a single calibration and minimal warm-up. Current development work is focused on the design and manufacture of a commercially feasible device that will include marked enhancements to device robustness and longevity.